THIS in Identity Politics. THIS, is what Repubicans have done for 6 Decades

Blacks are only here because other blacks sold them to the usa
No, blacks are here mostly because whites started wars between tribes, or threatened blacks with death by gunfire. You really need to study what really happened, and then learn that whites didn't have to buy anybody. If you don't think Blacks would have immigrated here from Africa, like others did, you're ignorant. So again, white man, understand that you descend from people who ran away from Europe because they were losers. Some were such losers that they were sent here to debtors prisons. Others were so desperate to leave that they signed up to be indentured servnts for 7 years. So you really need to study your history white man before you run your mouth.
 
The Republican Party is the party of the klan today. This is not 1860.

Eric Schmitt, REPUBLICAN, shows you that.
You can't ignore and deny history, your hatred is no less than the Democrat Klan of yesteryears. Deal with it. That such pathetic hatred is further enhanced by your silly TDS only makes things worse.
 
No, blacks are here mostly because whites started wars between tribes, or threatened blacks with death by gunfire. You really need to study what really happened, and then learn that whites didn't have to buy anybody. If you don't think Blacks would have immigrated here from Africa, like others did, you're ignorant. So again, white man, understand that you descend from people who ran away from Europe because they were losers. Some were such losers that they were sent here to debtors prisons. Others were so desperate to leave that they signed up to be indentured servnts for 7 years. So you really need to study your history white man before you run your mouth.
European whites, go beg them for your reparations. Leave those of us whose ancestors freed the slaves out of it. You still deny slavery is only possible because blacks sold blacks. Nothing you say can be taken seriously so long as you continue to deny reality.
 
Democrats fought to defend slavery

Democrats voted against civil rights in large numbers

Democrats were the KKK

IM2 LOGIC: Republicans R Democrats cuz mom and Whoopi told me so
Democrats did not exist in the confederacy *****.

According to Merriam-Webster the definition of disingenuous is “lacking in candor: giving a false appearance of simple frankness.” As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 Democrats and 139 Republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house. In the senate, forty-six Democrats and twenty-seven Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act. In the house, 221 Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 112 Republicans did. In the senate, forty-seven Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and thirty Republicans did.

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- June 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- July 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- July 9, 1965 .

And the REPUBICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE in 1964 voted aginst the Civil Rights Act.

Right wing logic:

Keep repeating what happened in the 1800's, then tell backs how no one today was alive then.


So it's like this idiot, Republicans promised blacks reparations.

Sherman’s Special Field Orders No. 15,” in The War of the Rebellion: a Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Series I, Vol. 47, Part II (Washington: GPO, 1895), pp.60-62 http://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/ after_slavery_educator/unit_three_documents/document_five

Circular #13 War Department Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands. Washington July 28, 1865,” Source: National Archives and Records Administration, Record Group 105, Entry 24, No. 139 Asst Adjutant General Circulars 1865-1869, Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, pp. 14-15.

So if yu want to ply that game, todays Republican Party needs to pass a reparations bill to repay blacks for all we have lost as result of slavery, Jim Crow, and today's version of white racism.

So like I said, know your history white man before you run your mouth.
 
Last edited:
European whites, go beg them for your reparations. Leave those of us whose ancestors freed the slaves out of it. You still deny slavery is only possible because blacks sold blacks. Nothing you say can be taken seriously so long as you continue to deny reality.
European whites are not responsible for laws made in America. Now you need to shut up about this because blacks paid taxes in the 1900s for programs we were excluded from. So like I said to idiocracy, learn your history, white man. I don't deny anything; what you deny is how it ALL really happened and the fact that whites did not have to buy anyone.

"My country Ghana in West Africa was a major Slave Trading Post (Headquarters) where slaves from different parts of Africa were brought and arranged before shipping abroad."

"When the white strangers first came to Africa, We (my ancestors) were not sure about their intentions so most communities drove them away from their land. However, the white strangers managed to convince some of our traditional rulers that they had not come to cause any harm but just to preach the good news (the Bible) and also to trade with the local people."

"Some of the local chiefs along the coast started accepting the white strangers by giving them place to stay. The white strangers started building missionary centers where they stayed and preached the gospel and also traded with the local people. The white strangers later on expanded those missionary centers (including churches and cathedrals) into forts and castles where they packed slaves before shipping them abroad."

"The white strangers did not understand the local language and the local people did not understand a word the white strangers were saying so it made communication very difficult. To help break the language barrier, the white strangers went to the local rulers and asked the local rulers to give them some of the local people to train so they could speak the foreign language which would make communication easier but none of those local rulers were ready to give their people out to go stay with strangers."

