Those of you who oppose Trumps solution to the Iran problem post your solutions here

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Trump ended the JCPOA in 2018. Iran stopped complying with the terms in 2019.

Cause. Effect.

They were never complying in the first place. The IAEA was not accessing what we knew the Iranians had been doing.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Which allowed them to fire up their nuke program, you asswipe. Trump never read a paragraph of that pact,

The mullahs were very dishonest and wouldn't allow inspections in their country. They've always wanted and needed a nuclear bomb. They're getting what they deserve shitmouth.

 

[Marener]

Absolutely

Oh man. Wait until you hear how many people Putin has killed.

Do you believe a regime that murders 32,000 of its own citizens should be removed?

Isn’t this the kind of rhetoric you guys used to push the war in Iraq? How did that work out?

 

[OldFlame]

He's an idiot

As are many others on here, some I'm very surprised by. Nothing like taking out an islamist terrorist leader to bring out all the closet Jew hating muslims and their brethren in here.

 

[Godboy]

Right now you considering sponsoring Kurdish terrorists in Iran, a common tactic with you guys, read some news.

What do you mean by "sponser"? Are we giving them money and bombs?

 

[Godboy]

Noam is a homo. Im not listening to one second of that idiot.

 

[Marener]

They were never complying in the first place. The IAEA was not accessing what we knew the Iranians had been doing.

IAEA had access to Fordow and Natanz. What are you talking about?

 

[Marener]

Noem is a ******. Im not listening to one second of that idiot.

lol. Freudian slip.

Noem definitely is an idiot.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Roflmao at Noam

As are many others on here, some I'm very surprised by. Nothing like taking out an islamist terrorist leader to bring out all the closet Jew hating muslims and their brethren in here.

You noticed also. Well done

 

[Churchill]

Noam is a homo. Im not listening to one second of that idiot.

Your antisemitism is noted (I didn't for a second think you would listen to him).

 

[Couchpotato]

Israel has been a target and on the receiving end of attacks from it's "Peaceful Muslim" neighbors ever since the UN set the partition of Israel and fake "Palestine" in 1948. That initial war in 1948 sought to wipe out Israel and the Jews there. All the attacks/wars since then have had the same goal. Many have been funded and supported by the theocracy in Iran.

So the UN just unilaterally declared that the people living there no longer had a right to that land? Under what authority did they do that? Do you have any idea how bat shit crazy that sounds? What do you think would happen if the UN said some section of the US was no longer part of the US and that they were creating another country and giving that land to that group of people? Even if that land were completely uninhabited there's zero chance we stand for that.

The Oct. 7, 2024 attack was similar and the coward Hamas (funded and armed by Iran) used the people and land of Gaza as a shield and base of operation. If Israel didn't try to eliminate Hamas from Gaza Hamas would have continued to attack.

Goal of that 1948 war against Israel was to take their land after defeating the new nation and "removing" the Jews. The Muslim attacks set those terms and have stuck by them as well as never ending their attacks and wars against Israel. Since the terms are all or nothing, Israel has a right to keep lands taken from their enemies.

Muslims are ready control dozens of more land area on Earth than the land of Israel. If the Muslims would stop and let Israel be, then a lot of the violence might stop.

I say might because part of the dogma of Islam is Muhammad's command before he passed-on that his followers must spread Islam over the whole of Earth.

Why does any of that mean we (the US) has to attack Iran exactly? And what was the eminent threat that existed which precluded the President from going to Congress to get authorization to attack Iran? Oh, and how is the threat now different than the threat that existed when Trump was in office the first time, and when did that change exactly? Did the Trump admin just realize that Iran was a threat because if they already knew it why didn't they run on that in the Presidential campaign?


You are well out of your depth. Quit while you are ahead.

 

[Couchpotato]

That's exactly what the 'Palestinians' have done for decades, maybe you should preach to them.

No one is saying the Palestinians are innocent in this. I don't see how what the Palestinians have done means we have to bomb Iran.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Oh man. Wait until you hear how many people Putin has killed.

Isn’t this the kind of rhetoric you guys used to push the war in Iraq? How did that work out?

One of these things is not like the other. Learned that on Sesame Street moroner

 

[OldFlame]

So the UN just unilaterally declared that the people living there no longer had a right to that land? Under what authority did they do that? Do you have any idea how bat shit crazy that sounds? What do you think would happen if the UN said some section of the US was no longer part of the US and that they were creating another country and giving that land to that group of people? Even if that land were completely uninhabited there's zero chance we stand for that.


Why does any of that mean we (the US) has to attack Iran exactly? And what was the eminent threat that existed which precluded the President from going to Congress to get authorization to attack Iran? Oh, and how is the threat now different than the threat that existed when Trump was in office the first time, and when did that change exactly? Did the Trump admin just realize that Iran was a threat because if they already knew it why didn't they run on that in the Presidential campaign?


You are well out of your depth. Quit while you are ahead.

Talk about being out of your depth.

Before 1948, the land that became Israel was primarily under British administration known as the Mandatory Palestine (1923–1948). The vast majority of the land (approx. 70-85%) was state land (public land) that passed from the Ottoman Empire to the British, with the remaining land owned by Arab, Jewish, and foreign residents.

