They've Always Been 'Racists'

[PoliticalChic]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

 

[alang1216]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

See what I mean about the least intelligent apologists for the racist Democrat Party offering that lie???

This moron is always available to prove me right.



He says..." The GOP under Goldwater blah blah blah..."

Watch this:

"...a review of Senator Barry Goldwater’s record shows that he was a Libertarian, not a racist. Goldwater was a member of the Arizona NAACP and was involved in desegregating the Arizona National Guard.

Goldwater also supported the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1960, as well as the constitutional amendment banning the poll tax. His opposition to the more comprehensive Civil Rights Act of 1964 was based on his libertarian views about government. Goldwater believed that the 1964 Act, as written, unconstitutionally extended the federal government's commerce power to private citizens, furthering the government’s efforts to "legislate morality" and restrict the rights of employers.

It is instructive to read the entire text of Goldwater's 1964 speech at the 28th Republican National Convention, accepting the nomination for president that is available from the Arizona Historical Foundation. By the end of his career, Goldwater was one of the most respected members of either party and was considered a stabilizing influence in the Senate. Senator Goldwater's speech may be found also on the Internet at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may98/goldwaterspeech.htm http://www.nationalblackrepublicans...#Democrats_Smeared_Dr._Martin_Luther_King__Jr.

 

[Penelope]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

Dixiecrats = Republicans and trampers.

 

[jc456]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

VA governor black face is all you need to know!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

Dixiecrats = Republicans and trampers.

See, that is the problem you have of never having read a book.

That, and you're a dope.

They were "Dixiecrats" ....not "Dixiecans," you dope.




Here, the education you never received:

1. Every segregationist who ever served in the Senate was a Democrat, and remained a Democrat…except for Strom Thurmond. He remained a Democrat for eighteen years after running for President as a Dixiecrat- before he became a Republican. There’s a reason they are not called “Dixiecans.”

2. “The Dixiecrats were welcomed back into the Democratic fold with open arms. Democrats never denied a segregationist a committee chairmanship or a leadership position because of his noxious views on race. No Democrat has ever been punished for making a racist remark….More than 80 percent of Republicans in the House and Senate voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965….[The] record on race, of Thurmond the Republican is pretty good. He was among the first of Southern senators to hire blacks for his staff. He supported blacks for judgeships. He voted for extension of the Voting Rights Act.” Jack Kelly

a. Ernest Hollings, Richard Russell, Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, J. William Fulbright, and Robert Byrd all voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act…and all remained Democrats. But, lest one think that only Southern Democrats were inclined against civil rights, the following Democrats were far from Southerners and all voted against allowing the 1957 civil rights bill on the calendar: Senators Wayne Morse of Oregon (a favorite target of Senator Joe McCarthy), Warren Magnuson of Washington, James Murray of Montana, Mike Mansfield of Montana, and Joseph O’Mahoney of Wyoming.



Seems you inadvertently proved the title of the thread, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

VA governor black face is all you need to know!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Is the anti-white racism any better than their anti-black racist history?????


4. “NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech

More and more, it seems Democrats are proving to be exactly who many conservatives always thought they were.

Offering a disturbingly divisive message Monday to mark the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams let newcomers know that they are not welcome in New York City, according to the New York Post.

White newcomers from the nation’s heartland, of course — as those coming illegally from south of the border continue to receive a warm embrace in the sanctuary city."
NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech



Democrats…..vote against this party in November, before they start wearing the brown shirts and armbands.

 

[Jitss617]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Every person of color democrat that you see speaking all get paid or grant money to support The racist policies that have destroyed their community

 

[jc456]

QUOTE="Jitss617, post: 23912497, member: 71708"]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Every person of color democrat that you see speaking all get paid or grant money to support Thracian policies that have destroyed their community[/QUOTE]

Exactly

 

[Muhammed]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

Your revisionist history is bullshit.

The State's Rights Democratic Party (aka Dixiecrat party) is merely an insignificant footnote in the Democratic party's sordid racist 192 year history. It was founded in 1948 and dissolved less than a year later.

The way the Democratic party clings to the Dixiecrat canard as if it somehow absolves them of their sins is pathetic.

All of you party of slavery and Jim Crow supporters are pathetic.

 

[alang1216]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

See what I mean about the least intelligent apologists for the racist Democrat Party offering that lie???

This moron is always available to prove me right.



He says..." The GOP under Goldwater blah blah blah..."

Watch this:

"...a review of Senator Barry Goldwater’s record shows that he was a Libertarian, not a racist. Goldwater was a member of the Arizona NAACP and was involved in desegregating the Arizona National Guard.

Goldwater also supported the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1960, as well as the constitutional amendment banning the poll tax. His opposition to the more comprehensive Civil Rights Act of 1964 was based on his libertarian views about government. Goldwater believed that the 1964 Act, as written, unconstitutionally extended the federal government's commerce power to private citizens, furthering the government’s efforts to "legislate morality" and restrict the rights of employers.

