They don't want to investigate?

The departures – including that of the chief of the section, as well as the principal deputy chief, deputy chief and acting deputy chief – represent the most significant mass resignation at the Justice Department since February. At that time, five leaders and supervisors of the department’s Public Integrity Section, which investigates public officials for possible corruption, resigned rather than comply with an appointee of President Donald Trump’s orders to dismiss the bribery case against then-New York mayor Eric Adams.

It's sad that you define (former) public servants with enough integrity to leave their jobs in protest over the overtly shameful behavior of trump lackeys as "leftist hacks" without even knowing anything about their backgrounds. The DoJ needs more people like them, not less.

We know the way the law has been used and abused over the last 60 years, so we know what their background is.
 
We know the way the law has been used and abused over the last 60 years, so we know what their background is.
No mass resignations

Early retirements, one is still working

Damn the libs will hang onto any lie if it fits their narrative
 
Like.most on the left everytime you do not get your way the flood of excuses and rants begin

Now try very hard. THINK

If Saint Renee did not go out to try and interfere with an ICE operstion; if she was not blocking the road; if would have stepped out of the vehicle has directed by the officer; if she would not have tried to drive off with an officer in physical contact with the vehicle; and not drove towards another officer; she would not have been shot

Let’s assume everything you’ve just said to be 100% true. There is still a very simple question remaining:

WHY NOT INVESTIGATE THE INCIDENT???

They always investigate these sort of lethal incidents and this one would be ESPECIALLY important to investigate and produce a report on given how much of a public issue this killing is.

Why the exception? Can you rationally answer?
 
Last edited:
We know the way the law has been used and abused over the last 60 years, so we know what their background is.
You think you know how the law was abused, but do you really? Or is your misguided belief based on accusations by trump? Motivated by the crimes he committed and the subsequent indictments for those crimes.
 
So, you choose to dismiss my point instead of engage. OK.

What's next? ANother provoked killing, or you ready to escalate to the next level?
Actually, there was another shooting involving an ICE officer. This time a protestor was shot in the leg. Provocations by ICE are part of the plan. Designed to enrage the public. Cause confrontations. Continuously escalate the situation looking for a justification for the regime to become more repressive.

Clear your mind for a moment. If I said there was a country in which masked agents of the government were roaming the streets in the face of mass protests, violating the rights of citizens, asking people for identification, and in many cases detaining/arresting people (some of which being legal citizens of that country) with no criminal record...........would America be your first guess?
 
Actually, there was another shooting involving an ICE officer. This time a protestor was shot in the leg. Provocations by ICE are part of the plan. Designed to enrage the public. Cause confrontations. Continuously escalate the situation looking for a justification for the regime to become more repressive.

Clear your mind for a moment. If I said there was a country in which masked agents of the government were roaming the streets in the face of mass protests, violating the rights of citizens, asking people for identification, and in many cases detaining/arresting people (some of which being legal citizens of that country) with no criminal record...........would America be your first guess?
So last night it was planned to have a mucking ILLEGAL hit an ICE Officer with a shovel?
 
Last edited:

Federal officer shoots person in leg after being attacked during Minneapolis arrest, officials say​

Earlier Wednesday, a judge gave the Trump administration time to respond to a request to suspend its immigration crackdown in Minnesota, while the Pentagon looked for military lawyers to join what has become a chaotic law enforcement effort in the state.

“What we need most of all right now is a pause. The temperature needs to be lowered,” state Assistant Attorney General Brian Carter said during the first hearing in a lawsuit filed by Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

Local leaders say the government is violating free speech and other constitutional rights with the surge of law enforcement. U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez promised to keep the case “on the front burner” and gave the U.S. Justice Department until Monday to file a response to a request for a restraining order.

The judge said these are “grave and important matters,” and that there are few legal precedents to apply to some of the key points in the case.

Justice Department attorney Andrew Warden suggested the approach set by Menendez was appropriate.


Regrettably, I have to say it's gotten to a point when I don't believe anything the trump government says until I see it has been verified. They've lied too many times to be given the benefit of the doubt.
 
Why is the FBI investigating. Isn't murder a STATE crime?
The crime is investigated according to the jurisdiction of the victim, not the perpetrattor.

If an illegal mexican immigrant kills an American Citizen, do we let Mexico investigate?
Um, because a Federal Law Enforcement officer was involved in a shooting, stupid.

The state can investigate all it wants. Unfortunately for you, MN Statute 090.66, SIGNED BY TAMPON TIMMY, makes this a good shoOt.
 
Let’s assume everything you’ve just said to be 100% true. There is still a very simple question remaining:

WHY NOT INVESTIGATE THE INCIDENT???

They always investigate these sort of lethal incidents and this one would be ESPECIALLY important to investigate and produce a report on given how much of a public issue this killing is.

Why the exception? Can you rationally answer?
Hey stupid, the FBI is investigating it.

And nothing is stopping Tampon from investigating.
 
why did he do that? she was a woman in her car and of no risk to anyone. Why pull out a gun?
A deranged woman in a 3000 pound car who did strike the agent proven by video and hospital records after obstructing justice and revisiting arrest. Shes an imminent threat to all agents in the area justifying use of deadly force to stop her.
All she had to do was stop. She made a choice thats intent to harm
 
A deranged woman in a 3000 pound car who did strike the agent proven by video and hospital records after obstructing justice and revisiting arrest. Shes an imminent threat to all agents in the area justifying use of deadly force to stop her.
All she had to do was stop. She made a choice thats intent to harm
Or get out of the car as she was told
 
All she had to do was stop. She made a choice thats intent to harm

All he had to do is not shoot her in the head three times, two times when he was completely out of the way and shooting through the side window.

He clearly made the choice to kill the driver of a fleeing car - which is an illegal use of lethal force.
 
15th post
All he had to do is not shoot her in the head three times. He made the choice to kill.
stg011526dAPR-500x310.webp
 
You can’t answer why administration wont investigate and deliver official findings.

I can - they don’t want the findings. DUH.
Look kid you can dismiss what happened as fake news when it does not fit your agenda

If the dumb blond would not have stuck her blue nose in matters that did not concern her, nothing would have happened

afb011526dAPR-500x310.webp
 
Not self defense, as the video shows. Why would Ross need to defend himself from a car turning away from him?
If the reports are accurate, internal bleeding indicates a far different picture.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom