Personal attacks rules and desperately needed m
You do have an organized demograph here who likes to call anyone who might disagree with some political policy a terrorist or a terrorist supporter, for example. And they are a nasty, antagonistic, committed bunch, for sure. That gambit is most often invoked for the purpose of stimulating others of like mindsets and intent to gang up on people in the same, juvenile, antagonistic way whom they know will not stoop to their vitriolic level in return nor carry on with dialogue in that solicited way, observably. It's cowardice, really. People like that are not viable and valuabe in any setting where there is an expectation of civil, relevant and meanigful dialogue.
This Mickey Mousery is intended to deter from any civil, meaningful dialogue. And that's usually what happens.
These are very low value posters because that's primarily their intent here.
I had responded to one of the more primary, habitual purveyors of that gambit earlier in the thread when I had mentioned directly to that particular purveyor that the user should be thankful he's still allowed around here.
Bad element, those types. Intelligent, relevant, meaningful, civil dialogue is not possible when this gambit dominates.
Just juvenile, low value smut, really, that only serves to degrade the board further.
And, really, that's the intent with those types, observably.
And then there is the cry victimhood when you call em out on it. It's laughable...