We are having this conversation because there are bogus allegations of a non-existent steal. Anyone can make allegations of a steal.
So you are accusing the evidence of being bogus! How do you know? What is your evidence or proof? Why won't you reveal it? Is it a secret? Anyone can say they are bogus when they have never been allowed TESTED in an open courtroom. Shall I put up all of the evidence one by one and you SHOW how each are bogus? IE, cannot be true.
Without proven either way, Trump's evidence is only as bogus as Biden's election.
I wouldn't play poker with a person who claimed having the winning hand who refused to SHOW his hand to me, much less pick a president that way. Trump has OFFERED to give the evidence freely, funny that no democrat is willing to try it, while calling it all "baseless." That ALONE is proof of the fraud, because if you could openly BLAST Trump's evidence to pieces, you would do it with zeal so you could plaster it as embarrassing front page news for all the world to see!
If they had any real evidence it needed to be produced in a court in accordance to the State election law where the election was held.
Stop the Squeal, you're killing Americans!
The courts did not allow that. Stop the lying. There was massive fraud.
The Trump campaign alleged numerous instances of voter fraud, including dead voters and voters who cast multiple ballots, but the Democratic defendants
said during a hearing Thursday that
the campaign’s evidence, which is under seal and not available to the public, is “built on nothing more than speculation, conspiracy theories and a fundamental misunderstanding of the electoral process.”
Nevada District Judge James Russell sided with the state and ruled the Trump campaign did not successfully show any evidence that proved their allegations of voter fraud, stating, “The court finds that there is no credible or reliable evidence that the 2020 General Election in Nevada was affected by fraud.”
The judge also ruled the Trump campaign did not show any evidence proving “malfeasance” by election officials and blasted the credibility of the campaign’s witnesses, saying witnesses’ “declarations constitute hearsay” and the expert witness testimony “was of little to no value.”
The court dismissed the campaign’s lawsuit trying to overturn the election results.
www.forbes.com