To all you calling BS on the Trump indictment…

[AntonToo]

Loads of evidence. Brainless twats, like you, ignore it.

Cool story, but we keep asking for serious evidence of any Biden's involvement, you keep dodging. Strange right?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

OMG, the trial verdict was based on that Trump paid over $2700 to Stormy Daniels.

But Clinton can settle things for $850K and no problem, amirite?

https://www.nycourts.gov/LegacyPDFS/press/PDFs/People%20v.%20DJT%20Jury%20Instructions%20and%20Charges%20FINAL%205-23-24.pdf

Clinton did it through the courts, DUMBASS.

Clinton Settles Paula Jones Lawsuit ...​

The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com › stories › jones111498
President Clinton reached an out-of-court settlement with Paula Jones yesterday, agreeing to pay her $850,000 to drop the sexual harassment lawsuit that led ...

Trump DIDN'T.

 

[westwall]

Cool story, but we keep asking for serious evidence of any Biden's involvement, you keep dodging.

Strange right?

HE HAD STOLEN CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FROM HIS TIME AS A SENATOR YOU STUPID ****!

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Loads of evidence. Brainless twats, like you, ignore it.

Loads of "Evidence"?
All I hear and see are accusations from the Trump cult.

NO one has even filed charges.
MAYBE, because teabaggers have no witnesses.

 

[westwall]

Loads of "Evidence"?
All I hear and see are accusations from the Trump cult.

NO one has even filed charges.
MAYBE, because teabaggers have no witnesses.

See post above yours, moron.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

HE HAD STOLEN CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FROM HIS TIME AS A SENATOR YOU STUPID ****!

Special counsel won't charge Biden in classified docs probe​

ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
https://abcnews.go.com › story
Feb 8, 2024 — Special counsel Robert Hur won't recommend charges against President Biden for his handling of classified documents,, despite evidence he ...

We know, Hur must be the "Deep State" now?

 

[AntonToo]

HE HAD STOLEN CLASSIFIED MATERIAL FROM HIS TIME AS A SENATOR YOU STUPID ****!

1. Criminal is someone convicted of a crime.

2. Prosecutor declined charges against Biden and at lengh reported why.

3. Trump was indicted on 90+ counts and is now a convicted criminal, having been found guilty on all 34 counts of the first case.

Conclusion: You are clearly full of blatantly counter factual crap.

 

[westwall]

Special counsel won't charge Biden in classified docs probe​

View attachment 954819
ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos
https://abcnews.go.com › story
Feb 8, 2024 — Special counsel Robert Hur won't recommend charges against President Biden for his handling of classified documents,, despite evidence he ...

We know, Hur must be the "Deep State" now?

Yeah. Dumbfuck. STOLEN CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS FROM WHEN HE WAS A SENATOR.

A FELONY.

AND HE SKATES BECAUSE HE'S POLITICAL CLASS.

just like I said you stupid ****.

 

[westwall]

1. Criminal is someone convicted of a crime.

2. Prosecutor declined charges against Biden and at lengh reported why.

3. Trump is now a convicted criminal, found guilty on 34 counts.

Conclusion: You are clearly full of blatantly counter factual crap.

Yeah, because he's SENILE, not because he isn't guilty you stupid ****!

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

See post above yours, moron.

I did DUMBASS.

Your accusations amount to shit, as usual.

 

[AntonToo]

Yeah, because he's SENILE, not because he isn't guilty you stupid ****!

Horseshit, if Trump co-operated with National Archives and investigators like Biden did then he would never get indicted on the documents either. Spill overs are not-uncommon and our elected officials get a lot of benefit of the doubt before the charges are brought. Trump was indicted on this because he can't help himself from operating like a shameless degenerate criminal.

Besides all that, Trump is now a criminal. Thats not a matter of opinion, this is a matter of court established fact.

 

[The Duke]

1. Criminal is someone convicted of a crime.


Conclusion: You are clearly full of blatantly counter factual crap.

No, criminals are people that commit crimes, whether they are caught and punished or not.

Crimes like treason, election interference, extortion, fraud, robbery, bribery. These are not victimless crimes.

 

[the watcher]

How do you know it’s bs?!

You can't know anything except he was found guilty on all charges. You can however infer a few things from the proceedings to judgement which started even before he was elected with character assassination, false narratives about his Russia dealings, and the column A and column B misdemeanors which were parlayed into a felony indictment but a creative partisan prosecutor. When I read the instructions to the jury which said in so many words, you don't have to agree on anything just pick out some things from this list and some things from that list and the court will consider them unanimous, I could see he was influencing their decision, even if that were necessary. That says to me the whole thing is tainted even without knowing the charges. Whatever your opinion of the legal system and "no one I'd above the law" was before this, it hasn't changed and is probably reinforced. This whole episode is a blight on US justice, and we have lost what little credibility we had left abroad, and we will be treated like a narco state run by a cartel with nuclear weapons should be. This is a terrible precedent, and will come to haunt the US for generations, faked history notwithstanding. Remember what Chucky Shumer said :

Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he’s being really dumb to do this.

 

[AntonToo]

No, criminals are people that commit crimes, whether they are caught and punished or not.

