This is what voting against your self-interests looks like.

[pknopp]

Or maybe what they can't conceive of supporting anything beyond short term personal gain.

That's why we have a $37 trillion and growing debt.

 

[dblack]

That's why we have a $37 trillion and growing debt.

Pretty much.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Affidavit of Support | USCIS

Form I-864, Affidavit of Support under Section 213A of the INA, is a contract an individual signs agreeing to use their financial resources to support the intending immigrant named on the affidavit. The individual who signs the affidavit of support becomes the sponsor once the intending...

www.uscis.gov

Here you go, you ****** fraud lefties.

SPONSOR ILLEGALS….BECAUSE YOU CARE SO MUCH.

Affidavit of Support​

Form I-864, Affidavit of Support under Section 213A of the INA, is a contract an individual signs agreeing to use their financial resources to support the intending immigrant named on the affidavit. The individual who signs the affidavit of support becomes the sponsor once the intending immigrant becomes a lawful permanent resident. The sponsor is usually the petitioner who filed an immigrant petition on behalf of the intending immigrant.

An affidavit of support is a legally enforceable contract, and the sponsor’s responsibility usually lasts until the family member or other individual either becomes a U.S. citizen, or is credited with 40 quarters of work (usually 10 years).

The law concerning the affidavit of support is found in Sections 212(a)(4) and 213A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The provisions are codified in Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 8 CFR 213a.

Lets go you phony *****.

Pledge to provide for illegals. Post the sworn affidavit to this site.

You USMB lefties are not just shit talking bubbleheads, are you?

IF IT IS SO IMPORTANT TO YOU, PROVIDE FOR ILLEGALS.

 

[justoffal]

As GOP weighs Obamacare cuts, the party’s constituents are more likely to use marketplace coverage, poll finds​

Republicans on Capitol Hill are weighing legislation that’s estimated to cut billions of dollars of funding for the Affordable Care Act and cause millions of people to lose their health insurance. Many of their constituents may not be happy about it, polling suggests.

Nearly half, 45%, of adults enrolled in a health plan offered through the ACA insurance marketplace identify as Republicans, according to a new survey by KFF, a nonpartisan group that conducts health policy research.

(More than three-quarters of those Republican ACA users identify as “MAGA” Republicans. Those MAGA Republicans represent 31% of ACA purchasers overall.)

Meanwhile, 35% of Democrats get their health insurance through the ACA, KFF found.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/gop-weighs-aca-marketplace-cuts-republicans-more-likely-to-use-it.html

To be clear, the voters I'm referring to are not congressional Repubs voting to screw their own constituents. I'm referring to rank and file Repubs who rely on the ACA for their healthcare because it is not offered by their employer.......if they have one.

But hey, who needs healthcare, or an education for your kids...

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/16/politics/trump-education-funding-invs

........when you get to sit down at your TV each night and be entertained watching The trump Show.

The only hope for the future of health care is to go back to the private market. Yes they are dishonest bastards but the Marxist lean that Obamacare put on national health care has driven up the average cost of every service by 200%.

 

[pknopp]

The only hope for the future of health care is to go back to the private market. Yes they are dishonest bastards but the Marxist lean that Obamacare put on national health care has driven up the average cost of every service by 200%.

At most, Obamacare did nothing to address the ever rising cost of health care. It was done to address the fact many could not afford coverage or health care.

 

[BluesLegend]

This is what voting against your self-interests looks like.​

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Can you say that in English please? Somehow your thoughts got lost in translation.

It was fairly clear.

 

[berg80]

The only hope for the future of health care is to go back to the private market. Yes they are dishonest bastards but the Marxist lean that Obamacare put on national health care has driven up the average cost of every service by 200%.

Care to explain why nations with a nationalized healthcare system pay less per capita for the population they cover but get better health results than the US? If not for the negotiating power of the government thru its Medicare/caid program, refusing to pay the exorbitant fees the private market tries to charge, cost inflation would be thru the roof.

 

[dblack]

Care to explain why nations with a nationalized healthcare system pay less per capita for the population they cover but get better health results than the US? If not for the negotiating power of the government thru its Medicare/caid program, refusing to pay the exorbitant fees the private market tries to charge, cost inflation would be thru the roof.

Sure. The more control you have over something, the more you can "save". We would probably see similar "savings" if we nationalized groceries stores.

 

[berg80]

Senate Republicans Propose Gutting Medicaid Further To Make Trump Tax Cuts Permanent​

The Senate Finance Committee, which oversees changes made to taxes and social safety net programs like Medicare and Medicaid, dropped their portion of edits to House Republicans’ reconciliation package on Monday afternoon.

Committee Republicans propose steeper cuts to certain programs, including Medicaid and the Child Tax Credit, in order to make President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts permanent. The panel has also proposed a slower phase out on the Biden-era clean energy tax credits, though experts point out the overall effect would still be equal to gutting the clean energy incentives.

Many Senate Republicans have vocalized issues with a handful of provisions in the House version of the bill — Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) has warned against a “full-scale repeal” of current energy tax credits; Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MS) has made some noise about cutting Medicaid; Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) goes back-and-forth daily about whether he’s content with the federal spending cuts outlined in the bill.

