This is Hamas

[gipper]

As is almost always the case with your posts, this is totally irrelevant to the point that the Palestinians as almost all Arabs were radicalized by Islam since the seventh century and not by anything Israel did.

Your ignorant hatred of the Palestinians allows you to accept lies as truth.

It is most ironic dumb Americans like yourself, who likely descend from Europeans who committed real atrocities for centuries against Jews, while Jews lived in relative peace among Arabs and Muslims for centuries.

For the Arabs, and the above all for the 1.2 million Arabs of Palestine, the partitioning of the land in which they had been a majority for seven centuries seemed a monstrous injustice thrust upon them by white Western imperialism in expiation of a crime they had not committed. With few exceptions, the Jewish people had dwelt in relative security among the Arabs over the centuries. The golden age of the Diaspora had come in the Spain of the caliphs, and the Ottoman Turks had welcomed the Jews when the doors of much of Europe were closed to them. The ghastly chain of crimes perpetrated on the Jewish people culminating in the crematoriums of Germany had been inflicted on them by the Christian nations of Europe, not those of the Islamic East, and it was on those nations, not theirs, the Arabs maintained, that the burden of those sins should fall. Beyond that, seven hundred years of continuous occupation seemed to the Arabs a far more valid claim to the land than the Jews' historic ties, however deep.
Larry Collins, Ô Jérusalem

Read his book O Jerusalem, written long ago. It will prove without a doubt how ignorant you are. John Lawrence Collins Jr.

GET INFORMED!!!!

 

[Roudy]

Your ignorant hatred of the Palestinians allows you to accept lies as truth.

It is most ironic dumb Americans like yourself, who likely descend from Europeans who committed real atrocities for centuries against Jews, while Jews lived in relative peace among Arabs and Muslims for centuries.

For the Arabs, and the above all for the 1.2 million Arabs of Palestine, the partitioning of the land in which they had been a majority for seven centuries seemed a monstrous injustice thrust upon them by white Western imperialism in expiation of a crime they had not committed. With few exceptions, the Jewish people had dwelt in relative security among the Arabs over the centuries. The golden age of the Diaspora had come in the Spain of the caliphs, and the Ottoman Turks had welcomed the Jews when the doors of much of Europe were closed to them. The ghastly chain of crimes perpetrated on the Jewish people culminating in the crematoriums of Germany had been inflicted on them by the Christian nations of Europe, not those of the Islamic East, and it was on those nations, not theirs, the Arabs maintained, that the burden of those sins should fall. Beyond that, seven hundred years of continuous occupation seemed to the Arabs a far more valid claim to the land than the Jews' historic ties, however deep.
Larry Collins, Ô Jérusalem

Read his book O Jerusalem, written long ago. It will prove without a doubt how ignorant you are. John Lawrence Collins Jr.

GET INFORMED!!!!

And the Nazi Mufti was Trying to do the same to Jews in Israel, you ignorant illiterate fool.

Hitler's Mufti

Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini.

www.catholic.com

Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. “Hitler’s Mufti,” as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.

 

[gipper]

Your ancestors likely murdered Jews in the many pogroms, committed by your forefathers.

 

[gipper]

And the Nazi Mufti was Trying to do the same to Jews in Israel, you ignorant illiterate fool.

Hitler's Mufti

Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini.

www.catholic.com

Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. “Hitler’s Mufti,” as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.

One would think you’d learn from your ancestors mistakes. They mass murdered Jews on an industrial scale for centuries. Yet now, you want to do the exact same thing to Muslims and Arabs.

Can’t fix stupid.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Your ignorant hatred of the Palestinians allows you to accept lies as truth.

It is most ironic dumb Americans like yourself, who likely descend from Europeans who committed real atrocities for centuries against Jews, while Jews lived in relative peace among Arabs and Muslims for centuries.