Crimes like treason, election interference, extortion, fraud, robbery, bribery. These are not victimless crimes.

Fine, CONVICTED CRIMINAL - lets go with that.

 

[Slade3200]

You can't know anything except he was found guilty on all charges. You can however infer a few things from the proceedings to judgement which started even before he was elected with character assassination, false narratives about his Russia dealings, and the column A and column B misdemeanors which were parlayed into a felony indictment but a creative partisan prosecutor. When I read the instructions to the jury which said in so many words, you don't have to agree on anything just pick out some things from this list and some things from that list and the court will consider them unanimous, I could see he was influencing their decision, even if that were necessary. That says to me the whole thing is tainted even without knowing the charges. Whatever your opinion of the legal system and "no one I'd above the law" was before this, it hasn't changed and is probably reinforced. This whole episode is a blight on US justice, and we have lost what little credibility we had left abroad, and we will be treated like a narco state run by a cartel with nuclear weapons should be. This is a terrible precedent, and will come to haunt the US for generations, faked history notwithstanding. Remember what Chucky Shumer said :

It a vigorous fight y’all are putting up. Many conspiracy theories. But in the end you have laws, charges, a trial to review evidence, and a judgement made by a jury. That’s our system. Lazily calling it BS without actually considering the merits of the case like so many are doing is the part that is actually BS. Now you have millions of people disparaging our legal system and country. Can’t think of anything more anti-American

 

[Care4all]

And the key witness against Trump in the latest show trial that's a known perjurer, who embezzled money from Trump when he was his client, and it was a lot more than $2700.
And he admitted it in court. Will he be prosecuted for embezzling? Hmm?
No charges have been brought about that..I find that odd, maybe you don't.

Trump would have to file a complaint but he can't, because his defense in the trial was that he never paid Cohen Back for the $130,000, or the $50,000 Cohen claimed as an expense, that was actually only $20,000.

since the defense claimed the money paid to Cohen for 12 months, the $35k a month in 2017 was as a retainer for law work done by Michael for them, each of those 12 months....

and not for the $130k and $50k grossed up for taxes, plus bonus as the Alan Weisselberg scribbled notes stated....And also entered in as evidence.

trump claimed that he didn't falsify his records that state Cohen s $35k a month pay in 2017 was for legal work done each month by Cohen in 2017.

the prosecution claims it was to reimburse Cohen.

So, Trump claim that he was not reimbursing Cohen for Stormy and RedFinch expense, means Cohen was never reimbursed for Cohen's $30k overage, grossed up. So Cohen never stole from Trump....

 

[AntonToo]

Trump would have to file a complaint but he can't, because his defense in the trial was that he never paid Cohen Back for the $130,000, or the $50,000 Cohen claimed as an expense, that was actually only $20,000.

since the defense claimed the money paid to Cohen for 12 months, the $35k a month in 2017 was as a retainer for law work done by Michael for them, each of those 12 months....

and not for the $130k and $50k grossed up for taxes, plus bonus as the Alan Weisselberg scribbled notes stated....And also entered in as evidence.

trump claimed that he didn't falsify his records that state Cohen s $35k a month pay in 2017 was for legal work done each month by Cohen in 2017.

the prosecution claims it was to reimburse Cohen.

So, Trump claim that he was not reimbursing Cohen for Stormy and RedFinch expense, means Cohen was never reimbursed for Cohen's $30k overage, grossed up. So Cohen never stole from Trump....

Consistency is not their strong suit if you haven't noticed.

It requires half a thought to understand that it's self-contradictory to deny that Trump paid Cohen off for NDA expenses, while claiming Cohen ripped Trump off for the very same expenses.

 

[The Duke]

It a vigorous fight y’all are putting up. Many conspiracy theories. But in the end you have laws, charges, a trial to review evidence, and a judgement made by a jury. That’s our system. Lazily calling it BS without actually considering the merits of the case like so many are doing is the part that is actually BS. Now you have millions of people disparaging our legal system and country. Can’t think of anything more anti-American

 

[The Duke]

Trump would have to file a complaint but he can't, because his defense in the trial was that he never paid Cohen Back for the $130,000, or the $50,000 Cohen claimed as an expense, that was actually only $20,000.

since the defense claimed the money paid to Cohen for 12 months, the $35k a month in 2017 was as a retainer for law work done by Michael for them, each of those 12 months....

and not for the $130k and $50k grossed up for taxes, plus bonus as the Alan Weisselberg scribbled notes stated....And also entered in as evidence.

trump claimed that he didn't falsify his records that state Cohen s $35k a month pay in 2017 was for legal work done each month by Cohen in 2017.

the prosecution claims it was to reimburse Cohen.

So, Trump claim that he was not reimbursing Cohen for Stormy and RedFinch expense, means Cohen was never reimbursed for Cohen's $30k overage, grossed up. So Cohen never stole from Trump....

Have you seen the streets of New York today? This is NOT gonna go like the Leftist ShitLords planned.

I couldn't tell you what's going to happen, but have the feeling something is, and it will be big, bigger than expectations.

 

[Slade3200]

Posting memes instead of counterpoints is even more lazy than your regular parroting of talking points