The Deadly Consequences of Democrats’ War on ICE Enforcement

[PeterPilot]

You are lying.

That's the question I have been asking you.
You have not gathered up the intellectual honesty to address it.
I am sure this will not change.

Prove me wrong - tell me you believe none of the nits you picked negate his right to self-defense.

I've answered your dumbass questions, but you just don't like the answers. Too bad shooter. Denial is a problem for humans.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I've answered your dumbass questions...

Thank you for making it clear there's no need for me to waste any more time on you.

 

[hadit]

A man has the responsibility to not place himself in harm's way. Don't do stupid things.

Absolutely. He should have gotten out of the way and allowed her car to be disabled so she could be extracted from it.

I wear a helmet when riding my motorcycle, but I understand I can still be harmed. I can drown in the ocean when I swim in it. Friends have died doing just that.

But I don't place my body in front of a car or airplane with a running engine.

When someone steps in front of my car I don't attempt to drive around them, I allow them to get out of the way. Should I be in a situation where LE points guns at me, I will do whatever they tell me to do. Doing otherwise is simply foolish. Where is the compassion for her foolishness?

 

[IM2]

Let's stop lying about what happened to Good. She was turning away from the ICE officer when she got shot. The last shot was fired through the side window. Nobody was trying to run over that agent. It is time the right stopped the wholesale lying about events in this country.

 

[Lockback]

Thank you for making it clear there's no need for me to waste any more time on you.

I mean, the guy is a pilot for peters, for heaven's sake.
That can't be good.

 

[IM2]

There is no Democrat war on ICE. There is the Trump administration war on the American people.

 

[PeterPilot]

Absolutely. He should have gotten out of the way and allowed her car to be disabled so she could be extracted from it.

When someone steps in front of my car I don't attempt to drive around them, I allow them to get out of the way. Should I be in a situation where LE points guns at me, I will do whatever they tell me to do. Doing otherwise is simply foolish. Where is the compassion for her foolishness?

Where is the knowledge of her intentions?

 

[hadit]

Let's stop lying about what happened to Good. She was turning away from the ICE officer when she got shot. The last shot was fired through the side window. Nobody was trying to run over that agent. It is time the right stopped the wholesale lying about events in this country.

Yes, let's tell the truth about her. First thing, let's look at her actions:

When LE surrounds you and points guns at you, what's the smart thing to do?
1. Exactly what they tell you to do, knowing that if they are in the wrong, you will probably get a big payday in the lawsuit.
2. Refuse to do what they say and attempt to flee, knowing you stand a good chance of not making it to tomorrow.

When you want to take your car out of a parking spot and someone steps in front of you, what is your responsibility as a driver?
1. Do not attempt to move your car because you are liable if you begin moving and hit the pedestrian.
2. Cut your wheels to one side, hoping you won't hit the pedestrian and hit the gas.

Where is the compassion for this woman's foolishness?

 

[hadit]

Where is the knowledge of her intentions?

We're going by her actions. The officer was wrong for getting in front of the car, she was wrong for trying to flee.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Where is the compassion for this woman's foolishness?

You forget:
Liberals believe their hatred for Trump entitles them to do whatever they want, without consequence.

 

[PeterPilot]

Byrd didn't murder Babbit.

Why not?

 

[Concerned American]

An officer that could easily be described as dumber than a box of rocks for placing his body directly in front of a vehicle with a running engine, driven by a US citizen. They don't hire those ICE goons for IQ. South Park covered that some months back.

Americans don't intentionally run their cars into ANYONE, least of all law enforcement in the performance of their duties. Now run along, you're an anarchist piece of garbage.

 

[PeterPilot]

Americans don't intentionally run their cars into ANYONE, least of all law enforcement in the performance of their duties. Now run along, you're an anarchist piece of garbage.

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

 

[Concerned American]

When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.

What's your excuse? You lost any debate when you advocated for a anarchist who decided to assault a law enforcement officer with a deadly weapon. Try again.

 

[IM2]

Why not?

Really? She was with a violent, angry mob that was trying to break into the congressional chamber. She was not some innocent tourist who wandered into the capital and got gunned down. That mob was beating the guards in front of that door. So what do you think the outcome would have been if they had been able to bust down the door and rush those officers?

It time the lies stopped.

 

[IM2]

What's your excuse? You lost any debate when you advocated for a anarchist who decided to assault a law enforcement officer with a deadly weapon. Try again.

What you claim did not happen.

 

[Concerned American]

What's your excuse? You lost any debate when you advocated for a anarchist who decided to assault a law enforcement officer with a deadly weapon. Try again.

buttercup your timid fake news response with no indication of why you believe Renee Good's assault on a law enforcement officer is fake news is noted. BTW, your emoji is the 666th fake news notification I've received since being on the board. Hmmmm.

 

[hadit]

Americans don't intentionally run their cars into ANYONE, least of all law enforcement in the performance of their duties. Now run along, you're an anarchist piece of garbage.

Who bears the brunt of the responsibility to avoid a car striking a pedestrian, the pedestrian or the driver? In this case, we see extreme bending and twisting to avoid putting any responsibility on the driver at all.

 

[Concerned American]

Who bears the brunt of the responsibility to avoid a car striking a pedestrian, the pedestrian or the driver? In this case, we see extreme bending and twisting to avoid putting any responsibility on the driver at all.

Pedestrian has the right of way.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Who bears the brunt of the responsibility to avoid a car striking a pedestrian, the pedestrian or the driver? In this case, we see extreme bending and twisting to avoid putting any responsibility on the driver at all.

Imagine, had the driver been a white man, and the pedestrian member of the Burn and Loot Mob