This bullshit with Iran is escalating too fast.

[charwin95]

I'm curious about something...

Are we simply to allow threats around the world to fester until they become threats to us?

Good question you should direct to your kind.

Iran is a threat especially when they acquire the ambition of nuclear arms. Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse. Except we go to war.

Trump is a danger to Americans. He should be remove from the office.

Don't forget that Trump has nuclear codes. SOS.

Trump should not be allowed to have that toys.

 

[charwin95]

For lack of a better metaphor, Gramps, we got explosive diarrhea. We f**king destroyed the pot yesterday when we killed Soleimani.

For lack of a better metaphor

Man, I could make such a nasty joke here....

Okay, the problem with this metaphor. Solemani's death doesn't change the problem. The problem is we took out Saddam, we loosed all the ethnic strife in Iraq that gave the Iranians the opporunity to do what we couldn't do- restore order.

If anything, yesterday's attack has made the Iranians and Iraqis closer. (We also killed Iraqis in that attack).

President of Iraq is very upset because it violated Iraq sovereignty and totally disrespected Iraq territory.

and what did you say when Obozo sent troops into Pakistan to take out OBL? Was that an illegal invasion of a sovereign country?

Obama sent troops to kill OBL wanted all over the world was an honor applauded around the world. With minor or no protests. We don’t see a war coming.

Trump killed this dude in the middle of his impeachment. What a timing?
Trump killed one bad dude....We are expecting a WAR.
See the difference??

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

if you read more - they said they were able to go into anywhere they wanted access.

You need to read up more.

i didn't say it was a treaty. it was an agreement & we signed onto it.

If it wasn't a treaty, and wasn't ratified by the Senate, it can be overturned without Senate input.

the UN was involved. that's serious shit & senators signed onto the agreement when it was implemented.

How many Senators "signed onto the agreement"?

you think the IAEA would lie about iran? hmmmmm sounds just W's reasoning. are you saying obama did this all on his own & donny getting out was the best thing to do?

wow wow wow. you go boy. you go.

you think the IAEA would lie about iran?

You think the IAEA inspected any military sites?

are you saying obama did this all on his own

Of course not. He got a bunch of votes in the Senate.

How many exactly?

don't know what votes he got. oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny 'eh?

don't know what votes he got.

It's right there in your link.​

September 8, 2015: Four additional Senators announce that they will support the nuclear deal with Iran, bringing the total number to 42. This important milestone will prevent the Senate from reaching the 60 vote threshold required for ending debate and moving to vote on a resolution of disapproval.

oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny

If you think Iran was going to pause for 10 years, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible, 'eh? how'z this all working out for us?

you think we are safer NOW after his actions? i bet you do, despite it all. i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

A non-treaty which looks like it received 42 votes in the Senate.
Which gave Iran billions and lifted restrictions on their economy, allowing them to continue to support terrorism and continue their nuclear program.

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible

Trump's sanctions on Iran will make it more difficult to continue the nuclear programs that they were continuing under Obama's "agreement". Hopefully, the people will rise up again, and unlike that pussy Obama, who gave them zero support, the US will actually help them overthrow the mullahs.

how'z this all working out for us?

Better.

you think we are safer NOW after his actions?

You think the fake agreement that didn't allow inspections at military sites made us safer?
Like I said, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

Pallets of cash in the middle of the night aren't nothing.
Not to mention freeing up assets frozen in banks around the world.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Educate yourself.

Right back at ya.

https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12569/medical-isotope-production-without-highly-enriched-uranium

Wow, you realize that this article is about a recent development to substitute it, which is great if you can afford it. A third world country can't...

Because they have massive reserves of hydrocarbons and they're a terror state.

1) We don't want anyone burning hydrocarbons if they don't have to.
2) How do you define a "Terror State"? I go back to my statement that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

We armed the Kurds. The Turks consider them terrorists. We armed Bin Laden. That guy turned on us. We armed the Contras, who smuggled drugs into the US and committed acts of terror in Central America.

Maybe we're the "Terror State".

Wow, you realize that this article is about a recent development to substitute it, which is great if you can afford it. A third world country can't...

You realize that Iran doesn't want HEU to make radioisotopes, right?

1) We don't want anyone burning hydrocarbons if they don't have to.

In the case of Iran, that's the only thing we want them using for power.

2) How do you define a "Terror State"?

Iran.

I go back to my statement that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

But you're a stupid twat.

​

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm curious about something...

Are we simply to allow threats around the world to fester until they become threats to us?

Good question you should direct to your kind.

Iran is a threat especially when they acquire the ambition of nuclear arms. Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse. Except we go to war.

Trump is a danger to Americans. He should be remove from the office.

Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse.

Sounds like the sanctions have a chance of toppling the mullahs.

If Obama hadn't been such a weak twat the last time protests broke out, this might have been resolved before Trump.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

1. You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions. You only hurt ordinary people that are against the ( old hard liners) mullahs.

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime. It took generations for the young generations to come to that level. Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

2. Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program. Obama doesn’t want to go to war............. Trump STUPIDITY made the mullahs restart their nuclear program. In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

America is not ready for another war in ME. If we go to war. WARMONGER people like you would be responsible and who voted for this president.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

And currently anti-mullah protests.

You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions.

Why not?

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime.

And imagine how much less they like them when they waste money on terror and nuclear programs and can't meet the needs of their people.

Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

And that can all change, once the mullahs hang.

Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program.

Why do you feel they slowed down their program?

In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

Sounds like a plan.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And only ignorant assholes believed Iran would ever honor a treaty.

Really? I MEAN REALLY? Trump violated the treaty. How can you be so stupid and ignorant?

It wasn't a treaty, Moron.


It was an Executive Order. The next President can shitcan EOs, which is what Trump did.

