Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet

[Dusty]

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That doesn't surprise me that does not surprise me that does not surprise me hello that does not surprise me that thar

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation
of forward-looking minds that way of fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering styling service to use alongside my current landline cable service to make comparisons or at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing a that time.

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius.

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk.

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation of forward-looking minds that we are fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering starlink service to use alongside my current landline cable service for the purpose of making comparisons for at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing at that time.

LOL so are the space x satellites 6G compliant or will they be trash in 5 to 10 years.

Reality is real

Not sure how they're going to work honestly. All of my experiments with satellite internet services in the past have been nothing but a catastrophe. It tends to be needlessly expensive the dishes are horrible looking on the house but if you don't put them high enough then no good for anything.
If musk has found a way to send reliable signals through the atmosphere regardless of weather conditions and he is indeed going to put 40,000 plus of these things in orbit (but of course the pentagon's going to tag along) I would say he might have something going. In any case I see it as worth trying for a brief period of time to compare with what I already have from Comcast which is a fairly good service at market price.

Musk has found nothing, these satellites have a dual purpose which is to keep the military grid operational in a full scale war. It would take 10000 per month per subscriber for space x to become positive in 25 years before which the satellites will be obsolete

Though I have no way of knowing about Tesla corp.... I can tell you that I do know of such dummy products that are covered by black opps budgets that never actually make it to public knowledge... I can assume the same applies though. In any case if it also has a military component that's fine by me. The Chinese have made no secret about launching preying mantis type satellites as a wake up call to the west about how easily a military strategy dependent on satellite technology can be overcome....If musk puts up 40,000 of them then I presume that may be an adequate answer to that threat. I do know that one local company ( I will not mention any locale at all .... sorry ) has developed a program to guide cruise missiles based solely on geographical recognition. The missile so equipped has its own robot pilot that does not need GPS..... it knows where it's going and can take numerous unpredictable routes to get there with a certain amount of autonomy even if all communications have been cut off from it. We are approaching Star Trek stuff pretty quickly.

JO

That cruise missile guidance system would need a starting point to determine frame of reference and a lost host could never provide this, and just so you know oceans have no geographical features.

Next

yeah I know that
I found the whole thing very fascinating though.....look the Nazi's hit London Pretty accurately with the V2's ..... I'm pretty sure we can do better. We'll have to do better..... a powerful EMP blast eats up any kind of signal anyway...

JO

Again the Nazi bombs had a concrete frame of reference, they were pointed and fell when they were out of fuel. The Brits knew they were safe if they heard the motor. The Nazies hated everyone so it did not really matter where the thing landed, the USA will never use such a system for fear of hitting an ally

And yet they do anyway all the time...the point is this..... The missile knows where it's going....I don't know how and probably would be told to MYOB if I were to ask but it does...hell I'd wager that a PS4 has enough computation power to do that.

You are referring to terrain following radar that does not exist on an ocean where the majority of missiles are launched from. But wait not only is the missile lost so would the launch platform be lost. This is why starlink is launching 40000 top secret to no one GPS satellites to keep the system up in an all out attack

 

[justoffal]

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That doesn't surprise me that does not surprise me that does not surprise me hello that does not surprise me that thar

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation
of forward-looking minds that way of fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering styling service to use alongside my current landline cable service to make comparisons or at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing a that time.

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius.

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk.

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation of forward-looking minds that we are fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering starlink service to use alongside my current landline cable service for the purpose of making comparisons for at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing at that time.

LOL so are the space x satellites 6G compliant or will they be trash in 5 to 10 years.

Reality is real

Not sure how they're going to work honestly. All of my experiments with satellite internet services in the past have been nothing but a catastrophe. It tends to be needlessly expensive the dishes are horrible looking on the house but if you don't put them high enough then no good for anything.
If musk has found a way to send reliable signals through the atmosphere regardless of weather conditions and he is indeed going to put 40,000 plus of these things in orbit (but of course the pentagon's going to tag along) I would say he might have something going. In any case I see it as worth trying for a brief period of time to compare with what I already have from Comcast which is a fairly good service at market price.