For the Arabs, and the above all for the 1.2 million Arabs of Palestine, the partitioning of the land in which they had been a majority for seven centuries seemed a monstrous injustice thrust upon them by white Western imperialism in expiation of a crime they had not committed. With few exceptions, the Jewish people had dwelt in relative security among the Arabs over the centuries. The golden age of the Diaspora had come in the Spain of the caliphs, and the Ottoman Turks had welcomed the Jews when the doors of much of Europe were closed to them. The ghastly chain of crimes perpetrated on the Jewish people culminating in the crematoriums of Germany had been inflicted on them by the Christian nations of Europe, not those of the Islamic East, and it was on those nations, not theirs, the Arabs maintained, that the burden of those sins should fall. Beyond that, seven hundred years of continuous occupation seemed to the Arabs a far more valid claim to the land than the Jews' historic ties, however deep.
Larry Collins, Ô Jérusalem

Read his book O Jerusalem, written long ago. It will prove without a doubt how ignorant you are. John Lawrence Collins Jr.

GET INFORMED!!!!

What the Europeans did to the Jews over the centuries is completely irrelevant to the source of the conflict between Jews and Muslims today. From the earliest days of Islamic civilization, a core value of Muslim culture, law and religion has been to hold Jews and other Non Muslims as inferior to Muslims and to allow the persecution and humiliation of them under Sharia law, making every Muslim state an apartheid state throughout the history of Islam.

When the Jews who immigrated to Palestine in the early 20th century refused to live as second class citizens, the Arabs attacked them with the full support of the Arab nations and that Muslim determination to deny Jews the same rights as Muslims is the sole cause of the present conflict.

After the British announced they would withdraw from Palestine in May of 1948, the UN struggled to find some equitable compromise both the Palestinian Arabs and the Palestinian Jews would accept, but the Arabs, still fully committed to preventing the Jews having the same rights as Muslims, rejected all offers and since it would have been a violation of the rights and values in the UN charter to promote another Arab apartheid state, the UN had no choice but to suggest a partition of the land. The Arab response was to threaten to massacre the Jews if they accepted the UN's offer and judging by the way the Arab nations have responded to Hamas, the Arab nations appear to think the massacre of the Jews is still the best solution.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Jews are winning, as always, and always will be winning.

 

[gipper]

What the Europeans did to the Jews over the centuries is completely irrelevant to the source of the conflict between Jews and Muslims today. From the earliest days of Islamic civilization, a core value of Muslim culture, law and religion has been to hold Jews and other Non Muslims as inferior to Muslims and to allow the persecution and humiliation of them under Sharia law, making every Muslim state an apartheid state throughout the history of Islam.

When the Jews who immigrated to Palestine in the early 20th century refused to live as second class citizens, the Arabs attacked them with the full support of the Arab nations and that Muslim determination to deny Jews the same rights as Muslims is the sole cause of the present conflict.

After the British announced they would withdraw from Palestine in May of 1948, the UN struggled to find some equitable compromise both the Palestinian Arabs and the Palestinian Jews would accept, but the Arabs, still fully committed to preventing the Jews having the same rights as Muslims, rejected all offers and since it would have been a violation of the rights and values in the UN charter to promote another Arab apartheid state, the UN had no choice but to suggest a partition of the land. The Arab response was to threaten to massacre the Jews if they accepted the UN's offer and judging by the way the Arab nations have responded to Hamas, the Arab nations appear to think the massacre of the Jews is still the best solution.

You know what Christians did to Jews for centuries was wrong, yet you support the exact same treatment be applied to Muslims today.

Learn from your mistakes.

 

[Shusha]

For the Arabs, and the above all for the 1.2 million Arabs of Palestine, the partitioning of the land in which they had been a majority for seven centuries seemed a monstrous injustice thrust upon them by white Western imperialism in expiation of a crime they had not committed. With few exceptions, the Jewish people had dwelt in relative security among the Arabs over the centuries. The golden age of the Diaspora had come in the Spain of the caliphs, and the Ottoman Turks had welcomed the Jews when the doors of much of Europe were closed to them. The ghastly chain of crimes perpetrated on the Jewish people culminating in the crematoriums of Germany had been inflicted on them by the Christian nations of Europe, not those of the Islamic East, and it was on those nations, not theirs, the Arabs maintained, that the burden of those sins should fall. Beyond that, seven hundred years of continuous occupation seemed to the Arabs a far more valid claim to the land than the Jews' historic ties, however deep.
Larry Collins, Ô Jérusalem

Apologetics for colonialism.

This reads: We, the colonizers, have exclusive rights to the land in its entirety rather than the indigenous peoples of that land, who are to have no rights to their own homeland. Because we've been here a while. Because we forced a majority upon the indigenous peoples. Because we've been less frequently violent against the indigenous peoples than the previous invaders.