Get an education.

uh - wrong. it was a multi nation agreement that demanded inspections to make sure iran was complying. they were. now your dotard president reneged, making 'america's word' the same as 'shit' & that there 10 yr pause - , that would give iran the opportunity to NOT create a nuke & turn into a once again thriving nation - has now turned it into a few mere months away path to nuclear weapons.

the Iranians were not complying with the agreement, they were enriching uranium and proceeding with their plans to develop nuclear bombs. They were using the money Obozo gave them to fund muslim terrorists around the world. they hoodwinked obama and he was too dumb to realize it. The only thing those sand rats understand is massive force. Fortunately the Iranian people are fed up with the radical mullahs and are protesting i the streets.

That is not true Dude. Totally incorrect. That’s what Trump ( or Bibi) told you which he has no single evidence NADA nothing.
This guy is a total pathological liar. How can you even believe what he is saying? We have not heard any complaints from IAEA inspectors or other countries that sigh with the agreement about any violations......... Except from Trump.

Iranians has NOT enriched or advanced their nuclear program since Obama told them to STOP.

This is way too long to explain but I will make it short and easy for you. Okay? And I don’t fucking lie.

Iran started their nuclear ambitions a long time ago like in 50s. Fast forward. Then start enriching uranium in 2012. They are very close in making a nuclear weapons including the hard water facilities in Arak but it was on hold as part of Obama wonderful deal and can be completed in less than 6 months. And it will be completed this (at the courtesy of our president Trump) year.

Now to prove that you are incorrect and TOTALLY WRONG......... From 2012. If Iran was able to cheat or violate or enrich uranium.

Don’t you think they could have the bomb by now?

Iranians has NOT enriched or advanced their nuclear program since Obama told them to STOP.

Awwww......aren't you special.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It wasn't a treaty, Moron.


It was an Executive Order. The next President can shitcan EOs, which is what Trump did.

Get an education.

uh - wrong. it was a multi nation agreement that demanded inspections to make sure iran was complying. they were. now your dotard president reneged, making 'america's word' the same as 'shit' & that there 10 yr pause - , that would give iran the opportunity to NOT create a nuke & turn into a once again thriving nation - has now turned it into a few mere months away path to nuclear weapons.

it was a multi nation agreement

Cool story bro.

How many votes did it get in the US Senate?

that demanded inspections to make sure iran was complying.

Inspections by Iranians? Or by Americans?
Inspections everywhere, with no notice?

that there 10 yr pause - , that would give iran the opportunity to NOT create a nuke & turn into a once again thriving nation

They can thrive after they oust the mullahs.

it's not a story bruh, but facts. read them & learn something.

Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy With Iran

• Fact Sheets & Briefs

Last Reviewed:
November 2019
Contact: Kelsey Davenport, Director for Nonproliferation Policy, (202) 463-8270 x102

Iran and six world powers known as the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) reached a historic nuclear deal on July 14, 2015 that limited Iran's nuclear program and enhanced monitoring in exchange for relief from nuclear sanctions.

April 14, 2015: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously passes legislation authored by Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) that will require the President to submit the deal to Congress for a vote of approval or disapproval. According to the legislation, the President will not be able to waive sanctions during the 30 day Congressional review period.

March 9, 2015: Senator Tom Cotton and 46 other senators sign an open letter to the Parliament of Iran. The letter warns that any deal reached without legislative approval could be revised by the next president “with the stroke of a pen.”


May 27, 2016: The IAEA issues its quarterly report on Iran's implementation of the nuclear deal. The report shows Iran is abiding by restrictions under the agreement and inspectors have been able to access certain Iranian sites using complimentary access visits.

July 19, 2015: The Obama administration sends the comprehensive deal and supporting documents to Congress, beginning the 60 day review period mandated by the Iran Nuclear Deal Review Act.

July 20, 2015: The UN Security Council unanimously passes a resolution endorsing the nuclear deal and the lifting of UN Security Council nuclear sanctions once key steps are taken in the deal.

August 15, 2015: The IAEA confirms that Iran submitted documents and explanations to answer the agency's unresolved concerns about past activities that could be related to nuclear weapons development.

September 2, 2015: The 34th Senator announces support for the nuclear deal with Iran, meaning that Congress will not have the support to override a presidential veto on a resolution disapproving of the deal.

September 8, 2015: Four additional Senators announce that they will support the nuclear deal with Iran, bringing the total number to 42. This important milestone will prevent the Senate from reaching the 60 vote threshold required for ending debate and moving to vote on a resolution of disapproval.

September 8, 2016: The IAEA releases its third quarterly report since JCPOA implementation day, showing Iran continues to abide by its restrictions under the JCPOA. The report notes that Iran removed 96 IR-1 centrifuges from the storage area at Natanz to replace damaged centrifuges that were enriching uranium.

November 8, 2016: Donald Trump is elected as the 45th President of the United States. During the presidential campaign, Trump referred to the JCPOA as the worst deal ever negotiated and pledged to renegotiate it. The U.S.’s European allies in the P5+1 previously signaled they would resist efforts to renegotiate the deal.

November 20, 2016: IAEA releases its fourth quarterly report on Iranian nuclear program since JCPOA implementation day. The report notes that Iran had 130.1 metric tons of heavy water, slightly over the 130 metric tons permitted under the deal. The IAEA report says Iran plans to transfer heavy water out of the country.

December 1, 2016: Congress passes a 10-year extension of the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA), which becomes law on December 15th. Extension of the ISA is consistent with U.S. obligations under the JCPOA, although many of the ISA’s provisions are being waived under Washington’s commitments under the agreement.

December 6, 2016: IAEA verifies that all 11 metric tons of heavy water shipped out of Iran have reached their destination and are in storage, bringing Iran back within the limit on heavy water of 130 metric tons established by the JCPOA.

2017
January 12, 2017: In his confirmation hearing for the position of Secretary of Defense, General Jim Mattis tells Congress that, while he believes the JCPOA is an imperfect agreement, “when America gives her word, we have to live up to it and work with our allies.” His remarks echo a previous statement in April, when he noted there is “no going back” on the deal absent a clear violation of the agreement.