Musk has found nothing, these satellites have a dual purpose which is to keep the military grid operational in a full scale war. It would take 10000 per month per subscriber for space x to become positive in 25 years before which the satellites will be obsolete

Though I have no way of knowing about Tesla corp.... I can tell you that I do know of such dummy products that are covered by black opps budgets that never actually make it to public knowledge... I can assume the same applies though. In any case if it also has a military component that's fine by me. The Chinese have made no secret about launching preying mantis type satellites as a wake up call to the west about how easily a military strategy dependent on satellite technology can be overcome....If musk puts up 40,000 of them then I presume that may be an adequate answer to that threat. I do know that one local company ( I will not mention any locale at all .... sorry ) has developed a program to guide cruise missiles based solely on geographical recognition. The missile so equipped has its own robot pilot that does not need GPS..... it knows where it's going and can take numerous unpredictable routes to get there with a certain amount of autonomy even if all communications have been cut off from it. We are approaching Star Trek stuff pretty quickly.

JO

That cruise missile guidance system would need a starting point to determine frame of reference and a lost host could never provide this, and just so you know oceans have no geographical features.

Next

yeah I know that
I found the whole thing very fascinating though.....look the Nazi's hit London Pretty accurately with the V2's ..... I'm pretty sure we can do better. We'll have to do better..... a powerful EMP blast eats up any kind of signal anyway...

JO

Again the Nazi bombs had a concrete frame of reference, they were pointed and fell when they were out of fuel. The Brits knew they were safe if they heard the motor. The Nazies hated everyone so it did not really matter where the thing landed, the USA will never use such a system for fear of hitting an ally

And yet they do anyway all the time...the point is this..... The missile knows where it's going....I don't know how and probably would be told to MYOB if I were to ask but it does...hell I'd wager that a PS4 has enough computation power to do that.

You are referring to terrain following radar that does not exist on an ocean where the majority of missiles are launched from. But wait not only is the missile lost so would the launch platform be lost. This is why starlink is launching 40000 top secret to no one GPS satellites to keep the system up in an all out attack

Probably true....but no signal GPS or otherwise can penetrate a dense EMP burst....Did somebody say it was TOP SECRET???...... It wasn't me .... but apparently you think there is something hidden and I already told you it's not that uncommon. There are LOTS of things the don't have really good explanations to go with them that are covered by some hidden budget or another all over the pentagon's procurement process. Starlink is probably one of them. I mean it makes perfect sense even if it is a financial loser. Who knows...it may well be a good product for $99./month also.....only one way to find out. BTW... I don't know abut today's navy but I do know that a qualified Navigator in yesterday's navy had to demonstrate the ability to use a Mariner's compass set along with star charts for those .... JUST-IN-CASE ... scenarios. Could be they gave up on that.

JO

 

[Dusty]

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That doesn't surprise me that does not surprise me that does not surprise me hello that does not surprise me that thar

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation
of forward-looking minds that way of fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering styling service to use alongside my current landline cable service to make comparisons or at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing a that time.

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius.

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk.

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation of forward-looking minds that we are fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering starlink service to use alongside my current landline cable service for the purpose of making comparisons for at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing at that time.

LOL so are the space x satellites 6G compliant or will they be trash in 5 to 10 years.

Reality is real

Not sure how they're going to work honestly. All of my experiments with satellite internet services in the past have been nothing but a catastrophe. It tends to be needlessly expensive the dishes are horrible looking on the house but if you don't put them high enough then no good for anything.
If musk has found a way to send reliable signals through the atmosphere regardless of weather conditions and he is indeed going to put 40,000 plus of these things in orbit (but of course the pentagon's going to tag along) I would say he might have something going. In any case I see it as worth trying for a brief period of time to compare with what I already have from Comcast which is a fairly good service at market price.

