james bond
Gold Member
- Oct 17, 2015
- 13,407
- 1,803
- 170
Why not? The math not only allows it, it seems to dictate it. You would have a tougher time explaining that our observable univerae is all there is or ever was, than otherwise. So you are wrong, that's actually not simpler. And it would be very silly for scientists to place such a limit on their own research. So you are doubly wrong.
We know there is only one universe because by definition and God said he only created one. ...
Did he say so? The very old sentence "He cretated the heavens and the worlds" looks not like the people in former times had the impression god limited his creation to only one interpretation of reality. So why not different natural laws in different universes? The real astonishing thing is not this - the real astonishing thing is we are able to have ideas, which try to overstep the reality in which we live here. What we are not able to overstep: We are not able to think about a universe without any natural laws.
He created the heavens and earth our of nothing. It was creation ex nihilo. We found that it involved the five manifestations of all natural phenomena -- force (God), space, time, matter and motion. All had to be present at the same time in order for it to happen. Can you explain how your interpretation of reality happened using these manifestations?
People want me to support my statements using books since Darwin wrote one. Here is one -- The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God. One of the reasons it states why humans want to eliminate God is that they hate God. They do not want to be be subject to God's laws and not be held accountable for their behavior. You can see some of this emotion in the stuff atheists write here.