"Later on, some of the local rulers came up with an idea that, instead of killing those criminals, they could actually give those criminals to the white strangers so the white strangers could preach the good news they said they came to preach to those criminals, change them into good people and also train them in the foreign language in order to aid communication which was better than killing those criminals. So the traditional rulers gave those criminals out to the white strangers and to show appreciation, those white strangers gave gifts like textiles, bottles of wine, mirrors, etc. to the traditional rulers. That was how the white strangers got their first ‘local servers.’"

"Those criminals were the few ‘Africans’ who helped the white strangers to get more slaves."

Before the white man came to Africa, tribal wars were mostly fought with swords, spears, bows and arrows. Although these weapons were lethal they were nowhere near as quick and fatal as the gun. The problem here was that, only the white strangers had guns and decided which tribal group to support in times of battle. Any tribal group the white strangers supported with their powerful cannons, guns and ammunitions, easily conquered their enemies. This also created another major problem. The white strangers did not support any tribal group for free. In fact, the white strangers started demanding taxes (which included pieces of gold and prisoners of war) and total submission after victory. Any tribal group or community which failed to submit to the Europeans and pay taxes were wiped out."


Africans did NOT sell their own people into slavery, Africans did not sell their own people into slavery

“Africans started to fight the transatlantic slave trade as soon as it began. Their struggles were multifaceted and covered four continents over four centuries. Still, they have often been underestimated, overlooked, or forgotten. African resistance was reported in European sources only when it concerned attacks on slave ships and company barracoons, but acts of resistance also took place far from the coast and thus escaped the slavers’ attention."

“Some leaders actively worked against the transatlantic slave trade. One of the most famous was Abdel Kader Kane, the Muslim leader of the Futa Toro region in northern Senegal. Kane had succeeded in peopling his kingdom by retaking by force his people who had been kidnapped and by forbidding slave caravans from passing through his territory. "

"Fort Saint-Joseph on the Senegal River was attacked and all commerce was interrupted for six years. Several conspiracies and actual revolts by captives erupted on Gorée Island and resulted in the death of the governor and several soldiers. In addition, the crews of quite a few slave ships were killed on the River Gambia; in Sierra Leone, people sacked the captives’ quarters of the infamous trader John Ormond. Similar incidents occurred in other parts of the African coast. Written records document how Africans on shore attacked more than a hundred ships."


Schomburg Center for the Research of Black Culture “The
Abolition of the Slave Trade-African Resistance.

So, when you can find any records of Africans floating into Europe and selling slaves, let me know. It's you who denies reality, and I DGAF what you take or don't take seriously.
 
Last edited:
Unkotare, didn't you say you were a teacher?

I posted documentation. Do you teach students not to study facts? No wonder schools are fucked up with teachers like you.
 
Democrats did not exist in the confederacy *****.

According to Merriam-Webster the definition of disingenuous is “lacking in candor: giving a false appearance of simple frankness.” As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 Democrats and 139 Republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house. In the senate, forty-six Democrats and twenty-seven Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act. In the house, 221 Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 112 Republicans did. In the senate, forty-seven Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and thirty Republicans did.

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- June 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- July 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- July 9, 1965 .

And the REPUBICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE in 1964 voted aginst the Civil Rights Act.

Right wing logic:

Keep repeating what happened in the 1800's, then tell backs how no one today was alive then.


So it's like this idiot, Republicans promised blacks reparations.

Sherman’s Special Field Orders No. 15,” in The War of the Rebellion: a Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Series I, Vol. 47, Part II (Washington: GPO, 1895), pp.60-62 http://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/ after_slavery_educator/unit_three_documents/document_five

Circular #13 War Department Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands. Washington July 28, 1865,” Source: National Archives and Records Administration, Record Group 105, Entry 24, No. 139 Asst Adjutant General Circulars 1865-1869, Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, pp. 14-15.

So if yu want to ply that game, todays Republican Party needs to pass a reparations bill to repay blacks for all we have lost as result of slavery, Jim Crow, and today's version of white racism.

So like I said, know your history white man before you run your mouth.
Im#2 says democrats didn't exist during slavery :abgg2q.jpg:

Ever notice how #2 never presents the percentages of Democrats who voted against civil rights? It is because its so high. I think that makes #2 a liar, what you say?
 
No, blacks are here mostly because whites started wars between tribes, or threatened blacks with death by gunfire. You really need to study what really happened, and then learn that whites didn't have to buy anybody. If you don't think Blacks would have immigrated here from Africa, like others did, you're ignorant. So again, white man, understand that you descend from people who ran away from Europe because they were losers. Some were such losers that they were sent here to debtors prisons. Others were so desperate to leave that they signed up to be indentured servnts for 7 years. So you really need to study your history white man before you run your mouth.
Say im#2, if whites are such losers, what do u have to say for blacks who commit the most crime?
 
