R
rdean
Guest
Watching Republican Senator's this morning on Morning Joe talking about this situation.
There was no letter on the bed. Senators asked the military and they said it had been fully investigated. It never existed.
One GOP Senator said that Bergdahl looked undernourished, drugged, was mumbling and appeared to be "coerced", but didn't seem to be in any imminent danger (huh"?). This from a 90 second video shown to all Senators.
And they were asked if the White House called them and apologized for any misunderstanding and they had the hardest time saying "yes".
Joe Scarborough attacked the parents of this kid while others at the table told him to leave the kid's parents alone. Joe said the parents should have called the Pentagon and demanded care for their son (after VA funding has been cut - like that's gonna happen).
What isn't clear is whether Republicans understand that it was al Qaeda that attacked the US. To an outside observer, after 9/11, the US then attacked Iraq and the Taliban but let the leader of al Qaeda go. I never could understand that.
And finally, isn't leaving an American in the hands of Islamic Extremists what Republicans accused Obama of doing?
I think in their zeal to attack the president, Republicans are setting themselves up for very difficult explanations. How do you think they will respond?
There was no letter on the bed. Senators asked the military and they said it had been fully investigated. It never existed.
One GOP Senator said that Bergdahl looked undernourished, drugged, was mumbling and appeared to be "coerced", but didn't seem to be in any imminent danger (huh"?). This from a 90 second video shown to all Senators.
And they were asked if the White House called them and apologized for any misunderstanding and they had the hardest time saying "yes".
Joe Scarborough attacked the parents of this kid while others at the table told him to leave the kid's parents alone. Joe said the parents should have called the Pentagon and demanded care for their son (after VA funding has been cut - like that's gonna happen).
What isn't clear is whether Republicans understand that it was al Qaeda that attacked the US. To an outside observer, after 9/11, the US then attacked Iraq and the Taliban but let the leader of al Qaeda go. I never could understand that.
And finally, isn't leaving an American in the hands of Islamic Extremists what Republicans accused Obama of doing?
I think in their zeal to attack the president, Republicans are setting themselves up for very difficult explanations. How do you think they will respond?