This Tells it All Folks-Trump Supporters Don't GAD About America

IM2

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Mar 11, 2015
96,004
81,979
3,645
Trump’s Depravity Will Not Cost Him This Election

Many Americans know exactly who Trump is, and they like it.

By Tom Nichols

Yesterday, The Atlantic published another astonishing story by editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg about Trump’s hatred of the military. The reporting included, among other things, the retired general and former Trump chief of staff John Kelly confirming on the record that “Trump used the terms suckers and losers to describe soldiers who gave their lives in the defense of our country,” a fact that Goldberg had first reported in September 2020. (Team Trump, unsurprisingly, continues to deny the story.) Not long after the publication of yesterday’s article, The New York Times published excerpts from interviews with Kelly in which Kelly said—on tape, no less—that Trump fits the definition of a fascist.

Like many of Trump’s critics, I’ve repeatedly asked one question over the years: What’s it going to take? When will Republican leaders and millions of Trump voters finally see the immorality of supporting such a man? Surely, with these latest revelations, we’ve reached the Moment, the Turning Point, the Line in the Sand, right?

Wrong. As New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu—one of the many former Trump critics now back on the Trump train—said today on CNN in response to a question about Kelly’s comments: “With a guy like [Trump], it’s kinda baked into the vote.”

The belief that at some point Trump voters will have finally had enough is an ordinary human response to seeing people you care about—in this case fellow citizens—associate with someone you know to be awful. Much like watching a friend in an unhealthy relationship, you think that each new outrage is going to be the one that provokes the final split, and yet it never does: Your friend, instead of breaking off the relationship, makes excuses. He didn’t mean it. You don’t understand him like I do.

But this analogy is wrong, because it’s based on the faulty assumption that one of the people in the relationship is unhappy. Maybe the better analogy is the friend you didn’t know very well in high school, someone who perhaps was quiet and not very popular, who shows up at your 20th reunion on the arm of a loudmouthed boor—think a cross between Herb Tarlek and David Duke—who tells offensive stories and racist jokes. She thinks he’s wonderful and laughs at everything he says.

But what she really enjoys, all these years after high school, is how uncomfortable he’s making you.

And this, in brief, is the problem for Kamala Harris in this election. She and others have likely hoped that, at some point, Trump will reveal himself as such an obvious, existential threat that even many Republican voters will walk away from him. (She delivered a short statement today emphasizing Kelly’s comments.) For millions of the GOP faithful, however, Trump’s daily attempts to breach new frontiers of hideousness are not offensive but reassuring. They want Trump to be awful—precisely because the people they view as their political foes will be so appalled if he wins. If Trump’s campaign was focused on handing out tax breaks and lowering gas prices, he’d be losing, because for his base, none of that yawn-inducing policy stuff is transgressive enough to be exciting. (Just ask Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who each in their own way tried to run as a Trump alternative.)

Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story—I wrote an entire book about it—but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.


So here you have it folks. We have part of the country who believe they are entitled and that others are taking what they BELIEVE THEY are entitled to and worked so hard for away. I just happen to fit the description of one of those others even as my ancestors worked for free and our free labor saved America so much money that it could become wealthy.Then my parents and grandprents just happened to pay taxes for programs that provided the types of people that support Trump today wth the things that allowed the white middle class to be created. WhiLe they were paying taxes to help create that midde class, they lived at an 80 percent rate of poverty in the 30's and a 55 percent rate just before Johnson implemented that Great Society program that trump supporters today blame fot the destruction of the back familiy, even though I had mom and dad with me as I grew up, and so did virtually every other black kid in our neighborhood.

In 2 weeks America could be looking at the beginning of the end because a group of people believe in an imaginary place that they want to go back to that never existed.
 
Trump’s Depravity Will Not Cost Him This Election

Many Americans know exactly who Trump is, and they like it.

By Tom Nichols

Yesterday, The Atlantic published another astonishing story by editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg about Trump’s hatred of the military. The reporting included, among other things, the retired general and former Trump chief of staff John Kelly confirming on the record that “Trump used the terms suckers and losers to describe soldiers who gave their lives in the defense of our country,” a fact that Goldberg had first reported in September 2020. (Team Trump, unsurprisingly, continues to deny the story.) Not long after the publication of yesterday’s article, The New York Times published excerpts from interviews with Kelly in which Kelly said—on tape, no less—that Trump fits the definition of a fascist.

Like many of Trump’s critics, I’ve repeatedly asked one question over the years: What’s it going to take? When will Republican leaders and millions of Trump voters finally see the immorality of supporting such a man? Surely, with these latest revelations, we’ve reached the Moment, the Turning Point, the Line in the Sand, right?