Key details on land ownership and control:

• British Mandate: Following World War I, Britain controlled the area through a League of Nations mandate, inheriting control from the Ottoman Empire.
• Public Land (State Land): Most of the land was considered public land belonging to the governing authority (Ottoman, then British).
• Private Land Ownership: Just before 1948, roughly 3% of the land was owned by Arabs who became Israeli citizens, while about 9% was owned by Jews. The remaining land was owned by Arab, Jewish, and foreign owners, including absentee landlords.
• Ottoman Legacy: For 400 years prior to 1917, the area was part of the Ottoman Empire.
• [[]]UN Partition Plan[[/nav]]: In 1947, the United Nations proposed dividing the British Mandate into separate Arab and Jewish states.
  Wikipedia +6

The population was a mix of Arabs (including Bedouins), Jews, and other groups, and the territory was known as Palestine in English, Falastin in Arabic, and Eretz Yisrael (Land of Israel) in Hebrew.

 

[Marener]

One of these things is not like the other. Learned that on Sesame Street moroner

Neoconservatism is alive and well.

 

[OldFlame]

No one is saying the Palestinians are innocent in this. I don't see how what the Palestinians have done means we have to bomb Iran.

No one has said we're taking out Iran's leaders because of what the Palestinians have done.

 

[Churchill]

Israel has been a target and on the receiving end of attacks from it's "Peaceful Muslim" neighbors ever since the UN set the partition of Israel and fake "Palestine" in 1948. That initial war in 1948 sought to wipe out Israel and the Jews there. All the attacks/wars since then have had the same goal. Many have been funded and supported by the theocracy in Iran.

The tactic of always framing this as something that began in 1948 is pretty much entrenched in Zionist history of the region. Its basically censorship by omission. Censorship of the betrayal of the Arabs by the British in 1918, censorship of Zionist terrorism in the 1920s and 1930s, censorship of the murder of non-Zionist Jews by Zionist Jews, censorship of the planned ethnic cleansing of Palestinians as far back as 1919, censorship of the Zionist nationalism schools modelled in the Hitler Youth.

You leave all that and much more out because you must prop up the narrative that Arabs hated Jews when there's no evidence to sustain such a claim.

Jews were persecuted by Christians for centuries but not by Muslims, they were exterminated en-mass by Christians not Arabs.

If there were even a grain of truth to the claim Arabs/Muslims are historically violently antisemitic and that they sought to exterminate Jews in WW2, then how do you explain the eagerness of Jews from all other world to go and live there after 1948?

Would any Jew, who believed all of that dare to setup a home in the midst of millions of Arabs?

Utterly ridiculous, neo-Zionism is ridiculous and you are ridiculous for buying all their claptrap.

The Oct. 7, 2024 attack was similar and the coward Hamas (funded and armed by Iran) used the people and land of Gaza as a shield and base of operation. If Israel didn't try to eliminate Hamas from Gaza Hamas would have continued to attack.

Goal of that 1948 war against Israel was to take their land after defeating the new nation and "removing" the Jews. The Muslim attacks set those terms and have stuck by them as well as never ending their attacks and wars against Israel. Since the terms are all or nothing, Israel has a right to keep lands taken from their enemies.

Muslims are ready control dozens of more land area on Earth than the land of Israel. If the Muslims would stop and let Israel be, then a lot of the violence might stop.

I say might because part of the dogma of Islam is Muhammad's command before he passed-on that his followers must spread Islam over the whole of Earth.

 

[AZrailwhale]

So the UN just unilaterally declared that the people living there no longer had a right to that land? Under what authority did they do that? Do you have any idea how bat shit crazy that sounds? What do you think would happen if the UN said some section of the US was no longer part of the US and that they were creating another country and giving that land to that group of people? Even if that land were completely uninhabited there's zero chance we stand for that.


Why does any of that mean we (the US) has to attack Iran exactly? And what was the eminent threat that existed which precluded the President from going to Congress to get authorization to attack Iran? Oh, and how is the threat now different than the threat that existed when Trump was in office the first time, and when did that change exactly? Did the Trump admin just realize that Iran was a threat because if they already knew it why didn't they run on that in the Presidential campaign?


You are well out of your depth. Quit while you are ahead.

The League of Nations divided up what the Ottoman called Trans-Jordan into Jordan for the Muslims and Israel for the Jews. They left the British to administer the removal and resettlement of the Muslims into Jordan, or another of the ex-Ottoman countries. The Brits did nothing until the UN partitioned Israel. In 1918 breaking up empires and removal of populations wasn't a hot-button issue like it is today.

 

[Clipper]

The mullahs were very dishonest and wouldn't allow inspections in their country. They've always wanted and needed a nuclear bomb. They're getting what they deserve shitmouth.

That's not what Europeans who also signed that treaty are saying, Trump humper.

Go outside, stare at the sky & wait for The Raaaaaapture, idiot. Ask Huckster Huckabee to hold hands with you.

 

[Stryder50]

Neoconservatism is alive and well.

So is old school Conservatism.

Much better than your parasitic deadwood non-productive pseudo-liberakism.