Thomas Massie's ex accuses him of hush money offer

Except that Massie only votes with the left about 2% of the time. When the GOP is trying to bankrupt the country, protect pedophiles and get us into wars.

Things you RINO's support.
Really? Only two percent?

The way he crows about bucking Trump, you would think it was all the time.

Except when he makes campaign ads where he photochops Trump into a picture with him.
 
Last edited:
Axios as a source is a RED FLAG!!!

Greg
Really? Why?
Is that a good reason for Massie to consistently side with Democrats?
I don't think he sets out to side with the Dems, he is more about voicing his disagreement with the Republicans when his morals tell him to.

To the guy who thinks Massive is the best Republican the Dems can have, well, I think that that is an unfortunate effect of having a system that's dominated by two parties. If someone disagrees with something from within his party, inevitably it comes out looking like he is agreeing with or helping the other side. It's unfortunate and should be changed. For me personally, I have a lot of respect for Massie, he votes according to his conscience, which is why Trump is always giving him a hard time. Trump is part of the problem, so whenever he encounters resistance in the form of integrity as the kind exhibited by Massie, he (Trump) does his best to ostracize him. In fact, didn't Trump once say that he was going to have someone run against Massive and he was almost like bragging about it? God how I loathe Trump.
 
Really? Why?

I don't think he sets out to side with the Dems, he is more about voicing his disagreement with the Republicans when his morals tell him to.
But we just found out that his "morals" include abusing women and paying them off for their silence.

We know that with exactly as much evidence that we know that all the men in the Epstein files are pedophiles.
To the guy who thinks Massive is the best Republican the Dems can have, well, I think that that is an unfortunate effect of having a system that's dominated by two parties. If someone disagrees with something from within his party, inevitably it comes out looking like he is agreeing with or helping the other side. It's unfortunate and should be changed. For me personally, I have a lot of respect for Massie, he votes according to his conscience, which is why Trump is always giving him a hard time. Trump is part of the problem, so whenever he encounters resistance in the form of integrity as the kind exhibited by Massie, he (Trump) does his best to ostracize him. In fact, didn't Trump once say that he was going to have someone run against Massive and he was almost like bragging about it? God how I loathe Trump.
Unlike Massie, Trump is following up on that word. Massie is about to primaried by a Trump-backed Republican.

Yes, the two-party system sucks, but our system of elections all but guarantees it as the founders predicted. We could go to a parliamentary system that would allow smaller parties to have a say, but "not democrats" like YoursTruly never mention that.
 
Really? Why?

I don't think he sets out to side with the Dems, he is more about voicing his disagreement with the Republicans when his morals tell him to.

To the guy who thinks Massive is the best Republican the Dems can have, well, I think that that is an unfortunate effect of having a system that's dominated by two parties. If someone disagrees with something from within his party, inevitably it comes out looking like he is agreeing with or helping the other side. It's unfortunate and should be changed. For me personally, I have a lot of respect for Massie, he votes according to his conscience, which is why Trump is always giving him a hard time. Trump is part of the problem, so whenever he encounters resistance in the form of integrity as the kind exhibited by Massie, he (Trump) does his best to ostracize him. In fact, didn't Trump once say that he was going to have someone run against Massive and he was almost like bragging about it? God how I loathe Trump.
So I assume you have a lot of respect for Fetterman for the same reason?
 
Really? Why?

I don't think he sets out to side with the Dems, he is more about voicing his disagreement with the Republicans when his morals tell him to.

To the guy who thinks Massive is the best Republican the Dems can have, well, I think that that is an unfortunate effect of having a system that's dominated by two parties. If someone disagrees with something from within his party, inevitably it comes out looking like he is agreeing with or helping the other side. It's unfortunate and should be changed. For me personally, I have a lot of respect for Massie, he votes according to his conscience, which is why Trump is always giving him a hard time. Trump is part of the problem, so whenever he encounters resistance in the form of integrity as the kind exhibited by Massie, he (Trump) does his best to ostracize him. In fact, didn't Trump once say that he was going to have someone run against Massive and he was almost like bragging about it? God how I loathe Trump.

Democrats vote against Republicans (most of the time) because they're Republicans.
Massie votes against Republicans because they're either trying to get us into a war, protect pedophiles or bankrupt the country.

And so the Trump supporters claim he always votes with the democrats.

In his latest interview with Tucker, he spells it out with BBB and the part of the first draft that ended transgender surgeries for minor. He voted against the bill because it added trillions to the debt. So the Trump tribe ran ads saying he voted "against a bill that ended transgender surgeries for minors." The surgeries had nothing to do with his reasons for voting no.

Also, Massie a huge advocate of stand alone, single issue bills. That way everyone doesn't have to vote yes on things they don't like. Or no on things they do.
 
This is just a pre election smear campaign. West has already started changing her story.


View attachment 1256237
Also,

BEWARE...!

Axios, is who Trump has been using the past few weeks as his go to media outlet on newest Trump/Iranian Scoop on deal making news to disperse and affect the stock market.

Same guy writing Trump's stock (market manipulation) articles at Axios, wrote this Massie article....
 
I knew he was corrupt. I'm not surprised. He might fool some. Not me.