Musk has found nothing, these satellites have a dual purpose which is to keep the military grid operational in a full scale war. It would take 10000 per month per subscriber for space x to become positive in 25 years before which the satellites will be obsolete

Though I have no way of knowing about Tesla corp.... I can tell you that I do know of such dummy products that are covered by black opps budgets that never actually make it to public knowledge... I can assume the same applies though. In any case if it also has a military component that's fine by me. The Chinese have made no secret about launching preying mantis type satellites as a wake up call to the west about how easily a military strategy dependent on satellite technology can be overcome....If musk puts up 40,000 of them then I presume that may be an adequate answer to that threat. I do know that one local company ( I will not mention any locale at all .... sorry ) has developed a program to guide cruise missiles based solely on geographical recognition. The missile so equipped has its own robot pilot that does not need GPS..... it knows where it's going and can take numerous unpredictable routes to get there with a certain amount of autonomy even if all communications have been cut off from it. We are approaching Star Trek stuff pretty quickly.

JO

That cruise missile guidance system would need a starting point to determine frame of reference and a lost host could never provide this, and just so you know oceans have no geographical features.

Next

yeah I know that
I found the whole thing very fascinating though.....look the Nazi's hit London Pretty accurately with the V2's ..... I'm pretty sure we can do better. We'll have to do better..... a powerful EMP blast eats up any kind of signal anyway...

JO

Again the Nazi bombs had a concrete frame of reference, they were pointed and fell when they were out of fuel. The Brits knew they were safe if they heard the motor. The Nazies hated everyone so it did not really matter where the thing landed, the USA will never use such a system for fear of hitting an ally

And yet they do anyway all the time...the point is this..... The missile knows where it's going....I don't know how and probably would be told to MYOB if I were to ask but it does...hell I'd wager that a PS4 has enough computation power to do that.

You are referring to terrain following radar that does not exist on an ocean where the majority of missiles are launched from. But wait not only is the missile lost so would the launch platform be lost. This is why starlink is launching 40000 top secret to no one GPS satellites to keep the system up in an all out attack

Probably true....but no signal GPS or otherwise can penetrate a dense EMP burst....Did somebody say it was TOP SECRET???...... It wasn't me .... but apparently you think there is something hidden and I already told you it's not that uncommon. There are LOTS of things the don't have really good explanations to go with them that are covered by some hidden budget or another all over the pentagon's procurement process. Starlink is probably one of them. I mean it makes perfect sense even if it is a financial loser. Who knows...it may well be a good product for $99./month also.....only one way to find out. BTW... I don't know abut today's navy but I do know that a qualified Navigator in yesterday's navy had to demonstrate the ability to use a Mariner's compass set along with star charts for those .... JUST-IN-CASE ... scenarios. Could be they gave up on that.

JO

Nobody uses star charts in a panic launch. The only reason that the Navy keeps sextants is because the GPS system is so vulnerable in the first place. 99 dollars a month would never pay for the fuel in just one rocket much less the launch itself

 

[justoffal]

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That doesn't surprise me that does not surprise me that does not surprise me hello that does not surprise me that thar

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius....

Jo

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation
of forward-looking minds that way of fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering styling service to use alongside my current landline cable service to make comparisons or at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing a that time.

Till September 2021 Space X is gonna cover the whole planet with a Starlink internet connection and it's gonna launch 42 thousand of satellites. How do you relate to the number of satellites in the orbit of Earth?

Musk is a genius.

Musk claimed that Starlink satellites when their time of usage comes to the end will be able to lead themself to the atmosphere of Earth and burn in order not to increase the number of space junk.

That does not surprise me at all. Musk is apparently one of a new generation of forward-looking minds that we are fortunate enough to benefit from. I believe satellites are multi-purpose as one poster has already observed and at this point in time I hear there are about 3,400 of them. I will be ordering starlink service to use alongside my current landline cable service for the purpose of making comparisons for at least 2 months before I decide to purchase it permanently. One of the things I will be looking for is the performance of the internet during bad weather as satellite reception is notorious for failing at that time.

LOL so are the space x satellites 6G compliant or will they be trash in 5 to 10 years.