The right of the indigenous Jewish peoples to self-determination; to preservation of their culture, history, language; to create a nation which holds to their values and their way of life does not exist on the sufferance of others, let alone on the sufferance of invaders and colonizers.

The indigenous Jewish people have decolonized (parts) of their homeland and re-asserted the right to self-determination and sovereignty.

 

[toomuchtime_]

You know what Christians did to Jews for centuries was wrong, yet you support the exact same treatment be applied to Muslims today.

Learn from your mistakes.

Of course, just the opposite is true. It is the Muslims determination to continue the persecution of Jews that is the source of the conflict.

 

[gipper]

Apologetics for colonialism.

This reads: We, the colonizers, have exclusive rights to the land in its entirety rather than the indigenous peoples of that land, who are to have no rights to their own homeland. Because we've been here a while. Because we forced a majority upon the indigenous peoples. Because we've been less frequently violent against the indigenous peoples than the previous invaders.

The right of the indigenous Jewish peoples to self-determination; to preservation of their culture, history, language; to create a nation which holds to their values and their way of life does not exist on the sufferance of others, let alone on the sufferance of invaders and colonizers.

The indigenous Jewish people have decolonized (parts) of their homeland and re-asserted the right to self-determination and sovereignty.

Well then, they and you must expect consequences for your “decolonization.” People who lived on that land for over millennia aren’t likely to take kindly to bring colonized. I know you don’t care about these people, but you have to put yourself in their position. Something I suspect you aren’t intelligent enough to accomplish.

If the Native Americans were to revolt, steal land and murder the inhabitants, no doubt you’d approve of their actions. Because after all, its their homeland.

 

[Shusha]

Well then, they and you must expect consequences for your “decolonization.” People who lived on that land for over millennia aren’t likely to take kindly to bring colonized. I know you don’t care about these people, but you have to put yourself in their position. Something I suspect you aren’t intelligent enough to accomplish.

If the Native Americans were to revolt, steal land and murder the inhabitants, no doubt you’d approve of their actions. Because after all, its their homeland.

You entirely mischaracterize my beliefs. The rights of BOTH peoples should be recognized and BOTH peoples should be able to exercise those rights. The use of violence to prevent the recognition and exercise of rights of a peoples is abhorrent. The moral high ground was for the Arabs to accept one of the partition plans as a FAIR and EQUAL.

 

[Roudy]

One would think you’d learn from your ancestors mistakes. They mass murdered Jews on an industrial scale for centuries. Yet now, you want to do the exact same thing to Muslims and Arabs.

Can’t fix stupid.

Your ancestors your ancestors your ancestors, did the IslamoNazi worshipping illiterate monkey learn a new phrase?

The Mufti Husseini of Jerusalem was totally in bed with these same Nazis you keep harping about, and his genocidal Muslim Nazi army was responsible for killing tens of thousands of Jews AND Christians across eastern Europe during WWII:

Al-Husseini reached Rome in October 1941 and began serious discussions with the Mussolini regime. The result was twofold. First, he secured a meeting with Mussolini himself and then completed a practical agreement with the Italians. In return for Axis recognition of an Arab state of a fascist nature that would encompass Iraq, Syria, Palestine, and the Transjordan, he agreed to support the war against Britain. The Italian foreign ministry also urged Mussolini to grant al-Husseini one million lire.

The Mufti Meets the Führer​

Over the next few days, al-Husseini drafted a proposed statement of an Arab-Axis cooperative effort by which the Axis powers would recognize the right of the Arabs to deal with Jewish elements in Palestine and in the other Arab countries according to their own interests. The declaration was approved by Mussolini and sent to the German embassy in Rome. Pleased with the declaration, al-Husseini was invited to Berlin as an honored and useful guest of the Nazi regime. He arrived in Berlin on November 6 and met with Ernst von Weizsäcker, German secretary of state under Nazi Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. Two weeks later, he met with von Ribbentrop himself, a prelude to his triumphant reception on November 28, 1941, with Adolf Hitler.

