This is a thread for those on the LEFT to unequivocally condemn those celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

[Missourian]

You're wrong. You have that problem. You guys always want to pay the victim even while you're the perpetrator. The left is not the problem. You guys are.

Well said. A magnificent retort.

 

[Missourian]

You're wrong. You have that problem. You guys always want to pay the victim, even while you're the perpetrator. The left is not the problem. You guys are.

This guy is reported to have disliked the things Kirk was pushing. That's not leftist rhetoric that made him kill Kirk. It was Kirk's own fascist rhetoric that pissed this guy off to the point of murder. So you can just stop demanding the left do things you have never done when a democrat is hurt or killed, amd then take responsibility for the trash you people speak. It was Kirk's words tht this guy heard that made him do this, not some leftist..

From the Guardian...

This is going to be a very bad week for you.

Better change the oil and grease the bearings of your spin machine, cuz it's gonna get a workout.

 

[Cougarbear]

And put in bomb threats to black colleges.

Typical attempt to distract from the truth with a bogus made up hateful attack. When Floyd died, there were 574 riots, billions of dollars of black businesses destroyed and people killed. And all you can point at is some obscure made up bomb threat or Jan. 6th.

 

[Cougarbear]

BS.

What a winning argument.

 

[IM2]

What a winning argument.

It's all that needed to be said.

 

[Cougarbear]

You lied about the 2020 riots and the left. This is what you guys always do. And so now we have some self-righteous idiot demanding that only one side condemn this because he found a tweet. The left has given this far more grace than the right has about anything.

There were 574 riots after Floyd died. There are no riots since Kirk was executed by your sick leftist dictator commie minion.

 

[Chuz Life]

What a winning argument.

Message received, right?

"I don't like your message so I'm going to kill you."

Conservatives might want to adopt that philosophy of blaming the victim that way, going forward.

 

[Cougarbear]

Message received, right?

"I don't like your message so I'm going to kill you."

Conservatives might want to adopt that philosophy of blaming the victim that way, going forward.

That won’t happen. We see the problem. They creat the problem to cause more problems.

 

[JoeB131]

No one cares what you retract.

Here's an easy one.

Was Kamala Harris the best and most qualified choice for Vice President of the United States.

We don't have to quibble over her status as a DEI hire... Biden stated as fact his main qualifications were not merit based. The number one and number two qualifications were black and female. He never considered a man or any other race. The pool was limited to the best black female.

Females are 51% of the population.

Blacks are 13%.

Black females are 6.7% of the population.

Statistically speaking, is it possible to pick the BEST CANDIDATE if you first eliminate 93% of the population?

Depends on what you consider qualified.

Let's be honest, your party made Dan Quayle VP, and that guy was a complete idiot. You tried to make Sarah Palin VP. Fortunately, we dodged that bullet.

However, they were both selected because they bolstered the candidate's support among an important constituency - namely, evangelical Christians.

What qualified Harris was that winning in 2020 meant energizing women and blacks to vote, and that means she WAS the most qualified VP choice, if the purpose of the VP choice is to bolster the ticket's chances of winning.

 

[JoeB131]

He did not say black women , your a lazy liar.

If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.

No, a racist does not associate with different races. You actually have to prove that Kirk died be believing that certain races were inferior to others. That’s it you have nothing.

You could never prove the racism. You’re lazy you copy and paste stuff. And you surely could not hold a job at McDonald’s. horrible rhetoric you have and it’s a big problem for this country.

You’re a fraud too… going by your comments on foreign wars and your refusal to call out real racism.

Did someone cut your Borscht Ration again, Ivan? You seem a little grumpy on the Troll Farm now that we found out Kirk's killer was a fellow right-winger.

 

[JoeB131]

Hillary Clinton was from a very conservative household.

What's your point?

I'm reasonably sure Hillary didn't shoot Charlie Kirk.

I realize you think that she is responsible for a lot of deaths, from Vince Foster to Jeffrey Epstein, but she's just not that dangerous.


The thing is, all the evidence points to this guy being a right-wing follower of Nick Fuentes, from a family that has already been radicalized.

That's a far cry from Hillary growing up in a moderate Illinois Republican household in the 1950s. (Ah, the 1950's, when Republicans weren't batshit crazy!)

 

[JoeB131]

There were 574 riots after Floyd died. There are no riots since Kirk was executed by your sick leftist dictator commie minion.

not sure why you think that's meaningful.

Of course white people aren't going to "riot". There's no need to "riot" when you already have privilege.

 

[OODA_Loop]

The thing is, all the evidence points to this guy being a right-wing follower of Nick Fuentes, from a family that has already been radicalized.

Love to see all the evidence or hell just part of it. Standing by.

 

[Hollie]

the shooter's family is all maga, but the terrorists are democrats?

Where do you FAGATs get the conspiracy theory that " the shooter's family is all MAGA"?

 

[JoeB131]

Love to see all the evidence or hell just part of it. Standing by.

What is a 'groyper? What to know about Nick Fuentes' alt-right movement

Fuentes' band of extremist followers take their name from the underbelly of internet meme culture.

www.newsweek.com

Robinson's family said he had become "more political" in recent years, according to police. The markings on the bullet casings suggest the subject was steeped in meme culture and made references to online taunts and anti-fascist messages.

Groypers, Helldivers 2, Furries: What Do the Messages Left by Charlie Kirk’s Alleged Killer Actually Mean?

Suspect Tyler Robinson allegedly inscribed messages on bullet casings that reference video games and internet culture—but they hardly point toward a coherent ideology.

www.vanityfair.com

As of yet, little is known about Robinson’s alleged motivations or ideology. But the few details surrounding the 22-year old point toward a troubling trend: young shooter suspects who communicate primarily via obtuse memes and digitally inflected irony.

