This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett

[Blisterfinger]

By "everyone", you mean mentally ill MAGAs that create their own reality.....like Nazis do.

Nope, you have fallen into the minority. Get used to it. People that know what they're doing are in charge now. Take your Nazi crap and stuff it up your ass.

 

[Rigby5]

I wouldn’t expect you to recognize “sense.”

Obviously false. She shredded the dumbass Jackson decision for its inane babble and defiance of the Constitution. And it is brilliant to counter the silly fear of an imperial presidency by criticizing Jackson’s approval of an imperial judiciary.

Not what was said or done. You do rely far too much on baseless nonsense in lieu of facts.

Wrong.
Barret made no argument at all.
She just made derogatory personal comments, without backing it up with any logic, reasons, legal principles, or foundation.

Of course the judiciary is supposed to pass injunctions against executive actions when necessary.
That is the whole point and purpose of having a separate judiciary.
What Barret is suggesting is insurrection, by essentially the elimination of judicial due process.
Judicial due process which is essential in order to prevent draconian executive dictatorships.

Of course the scope of the judicial injunctions are supposed to be and must be of equal scope of the executive orders.

 

[Rigby5]

I'm starting to think these useless GAS BAGS in the Judicial branch are more useless than the GAS BAGS in congress. Where were all these judges and the SCOTUS so concerned about the law and Constitution when 15 MILLION F'ing illegals were invading and got busy RAPING and KILLING Americans??

Wrong.
Illegal immigrants tend to be simpler natives and much more intimidated and law abiding.
Illegal immigrants have less than half the crime rate of citizens.

The "raping and killing" was done by our ancestors when we illegally invaded and massacred the natives who were the only legal owners and citizens.

 

[Rigby5]

Because you can't.

A basis discussion of law has to go back to basic principles of a republic, and you do NOT want to try to use statutes as a basis for anything.
That is because statutes are often wrong.
Like we used to have statutes allowing slavery.
Does that mean slavery ever could really be legal?
Of course not, because slavery violates basic principles of a republic, which is based on the defense of inherent individual rights.
You can't legally have slavery in a republic.
The fact we did, just proves the legislators were deliberately wrong.

So now that we admit slavery is wrong, is everything fixed?
Nope.
When you go back to basic principles, then it is obvious that legal authority only comes from defense of rights of others.
And that means law that do not defend other, like drug laws, and adult sex laws, are all inherently illegal.
So we still have a long way to go.

Then we can come back to immigration.
And if we really believe in a republic, then we have to believe in that rights are inherent to ALL people, regardless of where they are born.
Maybe we can decide who gets to come here, but we certainly cannot deny them their day in court, since that is a universal right.

 

[Rigby5]

Because you can't.

Wrong.
It is very basic to any republic, that you cannot raid, arrest, or deport without judicial due process.

 

[Rigby5]

Now Ketanji don't no nuffin' bout what a woman be? Do she?

No one can tell what a woman is exactly since there are multiple criteria.

You are assuming that the X or Y sex chromosomes determine sex and that is all you need.
That is false.
Even if a person has XX of XY sex chromosomes, pesticides and herbicides in the food chain, viruses, etc. can cause the wrong hormones to cause the wrong sexual organs to develop in the fetus and born infant.
This is even more complex since 12 years later, another hormone mismatch can occur with puberty.

 

[Rigby5]

Not at all, my definition seems to be shared with the vast majority, probably approaching 99.9%, of the 7+ billion people on this planet. The only people who think differently are the radical neo-leftists and they are usually seriously fucked up psychologically and shouldn't be paid attention to, especially when it comes to sexuality and politics.

Wrong.
Only those who do not understand the fact hormones determine sexuality and not necessarily chromosomes are confused by this.
The fact chromosomes usually determine hormones is useless since it is not 100%.
Pesticides and herbicides are very strong hormones and can override DNA.

 

[Rigby5]

MAGA is your Superior, mentally ethically and morally.

Sorry, but clearly trying to bypass judicial due process is not just illegal, but insurrection against the principles of the republic.

It is not like it never happened before.
Around 1911 the Texas Rangers were notorious for murdering Mexicans who legally owned land in the US and had the right to be here.
But that is not excuse.
Vigilante violation of law has to be worked against and stopped.
ICE is so far over the line that is needs to be totally dismantled.

 

[WelfareQueen]

No one can tell what a woman is exactly since there are multiple criteria.

You are assuming that the X or Y sex chromosomes determine sex and that is all you need.
That is false.
Even if a person has XX of XY sex chromosomes, pesticides and herbicides in the food chain, viruses, etc. can cause the wrong hormones to cause the wrong sexual organs to develop in the fetus and born infant.
This is even more complex since 12 years later, another hormone mismatch can occur with puberty.

