They've Always Been 'Racists'

[alang1216]

5. But while electing Hussein, they embraced racism writ large…as he had this racialist reverend as his chosen speaker.

“Rhyming reverend gets last word at Obama inaugural

“We ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right,” Lowery said…”
Rhyming reverend gets last word at Obama inaugural

So the racist Dems hate Blacks AND Whites? As an Asian you're sitting pretty I guess.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hilariously broken history also known as gobbledygook propaganda. The blacks know which party is full of racists. And yes the Republicans own the South now like the Democrats did before Reagan. They also own

Is the anti-white racism any better than their anti-black racist history?????


4. “NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech

More and more, it seems Democrats are proving to be exactly who many conservatives always thought they were.

Offering a disturbingly divisive message Monday to mark the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams let newcomers know that they are not welcome in New York City, according to the New York Post.

White newcomers from the nation’s heartland, of course — as those coming illegally from south of the border continue to receive a warm embrace in the sanctuary city."
NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech



Democrats…..vote against this party in November, before they start wearing the brown shirts and armbands.

No matter what your garbage propaganda machine says, Nazis are still right wing racist assholes. White supremacists ring a bell? And no Nazis are not socialists. Talk about your big lie propaganda.you believe all right wing garbage propaganda, including the Nazis'...
White supremacists the KKK and Nazis since Trump.

I know I got under your scales again, blanko.....but, please....no vulgarity.
Act like an adult.


Now..."The blacks know which party is full of racists."


Let's check.....and see if you find anything you can dispute in the Democrat Hall of Shame...


1. The Democrats are, and have always been, the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship, the party that stood in schoolhouse doors to block black school children….until Republicans sent in the 101st airborne

2. It is the party of Jefferson Davis, the KKK, Planned Parenthood, concentration camps for American citizens, and restrictions on free speech.

3. It is the party of Mao ornaments on the White House Christmas tree, and of James Hodgkinson, and of Communist Bernie Sanders, of pretend genders.

4. The Democrat Party is the oldest racist organization in America, the trail of tears, the author of Jim Crow and the bigotry of low expectations, filibustered against women getting the vote and killed every anti-lynching bill to get to Congress

5. The Democrat Party is the number one funder of the Islamic Revolution in Tehran….to the tune of $100 billion to the Ayatollahs….and gave Hezbollah the go-ahead to sell cocaine in America.

6. It is the party of anti-Semitism and Louis Farrakhan, and of the first Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress.

7. It is the party that admits its future depends on flooding the country with illegal aliens, and telling them to vote.

8. It is the party that couldn't suck up to the Castro Brothers enough, and treats the Bill of Rights like a Chinese menu..

9. The Democrats got us into the Civil War…Jefferson Davis .... Woodrow Wilson, WWI….FDR, WWII……Truman, Korean War….VietNam, JFK and LBJ…..yet they want to weaken our military.

10. The Democrats are the party that looks at the mayhem their gun laws have produced in Chicago, ……and this is their model for the nation.

11. I should mention that the Democrat Party was used as a model by Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party….another ‘feather’ in the party’s cap?

12. The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism.

13. It's the party of felons over law-abiding actual citizens





Did I get another 100%, blanko?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. But while electing Hussein, they embraced racism writ large…as he had this racialist reverend as his chosen speaker.

“Rhyming reverend gets last word at Obama inaugural

“We ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right,” Lowery said…”
Rhyming reverend gets last word at Obama inaugural

So the racist Dems hate Blacks AND Whites? As an Asian you're sitting pretty I guess.

But you said I was Russian....

Can't you keep your lies straight?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Black, white, whatever....

...why is skin color always the target of the Democrats/Liberals???



6. “During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”

“So,” he said, “we have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them. There is no travel ban on them. There is no ban — you know, they had the Muslim ban. There is no white-guy ban. So what do we do about that?”
CNN’s Don Lemon doubles down after saying white men are ‘the biggest terror threat in this country’


Get that?

"...stop demonizing people....except whites..."

