- Moderator
- #141
Lol, I do believe he's ignoring me.
But it was not I who lit the match.
But it was not I who lit the match.
THIS in Identity Politics. THIS, is what Repubicans have done for 6 Decades
- Thread starter IM2
- Start date
IM2 would vote for that racist Jasmine Crockett in a NY minute even though she said that whites should not be allowed to run for office.
So IM2 is not opposed to racism. In fact, he supports it wholeheartedly. The irony is that he calls people who are opposed such disgusting racism “racists.”
So IM2 is not opposed to racism. In fact, he supports it wholeheartedly. The irony is that he calls people who are opposed such disgusting racism “racists.”
It t'weren't No Republican who authored Jim Crow and foughtIt started with The Southern Strategy. It continued with Reagan. Newt Gingrich and the Tea Party extended it. Now we have MAGA. It has been a white identity movement. They have played identity politics then whined when non whites and Democratic liberal whites called them on it. They have played the victim so effectively that so-called liberals such as Bill Maher started repeating their claims. But Eric Schmitt is a Republican. Why is it that it is always a Republican who makes these kinds of comments? I know the answer. It is obvious.
A Senator Just Unapologetically Declared the U.S. a White Homeland
America, he says, isn’t an idea—and isn’t for everyone.
On Nov. 19, 1863, Abraham Lincoln delivered one of the greatest speeches in American history, the Gettysburg Address. It opened “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”
On Tuesday, Eric Schmitt, the junior senator from Missouri, declared that Lincoln was wrong.
“What is an American?” This was the question Schmitt posed at the fifth annual National Conservatism Conference in Washington. His answer is that the nation is fundamentally not based on the idea of equality or freedom or any other ideal. Nor is it accessible to people of all races and religions. It is fundamentally, he told an assembled crowd, a white homeland.
The white Europeans who settled America and conquered the West “believed they were forging a nation—a homeland for themselves and their descendants,” he said. “They fought, they bled, they struggled, they died for us. They built this country for us. America, in all its glory, is their gift to us, handed down across the generations. It belongs to us. It’s our birthright, our heritage, our destiny. If America is everything and everyone, then it is nothing and no one at all. But we know that’s not true. America is not a ‘universal nation.’”
The implications of this vision are serious. This is a repudiation of our Constitution and the core of a national identity that includes all its citizens. It means that to be American is not about citizenship at all. “What is an American?” Schmitt asked. It is a white person. America is a white homeland that organically binds together white people of the past, present and future. And its policies must be guided for their benefit if they are to succeed.
A Sitting Senator Just Went Full Mask-Off White Nationalist
America, he says, isn’t an idea—and isn’t for everyone.slate.com
the Democrats Southern Stategy even during President Eisenhowers
Presidency.Where Big Democrat Bigot { L.B.J.} was the majority
leader of the Senate.One reason the Eisenhower Civil Rights bill
was stalled.
IDIOCRACY
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2017
- 4,999
- 5,406
- 1,938
My numbers are from the congressional record. Double downing on your lie huh IM#2?
Your argument is disingenuous. So, the fact a greater percentage of Republicans than Democracks supported civil rights is disingenuous? Since when are facts disingenuous? Answer, when they pop a safe-space.
More Democrats voted for these laws, and a Democratic president signed them. Strictly because there were far more Democracks in congress.
Today's Republican party voted against voting rights. When did that happen, exactly? I guess we'll have to take your word for it then.
They definitely oppose civil rights because that would be "woke." Neat.
So you can stop trying that argument. What would I be arguing against, the fact congress recently voted for civil rights built inside your head?
You right-wingers continue trying this bullshit Neat.
hoping to fool enough blacks into becoming Republicans.
But Eric Schmitt, Trump, Vanc,e and your party are blatantly racist. What would an IM2 know about racism?
IM2
Diamond Member
- Mar 11, 2015
- 113,613
- 143,685
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #145
If it were not for Rutherford B. Hayes, a Republican, ending Reconstruction, there would not have been Jim Crow. So again, you repubicans need to stop this disingenuous bulshit. Today's Republican Party consists of the people who were Dixiecrats. Eisenhower's Civil Rights bill had no teeth. I'm from Kansas, I live 40 miles fr Eisenhower's hometown. He came from racism, and that's why he implemented Operation *******.
IM2
Diamond Member
- Mar 11, 2015
- 113,613
- 143,685
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #146
Percentages don't vote, so stop repeating nonsense.My numbers are from the congressional record. Double downing on your lie huh IM#2?
Your argument is disingenuous. So, the fact a greater percentage of Republicans than Democracks supported civil rights is disingenuous? Since when are facts disingenuous? Answer, when they pop a safe-space.
More Democrats voted for these laws, and a Democratic president signed them. Strictly because there were far more Democracks in congress.
Today's Republican party voted against voting rights. When did that happen, exactly? I guess we'll have to take your word for it then.
They definitely oppose civil rights because that would be "woke." Neat.
So you can stop trying that argument. What would I be arguing against, the fact congress recently voted for civil rights built inside your head?
You right-wingers continue trying this bullshit Neat.
hoping to fool enough blacks into becoming Republicans.
But Eric Schmitt, Trump, Vanc,e and your party are blatantly racist. What would an IM2 know about racism?
I posted one link showing that Republicans voted against a modern version of the Voting Rights Act, and another where Repubicans filibustered the same bill.
IM2 still can't understand percentages.
I can't understand who he is even playing to.
Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 145,681
- 32,700
- 2,180
Himself
Harry Dresden
Only Adamantium Member
he thinks he is changing minds....
He might be. People without a racist bone in their body and listening to this black man rage on and on, blaming the failures of the black community completely on whites, making excuses for violent black killers, screaming “raaaaaacist” at everyone who thinks jobs shouldn’t go to the black candidate if a white candidate is more qualified, calling women “whores” if they express that the high crime and poverty rate among blacks is related to their high out-of-wedlock rate, and….these people are getting a very unsavory look into how some black people, like IM2, think.
They don’t care, and likely can’t read.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
-
Zone1 Does America of the year 2026 = Rome at the time of Jesus - Yeshua?- Started by DennisPTate
- Replies: 0