_


Thomas Massie's ex accuses him of hush money offer.
Axios | 5/13/26 |
Massie is accused by an ex-girlfriend of making a hush money offer after she (the girlfriend) was dismissed from a job arranged by an associate of Massie, when the associate and Massie had a falling out.
This smacks of being straight out of The Democrat Playbook tactic #1 if ya ask me. :dunno:
 
Anita Hill’s 1991 testimony regarding Clarence Thomas, though isolating at the time, became a watershed moment that revealed she was not alone in facing sexual harassment. The massive public response, including thousands of stories shared with her, validated her experience and launched a lasting conversation on workplace accountability. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
A Lasting Impact
  • Widespread Affirmation: Following her testimony, Hill was flooded with stories from others, affirming that she was not alone in experiencing scrutiny and hostility.
  • Cultural Shift: Her testimony sparked a public conversation on sexual harassment that was previously rare, leading to increased awareness and legal changes.
  • Impact on #MeToo: Hill has noted that current movements holding workplaces accountable, such as #MeToo and #TimesUp, were built over decades, starting with conversations from that era.
  • Continued Advocacy: In her book Believing, and through her work, she continues to highlight the need to believe and support survivors.
  • Shared Experience: She has connected with others who have testified against powerful individuals, such as Christine Blasey Ford, highlighting a shared, ongoing fight for accountability. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Hill has expressed that despite the outcome of her testimony, it was effective because it empowered others and forced a public reckoning.
You guys lie all the time and get people to lie for you. We see the Stockholm Syndrome women in your extreme feminist political doctrines.
 
You guys lie all the time and get people to lie for you. We see the Stockholm Syndrome women in your extreme feminist political doctrines.
really?

Over two dozen women have publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct, including sexual assault, harassment, or inappropriate behavior, ranging from the 1970s through the 2000s. Trump has denied these allegations. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Key Accusers and Allegations:
  • E. Jean Carroll (1996): Accused Trump of raping her in a department store dressing room. A jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in 2023, awarding her damages, and a second jury awarded further damages for defamation in 2024.
  • Ivana Trump (1989): In a 1992 divorce deposition, Trump's first wife described an incident in which she said her husband raped her. She later stated she did not want her words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense.
  • Stacey Williams (1993): A former model who alleged Trump groped her at Mar-a-Lago while Jeffrey Epstein watched.
  • Jill Harth (1992–1993): A former business associate who sued in 1997, alleging Trump forcibly kissed and groped her.
  • Summer Zervos (2007): A former "Apprentice" contestant who alleged Trump grabbed her and kissed her in a hotel bungalow. She sued for defamation, but later dropped the suit.
  • Jessica Leeds (1970s-80s): Accused Trump of grabbing her on a flight.
  • Amy Dorris (1997): Accused Trump of forcing a kiss and groping her at the U.S. Open.
  • Natasha Stoynoff (2005): A journalist who alleged Trump pushed her against a wall and kissed her while she was writing a story.
  • Karena Virginia (1998): Alleged Trump grabbed her arm and touched her breast at the U.S. Open.
  • Kristin Anderson (1990s): Alleged Trump touched her through her underwear at a nightclub.
  • Rachel Crooks (2005): A receptionist at Trump Tower who alleged Trump kissed her on the mouth.
  • Karen Johnson (early 2000s): Alleged Trump grabbed her at a New Year's Eve party.
  • Juliet Huddy (2005-06): Former Fox News anchor who alleged Trump kissed her on the lips.
  • Temple Taggart McDowell (1997): Former Miss Utah USA who alleged Trump kissed her without consent.
  • Jessica Drake (2006): Adult film actress who alleged Trump groped and kissed her.
  • Mindy McGillivray (2003): Alleged Trump grabbed her at Mar-a-Lago.
  • Lisa Boyne (1996): Alleged Trump looked up her skirt at a dinner.
  • Cathy Heller (1997): Alleged Trump forcibly kissed her.
  • Ninni Laaksonen (2006): Former Miss Finland who alleged Trump grabbed her.
  • Cassandra Searles (2013): Miss Washington USA who alleged Trump groped her. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]


Allegations Related to Pageants (1997–2006):
Several former pageant contestants alleged that Trump entered dressing rooms while they were changing:
  • Mariah Billado (1997): Miss Vermont Teen.
  • Victoria Hughes (1997): Miss New Mexico Teen.
  • Bridget Sullivan (2000): Miss New Hampshire Teen.
  • Tasha Dixon (2001): Miss Arizona Teen.
  • Samantha Holvey (2006): Miss North Carolina
 
And here's one of the main reasons the neocons are smearing America-First Massie:

1778754807074.webp
 
Really? Only two percent?

The way he crows about bucking Trump, you would think it was all the time.

Except when he makes campaign ads where he photochops Trump into a picture with him.
Imagine a Republican who doesn't like Trump.

It's as if being a Republican you must be so ******* brain dead that you can't have your own thoughts.
 
15th post
If Massie is innocent, all he needs to do is release everything he has on paper, electronic document, or video concerning the allegations.

Until he does that, of course we must speculate about what he is hiding and assume the worst.
 
Back
Top Bottom