Iran receives the first shipment in an order of 100 planes purchased from Airbus. Sanctions waived as part of the nuclear deal allow Iran to purchase new commercial aircraft.

January 15, 2017: IAEA verifies that Tehran has taken certain steps to remove infrastructure and excess centrifuges from Fordow within the necessary timeframe required by the JCPOA (one year after Implementation Day). Secretary of Energy Moniz releases a statement noting “Iran successfully met the milestone of removing excess centrifuges and infrastructure from Fordow, demonstrating that the deal continues to limit Iran’s nuclear program so as to provide confidence that Iran is not developing a nuclear weapon and maintain at least a one year breakout time.”

August 31, 2017: In its third quarterly report, the IAEA finds that as of Aug. 21, Iran’s stock of low-enriched uranium was 88.4 kg (194.89 pounds), well below a 202.8-kg limit, and the level of enrichment did not exceed a 3.67 percent cap. Iran’s stock of heavy water, stood at 111 tons, below the 130 ton limit.

November 13, 2017: The IAEA issues its fourth quarterly report for 2017 on Iran's implementation of the JCPOA. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano tells the agency's Board of Governors that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented and that IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit.

February 22, 2018: The IAEA issues its first quarterly report for 2018 on Iran's implementation of the JCPOA. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano tells the agency's Board of Governors that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented and that IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit. As of Feb. 12, 2018, the quantity of Iran’s uranium enriched up to 3.67% U-235 was 109.5 kg. The report notes that Iran informed the agency of its intention to pursue naval nuclear propulsion in the future.
[...]

Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy With Iran | Arms Control Association

The report shows Iran is abiding by restrictions under the agreement and inspectors have been able to access certain Iranian sites using complimentary access visits.

Certain sites?

IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit.

What about US inspectors?
What about locations on military sites?

I didn't see anything in your link about Senate votes to ratify a treaty.

Iran has 18 nuclear facilities and 9 other facilities monitored by IAEA.

Monitored by IAEA means & includes:
1. including satellite view.
2. mountain radiation (farts).
3. inspectors consist mostly Americans.

Military facilities are not included in the agreement to be inspected.

Iran has 18 nuclear facilities and 9 other facilities monitored by IAEA.

How many were hidden the last time they promised to stop?

Military facilities are not included in the agreement to be inspected.

I wonder if they could have nuclear facilities on a military base?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The report shows Iran is abiding by restrictions under the agreement and inspectors have been able to access certain Iranian sites using complimentary access visits.

Certain sites?

IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit.

What about US inspectors?
What about locations on military sites?

I didn't see anything in your link about Senate votes to ratify a treaty.

if you read more - they said they were able to go into anywhere they wanted access. i didn't say it was a treaty. it was an agreement & we signed onto it. it was not an EO like some dumbfuck tried peddling AND the UN was involved. that's serious shit & senators signed onto the agreement when it was implemented.

if you read more - they said they were able to go into anywhere they wanted access.

You need to read up more.

i didn't say it was a treaty. it was an agreement & we signed onto it.

If it wasn't a treaty, and wasn't ratified by the Senate, it can be overturned without Senate input.

the UN was involved. that's serious shit & senators signed onto the agreement when it was implemented.

How many Senators "signed onto the agreement"?

you think the IAEA would lie about iran? hmmmmm sounds just W's reasoning. are you saying obama did this all on his own & donny getting out was the best thing to do?

wow wow wow. you go boy. you go.

you think the IAEA would lie about iran?

You think the IAEA inspected any military sites?

are you saying obama did this all on his own

Of course not. He got a bunch of votes in the Senate.

How many exactly?

No IAEA are not allowed to inspect military sites.

Why do you want them to waste their time?

Why do you trust the mullahs?

 

[toobfreak]

Its Iran's move, will they poke the tiger or tuck their tail and go home? How badly do they want to get thumped?

And that really is the question, isn't it? Iran has been a deliberate antagonistic finger in the bear's eye for decades. Sweet-talking them and kissing their ass didn't make them like us. Now they could say to themselves: "Cut our losses and leave well enough alone," or they can do the stupid thing and push this into a true all out war they have to know they will lose. Trump has shown them that he can and is willing to kill them at will if need be. It can't be good to be the Ayatollah right now knowing that at any given time, Donald can mail him a bomb right through his bedroom window on a moment's notice from 12,000 miles away. We've shown these people we know just where they are at. Don't you think every enemy of ours like Little Kim has taken notice of this?

The EASY THING TO DO is to just stop pressing the USA's buttons. The only question now is whether Iran is smart enough.

 

[charwin95]

you think the IAEA would lie about iran? hmmmmm sounds just W's reasoning. are you saying obama did this all on his own & donny getting out was the best thing to do?

wow wow wow. you go boy. you go.

you think the IAEA would lie about iran?

You think the IAEA inspected any military sites?

are you saying obama did this all on his own

Of course not. He got a bunch of votes in the Senate.

How many exactly?

don't know what votes he got. oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny 'eh?

don't know what votes he got.

It's right there in your link.​

September 8, 2015: Four additional Senators announce that they will support the nuclear deal with Iran, bringing the total number to 42. This important milestone will prevent the Senate from reaching the 60 vote threshold required for ending debate and moving to vote on a resolution of disapproval.

oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny

If you think Iran was going to pause for 10 years, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible, 'eh? how'z this all working out for us?

you think we are safer NOW after his actions? i bet you do, despite it all. i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

A non-treaty which looks like it received 42 votes in the Senate.
Which gave Iran billions and lifted restrictions on their economy, allowing them to continue to support terrorism and continue their nuclear program.

