I don't condone it, but it's "officers" like this who give them such a bad reputation. I agree with B. Tatum once again. This man should have gotten arrested or fired at the very least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't condone it, but it's "officers" like this who give them such a bad reputation. I agree with B. Tatum once again. This man should have gotten arrested or fired at the very least.
There are changes needed in policing but defunding is not one of them.
I don't condone it, but it's "officers" like this who give them such a bad reputation. I agree with B. Tatum once again. This man should have gotten arrested or fired at the very least.
I believe that most cities where this has been considered by city counsels, the real goal was not to abolish the police but rather to reduce police budgets to get enough funds to hire "community service officers" who would support crime prevention, investigation, and response where full police powers are unnecessary. Ask any policeman, and you will hear about the many cases dealing with non-violent situations, dogs pooping on neighbor yards, kid's pranks, parents fighting to save their kids from drugs, trespassing, shoplifting, other petty crimes, abandon cars, mental illness, senior who wander always from home etc. Also, there are many domestic problems where follow up is needed but not by the police. The ideas I have heard that make sense is having these community service officers work closely with police. Where 911 can identify the situation as being non-violent, a community service officer would be dispatched.I know, but you can understand why people want to. Like I stated in my OP, I definitely don't condone it.