Wrong. As New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu—one of the many former Trump critics now back on the Trump train—said today on CNN in response to a question about Kelly’s comments: “With a guy like [Trump], it’s kinda baked into the vote.”

The belief that at some point Trump voters will have finally had enough is an ordinary human response to seeing people you care about—in this case fellow citizens—associate with someone you know to be awful. Much like watching a friend in an unhealthy relationship, you think that each new outrage is going to be the one that provokes the final split, and yet it never does: Your friend, instead of breaking off the relationship, makes excuses. He didn’t mean it. You don’t understand him like I do.

But this analogy is wrong, because it’s based on the faulty assumption that one of the people in the relationship is unhappy. Maybe the better analogy is the friend you didn’t know very well in high school, someone who perhaps was quiet and not very popular, who shows up at your 20th reunion on the arm of a loudmouthed boor—think a cross between Herb Tarlek and David Duke—who tells offensive stories and racist jokes. She thinks he’s wonderful and laughs at everything he says.

But what she really enjoys, all these years after high school, is how uncomfortable he’s making you.

And this, in brief, is the problem for Kamala Harris in this election. She and others have likely hoped that, at some point, Trump will reveal himself as such an obvious, existential threat that even many Republican voters will walk away from him. (She delivered a short statement today emphasizing Kelly’s comments.) For millions of the GOP faithful, however, Trump’s daily attempts to breach new frontiers of hideousness are not offensive but reassuring. They want Trump to be awful—precisely because the people they view as their political foes will be so appalled if he wins. If Trump’s campaign was focused on handing out tax breaks and lowering gas prices, he’d be losing, because for his base, none of that yawn-inducing policy stuff is transgressive enough to be exciting. (Just ask Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who each in their own way tried to run as a Trump alternative.)

Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story—I wrote an entire book about it—but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.


So here you have it folks. We have part of the country who believe they are entitled and that others are taking what they BELIEVE THEY are entitled to and worked so hard for away. I just happen to fit the description of one of those others even as my ancestors worked for free and our free labor saved America so much money that it could become wealthy.Then my parents and grandprents just happened to pay taxes for programs that provided the types of people that support Trump today wth the things that allowed the white middle class to be created. WhiLe they were paying taxes to help create that midde class, they lived at an 80 percent rate of poverty in the 30's and a 55 percent rate just before Johnson implemented that Great Society program that trump supporters today blame fot the destruction of the back familiy, even though I had mom and dad with me as I grew up, and so did virtually every other black kid in our neighborhood.

In 2 weeks America could be looking at the beginning of the end because a group of people believe in an imaginary place that they want to go back to that never existed.
The Atlantic?

Their story was debunked by the family of the military member they smeared:




This is the owner of the Atlantic, a Kamala sycophant and Epstein gal:

 
Trump’s Depravity Will Not Cost Him This Election

Many Americans know exactly who Trump is, and they like it.

By Tom Nichols

Yesterday, The Atlantic published another astonishing story by editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg about Trump’s hatred of the military. The reporting included, among other things, the retired general and former Trump chief of staff John Kelly confirming on the record that “Trump used the terms suckers and losers to describe soldiers who gave their lives in the defense of our country,” a fact that Goldberg had first reported in September 2020. (Team Trump, unsurprisingly, continues to deny the story.) Not long after the publication of yesterday’s article, The New York Times published excerpts from interviews with Kelly in which Kelly said—on tape, no less—that Trump fits the definition of a fascist.

Like many of Trump’s critics, I’ve repeatedly asked one question over the years: What’s it going to take? When will Republican leaders and millions of Trump voters finally see the immorality of supporting such a man? Surely, with these latest revelations, we’ve reached the Moment, the Turning Point, the Line in the Sand, right?

Wrong. As New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu—one of the many former Trump critics now back on the Trump train—said today on CNN in response to a question about Kelly’s comments: “With a guy like [Trump], it’s kinda baked into the vote.”

The belief that at some point Trump voters will have finally had enough is an ordinary human response to seeing people you care about—in this case fellow citizens—associate with someone you know to be awful. Much like watching a friend in an unhealthy relationship, you think that each new outrage is going to be the one that provokes the final split, and yet it never does: Your friend, instead of breaking off the relationship, makes excuses. He didn’t mean it. You don’t understand him like I do.