 

[alang1216]

So the racist Dems hate Blacks AND Whites? As an Asian you're sitting pretty I guess.

But you said I was Russian....

Can't you keep your lies straight?????

I recalled you are an Asian and asked if you speak Russian as you first language. No lies involved.

 

[alang1216]

Black, white, whatever....

...why is skin color always the target of the Democrats/Liberals???



6. “During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”

“So,” he said, “we have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them. There is no travel ban on them. There is no ban — you know, they had the Muslim ban. There is no white-guy ban. So what do we do about that?”
CNN’s Don Lemon doubles down after saying white men are ‘the biggest terror threat in this country’


Get that?

"...stop demonizing people....except whites..."

This from a poster with a thread titled:They've Always Been 'Racists'
You should Google the word 'hypocrite'.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. “WASHINGTON – Steven Clifford, author and former CEO of the King Broadcasting Company and National Mobile Television, told PJM that the federal government should “prohibit straight white males from voting” in U.S. elections as a way to “save” democracy.

“I think it’s the only hope for democracy in America and I will be leading a great movement to prohibit straight white males, who I believe supported Donald Trump by about 85 percent, from exercising the franchise and I think that will save our democracy,” Clifford said during an interview…” Former TV CEO Says U.S. Should Ban ‘Straight White Males from Voting’




They’ve revealed who they really are….Racists.

 

[2aguy]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

Wrong......that lie can't bear the internet.......

the lie of the Southern Strategy....

Nixon’s Southern Strategy: The Democrat-Lie Keeping Their Control Over the Black Community | Black Quill and Ink

Believe it or not, the entire myth was created by an unknown editor at the New York Times who didn’t do his job and read a story he was given to edit.

On May 17, 1970, the New York Times published an article written by James Boyd. The headline, written by our unknown editor, was “Nixon’s Southern Strategy: It’s All in the Charts.”

The article was about a very controversial political analyst named Kevin Phillips. Phillips believed that everyone voted according to their ethnic background, not according to their individual beliefs. And all a candidate had to do is frame their message according to whatever moves a particular ethnic group.

Phillips offered his services to the Nixon campaign. But if our unknown editor had bothered to read the story completely, he would’ve seen that Phillip’s and his theory was completely rejected!

Boyd wrote in his article, “Though Phillips’s ideas for an aggressive anti-liberal campaign strategy that would hasten defection of the working-class democrats to the republicans did not prevail in the 1968 campaign, he won the respect John Mitchell.” (Mitchell was a well-known Washington insider at the time).

A lazy, negligent editor partially read the story. And wrote a headline for it that attributed Nixon’s campaign success–to a plan he rejected.

In fact, Phillips isn’t even mentioned in Nixon’s memoirs.

Is all of this the result of a negligent copy editor at the New York Times? Or did they purposely work with the Democrat Party to create this myth? That has crossed my mind and it’s certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.

The actual story referenced by Williams...

see page 4, bottom of first column...

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf

 

[alang1216]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

Wrong......that lie can't bear the internet.......

the lie of the Southern Strategy....

Nixon’s Southern Strategy: The Democrat-Lie Keeping Their Control Over the Black Community | Black Quill and Ink

Believe it or not, the entire myth was created by an unknown editor at the New York Times who didn’t do his job and read a story he was given to edit.

On May 17, 1970, the New York Times published an article written by James Boyd. The headline, written by our unknown editor, was “Nixon’s Southern Strategy: It’s All in the Charts.”

The article was about a very controversial political analyst named Kevin Phillips. Phillips believed that everyone voted according to their ethnic background, not according to their individual beliefs. And all a candidate had to do is frame their message according to whatever moves a particular ethnic group.

Phillips offered his services to the Nixon campaign. But if our unknown editor had bothered to read the story completely, he would’ve seen that Phillip’s and his theory was completely rejected!

