Time For The Dispensing of Equal Justice

[Redfish]

You seem unhappy that Sanders lost so you are making excuses.

I could care less who won the corrupt, criminal DNC nomination. The Democrats, however, cared enough to Rig their Primaries, cheat in debates, engage in voter fraud during their primaries, etc.... and they became UNGLUED when Wikileaks exposed it all.

Everything Democratic, bad, bad, bad.
Everything Republican, good, good, good.

Your side is ALWAYS wrong.
My side is ALWAYS right.

SSDD from the blindfold-wearing partisan hack, who lives in the alternate reality gop bubble,

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

not true. most of us are now very pissed at the republicans for not doing what we sent them to DC to do.

See, unlike you brain dead demoturds, we actually use our brains and think for ourselves.

 

[The VOR]

...which has nothing to do with the fact that Hillary broke a multitude of laws and should be wearing an orange jumpsuit today instead of an ugly pants suit.

Still singing the Hillary song just like your orange messiah, huh Twinkle Toes?

She has gotten away with a series of criminal acts. She is not above the law. Why do you think she is above the law?

What crimes has she gotten away with, and why wasn't she charged for those crimes? This should be good, LOL.

 

[The VOR]

we actually use our brains and think for ourselves.

I have yet to see any proof of that, LOL.

 

[danielpalos]

...which has nothing to do with the fact that Hillary broke a multitude of laws and should be wearing an orange jumpsuit today instead of an ugly pants suit.

It is about, "priorities". Your guy is in the Executive Office and asking for tax breaks for the rich, micromanagement of our tax code in his favor, and cuts in food stamps for the poor.

 

[busybee01]

They are free to do that . The dnc is a private org . GOP did the same when The had the "little kids debate " vs the main GOP debates .

As for the witch hunt ? DAMN STRAIGHT ! Karmas a *****! Righties did the same to obama and Hillary . What goes around comes around .

the Trump/Russia allegations have produced zero evidence of anything illegal, improper, or unethical. The Hillary/DNC/media collusion and corruption has been proven and should be prosecuted to the fullest.


the problem is that most of the repubs are scared shitless of the media and would not do anything that might jeopardize their reelections and stop the gravy train.

The DC swamp needs to be drained of all corruption in both parties. That should be one of Trump's top priorities.

Zero ? First is was all made up lies . Then gee, some stuff did actually happen !

There's a lot of smoke . Flynn, sessions , trumps team. Why are they hiding the truth .

As for the dnc? What crimes ? They can pick n choose who they want .

yes, zero. there was no collusion with Russia to influence the votes in 2016. If you still believe that Russia changed votes in this country, where and how many?

The DNC------------violated their own rules and disenfranchised their voters in the primaries. Gave debate questions to HRC before the debates, i.e. cheated and lied.

Hillary--------her guilt was proven by Comey. Lynch and Bubba made a deal on a runway to let her off----------any idea how much Lynch now has in a swiss bank account because of that deal?

the media--------------continuously lied, and continues to lie, about Trump, his campaign, his administration, his family, and the successes that he has had in the first 6 months. Assisted in cheating by giving debate questions to the hildebeast.

The DNC did not disenfranchise their voters. They wanted Clinton and they got her. You can question their wisdom but that is all.

of course they did. the dem primary voters don't select their candidate, the super delegates do. the dem primary is a joke. the outcome is determined before any vote is cast. How about the dems who wanted Bernie? Were their voices heard? did any super delegates vote for him? The DNC picks the candidate, the primary votes are a ruse and a hoax.

The trouble is that Clinton beat Sanders by approximately 400 delegates not counting the super delegates. Clinton got 2,205 delegates to Sanders' 1,846. If the Democrats had wanted to screw Sanders, they would have allowed the winner take all method that Republicans allowed. Had that been done, Sanders would have been long gone.

SC Democrat Primary
Clinton 66%
Sanders 24%

Delegates won(Democrat system)
Clinton 39 (74%)
Sanders 14 (26%)

Delegates won under Republican rules
Clinton 53
Sanders 0

SC Republican Primary
Trump 33%
Rubio 22%
Cruz 22%

Delegates won(Republican system)
Trump 50(100%)

Delegates using Democrat system
Trump 22
Rubio 14
Cruz 14

 

[Syriusly]

HILLARY'S ASS BELONGS IN JAIL, AND THE INVESTIGATIONS NEED TO BE RE-OPENED WITH HILLARY BEING INDICTED.

Typical Trump voter.

"Jail Clinton- and then start the investigations- and of course indict her regardless of the investigations"

But whatever you do- don't investigate Trump.