At their meeting, al-Husseini requested German assistance with the Arab independence movement and Nazi support in the extermination of any Jewish homeland. For his part, Hitler promised to aid that liberation movement, but went still further, promising that the aim of Nazi Germany would be the elimination of all Jews living under British protection once such territories had been conquered. This was described by al-Husseini in his own memoirs:

Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish people in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: “The Jews are yours.” (Ami Isseroff and Peter FitzGerald-Morris, “The Iraq Coup Attempt of 1941, the Mufti, and the Farhud”)

 

[Roudy]

You know what Christians did to Jews for centuries was wrong, yet you support the exact same treatment be applied to Muslims today.

Learn from your mistakes.

Palestinians are the bastard Children of the marriage between Islamism and Nazism, learn from your mistakes.

The Mufti’s Final Solution​

Scholars have long studied how actively engaged al-Husseini was in the implementation of the Holocaust. There is no question that he supported the aims of the Nazis in perpetrating genocide and believed perversely that all Arabs should join that cause. He declared on German radio on March 1, 1944: “Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion. This saves your honor. God is with you” (qtd. in Norman Stillman, “Jews of the Arab World between European Colonialism, Zionism, and Arab Nationalism” in Judaism and Islam: Boundaries, Communications, and Interaction: Essays in Honor of William M. Brinner).

According to the testimony of Adolf Eichmann’s chief deputy Dieter Wisliceny (who was hanged for war crimes) the Mufti played a role in encouraging the Final Solution and was a close friend and advisor to Eichmann in the Holocaust’s implementation across Europe. Wisliceny testified further that al-Husseini had a close association with Heinrich Himmler and visited the gas chambers at Auschwitz, where he exhorted the staff to be even more dedicated in its important work.

To assist the practical slaughter of Jews and Christians, al-Husseini built an army of Muslim volunteer units for the Waffen-SS (the combat units of the dread SS) to operate for the Nazi cause in the Balkans. While the appeal for volunteers from among Muslims always struggled to meet the demands for new recruits, al-Husseini was able to organize three divisions of Bosnian Muslims who were then trained as elements of the Waffen-SS. The largest radical Muslim unit was the 13th Waffen-SS Handzar (“Dagger”) division that boasted over 21,000 men. They were joined by the Bosnian 23rd Waffen-SS Kama Division and the Albanian Skanderbeg 21st Waffen-SS Division. The Muslim Waffen-SS forces fought across the Balkans against Communist partisans and then assisted in the genocide of Yugoslavian Jews and in the persecution and slaughter of Gypsies and Christian Serbs in 1944 and 1945. The brutality extended to Catholics as well, for the Muslim Waffen-SS cut a path of destruction across the Balkans that encompassed a large number of Catholic parishes, churches, and shrines and resulted in the deaths of thousands of Catholics. By the end of the war, al-Husseini’s fanatical soldiers had killed over 90 percent of the Jews in Bosnia.



The Mufti’s Final Solution

 

[gipper]

You entirely mischaracterize my beliefs. The rights of BOTH peoples should be recognized and BOTH peoples should be able to exercise those rights. The use of violence to prevent the recognition and exercise of rights of a peoples is abhorrent. The moral high ground was for the Arabs to accept one of the partition plans as a FAIR and EQUAL.

I think you don’t know the history or understand it. You are under the belief that European Jews have every right to immigrate to Palestine, steal land and murder, because 2,000 years ago it was a Jewish nation. You purposely ignore the rights of the Palestinians.

Like I said, if Native Americans did the same today, you’d gladly give up your home to them. LOL.

 

[Shusha]

I think you don’t know the history or understand it. You are under the belief that European Jews have every right to immigrate to Palestine, steal land and murder, because 2,000 years ago it was a Jewish nation.

No, this is incorrect. (As in: it does not accurately reflect my beliefs).

I believe that indigenous peoples (that is - peoples with a distinct and recognizable culture attached to a homeland) have the inherent right of self-determination in their homeland, including in the form of State. I believe that these States have the right to determine immigration policies.

Every Jewish person is indigenous to Israel, Judea, and Samaria. Every Jew. It does not matter in which area of the world that Jew and their ancestors lived in Diaspora.

Your fascination with "European Jews" is telling. You are using "European" as a code word for "white" in an attempt to paint them as oppressors. Why do you ignore the Mizrahi Jews which make up half the population of Israel? Why are they not worthy of discussion?