Boyd wrote in his article, “Though Phillips’s ideas for an aggressive anti-liberal campaign strategy that would hasten defection of the working-class democrats to the republicans did not prevail in the 1968 campaign, he won the respect John Mitchell.” (Mitchell was a well-known Washington insider at the time).

A lazy, negligent editor partially read the story. And wrote a headline for it that attributed Nixon’s campaign success–to a plan he rejected.

In fact, Phillips isn’t even mentioned in Nixon’s memoirs.

Is all of this the result of a negligent copy editor at the New York Times? Or did they purposely work with the Democrat Party to create this myth? That has crossed my mind and it’s certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.

The actual story referenced by Williams...

see page 4, bottom of first column...

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf

I'm not sure how Nixon crept into the thread but here are the actual facts:

Goldwater carried six states: Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina and his home state of Arizona.[141] Goldwater's strong showing in the south is largely due to his support of the white southern view on civil rights: that states should be able to control their own laws without federal intervention.
​

The South was the bastion of the Dixiecrats and their racism. Their move to the GOP was dramatic and permanent and puts the lie to the notion that the Dems have always been the party of racism.

 

[2aguy]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

Wrong......that lie can't bear the internet.......

the lie of the Southern Strategy....

Nixon’s Southern Strategy: The Democrat-Lie Keeping Their Control Over the Black Community | Black Quill and Ink

Believe it or not, the entire myth was created by an unknown editor at the New York Times who didn’t do his job and read a story he was given to edit.

On May 17, 1970, the New York Times published an article written by James Boyd. The headline, written by our unknown editor, was “Nixon’s Southern Strategy: It’s All in the Charts.”

The article was about a very controversial political analyst named Kevin Phillips. Phillips believed that everyone voted according to their ethnic background, not according to their individual beliefs. And all a candidate had to do is frame their message according to whatever moves a particular ethnic group.

Phillips offered his services to the Nixon campaign. But if our unknown editor had bothered to read the story completely, he would’ve seen that Phillip’s and his theory was completely rejected!

Boyd wrote in his article, “Though Phillips’s ideas for an aggressive anti-liberal campaign strategy that would hasten defection of the working-class democrats to the republicans did not prevail in the 1968 campaign, he won the respect John Mitchell.” (Mitchell was a well-known Washington insider at the time).

A lazy, negligent editor partially read the story. And wrote a headline for it that attributed Nixon’s campaign success–to a plan he rejected.

In fact, Phillips isn’t even mentioned in Nixon’s memoirs.

Is all of this the result of a negligent copy editor at the New York Times? Or did they purposely work with the Democrat Party to create this myth? That has crossed my mind and it’s certainly not beyond the realm of possibility.

The actual story referenced by Williams...

see page 4, bottom of first column...

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf

I'm not sure how Nixon crept into the thread but here are the actual facts:

Goldwater carried six states: Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, South Carolina and his home state of Arizona.[141] Goldwater's strong showing in the south is largely due to his support of the white southern view on civil rights: that states should be able to control their own laws without federal intervention.
​

The South was the bastion of the Dixiecrats and their racism. Their move to the GOP was dramatic and permanent and puts the lie to the notion that the Dems have always been the party of racism.

There was no move by racists into the Republican party you doofus......they stayed democrats. all of the racists were supporters, friends or mentors to the likes of al gore and bill clinton.......and the black racists all supported obama....farakhan, jeremiah wright, sharpton, the black panthers...

the party of racism and hate has been and always will be the democrat party.

 

[2aguy]

Black, white, whatever....

...why is skin color always the target of the Democrats/Liberals???



6. “During a recent segment about a supermarket shooting in Kentucky, CNN host Don Lemon said that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men.”

“So,” he said, “we have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them. There is no travel ban on them. There is no ban — you know, they had the Muslim ban. There is no white-guy ban. So what do we do about that?”
CNN’s Don Lemon doubles down after saying white men are ‘the biggest terror threat in this country’


Get that?

"...stop demonizing people....except whites..."

This from a poster with a thread titled:They've Always Been 'Racists'
You should Google the word 'hypocrite'.