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible

**** Trump's sanctions on Iran will make it more difficult to continue the nuclear programs that they were continuing under Obama's "agreement". Hopefully, the people will rise up again, and unlike that pussy Obama, who gave them zero support, the US will actually help them overthrow the mullahs.

how'z this all working out for us?

Better.

you think we are safer NOW after his actions?

You think the fake agreement that didn't allow inspections at military sites made us safer?
Like I said, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

Pallets of cash in the middle of the night aren't nothing.
Not to mention freeing up assets frozen in banks around the world.

****Totally wrong.
Your post consists several issues but let me concentrate on your Trump sanctions against Iran nuclear program.

Trump sanctions DOES NOT stop or even slow down Iran nuclear program. That’s a fact.
Show me a shred of evidence that Iran violated the agreement and show us an evidence that sanctions will slow down Iran program.

How the fuck Trump can slow it form when they have ALL the ingredients?

 

[charwin95]

Really? I MEAN REALLY? Trump violated the treaty. How can you be so stupid and ignorant?

It wasn't a treaty, Moron.


It was an Executive Order. The next President can shitcan EOs, which is what Trump did.

Get an education.

uh - wrong. it was a multi nation agreement that demanded inspections to make sure iran was complying. they were. now your dotard president reneged, making 'america's word' the same as 'shit' & that there 10 yr pause - , that would give iran the opportunity to NOT create a nuke & turn into a once again thriving nation - has now turned it into a few mere months away path to nuclear weapons.

the Iranians were not complying with the agreement, they were enriching uranium and proceeding with their plans to develop nuclear bombs. They were using the money Obozo gave them to fund muslim terrorists around the world. they hoodwinked obama and he was too dumb to realize it. The only thing those sand rats understand is massive force. Fortunately the Iranian people are fed up with the radical mullahs and are protesting i the streets.

That is not true Dude. Totally incorrect. That’s what Trump ( or Bibi) told you which he has no single evidence NADA nothing.
This guy is a total pathological liar. How can you even believe what he is saying? We have not heard any complaints from IAEA inspectors or other countries that sigh with the agreement about any violations......... Except from Trump.

Iranians has NOT enriched or advanced their nuclear program since Obama told them to STOP.

This is way too long to explain but I will make it short and easy for you. Okay? And I don’t fucking lie.

Iran started their nuclear ambitions a long time ago like in 50s. Fast forward. Then start enriching uranium in 2012. They are very close in making a nuclear weapons including the hard water facilities in Arak but it was on hold as part of Obama wonderful deal and can be completed in less than 6 months. And it will be completed this (at the courtesy of our president Trump) year.

Now to prove that you are incorrect and TOTALLY WRONG......... From 2012. If Iran was able to cheat or violate or enrich uranium.

Don’t you think they could have the bomb by now?

Iranians has NOT enriched or advanced their nuclear program since Obama told them to STOP.

Awwww......aren't you special.

I am very special far more advance than you. I can guarantee you that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[charwin95]

I'm curious about something...

Are we simply to allow threats around the world to fester until they become threats to us?

Good question you should direct to your kind.

Iran is a threat especially when they acquire the ambition of nuclear arms. Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse. Except we go to war.

Trump is a danger to Americans. He should be remove from the office.

Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse.

Sounds like the sanctions have a chance of toppling the mullahs.

If Obama hadn't been such a weak twat the last time protests broke out, this might have been resolved before Trump.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

1. You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions. You only hurt ordinary people that are against the ( old hard liners) mullahs.

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime. It took generations for the young generations to come to that level. Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

2. Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program. Obama doesn’t want to go to war............. Trump STUPIDITY made the mullahs restart their nuclear program. In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

America is not ready for another war in ME. If we go to war. WARMONGER people like you would be responsible and who voted for this president.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

And currently anti-mullah protests.

You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions.

Why not?

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime.

And imagine how much less they like them when they waste money on terror and nuclear programs and can't meet the needs of their people.

Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

And that can all change, once the mullahs hang.

Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program.

Why do you feel they slowed down their program?

In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

Sounds like a plan.

You pick and choose and cherry pick my post to fit your agenda.

Dude. Do your stupid post all over.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

you think the IAEA would lie about iran?

You think the IAEA inspected any military sites?

are you saying obama did this all on his own

Of course not. He got a bunch of votes in the Senate.

How many exactly?

don't know what votes he got. oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny 'eh?

don't know what votes he got.

It's right there in your link.​

September 8, 2015: Four additional Senators announce that they will support the nuclear deal with Iran, bringing the total number to 42. This important milestone will prevent the Senate from reaching the 60 vote threshold required for ending debate and moving to vote on a resolution of disapproval.

oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny

If you think Iran was going to pause for 10 years, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible, 'eh? how'z this all working out for us?

you think we are safer NOW after his actions? i bet you do, despite it all. i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

A non-treaty which looks like it received 42 votes in the Senate.
Which gave Iran billions and lifted restrictions on their economy, allowing them to continue to support terrorism and continue their nuclear program.

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible

**** Trump's sanctions on Iran will make it more difficult to continue the nuclear programs that they were continuing under Obama's "agreement". Hopefully, the people will rise up again, and unlike that pussy Obama, who gave them zero support, the US will actually help them overthrow the mullahs.

how'z this all working out for us?

Better.

you think we are safer NOW after his actions?

You think the fake agreement that didn't allow inspections at military sites made us safer?
Like I said, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

Pallets of cash in the middle of the night aren't nothing.
Not to mention freeing up assets frozen in banks around the world.

****Totally wrong.
Your post consists several issues but let me concentrate on your Trump sanctions against Iran nuclear program.

Trump sanctions DOES NOT stop or even slow down Iran nuclear program. That’s a fact.
Show me a shred of evidence that Iran violated the agreement and show us an evidence that sanctions will slow down Iran program.

How the fuck Trump can slow it form when they have ALL the ingredients?

Trump sanctions DOES NOT stop or even slow down Iran nuclear program.