No, I do not support theft. But then, you can't steal your own homeland. You can't steal land to which you have a legal sovereign claim.

It may be that you are conflating ownership of personal property with what we call in Canada "Crown Lands". Are there cases of theft of personal property? Shrug. Possibly. We would have to look case-by-case. Most of what is commonly referred to as "theft" of "Palestinian land" is the result of the complex interactions of Ottoman land use law, Jordanian law, and the legal application of Israeli law in Area C. Masafer Yatta is a fantastic example of these complex interactions.

And no, I do not support murder. I do support self-defense.

You purposely ignore the rights of the Palestinians.

And yet I continuously use the language of the rights of BOTH peoples. So, nope.

Like I said, if Native Americans did the same today, you’d gladly give up your home to them. LOL.

I would not give up my personal property to anyone. However, I do believe in the right of self-determination of the indigenous peoples of Canada, up to and including a sovereign State. You wouldn't support that? You would, rather, deny self-determination to the indigenous peoples and insist that the colonizers are the only ones with rights to self-determination and statehood? Are you quite certain you want to go down that road?

 

[Roudy]

I think you don’t know the history or understand it. You are under the belief that European Jews have every right to immigrate to Palestine, steal land and murder, because 2,000 years ago it was a Jewish nation. You purposely ignore the rights of the Palestinians.

Like I said, if Native Americans did the same today, you’d gladly give up your home to them. LOL.

You are of the belief that just because Arab Muslim savages invaded and looted people’s and lands hundreds of years ago, the land actually belongs to them. That includes the ancient Jewish homeland of Israel and part of Europe like Spain that they still lay claim to today.

Look it up in your own Koran Abdul, even your holy book gives Israel to the Jews as of 1400 years ago. You’d think if the so called Palestinians were the natives, Mohammad would have given them recognition.

 

[gipper]

You are of the belief that just because Arab Muslim savages invaded and looted people’s and lands hundreds of years ago, the land actually belongs to them. That includes the ancient Jewish homeland of Israel and part of Europe like Spain that they still lay claim to today.

Look it up in your own Koran Abdul, even your holy book gives Israel to the Jews as of 1400 years ago. You’d think if the so called Palestinians were the natives, Mohammad would have given them recognition.

Go blow Bibi again. Traitor.

Can you believe this antisemitic Jew…????

ISRAEL PREPARES ANOTHER INVASION
Seymour Hersh
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right supporters have made it clear that the nearly two million Gazans who were caught in the war that Hamas triggered eighteen months ago were never a subject of concern to the Israeli leadership as it began its round-the-clock bombing in response to the October 7 attack. They were just collateral damage. Israel remains unabashed and is ready to begin another round of retribution.
On March 18 Netanyahu broke the terms of a ceasefire with Hamas by authorizing a series of Israeli airstrikes that killed an estimated four hundred Gazans. The prime minister claimed, falsely, that he did so because Hamas had refused to unilaterally release more Israeli hostages. His goal was to take the war directly to the estimated twenty to twenty-five thousand surviving Hamas fighters still in Gaza, many operating in isolation or in small units, armed only with pistols and rifles. Desperate to stay in office, Netanyahu assured his people after October 7 that Hamas would “pay an unprecedented price” for killing more than twelve hundred Israelis and capturing 251 hostages. He meant what he said, but he and the Israeli public did not expect that Hamas would not yet be totally defeated while more than fifty thousand Gazans, the majority of them women and children, would become fatal victims of Israeli air and ground attacks. Those numbers could be much greater and do not account for the many injured and suffering psychological trauma after constant bombing and deprivation of food, clean water, housing, and basic health care
ISRAEL PREPARES ANOTHER INVASION

 

[gipper]

No, this is incorrect. (As in: it does not accurately reflect my beliefs).

I believe that indigenous peoples (that is - peoples with a distinct and recognizable culture attached to a homeland) have the inherent right of self-determination in their homeland, including in the form of State. I believe that these States have the right to determine immigration policies.

Every Jewish person is indigenous to Israel, Judea, and Samaria. Every Jew. It does not matter in which area of the world that Jew and their ancestors lived in Diaspora.

Your fascination with "European Jews" is telling. You are using "European" as a code word for "white" in an attempt to paint them as oppressors. Why do you ignore the Mizrahi Jews which make up half the population of Israel? Why are they not worthy of discussion?

