This is what systemic racism looks like

I don’t know if you are playing dumb or you are dumb.
You can't do it. Please show me any company that is hiring people just because they are white. I know you can point to a statistic and say that's it, but you can't show where that statistics reflects the reason those people were hired. You just assume it's because they are white.
 
You can't do it. Please show me any company that is hiring people just because they are white. I know you can point to a statistic and say that's it, but you can't show where that statistics reflects the reason those people were hired. You just assume it's because they are white.
Companies have NEVER done that, everything is equal now. Only the most qualified candidates are hired today.
 
Recognizing the various cultures people come from isn't what racism is, Moron.... :lol:
It can be. Race and culture are often intertwined. I am sure you understand, considering your culture places a higher social status on lighter skin.
 
It can be. Race and culture are often intertwined. I am sure you understand, considering your culture places a higher social status on lighter skin.
:lol:

Look at you trying to project. See culture isn't biological you Dipshit, it's a choice. I don't support racism or colorism nor do I venerate the people who do. You do that and then are so ashamed of it you try to paint me with it. Be proud of who you are, frail boy. :itsok:
 
Is that why whites are 60 percent of the population but 76 percent of all employed workers?

There is no systemic racism against whites.
You overlook merit

The best workers deserve the job first not the ones with the darkest skin
 
:lol:

Look at you trying to project. See culture isn't biological you Dipshit, it's a choice. I don't support racism or colorism nor do I venerate the people who do. You do that and then are so ashamed of it you try to paint me with it. Be proud of who you are, frail boy. :itsok:
You have already outed yourself as a racist. You have celebrated the displacement of a racial group and called them “cucks”. Sorry my light-skinned fren, you are a racist.

No one “venerates” Jefferson for being a slaver. But you keep that same bigotry live in your heart.

I guess you don’t think cultures can be racist. So according to you Nazi, Germany was not a racist culture. White America, is not a racist culture. A bunch of pot-smoking former slavers who value light skin over dark skin, not racist. Got it.
 
Well, there are damn sure enough white ones to help remove that racist trait from your ass.
Says the guy who would choose a neurosurgeon based solely on the color of his skin…….. Sorry brudder, you are the racist.
 
This is racism!
Gge_CQ7WEAA5O3J
 
Right. It logically brings into question the credibility and qualifications of anyone non-white regardless of their talent. Totally unfair to those minorities of merit but unless they object first, it won’t change.
Apologies. I misread this post and originally thought you missed the point. But on second look, I agree.

One of my dearest friends was one of the most intelligent, capable, intuitive, remarkable people I've ever had the pleasure to know. A highly honored success in her field. But as a black woman she said she was discriminated against far more for being a woman than she ever was for being black.

But the one thing that bugged her most was the impression that she got her job, promotions, position because she was black and not because she worked hard for them, merited them, deserved them. Affirmative action was not a good thing for her and had had no place in her success.

When this administration indicated they would be hiring/appointing based on gender, transgender, sexual orientation, skin color, it immediately diminished anyone hired as being a DEI pick and not because they were qualified and deserving of their respective positions.

And because so many of those hires/appointees actually were unsuited for their jobs or performed so miserably in them, it only reinforced any negative opinions anyone had of any of those respective groups however unfair that might be.
 
Apologies. I misread this post and originally thought you missed the point. But on second look, I agree.

One of my dearest friends was one of the most intelligent, capable, intuitive, remarkable people I've ever had the pleasure to know. A highly honored success in her field. But as a black woman she said she was discriminated against far more for being a woman than she ever was for being black.

But the one thing that bugged her most was the impression that she got her job, promotions, position because she was black and not because she worked hard for them, merited them, deserved them. Affirmative action was not a good thing for her and had had no place in her success.

When this administration indicated they would be hiring/appointing based on gender, transgender, sexual orientation, skin color, it immediately diminished anyone hired as being a DEI pick and not because they were qualified and deserving of their respective positions.

And because so many of those hires/appointees actually were unsuited for their jobs or performed so miserably in them, it only reinforced any negative opinions anyone had of any of those respective groups however unfair that might be.
It’s the stipulation of being female and black that Ubangi Jackson should have cited in turning down her SCOTUS nomination.
By not rejecting the nomination for being based on those terms, she demonstrated that she was unqualified, lacking the objectivity to be an effective justice.
That’s logic.
 
Back
Top Bottom