But Obama's "agreement" did?

Show me a shred of evidence that Iran violated the agreement

It's sweet that you believe the mullahs stopped....really sweet.

show us an evidence that sanctions will slow down Iran program.

They're full speed ahead, just like they were before Trump.
We can only hope their people rise up, with US support this time, and overthrow the mullahs.

How the fuck Trump can slow it form when they have ALL the ingredients?

Choking off their money doesn't help them, does it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'm curious about something...

Are we simply to allow threats around the world to fester until they become threats to us?

Good question you should direct to your kind.

Iran is a threat especially when they acquire the ambition of nuclear arms. Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse. Except we go to war.

Trump is a danger to Americans. He should be remove from the office.

Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse.

Sounds like the sanctions have a chance of toppling the mullahs.

If Obama hadn't been such a weak twat the last time protests broke out, this might have been resolved before Trump.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

1. You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions. You only hurt ordinary people that are against the ( old hard liners) mullahs.

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime. It took generations for the young generations to come to that level. Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

2. Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program. Obama doesn’t want to go to war............. Trump STUPIDITY made the mullahs restart their nuclear program. In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

America is not ready for another war in ME. If we go to war. WARMONGER people like you would be responsible and who voted for this president.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

And currently anti-mullah protests.

You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions.

Why not?

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime.

And imagine how much less they like them when they waste money on terror and nuclear programs and can't meet the needs of their people.

Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

And that can all change, once the mullahs hang.

Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program.

Why do you feel they slowed down their program?

In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

Sounds like a plan.

You pick and choose and cherry pick my post to fit your agenda.

Dude. Do your stupid post all over.

You pick and choose and cherry pick my post to fit your agenda.

 

[charwin95]

uh - wrong. it was a multi nation agreement that demanded inspections to make sure iran was complying. they were. now your dotard president reneged, making 'america's word' the same as 'shit' & that there 10 yr pause - , that would give iran the opportunity to NOT create a nuke & turn into a once again thriving nation - has now turned it into a few mere months away path to nuclear weapons.

it was a multi nation agreement

Cool story bro.

How many votes did it get in the US Senate?

that demanded inspections to make sure iran was complying.

Inspections by Iranians? Or by Americans?
Inspections everywhere, with no notice?

that there 10 yr pause - , that would give iran the opportunity to NOT create a nuke & turn into a once again thriving nation

They can thrive after they oust the mullahs.

it's not a story bruh, but facts. read them & learn something.

Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy With Iran

• Fact Sheets & Briefs

Last Reviewed:
November 2019
Contact: Kelsey Davenport, Director for Nonproliferation Policy, (202) 463-8270 x102

Iran and six world powers known as the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) reached a historic nuclear deal on July 14, 2015 that limited Iran's nuclear program and enhanced monitoring in exchange for relief from nuclear sanctions.

April 14, 2015: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously passes legislation authored by Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) that will require the President to submit the deal to Congress for a vote of approval or disapproval. According to the legislation, the President will not be able to waive sanctions during the 30 day Congressional review period.

March 9, 2015: Senator Tom Cotton and 46 other senators sign an open letter to the Parliament of Iran. The letter warns that any deal reached without legislative approval could be revised by the next president “with the stroke of a pen.”


May 27, 2016: The IAEA issues its quarterly report on Iran's implementation of the nuclear deal. The report shows Iran is abiding by restrictions under the agreement and inspectors have been able to access certain Iranian sites using complimentary access visits.

July 19, 2015: The Obama administration sends the comprehensive deal and supporting documents to Congress, beginning the 60 day review period mandated by the Iran Nuclear Deal Review Act.

July 20, 2015: The UN Security Council unanimously passes a resolution endorsing the nuclear deal and the lifting of UN Security Council nuclear sanctions once key steps are taken in the deal.

August 15, 2015: The IAEA confirms that Iran submitted documents and explanations to answer the agency's unresolved concerns about past activities that could be related to nuclear weapons development.

September 2, 2015: The 34th Senator announces support for the nuclear deal with Iran, meaning that Congress will not have the support to override a presidential veto on a resolution disapproving of the deal.

September 8, 2015: Four additional Senators announce that they will support the nuclear deal with Iran, bringing the total number to 42. This important milestone will prevent the Senate from reaching the 60 vote threshold required for ending debate and moving to vote on a resolution of disapproval.

September 8, 2016: The IAEA releases its third quarterly report since JCPOA implementation day, showing Iran continues to abide by its restrictions under the JCPOA. The report notes that Iran removed 96 IR-1 centrifuges from the storage area at Natanz to replace damaged centrifuges that were enriching uranium.

November 8, 2016: Donald Trump is elected as the 45th President of the United States. During the presidential campaign, Trump referred to the JCPOA as the worst deal ever negotiated and pledged to renegotiate it. The U.S.’s European allies in the P5+1 previously signaled they would resist efforts to renegotiate the deal.

November 20, 2016: IAEA releases its fourth quarterly report on Iranian nuclear program since JCPOA implementation day. The report notes that Iran had 130.1 metric tons of heavy water, slightly over the 130 metric tons permitted under the deal. The IAEA report says Iran plans to transfer heavy water out of the country.

December 1, 2016: Congress passes a 10-year extension of the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA), which becomes law on December 15th. Extension of the ISA is consistent with U.S. obligations under the JCPOA, although many of the ISA’s provisions are being waived under Washington’s commitments under the agreement.

December 6, 2016: IAEA verifies that all 11 metric tons of heavy water shipped out of Iran have reached their destination and are in storage, bringing Iran back within the limit on heavy water of 130 metric tons established by the JCPOA.

2017
January 12, 2017: In his confirmation hearing for the position of Secretary of Defense, General Jim Mattis tells Congress that, while he believes the JCPOA is an imperfect agreement, “when America gives her word, we have to live up to it and work with our allies.” His remarks echo a previous statement in April, when he noted there is “no going back” on the deal absent a clear violation of the agreement.

