Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,906
- 90,778
- 3,635
So what that it's a paste? It's the same drug Rogan took.Horse dewormer is a paste. Joe Rogan did not take "horse dewormer". Im not sure how to simplify it more than that for you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what that it's a paste? It's the same drug Rogan took.Horse dewormer is a paste. Joe Rogan did not take "horse dewormer". Im not sure how to simplify it more than that for you.
Of course it has been shown to help. Thats why doctors prescribe it.But has not shown any effectiveness against covid-19 disease. It's just that simple. This is how it works. There are how many drugs that fit much of that description in your post? Why not take those?
I will tell you why. Again. Because an Indian crank posted a bad study that was quickly retracted, but it spread far and wide anyway.
And that's it. It does not appear to work, and using it for covid is the ultimate result of one quickly retracted study
That is kind of embarrassing, really.
There is water in dog food, but that doesnt mean it is meant for human consumption. So if someone was to publicly accuse me of eating dog food when in reality i was just consuming water, I could sue that person for defamation.So what that it's a paste? It's the same drug Rogan took.
It's not like water in food. The medicine is the exact same medicine intended to kill parasites. Again, all that's different is the dosage and delivery.There is water in dog food, but that doesnt mean it is meant for human consumption. So if someone was to publicly accuse me of eating dog food when in reality i was just consuming water, I could sue that person for defamation.
Not when both tablets arent meant for humans. Bad example.It's not like water in food. The medicine is the exact same medicine intended to kill parasites. Again, all that's different is the dosage and delivery.
It's like comparing 2 tablets of Tylenol with a gallon of liquid Tylenol and then pretending they're not both Tylenol.
Nope, still the same drug.Not when both tablets arent meant for humans. Bad example.
Wrong. See? You have been fooled by misinformation. A rational adult would now go check and accept that he has been fooled.Of course it has been shown to help. T
Haha, no you couldn't. Man, a lot of you live in fantasyland.if someone was to publicly accuse me of eating dog food when in reality i was just consuming water, I could sue that person for defamation.
Fooled by what? What the fuck are you even talking about.Wrong. See? You have been fooled by misinformation. A rational adult would now go check and accept that he has been fooled.
You think going on national tv and shouting to the world that i eat dog food isnt defamation? Do you actually believe the absurd shit that you say?Haha, no you couldn't. Man, a lot of you live in fantasyland.
Fooled by white wing bloggers who bread their butter by preying on people like you. That's why you are spreading lies about Ivermectin. Very simple. Get it?Fooled by what? What the fuck are you even talking about.
You seem confused about what constitutes defamation. Damages must also be shown. In your case, such a claim might actually improve your reputation. So you might have a tough time.You think going on national tv and shouting to the world that i eat dog food isnt defamation? Do you actually believe the absurd shit that you say?
Fooled by white wing bloggers who bread their butter by preying on people like you. That's why you are spreading lies about Ivermectin. Very simple. Get it?
Nope. Sorry. You seem confused about what constitutes defamation. Damages must also be shown. In your case, such a claim might actually improve your reputation. So you might have a tough time.
You need to find a dictionary immediately. You clearly dont even understand the word.Fooled by white wing bloggers who bread their butter by preying on people like you. That's why you are spreading lies about Ivermectin. Very simple. Get it?
You seem confused about what constitutes defamation. Damages must also be shown. In your case, such a claim might actually improve your reputation. So you might have a tough time.
You need to find a dictionary immediately. You clearly dont even understand the word.
Cute whining. But yes, you have to prove damages to win a defamation case. But you didn't know that, so now you're having a little hissy.You need to find a dictionary immediately. You clearly dont even understand the word.
Well seeing how they instantly stopped calling it "horse dewormer" the moment that he threatened to sue, Im going to assume that they were worried that he could in fact prove that there were damages.Cute whining. But yes, you have to prove damages to win a defamation case. But you didn't know that, so now you're having a little hissy.
Liar.Of course it has been shown to help.
They did?Well seeing how they instantly stopped calling it "horse dewormer" the moment that he threatened to sue, Im going to assume that they were worried that he could in fact prove that there were damages.