It is instructive to read the entire text of Goldwater's 1964 speech at the 28th Republican National Convention, accepting the nomination for president that is available from the Arizona Historical Foundation. By the end of his career, Goldwater was one of the most respected members of either party and was considered a stabilizing influence in the Senate. Senator Goldwater's speech may be found also on the Internet at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may98/goldwaterspeech.htm http://www.nationalblackrepublicans...#Democrats_Smeared_Dr._Martin_Luther_King__Jr.

I understand English may not be your first language (Russian?) but if you have someone read you my post you'll see I never said Goldwater was a racist, only that he was a supporter of States Rights. I guess you agree since you don't address that issue. States Rights was an umbrella that protected Jim Crow from Civil Rights legislation.

 

[Dick Foster]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

You must have lived in a different south than I did because I didn't see it that way at all and call BS. I was born in Virginia and brought up mostly in the Carolinas. Most of grammar school in North Carolina and high school in South Carolina then back to NC for some college. Yes the KKK was active and yes they were dixiecratic democrats.

 

[Norman]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

As long as the democrats have their slave class, they are happy.

Tax cattle, slaves, no difference as long as it is there.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

See what I mean about the least intelligent apologists for the racist Democrat Party offering that lie???

This moron is always available to prove me right.



He says..." The GOP under Goldwater blah blah blah..."

Watch this:

"...a review of Senator Barry Goldwater’s record shows that he was a Libertarian, not a racist. Goldwater was a member of the Arizona NAACP and was involved in desegregating the Arizona National Guard.

Goldwater also supported the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the Civil Rights Act of 1960, as well as the constitutional amendment banning the poll tax. His opposition to the more comprehensive Civil Rights Act of 1964 was based on his libertarian views about government. Goldwater believed that the 1964 Act, as written, unconstitutionally extended the federal government's commerce power to private citizens, furthering the government’s efforts to "legislate morality" and restrict the rights of employers.

It is instructive to read the entire text of Goldwater's 1964 speech at the 28th Republican National Convention, accepting the nomination for president that is available from the Arizona Historical Foundation. By the end of his career, Goldwater was one of the most respected members of either party and was considered a stabilizing influence in the Senate. Senator Goldwater's speech may be found also on the Internet at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may98/goldwaterspeech.htm http://www.nationalblackrepublicans...#Democrats_Smeared_Dr._Martin_Luther_King__Jr.

I understand English may not be your first language (Russian?) but if you have someone read you my post you'll see I never said Goldwater was a racist, only that he was a supporter of States Rights. I guess you agree since you don't address that issue. States Rights was an umbrella that protected Jim Crow from Civil Rights legislation.

I already noted that you are among the least intelligent posters...seeminglly a requirement to be a Democrat.....but you went to the trouble of proving it yet again with the silly "your first language (Russian?)."


Anyone with an education...not you....knows better than to believe that there is any confluence between the Republicans and Russia....

Fact is.....
The only party that backed Russia, supported and paid for its existence, is the Democrat Party.

Since FDR reversed American policy and recognized the blood drenched Bolshevik nation in 1933, the Russians, Soviets, Communists, Bolsheviks, Marxists, whatever have had no greater supporters than the Democrat Party.


Obama grabbed his ankles to be more 'flexible' for Putin.


Currently, the Democrat Party stands for nearly 100% of the demands of the communist party.


Amazing what an imbecile you are.



Now.....Vat about moose and squirrel????

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. But while electing Hussein, they embraced racism writ large…as he had this racialist reverend as his chosen speaker.

“Rhyming reverend gets last word at Obama inaugural

“We ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white will embrace what is right,” Lowery said…”
Rhyming reverend gets last word at Obama inaugural

 

[alang1216]

Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

My answer would be a zero chance and that is exactly what didn't happen. What did happen was the racist Dems, AKA Dixiecrats, didn't change their thinking only their party allegiance. The GOP under Goldwater became the party of States Rights, just what the Dixiecrats wanted to maintain their Jim Crow laws, while the Dems became the party of Civil Rights, just what the Dixiecrats hated.

Rewriting history again?

Your revisionist history is bullshit.

The State's Rights Democratic Party (aka Dixiecrat party) is merely an insignificant footnote in the Democratic party's sordid racist 192 year history. It was founded in 1948 and dissolved less than a year later.

The way the Democratic party clings to the Dixiecrat canard as if it somehow absolves them of their sins is pathetic.

All of you party of slavery and Jim Crow supporters are pathetic.