But this analogy is wrong, because it’s based on the faulty assumption that one of the people in the relationship is unhappy. Maybe the better analogy is the friend you didn’t know very well in high school, someone who perhaps was quiet and not very popular, who shows up at your 20th reunion on the arm of a loudmouthed boor—think a cross between Herb Tarlek and David Duke—who tells offensive stories and racist jokes. She thinks he’s wonderful and laughs at everything he says.

But what she really enjoys, all these years after high school, is how uncomfortable he’s making you.

And this, in brief, is the problem for Kamala Harris in this election. She and others have likely hoped that, at some point, Trump will reveal himself as such an obvious, existential threat that even many Republican voters will walk away from him. (She delivered a short statement today emphasizing Kelly’s comments.) For millions of the GOP faithful, however, Trump’s daily attempts to breach new frontiers of hideousness are not offensive but reassuring. They want Trump to be awful—precisely because the people they view as their political foes will be so appalled if he wins. If Trump’s campaign was focused on handing out tax breaks and lowering gas prices, he’d be losing, because for his base, none of that yawn-inducing policy stuff is transgressive enough to be exciting. (Just ask Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who each in their own way tried to run as a Trump alternative.)

Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story—I wrote an entire book about it—but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.


So here you have it folks. We have part of the country who believe they are entitled and that others are taking what they BELIEVE THEY are entitled to and worked so hard for away. I just happen to fit the description of one of those others even as my ancestors worked for free and our free labor saved America so much money that it could become wealthy.Then my parents and grandprents just happened to pay taxes for programs that provided the types of people that support Trump today wth the things that allowed the white middle class to be created. WhiLe they were paying taxes to help create that midde class, they lived at an 80 percent rate of poverty in the 30's and a 55 percent rate just before Johnson implemented that Great Society program that trump supporters today blame fot the destruction of the back familiy, even though I had mom and dad with me as I grew up, and so did virtually every other black kid in our neighborhood.

In 2 weeks America could be looking at the beginning of the end because a group of people believe in an imaginary place that they want to go back to that never existed.
its been proven as a fake story published by the the same degenerate that said Trump called dead soldiers losers also claimed Trump refused to pay 60 thousand dollars for a slain soldier .. ..

 
its been proven as a fake story published by the the same degenerate that said Trump called dead soldiers losers also claimed Trump refused to pay 60 thousand dollars for a slain soldier .. ..
The White House has no payment recorded. Some of the costs have been met by various other parties.
 
You would think his lazy ass could come up with something better. At least sometimes.
I did, and you're reading it.
its been proven as a fake story published by the the same degenerate that said Trump called dead soldiers losers also claimed Trump refused to pay 60 thousand dollars for a slain soldier .. ..

It hasn't been proven false.
 
Can you tell how panicky IM2 is now? LOL It's over cupcake you lost. AMERICA WON.
I made that mistake in 2020 thinking there was no way Biden could win even though the polls had Biden up nearly 10 points nationally .. I believed that polls favored Dems by several points because Hillary was up 6 points in oct 2016 .. now Trump is dead even in the national polls and slightly up in swing states I don't take it for granted that she will win ! republicans need to get out and vote to insure Dems don't win ..
 
Trump’s Depravity Will Not Cost Him This Election

Many Americans know exactly who Trump is, and they like it.

By Tom Nichols

Yesterday, The Atlantic published another astonishing story by editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg about Trump’s hatred of the military. The reporting included, among other things, the retired general and former Trump chief of staff John Kelly confirming on the record that “Trump used the terms suckers and losers to describe soldiers who gave their lives in the defense of our country,” a fact that Goldberg had first reported in September 2020. (Team Trump, unsurprisingly, continues to deny the story.) Not long after the publication of yesterday’s article, The New York Times published excerpts from interviews with Kelly in which Kelly said—on tape, no less—that Trump fits the definition of a fascist.

Like many of Trump’s critics, I’ve repeatedly asked one question over the years: What’s it going to take? When will Republican leaders and millions of Trump voters finally see the immorality of supporting such a man? Surely, with these latest revelations, we’ve reached the Moment, the Turning Point, the Line in the Sand, right?

Wrong. As New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu—one of the many former Trump critics now back on the Trump train—said today on CNN in response to a question about Kelly’s comments: “With a guy like [Trump], it’s kinda baked into the vote.”

The belief that at some point Trump voters will have finally had enough is an ordinary human response to seeing people you care about—in this case fellow citizens—associate with someone you know to be awful. Much like watching a friend in an unhealthy relationship, you think that each new outrage is going to be the one that provokes the final split, and yet it never does: Your friend, instead of breaking off the relationship, makes excuses. He didn’t mean it. You don’t understand him like I do.