 

[Syriusly]

So think about what you just said. The truth about the corruption and lying by Hillary and the DNC was exposed and was a factor in her losing. Funny how the truth affects voters isn't it?

wikileaks released it. There is no proof that wiki got it from Russia. If you have some proof, lets see it.

Seth Rich...dead.

And that is proof of what?

I love how you claim that there is absolutely no 'proof' of Trump colluding with Russia.

And then you bring up Seth Rich's murder- without any proof it is linked to anything.

You have your head so buried up Trump's ass you think his nose is a window.

 

[busybee01]

The DNC did not collude to rig the primary elections.

Yeah, and water isn't wet, and grass isn't green.

Part of the DNC hacking snowflakes are so pissed about revealed how Democrats DID collude in rigging the DNC Primaries. You should learn what the issue is before arguing.

Tell me how you rig a primary in which tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people vote. There is no collusion in supporting Clinton over Sanders. If Sanders had won, you would be saying that Sanders proves the Democrats are socialists. You seem unhappy that Sanders lost so you are making excuses.

do you understand that the super delegates control more votes than all of the individual delegates combined. I don't give a crap that Sanders was not given a chance by the dem party. I enjoy the corrupt organization that the dem party has become.

They do not. This is the breakdown in 2016

District 2,650
Statewide 910
Pledged PLEO's 491
Total 4,051

Unpledged PLEO's 712

Pledged Delegates 85%
Super delegates 15%

For example in Nevada which Clinton won

District Delegates
Clinton 13
Sanders 10

At-large
Clinton 4
Sanders 3

Pledged PLEO's
Clinton 3
Sanders 2

Unpledged PLEO's
8

 

[busybee01]

The DNC did not collude to rig the primary elections.

Yeah, and water isn't wet, and grass isn't green.

Part of the DNC hacking snowflakes are so pissed about revealed how Democrats DID collude in rigging the DNC Primaries. You should learn what the issue is before arguing.

Tell me how you rig a primary in which tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people vote. There is no collusion in supporting Clinton over Sanders. If Sanders had won, you would be saying that Sanders proves the Democrats are socialists. You seem unhappy that Sanders lost so you are making excuses.

those individual voters select delegates, the delegates pick the nominee. you don't even understand what you are trying to argue about.

You don't understand. The delegates are pledged to the candidate who wins based on statewide and district votes. They cannot vote for someone else unless their candidate withdraws.

 

[busybee01]

You seem unhappy that Sanders lost so you are making excuses.

I could care less who won the corrupt, criminal DNC nomination. The Democrats, however, cared enough to Rig their Primaries, cheat in debates, engage in voter fraud during their primaries, etc.... and they became UNGLUED when Wikileaks exposed it all.

There was no voter fraud. You love to make claims that have no basis in fact. Put up or shut up. If the DNC is so powerful, why didn't Clinton win in 2008? How did Obama win?

 

[easyt65]

I love how you claim that there is absolutely no 'proof' of Trump colluding with Russia. And then you bring up Seth Rich's murder- without any proof it is linked to anything.

The evidence is now out that the 'Trump Russia Collusion' scam was born from the Obama-Putin-Comey-Fusion GPS Russian propaganda. There is no Trump-Russia collusion...there never was.

Seth Rich was a Hillary/DNC Insuder who leaked for Wikileaks. He was murdered.

And all the snowflake scandals / scams are now starting to implode...despite all the scheming and attempts to hide it all.

 

[easyt65]

You seem unhappy that Sanders lost so you are making excuses.

I could care less who won the corrupt, criminal DNC nomination. The Democrats, however, cared enough to Rig their Primaries, cheat in debates, engage in voter fraud during their primaries, etc.... and they became UNGLUED when Wikileaks exposed it all.

There was no voter fraud. You love to make claims that have no basis in fact. Put up or shut up. If the DNC is so powerful, why didn't Clinton win in 2008? How did Obama win?

And you lie to claim I make things up when I don't.

I don't think the Iowa DNC chairman has released the votes yet as was demanded, several other primaries reported fraud.

Next you are going to claim the DNC did not help Hillary cheat in debates, even though Donna Brazile admitted to it.

 

[easyt65]

Hillary broke laws.
Comey brike the law.
Rice broke the law.
Brennan broke the law.
Clapper broke the law.
Lynch broke the law.
Holder broke the law.
Reid broke the law.
Castro broke the law.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz broke the law.
OBAMA broke the law.

The era of 'no accountability' us over. Sessions needs to get off his ass and begin enforcing the law.

