There is nothing more regressive than progressives

The United States was born in an era or age of liberalism, we were liberal when we began,
and America just rolls along getting more liberal. Think of people that were allowed to vote when the nation began and allowed to vote today. Does religion play a less dominant role?
Are women allowed equality do we have more freedom? How about minorities, slavery, education, and on it goes. We have only to read our history.
 
Last edited:
Should have been put down long ago. The parents are idiots who would rather make an infant suffer than do the right thing any decent person would do for a sick and dying pet.
You are a typical sick-fuck progressive. "Put down"? That is not a dog, you sick-fuck. It's a child. It is a baby. And who the fuck are you to decide when someone should be (and I quote) "put down"?

Obnoxious asshole, much?
 
Should have been put down long ago. The parents are idiots who would rather make an infant suffer than do the right thing any decent person would do for a sick and dying pet.
You are a typical sick-fuck progressive. "Put down"? That is not a dog, you sick-fuck. It's a child. It is a baby. And who the fuck are you to decide when someone should be (and I quote) "put down"?

Obnoxious asshole, much?

It's a sick, and suffering, and dying infant. It should have been euthanized (killed) long ago. That is the rational and humane thing to do.
 
Should have been put down long ago. The parents are idiots who would rather make an infant suffer than do the right thing any decent person would do for a sick and dying pet.
You are a typical sick-fuck progressive. "Put down"? That is not a dog, you sick-fuck. It's a child. It is a baby. And who the fuck are you to decide when someone should be (and I quote) "put down"?

Obnoxious asshole, much?

It's a sick, and suffering, and dying infant. It should have been euthanized (killed) long ago. That is the rational and humane thing to do.
Says who? What "suffering", you sick-fuck? There is nothing "rational" about murdering innocent people.
 
The United States was born in an era or age of liberalism, we were liberal when we began,and America just rolls along getting more liberal. How about minorities, slavery, education, and on it goes. We have only to read our history.
Yeah...how about minorities, slavery, etc?
Since its founding in the late 1820s, the Democratic Party has defended slavery, started the Civil War, and opposed Reconstruction. Its members engaged in the lynchings of blacks and opposed the civil rights acts of the 1950s and '60s.

Democrats' Hoodwinking of Blacks
 
The United States was born in an era or age of liberalism, we were liberal when we began,and America just rolls along getting more liberal. How about minorities, slavery, education, and on it goes. We have only to read our history.
Yeah...how about minorities, slavery, etc?
During Reconstruction, hundreds of black men were elected to Southern state legislatures as Republicans, and 22 black Republicans served in the U.S. Congress by 1900.

The Democratic Party did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935.

Democrats' Hoodwinking of Blacks
 
Should have been put down long ago. The parents are idiots who would rather make an infant suffer than do the right thing any decent person would do for a sick and dying pet.
You are a typical sick-fuck progressive. "Put down"? That is not a dog, you sick-fuck. It's a child. It is a baby. And who the fuck are you to decide when someone should be (and I quote) "put down"?

Obnoxious asshole, much?

It's a sick, and suffering, and dying infant. It should have been euthanized (killed) long ago. That is the rational and humane thing to do.
Says who? What "suffering", you sick-fuck? There is nothing "rational" about murdering innocent people.
Euthanasia isn't - murder. It's humane. I know, you don't get that.
 
The United States was born in an era or age of liberalism, we were liberal when we began,and America just rolls along getting more liberal. How about minorities, slavery, education, and on it goes. We have only to read our history.
Yeah...how about minorities, slavery, etc?
During Reconstruction, hundreds of black men were elected to Southern state legislatures as Republicans, and 22 black Republicans served in the U.S. Congress by 1900.

The Democratic Party did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935.

Democrats' Hoodwinking of Blacks
The South was Democratic then. Lincoln, GOP in the North and West, freed the slaves.
 
The United States was born in an era or age of liberalism, we were liberal when we began,and America just rolls along getting more liberal. How about minorities, slavery, education, and on it goes. We have only to read our history.
Yeah...how about minorities, slavery, etc?
During Reconstruction, hundreds of black men were elected to Southern state legislatures as Republicans, and 22 black Republicans served in the U.S. Congress by 1900.

The Democratic Party did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935.

Democrats' Hoodwinking of Blacks
The South was Democratic then. Lincoln, GOP in the North and West, freed the slaves.
Yeah. Exactly. That's the history of the Democrat Party. They opposed the Civil Rights movement as well.
 
The United States was born in an era or age of liberalism, we were liberal when we began,and America just rolls along getting more liberal. How about minorities, slavery, education, and on it goes. We have only to read our history.
Yeah...how about minorities, slavery, etc?
During Reconstruction, hundreds of black men were elected to Southern state legislatures as Republicans, and 22 black Republicans served in the U.S. Congress by 1900.

The Democratic Party did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935.

Democrats' Hoodwinking of Blacks
The South was Democratic then. Lincoln, GOP in the North and West, freed the slaves.
Yeah. Exactly. That's the history of the Democrat Party. They opposed the Civil Rights movement as well.
The South hates them n*ggers. Next item?
 
Yet another glaring example of how progressives allow emotions instead of logic and reason to dictate policy...
Every governor should be forced to actually take economic classes before taking or even running for office, especially Democrats.
Connecticut tried the idiotic "punish those 'evil' wealthy bastards - tax them to death" policies. As always, it didn't end well.
What this means? It means that conservatives are once again right. You cannot tax the wealthy into oblivion and expect great returns. They will either figure out a way not to pay taxes or they will take their money elsewhere.
You can always can count on the left to collapse economies (Cuba, U.S.S.R., Cambodia, Detroit).

Connecticut Hikes Taxes on the "Rich;" Look What's Happening Now...
 
Choice always leads to better outcomes. The left knows that - which is why those fascists are forced to achieve their agenda at the barrel of a gun.
This spring, PBS has been airing a three-part documentary series, "School, Inc.", spotlighting some of the successes of education choice and free-market schooling options around the world.
The left destroys everything it touches with failed, 19th century policy - including education.

New PBS Documentary on Education in America is Creating a Stir
 
It doesn't require research or a major documentary to answer such a simple question...
"School, Inc." is the brainchild of Andrew Coulson, an education policy researcher who left a successful career at Microsoft to answer a perplexing question: Why is it that innovation occurs frequently in other areas, but not in education?
Government can't innovate. And the left refuses to innovate. Put them together, and you get policy forever stuck in Karl Marx's late 1800's.

New PBS Documentary on Education in America is Creating a Stir
 

Forum List

Back
Top