The Republican Party is the party of the klan today. This is not 1860.

Eric Schmitt, REPUBLICAN, shows you that.
Which party kept electing a Grand Kleagle of the KKK to the Senate until he went toes up in 2010?

Oh yeah, YOUR racist party.
 
Democrats did not exist in the confederacy *****.

According to Merriam-Webster the definition of disingenuous is “lacking in candor: giving a false appearance of simple frankness.” As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 Democrats and 139 Republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the house. In the senate, forty-six Democrats and twenty-seven Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act. In the house, 221 Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 112 Republicans did. In the senate, forty-seven Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and thirty Republicans did.

HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- June 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- July 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- July 9, 1965 .

And the REPUBICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE in 1964 voted aginst the Civil Rights Act.

Right wing logic:

Keep repeating what happened in the 1800's, then tell backs how no one today was alive then.


So it's like this idiot, Republicans promised blacks reparations.

Sherman’s Special Field Orders No. 15,” in The War of the Rebellion: a Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies, Series I, Vol. 47, Part II (Washington: GPO, 1895), pp.60-62 http://ldhi.library.cofc.edu/exhibits/show/ after_slavery_educator/unit_three_documents/document_five

Circular #13 War Department Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands. Washington July 28, 1865,” Source: National Archives and Records Administration, Record Group 105, Entry 24, No. 139 Asst Adjutant General Circulars 1865-1869, Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, pp. 14-15.

So if yu want to ply that game, todays Republican Party needs to pass a reparations bill to repay blacks for all we have lost as result of slavery, Jim Crow, and today's version of white racism.

So like I said, know your history white man before you run your mouth.



Democrats filibustered the Civil Rights Act.

Why do you worship blatant racists, IM2
 
Last edited:
idiocracy,

When a person is shown linked information from congressional records and then hits the fake news button, that's a brainwashed individual who wants to keep believing lies. You were also shown documents showing that Republicans proposed reparations to the freed slaves. You were also shown how whites were able to get sllaves in Africa.

So there is no more to discuss with you.
 
idiocracy,

When a person is shown linked information from congressional records and then hits the fake news button, that's a brainwashed individual who wants to keep believing lies. You were also shown documents showing that Republicans proposed reparations to the freed slaves. You were also shown how whites were able to get sllaves in Africa.

So there is no more to discuss with you.
on ignore you go....he will say its because you are a racist....
 
Unkotare, didn't you say you were a teacher?
...
I sure am. I don't teach racism, ridiculously obvious bias, or bigotry. I teach my students to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate "documentation."

Nice try (not really)
 
Eurpean whites are nt respnsiblle fr laws made in America. Now yu need to shut up abut this because blacks paid taxes in the 1900's for programs we were excluded from. So like I said to idiocracy, learn your history white man. I don't deny anything, what you deny is how it ALL really happened and the fact that whites did not have to buy anyone.

"My country Ghana in West Africa was a major Slave Trading Post (Headquarters) where slaves from different parts of Africa were brought and arranged before shipping abroad."

"When the white strangers first came to Africa, We (my ancestors) were not sure about their intentions so most communities drove them away from their land. However, the white strangers managed to convince some of our traditional rulers that they had not come to cause any harm but just to preach the good news (the Bible) and also to trade with the local people."

"Some of the local chiefs along the coast started accepting the white strangers by giving them place to stay. The white strangers started building missionary centers where they stayed and preached the gospel and also traded with the local people. The white strangers later on expanded those missionary centers (including churches and cathedrals) into forts and castles where they packed slaves before shipping them abroad."

"The white strangers did not understand the local language and the local people did not understand a word the white strangers were saying so it made communication very difficult. To help break the language barrier, the white strangers went to the local rulers and asked the local rulers to give them some of the local people to train so they could speak the foreign language which would make communication easier but none of those local rulers were ready to give their people out to go stay with strangers."

"Later on, some of the local rulers came up with an idea that, instead of killing those criminals, they could actually give those criminals to the white strangers so the white strangers could preach the good news they said they came to preach to those criminals, change them into good people and also train them in the foreign language in order to aid communication which was better than killing those criminals. So the traditional rulers gave those criminals out to the white strangers and to show appreciation, those white strangers gave gifts like textiles, bottles of wine, mirrors, etc. to the traditional rulers. That was how the white strangers got their first ‘local servers.’"

"Those criminals were the few ‘Africans’ who helped the white strangers to get more slaves."