But this analogy is wrong, because it’s based on the faulty assumption that one of the people in the relationship is unhappy. Maybe the better analogy is the friend you didn’t know very well in high school, someone who perhaps was quiet and not very popular, who shows up at your 20th reunion on the arm of a loudmouthed boor—think a cross between Herb Tarlek and David Duke—who tells offensive stories and racist jokes. She thinks he’s wonderful and laughs at everything he says.

But what she really enjoys, all these years after high school, is how uncomfortable he’s making you.

And this, in brief, is the problem for Kamala Harris in this election. She and others have likely hoped that, at some point, Trump will reveal himself as such an obvious, existential threat that even many Republican voters will walk away from him. (She delivered a short statement today emphasizing Kelly’s comments.) For millions of the GOP faithful, however, Trump’s daily attempts to breach new frontiers of hideousness are not offensive but reassuring. They want Trump to be awful—precisely because the people they view as their political foes will be so appalled if he wins. If Trump’s campaign was focused on handing out tax breaks and lowering gas prices, he’d be losing, because for his base, none of that yawn-inducing policy stuff is transgressive enough to be exciting. (Just ask Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who each in their own way tried to run as a Trump alternative.)

Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story—I wrote an entire book about it—but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.


So here you have it folks. We have part of the country who believe they are entitled and that others are taking what they BELIEVE THEY are entitled to and worked so hard for away. I just happen to fit the description of one of those others even as my ancestors worked for free and our free labor saved America so much money that it could become wealthy.Then my parents and grandprents just happened to pay taxes for programs that provided the types of people that support Trump today wth the things that allowed the white middle class to be created. WhiLe they were paying taxes to help create that midde class, they lived at an 80 percent rate of poverty in the 30's and a 55 percent rate just before Johnson implemented that Great Society program that trump supporters today blame fot the destruction of the back familiy, even though I had mom and dad with me as I grew up, and so did virtually every other black kid in our neighborhood.

In 2 weeks America could be looking at the beginning of the end because a group of people believe in an imaginary place that they want to go back to that never existed.
Beginning of the end? I guess it could be the beginning of the end for the Democrat Party! What are you going to do if Trump gets into office...lessens inflation...creates good jobs...secures the border...brings peace to the Middle East...brings peace to Ukraine...and makes us energy independent? Why would anyone vote for a Progressive after all of that happens?
 
Beginning of the end? I guess it could be the beginning of the end for the Democrat Party! What are you going to do if Trump gets into office...lessens inflation...creates good jobs...secures the border...brings peace to the Middle East...brings peace to Ukraine...and makes us energy independent? Why would anyone vote for a Progressive after all of that happens?
:th_believecrap:
 
Beginning of the end? I guess it could be the beginning of the end for the Democrat Party! What are you going to do if Trump gets into office...lessens inflation...creates good jobs...secures the border...brings peace to the Middle East...brings peace to Ukraine...and makes us energy independent? Why would anyone vote for a Progressive after all of that happens?
Trump is not going to do all of the things. He didn't do it last time and hes less capable now. The trump presidency you claim was imaginary. He was handed a growing economy from Obama and you guys gave him credit for work he didn't do. Now your sources of propaganda have lied about what Biden has done and once they can get trump in there, the stories wil change and trump will take credit for everything Bidens been teing you about that he has done that you refused to believe,
 
I made that mistake in 2020 thinking there was no way Biden could win even though the polls had Biden up nearly 10 points nationally .. I believed that polls favored Dems by several points because Hillary was up 6 points in oct 2016 .. now Trump is dead even in the national polls and slightly up in swing states I don't take it for granted that she will win ! republicans need to get out and vote to insure Dems don't win ..

This. It looks good for Trump but my attitude is anything can happen
 
Trump is not going to do all of the things. He didn't do it last time and hes less capable now. The trump presidency you claim was imaginary. He was handed a growing economy from Obama and you guys gave him credit for work he didn't do. Now your sources of propaganda have lied about what Biden has done and once they can get trump in there, the stories wil change and trump will take credit for everything Bidens been teing you about that he has done that you refused to believe,
 
Trump is not going to do all of the things. He didn't do it last time and hes less capable now. The trump presidency you claim was imaginary. He was handed a growing economy from Obama and you guys gave him credit for work he didn't do. Now your sources of propaganda have lied about what Biden has done and once they can get trump in there, the stories wil change and trump will take credit for everything Bidens been teing you about that he has done that you refused to believe,
Trump did do it last time and he'll do it again. I can't wait to hear your explanation for that, IM2. Barack Obama gave us "The Great Recession" a weak economy that treaded water month after month despite near zero interest rates by the Fed for the longest period in the Fed's history!
 
