This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett

[excalibur]

Oh look....another MAGA racist bumpkin who thinks he knows more about the law than Ketanji Brown Jackson.

How surprising.

LOL

Why do you think that neither Sotomayor nor Kagan signed Brown's dissent? Because it was pathetic and far outside the mainstream of 200+ years of Constitutional law.

 

[Rigby5]

And you want to know what else is surprising? I know what a woman is unlike Ketanji who doesn't.

No you do not.
There are sexual chromosomes in the DNA, which normally cause the production of sexual hormones.
But there also are massive amounts of pesticides and herbicides in our food chain that also are sexual hormones.
So it is NOT at all clear who is a woman or a man.
The chromosomes and food chain can easily cause a mismatch between conception and puberty, so there is no way to know.

 

[Rigby5]

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”


The DEI autopen hire also cried that it required too much boring legalese to analyze the law and it was mind numbingly technical query. In essence, she was to dumb to understand it and couldn't be bothered with it.

This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

If you were following the Supreme Court news yesterday, you likely saw that Justice Amy Coney Barrett smacked down her fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson over her childish dissent, saying: “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Wrong.
The precedent has always been that every act by Congress or the Executive is always to be reviewed by the courts.
For example, when the SCOTUS forced states to implement school busing in order to reduce the obvious racial discrimination in many school system.
So Jackson is right and Barret is wrong.

 

[Rigby5]

LOL

Why do you think that neither Sotomayor nor Kagan signed Brown's dissent? Because it was pathetic and far outside the mainstream of 200+ years of Constitutional law.

Wrong.
They simply wrote their own dissent.

 

[IM2]

No you do not.
There are sexual chromosomes in the DNA, which normally cause the production of sexual hormones.
But there also are massive amounts of pesticides and herbicides in our food chain that also are sexual hormones.
So it is NOT at all clear who is a woman or a man.
The chromosomes and food chain can easily cause a mismatch between conception and puberty, so there is no way to know.

The simple mind uses the simple definition. A woman has a vagina and a man has a penis. That's the simple definition. You went into complexities the average MAGATS can't grasp.

 

[Rigby5]

Trump broke no laws. If he did cite the specific statutes he violated in detail.

Of course Trump broke laws.
But you have it totally backwards.
Presidents need statutes before they are authorized to do anything.
There never has to be a statute to specifically prevent a presidential action.

Here is an example.
Lets say Trump wants to start executing illegal immigrants.
You don't need to find a statute in order to know that is illegal.
For it to be legal, there first has to be a statute that gave the president that authority.
Anything not specifically authorizes is by default, illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

Not in the massive multitude of times in an since Trump got elected. What they've done is unethical to the core and political.

Obviously the reason for the massive increase in judicial injunctions is that Trump is committing massive violations of the law.
For example, sending Kilmar to El Salvador.
That was totally illegal.
Deporting those with spouses who are US citizens is illegal.
Deporting those with anchor babies is illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

That excerpt of Amy’s opinion is brilliant. And it’s also a perfect bullseye.

That makes no sense.
Amy avoided making any "opinion" brilliant or otherwise.
But anyone claiming that the courts do not have the authority to impose injunctions against DOJ or any executive procedures, is very uninformed.

 

[westwall]

Oh look....another MAGA racist bumpkin who thinks he knows more about the law than Ketanji Brown Jackson.

How surprising.

Oh look another racist dumbshit defending a woman who should not be a Supreme Court Justice because she's not smart enough to be one.

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrat SCUM as is typical, have bastardized injunctions to nullify a presidential election and the will of the American people. Democrats don't give a SHIT about elections, the law or Constitution when they lose.

ALREADY Dems have moved on to bastardize another area of the law to do an end run around this SCOTUS ruling. Get ready here come FAKE national injunctions camouflaged as CLASS ACTION SUITS. And the Democrat SCUM are bragging about it.

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrat SCUM as is typical, have bastardized injunctions to nullify a presidential election and the will of the American people. Democrats don't give a SHIT about elections, the law or Constitution when they lose.

ALREADY Dems have moved on to bastardize another area of the law to do an end run around this SCOTUS ruling. Get ready here come FAKE national injunctions camouflaged as CLASS ACTION SUITS. And the Democrat SCUM are bragging about it.

A REGIME as corrupt as the Democrats won't stop. Who is surprised their lawyers already have a class action F you to the SCOTUS filed immediately in Maryland?

 

[BluesLegend]

I'm starting to think these useless GAS BAGS in the Judicial branch are more useless than the GAS BAGS in congress. Where were all these judges and the SCOTUS so concerned about the law and Constitution when 15 MILLION F'ing illegals were invading and got busy RAPING and KILLING Americans??

 

[BackAgain]

That makes no sense.

I wouldn’t expect you to recognize “sense.”

Amy avoided making any "opinion" brilliant or otherwise.

Obviously false. She shredded the dumbass Jackson decision for its inane babble and defiance of the Constitution. And it is brilliant to counter the silly fear of an imperial presidency by criticizing Jackson’s approval of an imperial judiciary.

But anyone claiming that the courts do not have the authority to impose injunctions against DOJ or any executive procedures, is very uninformed.

Not what was said or done. You do rely far too much on baseless nonsense in lieu of facts.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Actually it is Coney Barrett's opinion that goes against precedent as well as the Constitution. And since white women benefited the most from DEI, Coney Barrett is the DEI autopen hire.

The racebaiting asshole emerges from his mother's basement to again show us why she tries to keep him there.

 

[WelfareQueen]

The Dims on this board....(now wait for it)....are almost as stupid as the Queen Latifa Justice Jackson (That's Ketanji if ya Nasty).

 

[HikerGuy83]

I don't need to "cite" them, genius....the Federal judges who blocked Trump's lawlessness already did that.

Total cop out as they generally manufactured some bullcrap like William O. Douglas used to do (or just reach behind them and pull it from their asses.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Trump has broken all kinds of laws. Nobody has to cite the statutes to your dumb MAGAT ---.

Because you can't.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Now Ketanji don't no nuffin' bout what a woman be? Do she?

 

[BackAgain]

“We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”


The DEI autopen hire also cried that it required too much boring legalese to analyze the law and it was mind numbingly technical query. In essence, she was to dumb to understand it and couldn't be bothered with it.

This Excerpt From Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissent Explains Why She Got Nuked by Amy Coney Barrett | The Gateway Pundit | by Mike LaChance

If you were following the Supreme Court news yesterday, you likely saw that Justice Amy Coney Barrett smacked down her fellow Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson over her childish dissent, saying: “We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

WAIT FOR IT

Yeah. That’s the ticket!

 

[Blisterfinger]

Oh look....another MAGA racist bumpkin who thinks he knows more about the law than Ketanji Brown Jackson.

How surprising.

MAGA is your Superior, mentally ethically and morally.