Iran receives the first shipment in an order of 100 planes purchased from Airbus. Sanctions waived as part of the nuclear deal allow Iran to purchase new commercial aircraft.

January 15, 2017: IAEA verifies that Tehran has taken certain steps to remove infrastructure and excess centrifuges from Fordow within the necessary timeframe required by the JCPOA (one year after Implementation Day). Secretary of Energy Moniz releases a statement noting “Iran successfully met the milestone of removing excess centrifuges and infrastructure from Fordow, demonstrating that the deal continues to limit Iran’s nuclear program so as to provide confidence that Iran is not developing a nuclear weapon and maintain at least a one year breakout time.”

August 31, 2017: In its third quarterly report, the IAEA finds that as of Aug. 21, Iran’s stock of low-enriched uranium was 88.4 kg (194.89 pounds), well below a 202.8-kg limit, and the level of enrichment did not exceed a 3.67 percent cap. Iran’s stock of heavy water, stood at 111 tons, below the 130 ton limit.

November 13, 2017: The IAEA issues its fourth quarterly report for 2017 on Iran's implementation of the JCPOA. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano tells the agency's Board of Governors that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented and that IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit.

February 22, 2018: The IAEA issues its first quarterly report for 2018 on Iran's implementation of the JCPOA. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano tells the agency's Board of Governors that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented and that IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit. As of Feb. 12, 2018, the quantity of Iran’s uranium enriched up to 3.67% U-235 was 109.5 kg. The report notes that Iran informed the agency of its intention to pursue naval nuclear propulsion in the future.
[...]

Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy With Iran | Arms Control Association

The report shows Iran is abiding by restrictions under the agreement and inspectors have been able to access certain Iranian sites using complimentary access visits.

Certain sites?

IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit.

What about US inspectors?
What about locations on military sites?

I didn't see anything in your link about Senate votes to ratify a treaty.

Iran has 18 nuclear facilities and 9 other facilities monitored by IAEA.

Monitored by IAEA means & includes:
1. including satellite view.
2. mountain radiation (farts).
3. inspectors consist mostly Americans.

Military facilities are not included in the agreement to be inspected.

Iran has 18 nuclear facilities and 9 other facilities monitored by IAEA.

How many were hidden the last time they promised to stop?

Military facilities are not included in the agreement to be inspected.

I wonder if they could have nuclear facilities on a military base?

You are very ignorant.

You make it sound that they just moved your septic tank.
You make it sound like IAEA inspectors are just inspecting your sewer.

You make it sound that IAEA inspectors just used walking around with just meters...... THEY ALSO USE SATELLITE.

Don’t you think American and other inspectors have the same stupid question like yours?

You cannot hide a nuclear facility? You are talking about war heads that can be move around but they are not even that close.

 

[charwin95]

if you read more - they said they were able to go into anywhere they wanted access. i didn't say it was a treaty. it was an agreement & we signed onto it. it was not an EO like some dumbfuck tried peddling AND the UN was involved. that's serious shit & senators signed onto the agreement when it was implemented.

if you read more - they said they were able to go into anywhere they wanted access.

You need to read up more.

i didn't say it was a treaty. it was an agreement & we signed onto it.

If it wasn't a treaty, and wasn't ratified by the Senate, it can be overturned without Senate input.

the UN was involved. that's serious shit & senators signed onto the agreement when it was implemented.

How many Senators "signed onto the agreement"?

you think the IAEA would lie about iran? hmmmmm sounds just W's reasoning. are you saying obama did this all on his own & donny getting out was the best thing to do?

wow wow wow. you go boy. you go.

you think the IAEA would lie about iran?

You think the IAEA inspected any military sites?

are you saying obama did this all on his own

Of course not. He got a bunch of votes in the Senate.

How many exactly?

No IAEA are not allowed to inspect military sites.

Why do you want them to waste their time?

Why do you trust the mullahs?

I trust our people that doing their jobs.

I don’t trust Trump. He is nothing but a piece of shit.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

it was a multi nation agreement

Cool story bro.

How many votes did it get in the US Senate?

that demanded inspections to make sure iran was complying.

Inspections by Iranians? Or by Americans?
Inspections everywhere, with no notice?

that there 10 yr pause - , that would give iran the opportunity to NOT create a nuke & turn into a once again thriving nation

They can thrive after they oust the mullahs.

it's not a story bruh, but facts. read them & learn something.

Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy With Iran

• Fact Sheets & Briefs

Last Reviewed:
November 2019
Contact: Kelsey Davenport, Director for Nonproliferation Policy, (202) 463-8270 x102

Iran and six world powers known as the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) reached a historic nuclear deal on July 14, 2015 that limited Iran's nuclear program and enhanced monitoring in exchange for relief from nuclear sanctions.

April 14, 2015: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously passes legislation authored by Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) that will require the President to submit the deal to Congress for a vote of approval or disapproval. According to the legislation, the President will not be able to waive sanctions during the 30 day Congressional review period.

March 9, 2015: Senator Tom Cotton and 46 other senators sign an open letter to the Parliament of Iran. The letter warns that any deal reached without legislative approval could be revised by the next president “with the stroke of a pen.”


May 27, 2016: The IAEA issues its quarterly report on Iran's implementation of the nuclear deal. The report shows Iran is abiding by restrictions under the agreement and inspectors have been able to access certain Iranian sites using complimentary access visits.

July 19, 2015: The Obama administration sends the comprehensive deal and supporting documents to Congress, beginning the 60 day review period mandated by the Iran Nuclear Deal Review Act.

July 20, 2015: The UN Security Council unanimously passes a resolution endorsing the nuclear deal and the lifting of UN Security Council nuclear sanctions once key steps are taken in the deal.