The real racist...LBJ v Goldwater....they guy who wasn't the racist..

Lyndon Johnson opposed every civil rights proposal considered in his first 20 years as lawmaker

"He had been a congressman, beginning in 1937, for eleven years, and for eleven years he had voted against every civil rights bill –

against not only legislation aimed at ending the poll tax and segregation in the armed services but even against legislation aimed at ending lynching: a one hundred percent record," Caro wrote.


"Running for the Senate in 1948, he had assailed President" Harry "Truman’s entire civil rights program (‘an effort to set up a police state’)…Until 1957, in the Senate, as in the House, his record – by that time a twenty-year record – against civil rights had been consistent," Caro wrote.

=========

The Party of Civil Rights | National Review

The Party of Civil Rights

The depth of Johnson’s prior opposition to civil-rights reform must be digested in some detail to be properly appreciated.

In the House, he did not represent a particularly segregationist constituency (it “made up for being less intensely segregationist than the rest of the South by being more intensely anti-Communist,” as the New York Times put it), but Johnson was practically antebellum in his views.

Never mind civil rights or voting rights: In Congress, Johnson had consistently and repeatedly voted against legislation to protect black Americans from lynching.


As a leader in the Senate, Johnson did his best to cripple the Civil Rights Act of 1957; not having votes sufficient to stop it, he managed to reduce it to an act of mere symbolism by excising the enforcement provisions before sending it to the desk of President Eisenhower.


Johnson’s Democratic colleague Strom Thurmond nonetheless went to the trouble of staging the longest filibuster in history up to that point, speaking for 24 hours in a futile attempt to block the bill. The reformers came back in 1960 with an act to remedy the deficiencies of the 1957 act, and Johnson’s Senate Democrats again staged a record-setting filibuster.

In both cases, the “master of the Senate” petitioned the northeastern Kennedy liberals to credit him for having seen to the law’s passage while at the same time boasting to southern Democrats that he had taken the teeth out of the legislation.



Johnson would later explain his thinking thus: “These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days, and that’s a problem for us, since they’ve got something now they never had before: the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this — we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.”

Read more at: The Party of Civil Rights
=============

Goldwater.....

Barry M. Goldwater: The Most Consequential Loser in American Politics


Goldwater treated all people the same. As a private citizen, he flew mercy missions to Navaho reservations, never asking for recognition or accepting payment. He felt that “the red man seemed as much—if not more—a part of Arizona and America as any white or black person.”[20] Moreover, a few weeks after Goldwater was discharged from the Army in November 1945, Democratic Arizona Governor Sidney Preston Osborn asked him to organize the Arizona Air National Guard. One of Goldwater’s first recommendations, soon approved, was to desegregate the unit. Goldwater’s integration of the state’s Air National Guard took place more than two years before President Harry Truman integrated the U.S. armed forces.
Goldwater was an early member of the Arizona chapters of both the NAACP and the National Urban League, even making up the latter’s operating deficit when it was getting started. Later as a Senator, he desegregated the Senate cafeteria in 1953, demanding that his black legislative assistant, Kathrine Maxwell, be served along with every other Senate employee after learning she had been denied service.
In the mid-1970s, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, investigating improper operations of the intelligence community in the United States, proposed that transcripts of the FBI tapes about Martin Luther King Jr.’s alleged indiscretions be published. An outraged Goldwater declared he would not be a party to destroying King’s reputation and strode out of the committee room. A fellow Senator recalled that Goldwater’s protest “injected some common sense into the proceedings,” and the electronic surveillance transcripts were not released.[21]
That his opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was based on constitutional grounds and not political considerations was underscored in the final week of the fall campaign.
Speaking in Columbia, South Carolina, Goldwater condemned segregation and declared that government must treat “all men as equal in the arena of law and civil order.”[22] He pledged if elected President to implement all provisions of the act. His forthright pro-civil rights speech was televised on 87 stations throughout the South.
---
NPR Wrong on Goldwater '64, Civil Rights, Say 4 Who Were There
As for the Republican nominee's position on the Civil Rights Act, Goldwater had said he would vote for passage if Section II on public accommodations and Section VII on equal employment opportunity were removed. With his view reinforced by a detailed memorandum from Phoenix lawyer and future Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Goldwater felt these sections were unconstitutional, were unenforceable without a federal police force, and would lead to the creation of racial quotas and affirmative action.

