To Replace Ginsberg Before the Election, Or Hold Off Until After the Election?

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
19,814
Reaction score
6,560
Points
360
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything

Bullshit. Explain why Crazy Joe has hired 600 lawyers.
He hired 600 lawyers to combat the 1000 lawyers Trump had already put in place.
got a link???
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
63,636
Reaction score
13,473
Points
2,290
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
He probably would under normal circumstances. But with all this mail-in BS, he might not concede at first until every vote is properly counted.
 

Fang

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2012
Messages
7,140
Reaction score
2,821
Points
350
Screw the Democrats. They are nothing but lying garbage. Trump will nominate a woman while county watches as Democrtas trash her character like the vile scum they are.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,060
Reaction score
19,362
Points
2,180
Location
in between
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything

Bullshit. Explain why Crazy Joe has hired 600 lawyers.
He hired 600 lawyers to combat the 1000 lawyers Trump had already put in place.
1000? Hell...that is a lot of shark bait.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,060
Reaction score
19,362
Points
2,180
Location
in between
n
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
no indication to say he wont,,,
That is not what he said.

What has Biden said?
when did he say that???
“I have to see. Look, you — I have to see. No, I’m not going to just say ‘yes.’ I’m not going to say no and I didn’t last time either,” Trump said.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
19,814
Reaction score
6,560
Points
360
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything

Bullshit. Explain why Crazy Joe has hired 600 lawyers.
He hired 600 lawyers to combat the 1000 lawyers Trump had already put in place.
1000? Hell...that is a lot of shark bait.
if what she said was true that would make it 1600,,,

but its not true or she would have provided a link,,,
 

San Souci

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2020
Messages
1,060
Reaction score
689
Points
920
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It does not matter. After a 4 year ,24/7 media blitz against him ,what does it do? Well ,this. It gives the Repubs a 5/4 majority in the COURT. Which means the Repubs can stop all the filthy Lib nonsense the filthy Democrats will try to run through.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
19,814
Reaction score
6,560
Points
360
n
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
no indication to say he wont,,,
That is not what he said.

What has Biden said?
when did he say that???
“I have to see. Look, you — I have to see. No, I’m not going to just say ‘yes.’ I’m not going to say no and I didn’t last time either,” Trump said.
so he didnt say he wouldnt,,,thanks for clearing that up,,,
 

JakeStarkey

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
168,037
Reaction score
16,452
Points
2,165
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
Excellent analysis, Meister. If she is replaced before Election Day (even a failed attempt), I think the fall out could cost the Pubs the WH and the Senate. So wait for after the election, and if the WH and Senate are going blue, ram a conservative through in the lame duck session. If that happened, I think a blue Congress and WH would stack the Court with two or four or even six new seats.

My advice: hold off to after the election and then decide.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,060
Reaction score
19,362
Points
2,180
Location
in between
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
He probably would under normal circumstances. But with all this mail-in BS, he might not concede at first until every vote is properly counted.
Trump refused to say he would concede in 2016 either.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
63,636
Reaction score
13,473
Points
2,290
n
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
no indication to say he wont,,,
That is not what he said.

What has Biden said?
when did he say that???
“I have to see. Look, you — I have to see. No, I’m not going to just say ‘yes.’ I’m not going to say no and I didn’t last time either,” Trump said.
Did Hillary immediately concede? Did Al Gore? This is nothing that unusual, especially since we are now changing our voting system from in person to mail-in.
 

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
17,133
Reaction score
12,643
Points
2,415
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
He probably would under normal circumstances. But with all this mail-in BS, he might not concede at first until every vote is properly counted.
Trump refused to say he would concede in 2016 either.
Didn't have to. He smashed Hitlery.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
19,814
Reaction score
6,560
Points
360
n
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
So if trump declared winner night of the election democrats will concede?
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
no indication to say he wont,,,
That is not what he said.

What has Biden said?
when did he say that???
“I have to see. Look, you — I have to see. No, I’m not going to just say ‘yes.’ I’m not going to say no and I didn’t last time either,” Trump said.
Did Hillary immediately concede? Did Al Gore? This is nothing that unusual, especially since we are now changing our voting system from in person to mail-in.
from hilarys own words she still hasnt conceded,,,she just lied on election night,,,
 

protectionist

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
39,359
Reaction score
6,829
Points
1,130
Will Trump concede if Biden wins?
He shouldn't because Biden can only win by voter fraud, and that's not a "win". How many illegal aliens will have voted for him ? I notice he's TV advertising to them in Spanish now. The man has no shame.
 

Gaeandilth

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2020
Messages
309
Reaction score
339
Points
158
Screw the Democrats. They are nothing but lying garbage. Trump will nominate a woman while county watches as Democrtas trash her character like the vile scum they are.
Wonder if they will get that lying bitch Ford up there to claim this one raped her too.
 

JakeStarkey

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
168,037
Reaction score
16,452
Points
2,165
Screw the Democrats. They are nothing but lying garbage. Trump will nominate a woman while county watches as Democrtas trash her character like the vile scum they are.
Wonder if they will get that lying bitch Ford up there to claim this one raped her too.
Ah, the emerging bitterness as righties realize they are going to really screw the pooch on this one.

Trump should leave it to the voters.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
86,060
Reaction score
19,362
Points
2,180
Location
in between
I'm torn over the replacing of Ms Ginsberg before the end of the year. On one hand, it would insure a conservative justice replacing her.
On the other hand, it would give the left a lot of negative ammunition to go after Trump for trying to replace her after what McConnell did in 2016.
Trump doesn't need the extra distraction during the campaigning, along with the msm going after him relentlessly for trying.
If he was upfront and saying that he's going to hold off, it could give him some positive momentum in the eyes of the voters in the swing states.
What say you?
It’s not a option we need her seat filled, it could be a constitutional crisis if it’s not filled.. I would hold hearings ASAP
Oh? Why would there be a Constitutional crisis?
Democrats plan to challenge the 2020 election, and having a 4-4 court would “risk a constitutional crisis” given that likelihood.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything, except Trump abuse of power and cheating.

If Trump doesn't try to pull a fast one, the winner will be who all the citizens voted for, on their ballot...

The supreme court is not suppose to decide any election.... if there are problems, the it is Congress who decides, according to the Constitution, not the Court.
Democrats don't plan to challenge anything

Bullshit. Explain why Crazy Joe has hired 600 lawyers.
He hired 600 lawyers to combat the 1000 lawyers Trump had already put in place.
1000? Hell...that is a lot of shark bait.
if what she said was true that would make it 1600,,,

but its not true or she would have provided a link,,,
Actually none of them are “hired”, they are recruited...Trump has his “Lawyers for Trump coalition”,
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
19,814
Reaction score
6,560
Points
360
Screw the Democrats. They are nothing but lying garbage. Trump will nominate a woman while county watches as Democrtas trash her character like the vile scum they are.
Wonder if they will get that lying bitch Ford up there to claim this one raped her too.
Ah, the emerging bitterness as righties realize they are going to really screw the pooch on this one.

Trump should leave it to the voters.
he did leave it to the voters,,they made him POTUS and its his job to appoint someone,,,
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
63,636
Reaction score
13,473
Points
2,290
Screw the Democrats. They are nothing but lying garbage. Trump will nominate a woman while county watches as Democrtas trash her character like the vile scum they are.
Wonder if they will get that lying bitch Ford up there to claim this one raped her too.
That would be tough to do since it seems Trump is aiming for a female.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top