August 15, 2015: The IAEA confirms that Iran submitted documents and explanations to answer the agency's unresolved concerns about past activities that could be related to nuclear weapons development.

September 2, 2015: The 34th Senator announces support for the nuclear deal with Iran, meaning that Congress will not have the support to override a presidential veto on a resolution disapproving of the deal.

September 8, 2015: Four additional Senators announce that they will support the nuclear deal with Iran, bringing the total number to 42. This important milestone will prevent the Senate from reaching the 60 vote threshold required for ending debate and moving to vote on a resolution of disapproval.

September 8, 2016: The IAEA releases its third quarterly report since JCPOA implementation day, showing Iran continues to abide by its restrictions under the JCPOA. The report notes that Iran removed 96 IR-1 centrifuges from the storage area at Natanz to replace damaged centrifuges that were enriching uranium.

November 8, 2016: Donald Trump is elected as the 45th President of the United States. During the presidential campaign, Trump referred to the JCPOA as the worst deal ever negotiated and pledged to renegotiate it. The U.S.’s European allies in the P5+1 previously signaled they would resist efforts to renegotiate the deal.

November 20, 2016: IAEA releases its fourth quarterly report on Iranian nuclear program since JCPOA implementation day. The report notes that Iran had 130.1 metric tons of heavy water, slightly over the 130 metric tons permitted under the deal. The IAEA report says Iran plans to transfer heavy water out of the country.

December 1, 2016: Congress passes a 10-year extension of the Iran Sanctions Act (ISA), which becomes law on December 15th. Extension of the ISA is consistent with U.S. obligations under the JCPOA, although many of the ISA’s provisions are being waived under Washington’s commitments under the agreement.

December 6, 2016: IAEA verifies that all 11 metric tons of heavy water shipped out of Iran have reached their destination and are in storage, bringing Iran back within the limit on heavy water of 130 metric tons established by the JCPOA.

2017
January 12, 2017: In his confirmation hearing for the position of Secretary of Defense, General Jim Mattis tells Congress that, while he believes the JCPOA is an imperfect agreement, “when America gives her word, we have to live up to it and work with our allies.” His remarks echo a previous statement in April, when he noted there is “no going back” on the deal absent a clear violation of the agreement.

Iran receives the first shipment in an order of 100 planes purchased from Airbus. Sanctions waived as part of the nuclear deal allow Iran to purchase new commercial aircraft.

January 15, 2017: IAEA verifies that Tehran has taken certain steps to remove infrastructure and excess centrifuges from Fordow within the necessary timeframe required by the JCPOA (one year after Implementation Day). Secretary of Energy Moniz releases a statement noting “Iran successfully met the milestone of removing excess centrifuges and infrastructure from Fordow, demonstrating that the deal continues to limit Iran’s nuclear program so as to provide confidence that Iran is not developing a nuclear weapon and maintain at least a one year breakout time.”

August 31, 2017: In its third quarterly report, the IAEA finds that as of Aug. 21, Iran’s stock of low-enriched uranium was 88.4 kg (194.89 pounds), well below a 202.8-kg limit, and the level of enrichment did not exceed a 3.67 percent cap. Iran’s stock of heavy water, stood at 111 tons, below the 130 ton limit.

November 13, 2017: The IAEA issues its fourth quarterly report for 2017 on Iran's implementation of the JCPOA. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano tells the agency's Board of Governors that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented and that IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit.

February 22, 2018: The IAEA issues its first quarterly report for 2018 on Iran's implementation of the JCPOA. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano tells the agency's Board of Governors that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented and that IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit. As of Feb. 12, 2018, the quantity of Iran’s uranium enriched up to 3.67% U-235 was 109.5 kg. The report notes that Iran informed the agency of its intention to pursue naval nuclear propulsion in the future.
[...]

Timeline of Nuclear Diplomacy With Iran | Arms Control Association

The report shows Iran is abiding by restrictions under the agreement and inspectors have been able to access certain Iranian sites using complimentary access visits.

Certain sites?

IAEA inspectors have had access to all locations they have needed to visit.

What about US inspectors?
What about locations on military sites?

I didn't see anything in your link about Senate votes to ratify a treaty.

Iran has 18 nuclear facilities and 9 other facilities monitored by IAEA.

Monitored by IAEA means & includes:
1. including satellite view.
2. mountain radiation (farts).
3. inspectors consist mostly Americans.

Military facilities are not included in the agreement to be inspected.

Iran has 18 nuclear facilities and 9 other facilities monitored by IAEA.

How many were hidden the last time they promised to stop?

Military facilities are not included in the agreement to be inspected.

I wonder if they could have nuclear facilities on a military base?

You are very ignorant.

You make it sound that they just moved your septic tank.
You make it sound like IAEA inspectors are just inspecting your sewer.

You make it sound that IAEA inspectors just used walking around with just meters...... THEY ALSO USE SATELLITE.

Don’t you think American and other inspectors have the same stupid question like yours?

You cannot hide a nuclear facility? You are talking about war heads that can be move around but they are not even that close.

You make it sound like IAEA inspectors are just inspecting your sewer.

No inspections on military facilities, right?
What about secret nuclear facilities, it's not like Iran didn't do that before.

THEY ALSO USE SATELLITE.

So what?

Don’t you think American and other inspectors have the same stupid question like yours?

Hopefully they aren't as stupid as you.

You cannot hide a nuclear facility?

They did it before.

 

[charwin95]

don't know what votes he got. oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny 'eh?

don't know what votes he got.

It's right there in your link.​

September 8, 2015: Four additional Senators announce that they will support the nuclear deal with Iran, bringing the total number to 42. This important milestone will prevent the Senate from reaching the 60 vote threshold required for ending debate and moving to vote on a resolution of disapproval.

oh but a 10 year pause vs a few months really was a win for donny

If you think Iran was going to pause for 10 years, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible, 'eh? how'z this all working out for us?

you think we are safer NOW after his actions? i bet you do, despite it all. i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

i read that. i thought you were talking about further in the timeline that wasn't what c/p. what are you whining about then re: senators signing on?