"He was absolutely right about [the two sections of the Civil Rights Act] and they did lead to precisely what Goldwater and most conservatives were afraid of," said Tom Winter, then executive editor of Human Events, who would join Ryskind as its co-owner a year later. As for the "extremism in the defense of liberty" speech, Winter recalled watching it from a San Francisco restaurant "and cheering it because it was clearly about freedom and fighting communism. I certainly didn't think it had anything to do with race."
Urban Legend: Goldwater Against Civil Rights


More specifically, Goldwater had problems with title II and title VII of the 1964 bill. He felt that constitutionally the federal government had no legal right to interfere in who people hired, fired; or to whom they sold their products, goods and services. He felt that “power” laid in the various states, and with the people. He was a strong advocate of the tenth amendment. Goldwater’s constitutional stance did not mean he agreed with the segregation and racial discrimination practiced in the South. To the contrary, he fought against these kinds of racial divides in his own state of Arizona. He supported the integration of the Arizona National guard and Phoenix public schools.[4] Goldwater was, also, a member of the NAACP and the Urban League.[5]

His personal feelings about discrimination are enshrined in the congressional record where he states, “I am unalterably opposed to discrimination or segregation on the basis of race, color, or creed or on any other basis; not only my words, but more importantly my actions through years have repeatedly demonstrated the sincerity of my feeling in this regard…”[6]. And, he would continued to holdfast to his strongly felt convictions that constitutionally the federal government was limited in what it could do, believing that the amoral actions of those perpetuating discrimination and segregation would have to be judged by those in that community. Eventually, the states government and local communities would come to pressure people to change their minds. Goldwater’s view was that the civil disobedience by private citizens against those business establishments was more preferable than intervention by the feds. He, optimistically, believed that racial intolerance would soon buckle under the economic and societal pressure.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hate is an action.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hate is an action.

I keep telling you that it is an unnecessary effort to prove yourself to be a moron, each and every day.

Readers have memories, and....trust me on this....your reputation precedes you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. “Democrats Unify Around Shutting Down White People

A Democratic National Committee candidate forum showed a party united in one theme: white people need to shut up.

A white female chair hopeful ventured forth to state her very job was to keep to her fellow Caucasians in their proper place at the Monday night event.

“My job is to shut other white people down when they want to say, ‘oh, no, I’m not prejudiced; I’m a Democrat; I’m accepting,'” Sally Boynton Brown, Idaho Democratic Committee chairwoman and DNC chair candidate, declared.”
Democrats Unify Around Shutting Down White People




Her understanding of her party had her conclude that the best way to accrue votes was to be racist.


The Democrat Party needs another 49 state landslide loss to prove it needs to cleanse itself of this sort of trash.

 

[Mac1958]

HOLY CRAP

I DIDN'T KNOW THESE PEOPLE WERE DEMOCRATS

This is pipe dream shit meant to feed the n-I-g-g-e-r-s and the s-p-I-c-s because they're stupid enough to believe that shit.

Today blacks act like animals because they are BARELY evolved past the Ape and need a strong central figure (the white man) to keep them in place and acting like normal people.

Sick of their shit and we should not hide it anymore. When they call me a fucking racist, and I say you damn right I am!!! Fuck those fucking people!

Why do Browns ("people of color") feel compelled to steal, assault, rape, murder Whites, their obvious superior beings? Browns should be worshiping Whites instead of being jealous douchebag criminals.'

Blacks... prone to violence, think they're still in the jungle, low IQ blacks.

How can you look at the world and not see that ALL ADVANCEMENTS came from Europe and America? Yeah, we're the superior race on the earth. All others developed because of whites

Look, he is actually intelligent and an actual person of color! How often does that happen?