Before the white man came to Africa, tribal wars were mostly fought with swords, spears, bows and arrows. Although these weapons were lethal they were nowhere near as quick and fatal as the gun. The problem here was that, only the white strangers had guns and decided which tribal group to support in times of battle. Any tribal group the white strangers supported with their powerful cannons, guns and ammunitions, easily conquered their enemies. This also created another major problem. The white strangers did not support any tribal group for free. In fact, the white strangers started demanding taxes (which included pieces of gold and prisoners of war) and total submission after victory. Any tribal group or community which failed to submit to the Europeans and pay taxes were wiped out."


Africans did NOT sell their own people into slavery, Africans did not sell their own people into slavery

“Africans started to fight the transatlantic slave trade as soon as it began. Their struggles were multifaceted and covered four continents over four centuries. Still, they have often been underestimated, overlooked, or forgotten. African resistance was reported in European sources only when it concerned attacks on slave ships and company barracoons, but acts of resistance also took place far from the coast and thus escaped the slavers’ attention."
“Some leaders actively worked against the transatlantic slave trade. One of the most famous was Abdel Kader Kane, the Muslim leader of the Futa Toro region in northern Senegal. Kane had succeeded in peopling his kingdom by retaking by force his people who had been kidnapped and by forbidding slave caravans from passing through his territory. "
"Fort Saint-Joseph on the Senegal River was attacked and all commerce was interrupted for six years. Several conspiracies and actual revolts by captives erupted on Gorée Island and resulted in the death of the governor and several soldiers. In addition, the crews of quite a few slave ships were killed on the River Gambia; in Sierra Leone, people sacked the captives’ quarters of the infamous trader John Ormond. Similar incidents occurred in other parts of the African coast. Written records document how Africans on shore attacked more than a hundred ships."


Schomburg Center for the Research of Black Culture “The
Abolition of the Slave Trade-African Resistance.

So when you can find any records of Africans floating into Europe and selling slaves, let me know. It's you who denies reality and I DGAF what you take or don't take seriously.
Give me break, blacks selling blacks has been going on for thousands of years. Playing ignorant isn't going to cut it. How foolish are you? Take some responsibility, stop blaming everyone else, particularly those who have never played a part in whatever silliness you are whining about.
 
Can we at least agree that nobody arguing here has ever been involved in any side of the Atlantic slave trade? Start with a simple recognition of reality.
 
15th post
Give me break, blacks selling blacks has been going on for thousands of years. Playing ignorant isn't going to cut it. How foolish are you? Take some responsibility, stop blaming everyone else, particularly those who have never played a part in whatever silliness you are whining about.
Whites have been selling whites fr the same amount of time.

Don't lecture me about responsibility white man. Take some yourself. Whites were not forced to buy anyone, and you were shown what whites did.

Do not run your white racist mouth about Democrats being the party of the Klan when no Democrat today played a part in any of the crap you dishonest white right wing POTS try using to deny the responsibility Republicans have right now for the identity politics they have continued to use such as the white supremacist BS spoken by Republican Senator Eric Schmitt.
 
Whites have been selling whites fr the same amount of time.

Don't lecture me about responsibility white man. Take some yourself. Whites were not forced to buy anyone, and you were shown what whites did.

Do not run your white racist mouth about Democrats being the party of the Klan when no Democrat today played a part in any of the crap you dishonest white right wing POTS try using to deny the responsibility Republicans have right now for the identity politics they have continued to use such as the white supremacist BS spoken by Republican Senator Eric Schmitt.
The one who DEALS the product is always held more culpable than the buyer. That’s why sentences for drug dealing is more severe than that given to the purchaser.

But because it was blacks who were the DEALERS, all of a sudden it’s’ the whites’ fault for buying? The Africans were absolutely reprehensible capturing their defenseless countrymen and selling them as slaves.
 
Leave those of us whose ancestors freed the slaves out of it.
We shall not leave the people who started and participated in Jim Crow out of this discussion.
 
No, blacks are here mostly because whites started wars between tribes, or threatened blacks with death by gunfire. You really need to study what really happened, and then learn that whites didn't have to buy anybody. If you don't think Blacks would have immigrated here from Africa, like others did, you're ignorant. So again, white man, understand that you descend from people who ran away from Europe because they were losers. Some were such losers that they were sent here to debtors prisons. Others were so desperate to leave that they signed up to be indentured servnts for 7 years. So you really need to study your history white man before you run your mouth.
Republicans have had no say in cities for at least that long. Prog mayors and city councils can destroy cities with excessive legislations and edicts. As long as they stay withing the boundaries of their budgets the cities survive.
 
Back
Top Bottom