I note you ignored the reason the State's Rights Democratic Party was begun in the first place (hint is was Democrat policies they didn't like):

The States' Rights Democratic Party (usually called the Dixiecrats) was a short-lived segregationist political party in the United States, active primarily in the South. After President Harry S. Truman ordered integration of the military in 1948 and other actions to address civil rights of African Americans, Southern conservative white politicians who objected to this course organized this party as a breakaway faction of the Democratic Party, determined to protect Southern states' rights to maintain racial segregation.[1]
​

After the 1948 election, its leaders generally returned to the Democratic Party. They didn't change their racist views only retook control the Democratic party in the South. Until they died off or turned to the pro-States Rights, GOP.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Hillary Clinton Had No Concession Speech, Blames Loss On ‘White People’
Hillary Clinton Had No Concession Speech, Blames Loss On ‘White People’ [VIDEO]

 

[francoHFW]

And not just in the ol' plantation days.....just....always.

The only contemporary difference is that now it's anti-white racism.



1. It has always been my contention and belief that the glory of America is the first amendment, which gifts freedom of speech, and, by extension of thought, to all of our people.
That means you are free to hate any individual, or group, for any reason. You may call it 'racism' but it is no problem as long as it does not become actions.

That alone proves the title of the thread....after all, didn't Republicans have to pry their slaves away from the Democrats....and they certainly have been testy since.

FACT CHECK: Did a State Democratic Party Logo Once Feature the Slogan 'White Supremacy'?





2. One of the more....juvenile....attempts to hide the facts is a claim we have all seen the least intelligent apologists for the Democrat Party attempt....
Defenders of the Dems love to offer the lie that in the 60s and 70s the Republicans suddenly became the racists.

"You so conveniently forgot the ideology of Republicans and Democrats changed in the 60's."
It's Nothing Personal....Just Business

The pretense is eminently simple to disprove.


Ask a Leftist, Democrat supporter what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican.

And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.




3. But it is still about melanin.
The only 'flip' in evidence is the anti-white racism that is the hallmark of Democrats today....

"It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics"
It’s Not ‘Identity Politics,’ It’s Anti-White Politics



"With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White
… Mr. Perez is a dedicated Social Justice Warrior, a key enforcer of the Obama administration’s anti-white programswhen serving in key positions in the Justice Department and the Department of Labor across almost all of the eight Obama years."
With Thomas Perez As DNC Chairthing, Democrats Go Full Anti-White



“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag. That's a dangerous bet to make.”
Democrats' trend of bashing white men is dangerous and could backfire




Democrat voters need to vote against your own party to cleanse it.

Hilariously broken history also known as gobbledygook propaganda. The blacks know which party is full of racists. And yes the Republicans own the South now like the Democrats did before Reagan. They also own

Is the anti-white racism any better than their anti-black racist history?????


4. “NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech

More and more, it seems Democrats are proving to be exactly who many conservatives always thought they were.

Offering a disturbingly divisive message Monday to mark the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams let newcomers know that they are not welcome in New York City, according to the New York Post.

White newcomers from the nation’s heartland, of course — as those coming illegally from south of the border continue to receive a warm embrace in the sanctuary city."
NYC official promotes division on MLK Day, tells white people ‘go back to Iowa’ in fear-mongering speech



Democrats…..vote against this party in November, before they start wearing the brown shirts and armbands.

No matter what your garbage propaganda machine says, Nazis are still right wing racist assholes. White supremacists ring a bell? And no Nazis are not socialists. Talk about your big lie propaganda.you believe all right wing garbage propaganda, including the Nazis'...
White supremacists the KKK and Nazis since Trump.

 

[alang1216]

I already noted that you are among the least intelligent posters...seeminglly a requirement to be a Democrat.....but you went to the trouble of proving it yet again with the silly "your first language (Russian?)."


Anyone with an education...not you....knows better than to believe that there is any confluence between the Republicans and Russia....

Fact is.....
The only party that backed Russia, supported and paid for its existence, is the Democrat Party.

Since FDR reversed American policy and recognized the blood drenched Bolshevik nation in 1933, the Russians, Soviets, Communists, Bolsheviks, Marxists, whatever have had no greater supporters than the Democrat Party.


Obama grabbed his ankles to be more 'flexible' for Putin.


Currently, the Democrat Party stands for nearly 100% of the demands of the communist party.


Amazing what an imbecile you are.



Now.....Vat about moose and squirrel????

So you're saying that Russian isn't your first language? Is it your second?

What's the confluence between the Republicans and Russia you ask?

• Trump asked the Russians to hack and release emails of his political opponent
• The only party that was hacked by Russia was the Democrat Party.
  
• The only party that had damaging emails released by Russia was the Democrat Party.
• Members of the Trump GOP campaign met with Russians to get dirt on Hillary (by their own admission)
• Trump took the word of Putin over the word of the US intelligence services regarding election interference
  
• Several members of Trump's staff were involved with Russians and lied about it
• Trump has repeated Russian disinformation
• Trump attempted to open a hotel in Russia

Should I believe you or my own eyes? Tough call, Natasha.