Reality is real

Not sure how they're going to work honestly. All of my experiments with satellite internet services in the past have been nothing but a catastrophe. It tends to be needlessly expensive the dishes are horrible looking on the house but if you don't put them high enough then no good for anything.
If musk has found a way to send reliable signals through the atmosphere regardless of weather conditions and he is indeed going to put 40,000 plus of these things in orbit (but of course the pentagon's going to tag along) I would say he might have something going. In any case I see it as worth trying for a brief period of time to compare with what I already have from Comcast which is a fairly good service at market price.

Musk has found nothing, these satellites have a dual purpose which is to keep the military grid operational in a full scale war. It would take 10000 per month per subscriber for space x to become positive in 25 years before which the satellites will be obsolete

Though I have no way of knowing about Tesla corp.... I can tell you that I do know of such dummy products that are covered by black opps budgets that never actually make it to public knowledge... I can assume the same applies though. In any case if it also has a military component that's fine by me. The Chinese have made no secret about launching preying mantis type satellites as a wake up call to the west about how easily a military strategy dependent on satellite technology can be overcome....If musk puts up 40,000 of them then I presume that may be an adequate answer to that threat. I do know that one local company ( I will not mention any locale at all .... sorry ) has developed a program to guide cruise missiles based solely on geographical recognition. The missile so equipped has its own robot pilot that does not need GPS..... it knows where it's going and can take numerous unpredictable routes to get there with a certain amount of autonomy even if all communications have been cut off from it. We are approaching Star Trek stuff pretty quickly.

JO

That cruise missile guidance system would need a starting point to determine frame of reference and a lost host could never provide this, and just so you know oceans have no geographical features.

Next

yeah I know that
I found the whole thing very fascinating though.....look the Nazi's hit London Pretty accurately with the V2's ..... I'm pretty sure we can do better. We'll have to do better..... a powerful EMP blast eats up any kind of signal anyway...

JO

Again the Nazi bombs had a concrete frame of reference, they were pointed and fell when they were out of fuel. The Brits knew they were safe if they heard the motor. The Nazies hated everyone so it did not really matter where the thing landed, the USA will never use such a system for fear of hitting an ally

And yet they do anyway all the time...the point is this..... The missile knows where it's going....I don't know how and probably would be told to MYOB if I were to ask but it does...hell I'd wager that a PS4 has enough computation power to do that.

You are referring to terrain following radar that does not exist on an ocean where the majority of missiles are launched from. But wait not only is the missile lost so would the launch platform be lost. This is why starlink is launching 40000 top secret to no one GPS satellites to keep the system up in an all out attack

Probably true....but no signal GPS or otherwise can penetrate a dense EMP burst....Did somebody say it was TOP SECRET???...... It wasn't me .... but apparently you think there is something hidden and I already told you it's not that uncommon. There are LOTS of things the don't have really good explanations to go with them that are covered by some hidden budget or another all over the pentagon's procurement process. Starlink is probably one of them. I mean it makes perfect sense even if it is a financial loser. Who knows...it may well be a good product for $99./month also.....only one way to find out. BTW... I don't know abut today's navy but I do know that a qualified Navigator in yesterday's navy had to demonstrate the ability to use a Mariner's compass set along with star charts for those .... JUST-IN-CASE ... scenarios. Could be they gave up on that.

JO

Nobody uses star charts in a panic launch. The only reason that the Navy keeps sextants is because the GPS system is so vulnerable in the first place. 99 dollars a month would never pay for the fuel in just one rocket much less the launch itself

Yeah I believe you. Like I said it doesn't have to make sense to serve a purpose. What I like about the service is that it doesn't depend on physical landlines. That doesn't mean it's going to be a good service though. Is it a byproduct of a military operation? Maybe.... As long as I get what I consider to be $99 worth I could give a shit less.

Jo

 

[teodor88]

Starlinks have ion thrusters for maneuvering and self-disposal, but even if the ion thrusters fail the orbit is so low they'll come down and burn up 0 in about a year due to atmospheric drag (yes, there's a thin atmosphere even at 500+km).