A non-treaty which looks like it received 42 votes in the Senate.
Which gave Iran billions and lifted restrictions on their economy, allowing them to continue to support terrorism and continue their nuclear program.

well - whether that 10 yr pause ever was a fact or not - - - doing what donny did sure made it impossible

**** Trump's sanctions on Iran will make it more difficult to continue the nuclear programs that they were continuing under Obama's "agreement". Hopefully, the people will rise up again, and unlike that pussy Obama, who gave them zero support, the US will actually help them overthrow the mullahs.

how'z this all working out for us?

Better.

you think we are safer NOW after his actions?

You think the fake agreement that didn't allow inspections at military sites made us safer?
Like I said, you're dumber than you first appeared.

i bet you also believe that we paid iran for the deal too.

Pallets of cash in the middle of the night aren't nothing.
Not to mention freeing up assets frozen in banks around the world.

****Totally wrong.
Your post consists several issues but let me concentrate on your Trump sanctions against Iran nuclear program.

Trump sanctions DOES NOT stop or even slow down Iran nuclear program. That’s a fact.
Show me a shred of evidence that Iran violated the agreement and show us an evidence that sanctions will slow down Iran program.

How the fuck Trump can slow it form when they have ALL the ingredients?

Trump sanctions DOES NOT stop or even slow down Iran nuclear program.

But Obama's "agreement" did?

Show me a shred of evidence that Iran violated the agreement

It's sweet that you believe the mullahs stopped....really sweet.

show us an evidence that sanctions will slow down Iran program.

They're full speed ahead, just like they were before Trump.
We can only hope their people rise up, with US support this time, and overthrow the mullahs.

How the fuck Trump can slow it form when they have ALL the ingredients?

Choking off their money doesn't help them, does it?

You have no clue what you are talking about. ZERO none.

 

[White 6]

The results is what? Did they shiver or spit? Or scared?

Let me tell you the reality and I don’t fucking lie.

I’ve been to Tehran twice and I know lots of Iranians here and in Iran. They are good people that hate the reputations of supporting terrorism.
The young generations do not like the old hard liners but they are scared of new revolutions to change the regime. Especially doesn’t know where and who to turns for support especially NOT this idiot Trump.
But the Trump sanctions against ordinary Iranians that need food, medicines and other human essentials...... That doesn’t want to get involved. Are turning the tides of HATES towards Americans.

The numbers of chanting death to America is very small compared to general populations. The numbers after the sanctions will turn the whole country of hating America not only in Iran but Iraq and Syria. We supposed to get these good people to be on our side not against us.

It took generations to build that kind support then here comes this ugly dude who doesn’t know what he is doing wrecked and fuck it up.

then the people within Iran need to take out the leaders to allow money back in. It's what the US wants. you don't get it though, cause you're too blind to see.

Tough shit does not solve this kind of problem with foreign countries. ME is not America.
Try to remember that. Sanctions against people will create more enemies for generations to come.

then why do demofks always push for sanctions? you don't care about russian people who live in a country with sanctions? it's a ball of twine you're tangled up in.

You are very ignorant and stupid.

1. Russia is an enemy and only country to that can eradicate US in the face of the earth.

2. Putin rape our democracy that you and others supported.

3. Russia deserves to be punished.

4. Russians will is like self sufficient and does not suffer as much like the Iranians.

5. Its bipartisan that pushes sanctions against Russia not just democrats. Then Trump always objected especially against any oligarchs.

You are very ignorant and stupid.

you really need to look in the mirror when making this statement.

the ignorance of the brainwashed sheep who listens to the corporate controlled media. hate to break your heart but OUR government is the most corrupt government on the planet,they are always starting wars with other countrys that did nothing to them. you obviously only listen to our corporate controlled media and what our corrupt school system taught you that this is a free country unable to understand it is a facist dictatership. has been since 1913.

most countrys love Putin because he a man of world peace which is WHY our government hates him and would love to wipe russia off the map of existance.

Put down that vodka bottle comrade. Nobody loves Putin but Putin and Trump.

 

[charwin95]

Good question you should direct to your kind.

Iran is a threat especially when they acquire the ambition of nuclear arms. Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse. Except we go to war.

Trump is a danger to Americans. He should be remove from the office.

Then Trump came in without any solution NOTHING to offer to solve this problem except made it worse.

Sounds like the sanctions have a chance of toppling the mullahs.

If Obama hadn't been such a weak twat the last time protests broke out, this might have been resolved before Trump.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

1. You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions. You only hurt ordinary people that are against the ( old hard liners) mullahs.

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime. It took generations for the young generations to come to that level. Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

2. Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program. Obama doesn’t want to go to war............. Trump STUPIDITY made the mullahs restart their nuclear program. In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

America is not ready for another war in ME. If we go to war. WARMONGER people like you would be responsible and who voted for this president.

There’s always anti American protest in the Middle East.

And currently anti-mullah protests.

You cannot topple the mullah just because of sanctions.

Why not?

I already explained this. The younger generations doesn’t like the existing regime.

And imagine how much less they like them when they waste money on terror and nuclear programs and can't meet the needs of their people.

Then stupid dumb sanctions changed all of that effecting peoples live, financially, food, medicine, jobs and regular daily need.

And that can all change, once the mullahs hang.

Obama did a very good job slowing down the Iran nuclear program.

Why do you feel they slowed down their program?

In less than 2 years they have their toys. The only way to stop that now is we go to war.

Sounds like a plan.

You pick and choose and cherry pick my post to fit your agenda.

Dude. Do your stupid post all over.

You pick and choose and cherry pick my post to fit your agenda.

View attachment 298559

It just shows you don’t have a clue of what you are saying.
Just pure ignorant.