Ah.....no. XX is always female. XY is always male. It doesn't matter what your brand of coffee is or whether or not you were born facing magnetic north.

A very tiny percentage of human can be intersex. Roughly 1/10.000. The rest of us are either male or female.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Kitanje Jackson knows what a woman is, but you don't know squat about the law.

Tell us all about the law being discussed here.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

No one can tell what a woman is exactly since there are multiple criteria.

You are assuming that the X or Y sex chromosomes determine sex and that is all you need.
That is false.

If you can't understand millions of years of basic biology that even a second grader can, you're nothing more than low human capital who isn't worth anyone's time.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Sorry, but clearly trying to bypass judicial due process is not just illegal, but insurrection against the principles of the republic.

It is not like it never happened before.
Around 1911 the Texas Rangers were notorious for murdering Mexicans who legally owned land in the US and had the right to be here.
But that is not excuse.
Vigilante violation of law has to be worked against and stopped.
ICE is so far over the line that is needs to be totally dismantled.

The rangers were never known for that and ICE is enforcing the law

 

[BackAgain]

, that definition is useless if it includes unstated exceptions as part of it.

what makes you make that baseless claim?

 

[Rigby5]

Nope, you have fallen into the minority. Get used to it. People that know what they're doing are in charge now. Take your Nazi crap and stuff it up your ass.

Minority or majority does not make things right or wrong.
The majority is supposed to protect the rights of every single individual, including minorities.
In fact, that is supposed to include individual rights of those of other races, religions, or country of origin.
You can't really be a patriot in a republic is you violate the rights of anyone.

 

[BackAgain]

Wrong.
Barret made no argument at all.
She just made derogatory personal comments, without backing it up with any logic, reasons, legal principles, or foundation.

Of course the judiciary is supposed to pass injunctions against executive actions when necessary.
That is the whole point and purpose of having a separate judiciary.
What Barret is suggesting is insurrection, by essentially the elimination of judicial due process.
Judicial due process which is essential in order to prevent draconian executive dictatorships.

Of course the scope of the judicial injunctions are supposed to be and must be of equal scope of the executive orders.

Wrong, as always. Tell the truth for a remarkable change of pace. You don’t even read her Opinion, did ya? You ignorant lying ass rash.

 

[OODA_Loop]

She actually used “Wait for It” in an opinion.

WOW.

 

[Clipper]

Or they are taking the opportunity of Chump to reshape America in their image.

More than likely.

 

[Rigby5]

The rangers were never known for that and ICE is enforcing the law

Wrong.
The Texas ranger were well known for their abuses around WWI.

{...
The Texas Rangers, a storied law enforcement agency, have a historical record of abuse. They have been involved in burning villages, hunting runaway slaves, and murdering Mexicans. In 1919, the Canales Investigation brought scrutiny to their violent actions against Mexican Americans
...}

What people forget is that almost all of the states purchased by the US from Mexico, had the land owned by Mexicans with Spanish Land Grants the US was supposed to honor.
But what do you think happened to cause almost all of those Spanish Land Grants to disappear? ( A Spanish Land Grant can't be sold. It is deeded to the family ancestors, much like a reservation.)

And while ICE is not the Texas Rangers, they are both examples of majority racism against individuals.

 

[westwall]

No one can tell what a woman is exactly since there are multiple criteria.

You are assuming that the X or Y sex chromosomes determine sex and that is all you need.
That is false.
Even if a person has XX of XY sex chromosomes, pesticides and herbicides in the food chain, viruses, etc. can cause the wrong hormones to cause the wrong sexual organs to develop in the fetus and born infant.
This is even more complex since 12 years later, another hormone mismatch can occur with puberty.

WRONG.

Defining a woman is easy. They have vaginas, wombs, and ovaries. Something that no man has.

DURRRRRR

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The Texas ranger were well known for their abuses around WWI.

{...
The Texas Rangers, a storied law enforcement agency, have a historical record of abuse. They have been involved in burning villages, hunting runaway slaves, and murdering Mexicans. In 1919, the Canales Investigation brought scrutiny to their violent actions against Mexican Americans
...}

What people forget is that almost all of the states purchased by the US from Mexico, had the land owned by Mexicans with Spanish Land Grants the US was supposed to honor.
But what do you think happened to cause almost all of those Spanish Land Grants to disappear? ( A Spanish Land Grant can't be sold. It is deeded to the family ancestors, much like a reservation.)

And while ICE is not the Texas Rangers, they are both examples of majority racism against individuals.

Wrong

Involved in is not the same as well known for

There are no such examples iof racism and both the rangers and ice enforce ther law and do so RIGHTEOUSLY