“We swear muthafuckers, you take our beaners from us and we’ll come for your guns one day” Filthy fucks!

MAGA! This is great news! Everything is falling into place so we can build the Wall and thwart this invasion of brown diseease ridden third worlders who are a threat to our sovereignty, culture and American traditions.

Being the elected representative of a bunch of dumbass ghetto Jungle Monkeys doesn't take intelligence. It take a ghetto dialect and a promise to get them more welfare.

Valerie Jarrett.... Is she that light skinned negro who looks like that ape in Planet of the Apes (negroes?)

I thought she was an ape...Next you'll be telling me Mooch isn't really a shaved wookie.

The asians made fun of obama.....the asians refer to negroes as 'monkey people' and not in jest....they are serious....and why shouldn't they be?

Pay the pavement ape or he will get very angry and burn his house down.

Yawn, Kambala wants every African American crack addict to have their own home while White, Red, and Yellow Americans some disabled vets rot on the street.

Nigga's acting like a Nigga...must be part of the Thugery... most blacks don't act like that!

I believe the black race is inferior to both the white and yellow races....I can prove it by taking a look at the world map and income, innovation/scientific discoveries, and prison populations. Maybe you have some other mysterious way of defining the word but you never seem to say what it is.

Most intelligent people understand how stupid blacks are....average i.q. of 85.....being one you should know.

Come on people you blacks are better than this shit every fucking week....stand BEHIND your police, you do the crime you get locked up...you fuck with THE MAN, he has every right to beat the shit out of you, and your community standing behind you just shows what stupid, low life idiots you are!

Fuck off House Negro. Shine my boots bitch

It also looks like the critics that were against desegregation were correct about the negro people, as proven by the violence perpetrated by negroes today.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hate is an action.

I keep telling you that it is an unnecessary effort to prove yourself to be a moron, each and every day.

Readers have memories, and....trust me on this....your reputation precedes you.

Thanks for having no response.If you start a thread you should at least make an effort.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hate is an action.

I keep telling you that it is an unnecessary effort to prove yourself to be a moron, each and every day.

Readers have memories, and....trust me on this....your reputation precedes you.

Thanks for having no response.If you start a thread you should at least make an effort.

I stated the fact in the OP, you claimed that thinking is an action to be criminalized.


Isn't this true, you Fascist?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hate is an action.

I keep telling you that it is an unnecessary effort to prove yourself to be a moron, each and every day.

Readers have memories, and....trust me on this....your reputation precedes you.

Thanks for having no response.If you start a thread you should at least make an effort.

I stated the fact in the OP, you claimed that thinking is an action to be criminalized.


Isn't this true, you Fascist?

You said this.

That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

Hate/racism is the action. You having no problem with that is unsurprising.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hate is an action.

I keep telling you that it is an unnecessary effort to prove yourself to be a moron, each and every day.

Readers have memories, and....trust me on this....your reputation precedes you.

Thanks for having no response.If you start a thread you should at least make an effort.

I stated the fact in the OP, you claimed that thinking is an action to be criminalized.


Isn't this true, you Fascist?

You said this.

That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

Hate/racism is the action. You having no problem with that is unsurprising.

You are denying freedom of speech....as I said, and you proved....you're a Fascist.

What's the problem?

 

[PoliticalChic]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hate is an action.

I keep telling you that it is an unnecessary effort to prove yourself to be a moron, each and every day.

Readers have memories, and....trust me on this....your reputation precedes you.

Thanks for having no response.If you start a thread you should at least make an effort.

I stated the fact in the OP, you claimed that thinking is an action to be criminalized.


Isn't this true, you Fascist?

You said this.

That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

Hate/racism is the action. You having no problem with that is unsurprising.

"Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense
This is naked tyranny."
Virginia Democrats Push Legislation to Make Criticism of Government Officials a Criminal Offense - Big League Politics


I know how Fascists like you would vote on this bill.