Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
no, it doesnt, not when you actually can read it for COMPREHENSIONYou post lies that do not equal fact and the abcense of supporting fact for your lies proves it.
The concrete core has supporting fact.
Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 describes a concrete core. FACT
because there are NO AGENTS here moronSo why did'n't the agent show us what it comprehends from the statement of Oxfords encyclopedia?
WHY?
So why did'n't the agent show us what it comprehends from the statement of Oxfords encyclopedia?
WHY?
So why did'n't the agent show us what it comprehends from the statement of Oxfords encyclopedia?
WHY?
Wh'y did'n't a'gen't Crisco'FEAR'a tos's i'n a f'ew ex'tra apos'trop'es?
It would have a little tiny bit extra credibility if it would learn some of the most fundamental rules of spelling. But as things stand, its inability to spell properly calls into legitimate question its ability to comprehend the things it reads.
hey, would basic Newtonian physics allow for invisible concrete?So why did'n't the agent show us what it comprehends from the statement of Oxfords encyclopedia?
WHY?
Wh'y did'n't a'gen't Crisco'FEAR'a tos's i'n a f'ew ex'tra apos'trop'es?
It would have a little tiny bit extra credibility if it would learn some of the most fundamental rules of spelling. But as things stand, its inability to spell properly calls into legitimate question its ability to comprehend the things it reads.
What about comprehending Basic Newtonian Physics that you seem to like to IGNORE and brush off when it comes to 9/11? It would help a little bit for your credibility if you could learn the most basic physics of our Earth. But as things stand, your inability to grasp these basic concepts (on purpose) calls for legitimate questions for your purpose in 9/11 discussions if you're not even properly educated in the basics of reality.
WTC7 Freefell for 2.25 seconds, and with using these basic physics you like to ignore and call people names over, proves controlled demolition. You just fear the truth, and pretend like the Physics don't matter, but then care about whether or not somebody can SPELL.
You sir, are in denial.
So why did'n't the agent show us what it comprehends from the statement of Oxfords encyclopedia?
WHY?
Wh'y did'n't a'gen't Crisco'FEAR'a tos's i'n a f'ew ex'tra apos'trop'es?
It would have a little tiny bit extra credibility if it would learn some of the most fundamental rules of spelling. But as things stand, its inability to spell properly calls into legitimate question its ability to comprehend the things it reads.
What about comprehending Basic Newtonian Physics that you seem to like to IGNORE and brush off when it comes to 9/11? It would help a little bit for your credibility if you could learn the most basic physics of our Earth. But as things stand, your inability to grasp these basic concepts (on purpose) calls for legitimate questions for your purpose in 9/11 discussions if you're not even properly educated in the basics of reality.
WTC7 Freefell for 2.25 seconds, and with using these basic physics you like to ignore and call people names over, proves controlled demolition. You just fear the truth, and pretend like the Physics don't matter, but then care about whether or not somebody can SPELL.
You sir, are in denial.
So why did'n't the agent show us what it comprehends from the statement of Oxfords encyclopedia?
WHY?
Wh'y did'n't a'gen't Crisco'FEAR'a tos's i'n a f'ew ex'tra apos'trop'es?
It would have a little tiny bit extra credibility if it would learn some of the most fundamental rules of spelling. But as things stand, its inability to spell properly calls into legitimate question its ability to comprehend the things it reads.
What about comprehending Basic Newtonian Physics that you seem to like to IGNORE and brush off when it comes to 9/11? It would help a little bit for your credibility if you could learn the most basic physics of our Earth. But as things stand, your inability to grasp these basic concepts (on purpose) calls for legitimate questions for your purpose in 9/11 discussions if you're not even properly educated in the basics of reality.
WTC7 Freefell for 2.25 seconds, and with using these basic physics you like to ignore and call people names over, proves controlled demolition. You just fear the truth, and pretend like the Physics don't matter, but then care about whether or not somebody can SPELL.
You sir, are in denial.
still waiting PEhey, would basic Newtonian physics allow for invisible concrete?Wh'y did'n't a'gen't Crisco'FEAR'a tos's i'n a f'ew ex'tra apos'trop'es?
It would have a little tiny bit extra credibility if it would learn some of the most fundamental rules of spelling. But as things stand, its inability to spell properly calls into legitimate question its ability to comprehend the things it reads.