Some memes, however, aren’t so neutral. The young men who admired, and still admire, Charlie Kirk tend to be extremely online—which doesn’t necessarily mean that they all share exactly the same ideology. Internecine conflict between conservative factions is common, both on social media and at events for young conservatives. The most notable of these are the “Groyper Wars” of 2019. “Groypers” are fans of white nationalist agitator Nick Fuentes who like to hide their racism behind ironic jokes; when Kirk began making an effort to mainstream his ultra-right-wing Turning Point USA movement, Fuentes instructed them to publicly troll Kirk.

A Facebook photo in which Robinson appears to reference a Groyper meme has led to early speculation that Kirk’s killing may have been an outgrowth of these intra-far-right skirmishes. But another feature of the modern far-right is an embrace of the post-truth huckster. In these circles, it’s always possible that someone is playing a character—or will claim to be doing so, muddying the waters so no one can accuse them of having a sincere belief beyond the desire to rile up their targets. For people like this, the whole world is a forum board, where lewd public comments and real-world violence are becoming increasingly interchangeable. (Consider the messages left behind by the deceased shooter of Annunciation Catholic School, which were full of references to both other shooters and innocuous memes.)

 

[Rawley]

Well, you do leave the important part out.

The fact this kid was from a conservative, Mormon household of gun enthusiasts certainly does change the narrative, doesn't it?

Nope

 

[OODA_Loop]

What is a 'groyper? What to know about Nick Fuentes' alt-right movement

Fuentes' band of extremist followers take their name from the underbelly of internet meme culture.

www.newsweek.com

Robinson's family said he had become "more political" in recent years, according to police. The markings on the bullet casings suggest the subject was steeped in meme culture and made references to online taunts and anti-fascist messages.

Groypers, Helldivers 2, Furries: What Do the Messages Left by Charlie Kirk’s Alleged Killer Actually Mean?

Suspect Tyler Robinson allegedly inscribed messages on bullet casings that reference video games and internet culture—but they hardly point toward a coherent ideology.

www.vanityfair.com

As of yet, little is known about Robinson’s alleged motivations or ideology. But the few details surrounding the 22-year old point toward a troubling trend: young shooter suspects who communicate primarily via obtuse memes and digitally inflected irony.

Some memes, however, aren’t so neutral. The young men who admired, and still admire, Charlie Kirk tend to be extremely online—which doesn’t necessarily mean that they all share exactly the same ideology. Internecine conflict between conservative factions is common, both on social media and at events for young conservatives. The most notable of these are the “Groyper Wars” of 2019. “Groypers” are fans of white nationalist agitator Nick Fuentes who like to hide their racism behind ironic jokes; when Kirk began making an effort to mainstream his ultra-right-wing Turning Point USA movement, Fuentes instructed them to publicly troll Kirk.

A Facebook photo in which Robinson appears to reference a Groyper meme has led to early speculation that Kirk’s killing may have been an outgrowth of these intra-far-right skirmishes. But another feature of the modern far-right is an embrace of the post-truth huckster. In these circles, it’s always possible that someone is playing a character—or will claim to be doing so, muddying the waters so no one can accuse them of having a sincere belief beyond the desire to rile up their targets. For people like this, the whole world is a forum board, where lewd public comments and real-world violence are becoming increasingly interchangeable. (Consider the messages left behind by the deceased shooter of Annunciation Catholic School, which were full of references to both other shooters and innocuous memes.)

So nothing supporting he was what you claim. Got it.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

FWIW those who claim to condemn Kirk’s murder but who also suggest Kirk was a racist …are not actually condemning the killing it seems.

Bc that accusation of racism taints the legacy of Kirk, and it lessens the condemnation of the killing.

IM2 Dr. Phosphorous and other lefties are a part of the problem with their rhetoric. They can’t just disagree politically, they make up accusations of racism. They are a minority in the country still such rhetoric is a problem.

The DEI defense (of the black pilot remark) here is poorly disguised racial prejudice.

If a firm has 95% white workers when there are 30% of the population being black and suitably qualified, then we likely have a problem.

The fix is to make sure that a sufficient number of qualified black candidates make it to the interview stage. That is avoid any real or subliminal filtering of black resumes, otherwise only qualified white candidates get interviewed and eventually hired.

If you can't get an interview because you're black then there's something wrong somewhere, DEI
is a fix, because many minorities get filtered out before the interview stage because they're black, foreign, use a wheelchair or deaf.

Objecting to DEI is to prefer a system where minorities are filtered out pre-interview, how can wanting that not be racial prejudice?

 

[Scoutster]

He just killed somebody in cold blood. The left needs to get their ass under control because they’re not gonna win many elections defending pieces of shit like this.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

.

I'm having trouble finding the right thread, but here is another left cultist justifying the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Post #214 translated -- "You say what we don't want to hear, we kill you."

Post in thread 'Some lefties calling Charlie Kirk racist the day after he was killed.'

Sep 13, 2025

.

But she's an "award winning paid poster"!

Doesn't that impress you?

.

Over 50 vacuous posts a day is impressive in a sense I guess.

• Meathead

• 

And Post #220.

Post in thread 'Some lefties calling Charlie Kirk racist the day after he was killed.'

Sep 13, 2025

What we have going on here are some left-wingers latching on to one off comments by Kirk. Usually 5 to 10 second sound bites and then they claim “oh look he’s a racist”. That’s not how it works though that does not fit the definition of racist. Not even close.

Well this was seen on the Don Lemon show and from a few more of the left wing influencers on YouTube and X. Basically what they are doing is with no evidence calling Kirk a racist or white supremacist because of one off comments while completely ignoring the fact that the guy has always argued for meritocracy. If anything...

• BULLDOG

• 

.