Senate Republicans Propose Gutting Medicaid Further To Make Trump Tax Cuts Permanent

The Senate Finance Committee, which oversees changes made to taxes and social...

talkingpointsmemo.com

The POT is all in on the "don't get sick" healthcare plan so the rich can buy better bottles of wine.

 

[berg80]

Sure. The more control you have over something, the more you can "save". We would probably see similar "savings" if we nationalized groceries stores.

And save is in quotations marks because.................?

Here's what AI has to say.........A nationalized healthcare system, also known as single-payer healthcare, could potentially lead to better health outcomes while spending less money compared to the current US system. This is achieved by streamlining administration, eliminating insurance company profits, and negotiating lower drug prices, ultimately reducing overall costs. While there are potential downsides like longer wait times for certain procedures, the overall consensus among researchers suggests that a single-payer system could improve health outcomes and reduce costs.

 

[dblack]

And save is in quotations marks because.................?

Because I don't necessarily trust your numbers, but it's beside the point. Which of course you ignored. Here it is again:

"The more control you have over something, the more you can "save". We would probably see similar "savings" if we nationalized groceries stores."

Government can dictate whatever we want. We can save ourselves all kinds of money that way. Do we want to??

Would you be in favor of nationalizing grocery stores. I bet we could save a lot of money that way.

Here's what AI has to say....

AI is merely an echo of all the shit people say on the internet. Garbage in, garbage out.

 

[Stann]

As GOP weighs Obamacare cuts, the party’s constituents are more likely to use marketplace coverage, poll finds​

Republicans on Capitol Hill are weighing legislation that’s estimated to cut billions of dollars of funding for the Affordable Care Act and cause millions of people to lose their health insurance. Many of their constituents may not be happy about it, polling suggests.

Nearly half, 45%, of adults enrolled in a health plan offered through the ACA insurance marketplace identify as Republicans, according to a new survey by KFF, a nonpartisan group that conducts health policy research.

(More than three-quarters of those Republican ACA users identify as “MAGA” Republicans. Those MAGA Republicans represent 31% of ACA purchasers overall.)

Meanwhile, 35% of Democrats get their health insurance through the ACA, KFF found.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/gop-weighs-aca-marketplace-cuts-republicans-more-likely-to-use-it.html

To be clear, the voters I'm referring to are not congressional Repubs voting to screw their own constituents. I'm referring to rank and file Repubs who rely on the ACA for their healthcare because it is not offered by their employer.......if they have one.

But hey, who needs healthcare, or an education for your kids...

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/16/politics/trump-education-funding-invs

........when you get to sit down at your TV each night and be entertained watching The trump Show.

Bottom line : The biggest betrayal of the American people ever.

 

[justoffal]

Bottom line : The biggest betrayal of the American people ever.

Depends on who you're talking to. Obamacare gave coverage to some at the expense of others.
A lot of those some are people who didn't want to support themselves. Time to reverse that.

 

[pknopp]

Depends on who you're talking to. Obamacare gave coverage to some at the expense of others.
A lot of those some are people who didn't want to support themselves. Time to reverse that.

Yeah, screw the sick.

 

[norwegen]

Self-interest isn't what motivates conscientious, red-blooded Americans to vote. It's what motivates Democrats to vote.

 

[Meathead]

Yeah, screw the sick.

I wouldn't, but we're all different. STDs are a *****.

 

[justoffal]

Yeah, screw the sick.

Sick people are genuinely deserving of help.
Fat, lazy.... Drug addicted social parasites are not.

 

[Stann]

Depends on who you're talking to. Obamacare gave coverage to some at the expense of others.
A lot of those some are people who didn't want to support themselves. Time to reverse that.

So you believe people should not have health care. In the richest country of the world , we can't afford to give everyone healthcare. I believe we should. Right now we have half measures. We should do it right and have universal coverage.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

As GOP weighs Obamacare cuts, the party’s constituents are more likely to use marketplace coverage, poll finds​

Republicans on Capitol Hill are weighing legislation that’s estimated to cut billions of dollars of funding for the Affordable Care Act and cause millions of people to lose their health insurance. Many of their constituents may not be happy about it, polling suggests.

Nearly half, 45%, of adults enrolled in a health plan offered through the ACA insurance marketplace identify as Republicans, according to a new survey by KFF, a nonpartisan group that conducts health policy research.

(More than three-quarters of those Republican ACA users identify as “MAGA” Republicans. Those MAGA Republicans represent 31% of ACA purchasers overall.)

Meanwhile, 35% of Democrats get their health insurance through the ACA, KFF found.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/10/gop-weighs-aca-marketplace-cuts-republicans-more-likely-to-use-it.html

To be clear, the voters I'm referring to are not congressional Repubs voting to screw their own constituents. I'm referring to rank and file Repubs who rely on the ACA for their healthcare because it is not offered by their employer.......if they have one.

But hey, who needs healthcare, or an education for your kids...

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/16/politics/trump-education-funding-invs

........when you get to sit down at your TV each night and be entertained watching The trump Show.

Only a lib. Would suggest conservatives can't be poor. Cutting funding can and should also be cutting off waste, which the gov. Is known to do in all and every phases and departments.