What about comprehending Basic Newtonian Physics that you seem to like to IGNORE and brush off when it comes to 9/11? It would help a little bit for your credibility if you could learn the most basic physics of our Earth. But as things stand, your inability to grasp these basic concepts (on purpose) calls for legitimate questions for your purpose in 9/11 discussions if you're not even properly educated in the basics of reality.
WTC7 Freefell for 2.25 seconds, and with using these basic physics you like to ignore and call people names over, proves controlled demolition. You just fear the truth, and pretend like the Physics don't matter, but then care about whether or not somebody can SPELL.
You sir, are in denial.
still waiting PEhey, would basic Newtonian physics allow for invisible concrete?What about comprehending Basic Newtonian Physics that you seem to like to IGNORE and brush off when it comes to 9/11? It would help a little bit for your credibility if you could learn the most basic physics of our Earth. But as things stand, your inability to grasp these basic concepts (on purpose) calls for legitimate questions for your purpose in 9/11 discussions if you're not even properly educated in the basics of reality.
WTC7 Freefell for 2.25 seconds, and with using these basic physics you like to ignore and call people names over, proves controlled demolition. You just fear the truth, and pretend like the Physics don't matter, but then care about whether or not somebody can SPELL.
You sir, are in denial.
answer this question
wrong again, PE wont answer it because he is a fucking moron and he knows your concrete core hoax is bullshit, but he knows if he answers he would lose your supportstill waiting PEhey, would basic Newtonian physics allow for invisible concrete?
answer this question
I don't believe PE will lower himself to your loaded question. In lieu of that this is proof of ditztcon-invisisteel core columns. All of the steel seen, above and below is OUTSIDE of the core area. Your invisiteel core columns are right there to the right of the rebar and the spire in the bottom super imposition. Can't you see them? That's the core area, and the steel core columns are totally invisible, as if they were not there! You've been waiting to prove your invisisteel theory ditzer, finally it is here.
That is rebar not heavy steel structure. This show heavy steel but it is all outside the core area.
This shows the spire on the right above, is outside the core area.
wrong again, PE wont answer it because he is a fucking moron and he knows your concrete core hoax is bullshit, but he knows if he answers he would lose your supportstill waiting PE
answer this question
I don't believe PE will lower himself to your loaded question. In lieu of that this is proof of ditztcon-invisisteel core columns. All of the steel seen, above and below is OUTSIDE of the core area. Your invisiteel core columns are right there to the right of the rebar and the spire in the bottom super imposition. Can't you see them? That's the core area, and the steel core columns are totally invisible, as if they were not there! You've been waiting to prove your invisisteel theory ditzer, finally it is here.
That is rebar not heavy steel structure. This show heavy steel but it is all outside the core area.
This shows the spire on the right above, is outside the core area.
and he needs all he can get
wrong again, PE wont answer it because he is a fucking moron and he knows your concrete core hoax is bullshit, but he knows if he answers he would lose your supportstill waiting PE
answer this question
I don't believe PE will lower himself to your loaded question. In lieu of that this is proof of ditztcon-invisisteel core columns. All of the steel seen, above and below is OUTSIDE of the core area. Your invisiteel core columns are right there to the right of the rebar and the spire in the bottom super imposition. Can't you see them? That's the core area, and the steel core columns are totally invisible, as if they were not there! You've been waiting to prove your invisisteel theory ditzer, finally it is here.
That is rebar not heavy steel structure. This show heavy steel but it is all outside the core area.
This shows the spire on the right above, is outside the core area.
and he needs all he can get
dipshit, that has already been proven
you are just too fucking delusional to admit it
concrete core, dipshitdipshit, that has already been proven
you are just too fucking delusional to admit it
How did WTC7 collapse with free fall speed?
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
concrete core, dipshitdipshit, that has already been proven
you are just too fucking delusional to admit it
How did WTC7 collapse with free fall speed?
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
address that
DiveCon said:i'll address any fact, when you actually post a fact
stiill waiting for you to adderess the concrete core, dipshitconcrete core, dipshitHow did WTC7 collapse with free fall speed?
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.
address that
DiveCon said:i'll address any fact, when you actually post a fact
How did WTC7 collapse with free fall speed?
Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building