Trump’s Depravity Will Not Cost Him This Election

Many Americans know exactly who Trump is, and they like it.

By Tom Nichols

Yesterday, The Atlantic published another astonishing story by editor in chief Jeffrey Goldberg about Trump’s hatred of the military. The reporting included, among other things, the retired general and former Trump chief of staff John Kelly confirming on the record that “Trump used the terms suckers and losers to describe soldiers who gave their lives in the defense of our country,” a fact that Goldberg had first reported in September 2020. (Team Trump, unsurprisingly, continues to deny the story.) Not long after the publication of yesterday’s article, The New York Times published excerpts from interviews with Kelly in which Kelly said—on tape, no less—that Trump fits the definition of a fascist.

Like many of Trump’s critics, I’ve repeatedly asked one question over the years: What’s it going to take? When will Republican leaders and millions of Trump voters finally see the immorality of supporting such a man? Surely, with these latest revelations, we’ve reached the Moment, the Turning Point, the Line in the Sand, right?

Wrong. As New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu—one of the many former Trump critics now back on the Trump train—said today on CNN in response to a question about Kelly’s comments: “With a guy like [Trump], it’s kinda baked into the vote.”

The belief that at some point Trump voters will have finally had enough is an ordinary human response to seeing people you care about—in this case fellow citizens—associate with someone you know to be awful. Much like watching a friend in an unhealthy relationship, you think that each new outrage is going to be the one that provokes the final split, and yet it never does: Your friend, instead of breaking off the relationship, makes excuses. He didn’t mean it. You don’t understand him like I do.

But this analogy is wrong, because it’s based on the faulty assumption that one of the people in the relationship is unhappy. Maybe the better analogy is the friend you didn’t know very well in high school, someone who perhaps was quiet and not very popular, who shows up at your 20th reunion on the arm of a loudmouthed boor—think a cross between Herb Tarlek and David Duke—who tells offensive stories and racist jokes. She thinks he’s wonderful and laughs at everything he says.

But what she really enjoys, all these years after high school, is how uncomfortable he’s making you.

And this, in brief, is the problem for Kamala Harris in this election. She and others have likely hoped that, at some point, Trump will reveal himself as such an obvious, existential threat that even many Republican voters will walk away from him. (She delivered a short statement today emphasizing Kelly’s comments.) For millions of the GOP faithful, however, Trump’s daily attempts to breach new frontiers of hideousness are not offensive but reassuring. They want Trump to be awful—precisely because the people they view as their political foes will be so appalled if he wins. If Trump’s campaign was focused on handing out tax breaks and lowering gas prices, he’d be losing, because for his base, none of that yawn-inducing policy stuff is transgressive enough to be exciting. (Just ask Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, who each in their own way tried to run as a Trump alternative.)

Some Trump voters may believe his lies. But plenty more want Trump to be terrifying and stomach-turning so that reelecting him will be a fully realized act of social revenge. Harris cannot propose any policy, offer any benefit, or adopt any position that competes with that feeling.

Exactly why so many Americans feel this way is a complicated story—I wrote an entire book about it—but a toxic combination of social resentment, entitlement, and racial insecurity drives many Trump voters to believe not only that other Americans are looking down on them but that they are doing so while living an undeservedly good life. These others must be punished or at least brought down to a common level of misery to balance the scales, and Trump is the guy to do it.


So here you have it folks. We have part of the country who believe they are entitled and that others are taking what they BELIEVE THEY are entitled to and worked so hard for away. I just happen to fit the description of one of those others even as my ancestors worked for free and our free labor saved America so much money that it could become wealthy.Then my parents and grandprents just happened to pay taxes for programs that provided the types of people that support Trump today wth the things that allowed the white middle class to be created. WhiLe they were paying taxes to help create that midde class, they lived at an 80 percent rate of poverty in the 30's and a 55 percent rate just before Johnson implemented that Great Society program that trump supporters today blame fot the destruction of the back familiy, even though I had mom and dad with me as I grew up, and so did virtually every other black kid in our neighborhood.

In 2 weeks America could be looking at the beginning of the end because a group of people believe in an imaginary place that they want to go back to that never existed.
In summary, the obama/biden/harris/walz junta is so horrible that trump even with all his faults has a chance to win

I suspect that election fraud will save the day for democrats, but trump does have a chance
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top