No, I do not support theft. But then, you can't steal your own homeland. You can't steal land to which you have a legal sovereign claim.

It may be that you are conflating ownership of personal property with what we call in Canada "Crown Lands". Are there cases of theft of personal property? Shrug. Possibly. We would have to look case-by-case. Most of what is commonly referred to as "theft" of "Palestinian land" is the result of the complex interactions of Ottoman land use law, Jordanian law, and the legal application of Israeli law in Area C. Masafer Yatta is a fantastic example of these complex interactions.

And no, I do not support murder. I do support self-defense.

And yet I continuously use the language of the rights of BOTH peoples. So, nope.

I would not give up my personal property to anyone. However, I do believe in the right of self-determination of the indigenous peoples of Canada, up to and including a sovereign State. You wouldn't support that? You would, rather, deny self-determination to the indigenous peoples and insist that the colonizers are the only ones with rights to self-determination and statehood? Are you quite certain you want to go down that road?

 

[gipper]

No, this is incorrect. (As in: it does not accurately reflect my beliefs).

I believe that indigenous peoples (that is - peoples with a distinct and recognizable culture attached to a homeland) have the inherent right of self-determination in their homeland, including in the form of State. I believe that these States have the right to determine immigration policies.

Every Jewish person is indigenous to Israel, Judea, and Samaria. Every Jew. It does not matter in which area of the world that Jew and their ancestors lived in Diaspora.

Your fascination with "European Jews" is telling. You are using "European" as a code word for "white" in an attempt to paint them as oppressors. Why do you ignore the Mizrahi Jews which make up half the population of Israel? Why are they not worthy of discussion?

No, I do not support theft. But then, you can't steal your own homeland. You can't steal land to which you have a legal sovereign claim.

It may be that you are conflating ownership of personal property with what we call in Canada "Crown Lands". Are there cases of theft of personal property? Shrug. Possibly. We would have to look case-by-case. Most of what is commonly referred to as "theft" of "Palestinian land" is the result of the complex interactions of Ottoman land use law, Jordanian law, and the legal application of Israeli law in Area C. Masafer Yatta is a fantastic example of these complex interactions.

And no, I do not support murder. I do support self-defense.

And yet I continuously use the language of the rights of BOTH peoples. So, nope.

I would not give up my personal property to anyone. However, I do believe in the right of self-determination of the indigenous peoples of Canada, up to and including a sovereign State. You wouldn't support that? You would, rather, deny self-determination to the indigenous peoples and insist that the colonizers are the only ones with rights to self-determination and statehood? Are you quite certain you want to go down that road?

 

[Roudy]

Go blow Bibi again. Traitor.

Can you believe this antisemitic Jew…????

ISRAEL PREPARES ANOTHER INVASION
Seymour Hersh
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right supporters have made it clear that the nearly two million Gazans who were caught in the war that Hamas triggered eighteen months ago were never a subject of concern to the Israeli leadership as it began its round-the-clock bombing in response to the October 7 attack. They were just collateral damage. Israel remains unabashed and is ready to begin another round of retribution.
On March 18 Netanyahu broke the terms of a ceasefire with Hamas by authorizing a series of Israeli airstrikes that killed an estimated four hundred Gazans. The prime minister claimed, falsely, that he did so because Hamas had refused to unilaterally release more Israeli hostages. His goal was to take the war directly to the estimated twenty to twenty-five thousand surviving Hamas fighters still in Gaza, many operating in isolation or in small units, armed only with pistols and rifles. Desperate to stay in office, Netanyahu assured his people after October 7 that Hamas would “pay an unprecedented price” for killing more than twelve hundred Israelis and capturing 251 hostages. He meant what he said, but he and the Israeli public did not expect that Hamas would not yet be totally defeated while more than fifty thousand Gazans, the majority of them women and children, would become fatal victims of Israeli air and ground attacks. Those numbers could be much greater and do not account for the many injured and suffering psychological trauma after constant bombing and deprivation of food, clean water, housing, and basic health care
ISRAEL PREPARES ANOTHER INVASION

Go suck IslamoNazi terrorist cork, Hamas ass licker.

I’ll take what the son of Hamas founder says about your fake cause.