To all you calling BS on the Trump indictment…

Don’t we have to assume he has the same evidence as before? It’s the same incident with the same witnesses. The only thing that’s changed is the amount of time that’s passed since the incident. A number of entities have looked at this in the past including Braggs predecessor and didn’t find enough to bring a charge. What could have possibly changed?
Well there’s the fact that Trump is not the president now as he was then.
 
As usual there is no rational thought remaining on the left . Justice is upside down and backwards because of their crazy hatred. Details of the secret indictment directed at the former president are B.S. until proven otherwise.
Until they go to court, dope. :uhoh3:
All evidence will be public then. But don’t forget it’s already been vetted by a jury before an indictment
 
You really believe that? If you do, you know nothing about our justice system. You cannot get anymore un American. You have peaked again.
You're just butthurt because for years you’ve been repeating false claims of a stolen election that falls flat in court. No way your propaganda could be false so the entire legal justice system must be lost!!!! You sound like a nut
 
The facts are that this is the same incident investigated by multiple entities both state and federal. There have t been any additional witnesses.

1. Trump banged a porn star in 2006
2. Said PS did an interview in 2010 (I thinkabout said affair
3. Trump runs for President in 2016 and PS sees an opportunity to make a little scratch.
4. Trump pays PS through his lawyer 130k of his own money to sign an NDA .
5. That transaction is recorded improperly as legal fees (the misdemeanor and only crime there is any solid evidence of)
6. The SDNY, FEC, Mueller Investigation, and Braggs predecessor all investigated this and didn’t bring charges against or even pursue an indictment of Trump for it.
7. Bragg is saying the payment to Daniels was actually a campaign contribution which makes the business records misdemeanor a felony and extends the statute of limitations and that’s what he indicted on.

What am I possibly missing?

The problem with this case will be proving that Trump wouldn’t have otherwise made that payment. The other issue for me anyway is that John Edward’s was charged for campaign finance violations for using campaign funds to payoff an affair. I don’t like a damned if you do damned if you don’t situations in law. Neither should you or anyone else.
There have been plenty of additional witnesses.
 
No. You “agree” that there was evidence of crimes which should saftisfy a f fair grand jury. You don’t know it to be true. So, you are indeed assuming the very thing you wish was true.

Again. You’re deluded. I haven’t made any excuses and unlike you, I do know some things about this. So does the Wall Steet Journal: Trump Hush-Money Case Will Likely Hinge on Evidence of Coverup — The Wall Street Journal

It is perfectly possible to suss out the nature of the likely charges (or at least a couple of them). I do also speculate, based on an as yet unconfirmed report, that if there are a host of other charges, that they might be related to tax “crimes.”
What is true is that the grand jury and the prosecutor believe that evidence that crimes were committed was satisfactory to a reasonable doubt standard and that indictment is warranted.
 
Awww...............So, why did the DA bring it?

New York law does identify a couple of ways to stop the statute of limitations clock. If the defendant was continuously outside New York state or if the defendant's whereabouts were "continuously unknown and continuously unascertainable by the exercise of reasonable diligence," then the clock is tolled.

While Trump's whereabouts were pretty much continuously known since the alleged payment to Stormy Daniels was made, as president, Trump was primarily living in Washington D.C. and spent considerable time in Florida as well.

That's because , William Barr stopped all investigation of his daddy.

AG Barr says Trump has fired SDNY federal prosecutor ...

View attachment 771970
Fox News
https://www.foxnews.com › politics › william-barr-trump...

Jun 20, 2020 — In a letter to Geoffrey Berman obtained by Fox News, Barr said he asked Trump to fire Berman after the Manhattan federal prosecutor said Friday ...


Trump Fires Geoffrey Berman, U.S. Attorney Who ...


NPR
https://www.npr.org › 2020/06/20 › geoffrey-berman-u-...

Jun 20, 2020 — The attorney general said Trump removed Geoffrey Berman as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.
Or if the subject was untouchable as a sitting president for four years,
 
What is true is that the grand jury and the prosecutor believe that evidence that crimes were committed was satisfactory to a reasonable doubt standard and that indictment is warranted.
Yup and now a judge will listen to a bunch of overpaid lawyers try and dismiss the case for Trump as he bitch n moans on social media. Then it will go to jury and no matter what facts and evidence comes out the cry’s from the right will be the exact same as they are right now. They will say the same things they are saying now while they don’t even know the charges. The charges don’t matter
 
Of course people will be outraged more. Even if it is the most incriminating evidence possible you guess will be outraged and cry foul. That’s what happens with brainwashed drones

No it's because all these charges are bullshit and that's why people will get riled up. If there was something.......anything that was legit, they would have brought it out right away.
 

Forum List

Back
Top