Tim Walz's Stolen Valor Gets Worse, Posed as Afghanistan War Veteran

[Superbadbrutha]

The 3 CSMs who outed Walz each served as many years or even mote than Walz did

Most veterans don't speak ill of other veterans and I damn sure don't listen to cowards speak ill of a veteran.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

This is like having been in the Army in 1968 and never gotten farther than San Diego during Vietnam, and calling yourself a Vietnam Veteran. 100% Stolen Valor.

Picture of Walz Holding 'Enduring Freedom Veteran' Protest Sign During 2004 Anti-George Bush Rally Resurfaces Amid Accusations of Stolen Valor | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

"A bombshell revelation has surfaced this week that could mark the end of Tim Walz’s political career. A photo, recently unearthed, shows Walz holding a protest sign reading “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry” during a 2004 anti-George Bush rally in Mankato, Minnesota.

The photograph, taken by Michael B. Brodkorb, was captured on August 4, 2004, as Walz protested outside a campaign rally for President Bush in Mankato, Minnesota.

Tim Walz has consistently portrayed himself as “a veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom,” the U.S. military operation in Afghanistan initiated after the September 11 attacks."


According to Free Beacon, it has come to light that Walz never deployed to Afghanistan, nor did he engage in any combat operations during his military career. His service was primarily in Italy, where he supported NATO forces but did not see action in the Middle East.

A video from 2009 recently resurfaced, showing Iraq War veteran David Thul confronting Walz’s aides at his Mankato office regarding these claims. Thul, armed with knowledge and evidence, filmed the encounter and pointed out that Walz’s assertions could be interpreted as violations of the Stolen Valor Act.

During this confrontation, Thul informed Walz’s aides that such misrepresentations could lead to jail time.

Thul presented evidence indicating that while Walz served in a supportive role, he did not serve in Afghanistan or engage in any combat actions. One aide admitted she was “not aware” of Walz serving in Afghanistan.


Thul went on to present the 2004 photo of Walz, holding a sign that says “Enduring Freedom Veterans for Kerry,” to another aide, who acknowledged that constituents could get the false impression that Walz served in Afghanistan."

Stolen Valor means something to Americans but not to democrats.

Democrats align with America's enemies and are even working with them on the intentional collapse of America.

Democrats = WEF

 

[Blisterfinger]

MAGA=Stolen Brains

Someone sure stole yours

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Mac-7]

Most veterans don't speak ill of other veterans and I damn sure don't listen to cowards speak ill of a veteran.

You are in denial

 

[Superbadbrutha]

You are in denial

I am not in denial about anything, the man served his country for 24yrs who are you to question his service.

 

[Mac-7]

I am not in denial about anything, the man served his country for 24yrs who are you to question his service.

His fellow non commissioned officers in his own NG unit questioned his service

And you cant face that fact

 

[Superbadbrutha]

His fellow non commissioned officers in his own NG unit questioned his service

And you cant face that fact

The man rejoined the military after 9/11, what did you do?

 

[Mac-7]

The man rejoined the military after 9/11, what did you do?

If I ever run for public office them you can demand to know my service record

But thats not the case here

Walz fellow soldiers questioned his actions as they have every right to

 

[Superbadbrutha]

If I ever run for public office them you can demand to know my service record

But thats not the case here

Walz fellow soldiers questioned his actions as they have every right to

I doubt if you did, because veterans don't attack other veterans service records. We actually defend them.

 

[Mac-7]

I doubt if you did, because veterans don't attack other veterans service records. We actually defend them.

Are you denying that the 3 e-9s from Walz’ own unit are vets?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Are you denying that the 3 e-9s from Walz’ own unit are vets?

I haven't denied anything that is what folks like you are doing.

Most veterans don't attack the record of another veteran.

 

[Mac-7]

I haven't denied anything that is what folks like you are doing.

Most veterans don't attack the record of another veteran.

I’m not doing anything

Its vets who knew Walz and served in his unit who are exposing his actions

 

[AZrailwhale]

In all fairness it's legitimate for a Veteran who spent his time in a stateside post or a shipyard or a supply depot in the U.S. during WW2 to claim WW2 Veteran benefits. Likewise any Veteran who served honorably during Korea and Vietnam and modern military incursions are legitimate Veterans of that era. Personally if I was a fifty something sergeant in the Guard, I would retire rather than be deployed to Iraq.

Veteran's benefits are not based upon service in a combat zone. Calling yourself a veteran of a combat zone is. I'm a Vietnam Era Veteran, I would no more claim to be a Vietnam Veteran than paint myself blue and run around in the street in subzero weather.

 

[AZrailwhale]

What Veteran hasn't "carried a weapon in war" or was it a "weapon of war"? Was he a sergeant major or a command sergeant major? It's a word spin game. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fan of socialist tampon Tim but attacking him this way doesn't seem like a smart move.

Walz was never either. He was a Master Sergeant acting as a Sergeant Major. When I was an E-4, I acted as an E-7 Classified Records Custodian because I was the only person in my unit with an appropriate level of clearance. That didn't make me an E-7.

 

[AZrailwhale]

No, he did not. He misspoke once and corrected it. America is tired of MAGA's weirdness.

He didn't "mis-speak", he built a political career on those lies. He constantly repeated them both in person and in writing.

 

[AZrailwhale]

I haven't denied anything that is what folks like you are doing.

Most veterans don't attack the record of another veteran.

Most veterans will be the first to attack a false record. They value the service rendered by their fellows.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You didn't thxs for letting us know that. It amazes me how folks who never served can question someone who actually served.

How many years did you serve? I served five years on active duty and four in the active reserves.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

its nothing of the sort, Toro. Stop disparaging a 24 year veteran

That’s not the point.

The point is lying about what you did.

Just saying 24 years over and over refutes nothing. Address the actual point

 

[AZrailwhale]

It's a disgrace listening to cowards who never served attack a man who gave 24yrs of service to his country. A damn shame.

His actual service was about the same number of days as a three-year enlistment. I've served in both active duty and reserve units, Reserve and National Guard are vacations compared with active duty.