 

[Pete7469]

The minority, rejected Democrats have hijacked the country through obstructionism and their Trump Witch Hunt, pursuing crimes for which they can not produce a crime committed to investigate / any evidence of a crime.

It is time for the American people to take back the country, time for Trump to take back the country and demonstrate HE and HIS administration - his AG - are in charge.

Trump's AG and FBI should 1st be ordered to re-open the investigation of Hillary Clinton, as just days ago more than 400 new official e-mails have been found and reported. That is over 400 NEW e-mails that were ILLEGALLY NOT submitted to the State Department as required by the FOIA and The Federal Records Act.

Snowflakes continue to FALSELY claim Hillary is old news, but she is NOT. Her crimes are still being exposed, as every single new official document found she never turned in is 1 criminal count. This new batch of documents found, therefore, constitutes over 400 Criminal counts of violations and over 400 Criminal counts of violations of the Federal Records Act - that 400+ new documents found = over 800 new criminal counts.

HILLARY'S ASS BELONGS IN JAIL, AND THE INVESTIGATIONS NEED TO BE RE-OPENED WITH HILLARY BEING INDICTED.

What I don't get is why the President doesn't pick up the phone and order the DOJ to begin these investigations. He has the power but instead all he does is tweet about it.

I'm convinced there are people behind the scene who wield greater power than those elected.

They don't want the corrupt system compromised, and it will be if the players start getting charged.

 

[Redfish]

...which has nothing to do with the fact that Hillary broke a multitude of laws and should be wearing an orange jumpsuit today instead of an ugly pants suit.

Still singing the Hillary song just like your orange messiah, huh Twinkle Toes?

She has gotten away with a series of criminal acts. She is not above the law. Why do you think she is above the law?

What crimes has she gotten away with, and why wasn't she charged for those crimes? This should be good, LOL.

1.failure to protect classified data
2. illegal transmission of classified data
3. perjury, lying under oath
4. receiving bribes, pay for play
5. illegally transferring uranium to Russia when SecState
6.transferring classified data to persons who did not have the proper clearances
7.using the Clinton foundation to launder bribes from foreign countries and organizations
8. dereliction of duty as SecState to protect our consulate in Benghazi

Comey excused these crimes by saying that she was careless and didn't "intend" to break the law------------that is total political bullshit.

 

[Redfish]

The DNC did not collude to rig the primary elections.

Yeah, and water isn't wet, and grass isn't green.

Part of the DNC hacking snowflakes are so pissed about revealed how Democrats DID collude in rigging the DNC Primaries. You should learn what the issue is before arguing.

Tell me how you rig a primary in which tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of people vote. There is no collusion in supporting Clinton over Sanders. If Sanders had won, you would be saying that Sanders proves the Democrats are socialists. You seem unhappy that Sanders lost so you are making excuses.

those individual voters select delegates, the delegates pick the nominee. you don't even understand what you are trying to argue about.

You don't understand. The delegates are pledged to the candidate who wins based on statewide and district votes. They cannot vote for someone else unless their candidate withdraws.

that does not apply to the super delegates. They can vote for whoever they want.

super delegates exist only in the dem party. The DNC doesn't care who the people want, the dem voters are the useful idiots to the dem elites.

 

[Redfish]

You seem unhappy that Sanders lost so you are making excuses.

I could care less who won the corrupt, criminal DNC nomination. The Democrats, however, cared enough to Rig their Primaries, cheat in debates, engage in voter fraud during their primaries, etc.... and they became UNGLUED when Wikileaks exposed it all.

There was no voter fraud. You love to make claims that have no basis in fact. Put up or shut up. If the DNC is so powerful, why didn't Clinton win in 2008? How did Obama win?

voter fraud has been proven and prosecuted in several states already. The question is how much of it actually happened and whether it was enough to swing a state. I doubt that it was, however one fraudulent vote is too many.

 

[eddiew37]

speaking of equal justice Scaramucci is having FBI investigate chief of staff Priebus for leaking Unbelievable You can't make this repub shit up

 

[Redfish]

speaking of equal justice Scaramucci is having FBI investigate chief of staff Priebus for leaking Unbelievable You can't make this repub shit up

justice should be blind. No one is exempt from our laws----------except of course the Clinton crime family.

 

[eddiew37]

speaking of equal justice Scaramucci is having FBI investigate chief of staff Priebus for leaking Unbelievable You can't make this repub shit up

justice should be blind. No one is exempt from our laws----------except of course the Clinton crime family.

hey red Why do you bullshit about Clintons when the ah in our WH is a gd moron with TEAMS of lawyers to cover for his crookedness these past 40 years or so?