They’re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won’t Commit

[Wry Catcher]

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

LOL..Dont let em in and they cant work.

 

[gipper]

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

The owners are the billionaires and millionaires. Ask your buddy Bernie Sanders. He speaks of them often. They include people like Soros, Koch Brothers, Facebook dork, Adelson, Hollywood Bergs, Bloomberg, Gates, Thiel, Steyer, Trump, Murdoch, Arnold, Pritzker, Buffett, etc......

You really should get informed before posting on a political forum. You might read some history too, because this is an old story. Ever heard of Rockefeller, Carnegie, JP Morgan? They and others did it over a hundred years ago.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

LOL..Dont let em in and they cant work.

That's the current strategy, one which the anti Obama crowd opposes.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

The owners are the billionaires and millionaires. Ask your buddy Bernie Sanders. He speaks of them often. They include people like Soros, Koch Brothers, Facebook dork, Adelson, Hollywood Bergs, Bloomberg, Gates, Thiel, Steyer, Trump, Murdoch, Arnold, Pritzker, Buffett, etc......

You really should get informed before posting on a political forum. You might read some history too, because this is an old story. Ever heard of Rockefeller, Carnegie, JP Morgan? They and others did it over a hundred years ago.

Yes, I've heard of the Robber Barons and the Gilded Age, do you have a point, other than making personal attacks instead of trying to rebut my written words?

 

[gipper]

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

The owners are the billionaires and millionaires. Ask your buddy Bernie Sanders. He speaks of them often. They include people like Soros, Koch Brothers, Facebook dork, Adelson, Hollywood Bergs, Bloomberg, Gates, Thiel, Steyer, Trump, Murdoch, Arnold, Pritzker, Buffett, etc......

You really should get informed before posting on a political forum. You might read some history too, because this is an old story. Ever heard of Rockefeller, Carnegie, JP Morgan? They and others did it over a hundred years ago.

Yes, I've heard of the Robber Barons and the Gilded Age, do you have a point, other than making personal attacks instead of trying to rebut my written words?

I answered your question. What more do you want or did you fail to comprehend my post.

 

[Carla_Danger]

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

As has been stated, both political parties are guilty. But you being you, must try to make it partisan issue....you failed again.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

Isn't our "owners" Oprah Winfrey?

 

[Carla_Danger]

Illegal immigration is a bi-partisan issue. Both parties love it. Hence, both parties have blood on their hands.

Yep, how sick is it to see these Elected asses to OUR GOVERNMENT come out and show more care about the illegal invaders coming into our country?

Obama is the absolute worse. But he did promise TRANSFORMATION so that's what all YOU who voted for him ARE GETTING and all on YOUR DIME.... and allowing it and condoning it by sitting here dumping on TRUMP just for saying something

Look at the above and tell me this isn't a miserable person. Why in the heck would someone let politics ruin their life if they weren't mentally ill, or completely miserable in the first place?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

Your biases have once again caused you to miss the point. Both parties are guilty, but for different reasons: The D's for humanity, the R's for cheap labor.

We can be sure the moderate D's will begin to question the practice of supporting the policy of Sanctuaries, given the horrific murder in The City by an obvious dirt bag.

If is unfortunate The Congress won't get together and pass comprehensive Immigration and border security legislation - there is plenty of blame to go around on that issue.

My biases? I very much dislike both parties and wish both would disappear.

Your delusions have taken hold of you to think the Ds want illegal immigration for humanitarian reasons. That belief is so lubricious it is laughable.

Both parties are for illegal immigration because their owners demand it.

Your opinions are worthless for lack of evidence.

Progressives have supported sanctuaries, not because their owners(?) demand it. And please, define your use of the word "owners", name them or STFU.

Business and Industry are the main employers of undocumented persons who are not legally able to work in the US. Of course Joe hoi polloi might pick up a day laborer outside of home depot, but most of those working in Restaurants, for Roofing Co's, and landscaping companies work for those who are not progressives.

The owners are the billionaires and millionaires. Ask your buddy Bernie Sanders. He speaks of them often. They include people like Soros, Koch Brothers, Facebook dork, Adelson, Hollywood Bergs, Bloomberg, Gates, Thiel, Steyer, Trump, Murdoch, Arnold, Pritzker, Buffett, etc......

You really should get informed before posting on a political forum. You might read some history too, because this is an old story. Ever heard of Rockefeller, Carnegie, JP Morgan? They and others did it over a hundred years ago.

Yes, I've heard of the Robber Barons and the Gilded Age, do you have a point, other than making personal attacks instead of trying to rebut my written words?

I answered your question. What more do you want or did you fail to comprehend my post.

 

[charwin95]

You citizens whining over something Trump said are just as guilty as these illegal invaders who is coming in our country and committing these crimes against US. You have blood on your hands and you sit and NOTHING

SNIP:
Leftists truly would rather reign in Hell than serve in Heaven: People are more worried about the Confederate flag flying in America than the Mexican flag flying here


With the San Francisco woman murdered by one of Barack Obama’s “new Americans,” we should ask: how much innocent blood will be spilled on the altar of the Left’s “fundamental transformation” of America? While callow and cowardly corporations are severing ties with Donald Trump because he dared speak a truth in an age of lies, the reality of far too many of the illegals invading our country is this:

They’re just committing the crimes Americans won’t commit.

Some will say, of course, that Americans sometimes do such evil as well. But it’s also true that Americans do sometimes take the menial jobs so often performed by illegals, yet we nonetheless hear the statement, “They’re just doing the jobs Americans won’t do.” So since we’re indulging rhetoric and generalizations here, turnaround is fair play.

Will people ever rise up and make that sickening agenda-facilitating suppression of truth known as political correctness exactly what it should be: a recognized vile heresy, to be stamped out with extreme prejudice? I recently heard someone take exception to the term “illegals,” making that now stale point that “no one is illegal” (cue the tiny violin). This person argued that bank robbers break the law as well, but we don’t brand them “illegals.” Point taken. We call bank robbers “criminals.”

And if the Left wants to apply the same descriptive to illegal aliens, it works for me.

(Or would “undocumented criminals” be preferable?)

It would be wholly accurate, too. Generally lost in our self-flagellating, suicidal pander-fest is that every illegal migrant is a criminal by definition. This is why the lying Left — ever engaging in language manipulation — dislikes the word “illegal”: accurate terminology relates the truth of a matter. This is intolerable when your agenda is completely contrary to Truth.

An even better adjective for illegals, however, is “invaders.” And Francisco Sanchez, the vile murderer of the San Francisco woman, Kathryn Steinle, certainly fits the bill. He repeatedly invaded our country for the purposes of destruction, dealing drugs and being convicted of felonies seven times until he finally took a life. Yet he is not the only one culpable in his malevolent act.

What do you call government officials who not only abdicate their responsibility to halt an invasion, but actually aid and abet it? Quislings? Traitors? Leftists? But I repeat myself.

Obama’s plan to “seed” communities around America with foreigners

ALL of it here
They re Just Committing the Crimes Americans Won t Commit

Not to befuddle a true believer, but wasn't President Reagan the one who opened the door? Didn't the Bush Administration at one time control the H. of Rep, and the Senate and do nothing to stem the flow across our Southern Border - after 911 American Citizens getting on plane had more restrictions than anyone walking across the border.

Exactly....Who put the immigration reform on hold? The Republican and yet people like Stephanie keep bitchin about immigration.