There is nothing more regressive than progressives

[P@triot]

Where does it say in the constitution that the people should not look after the sick, educate the children and take care of the old? I will save you the time. It doesn't. As for outlawing firearms. Where did I ever say that.

By the way....you pathological liar....the children were educated for 200 years before Jimmy Carter created the unconstitutional Department of Education.

 

[P@triot]

Where does it say in the constitution that the people should not look after the sick, educate the children and take care of the old? I will save you the time. It doesn't.

You're right - it doesn't say that the people "should not look after the sick, educate children, and take care of the old". But the people aren't doing those things you pathological liar - the federal government is doing those things. And it is 100% unconstitutional.

If you weren't so selfish and greedy, you would start a foundation to "look after the sick, educate children, and take care of the old". And that would be constitutional.

 

[Tuatara]

Where does it say in the constitution that the people should not look after the sick, educate the children and take care of the old? I will save you the time. It doesn't. As for outlawing firearms. Where did I ever say that.

By the way....you pathological liar....the children were educated for 200 years before Jimmy Carter created the unconstitutional Department of Education.

Pathological liar?? Wow, someone's angry. The US office of Education was implemented in 1857 and was used to provide educational information to the state and local education authorities and to gather statistical information on the fast-growing educational institutions of the United States, along with various histories and descriptive articles, phamplets, reports and books, often in coordination with various state universities. Those sick bastards. How dare they. The US office of Education ended in 1972 and was replenished as the US Department of Education in 1980 whose primary function was to establish policy for, administer and coordinate most federal assistance to education, collect data on US schools, and to enforce federal educational laws regarding privacy and civil rights. Now you and I may argue which policies are good for the children of the US but to say it's unconstitutional is ridiculous.

It says nothing about riding horses in the constitution but if someone does I wouldn't argue it unconstitutional.

 

[Tuatara]

Where does it say in the constitution that the people should not look after the sick, educate the children and take care of the old? I will save you the time. It doesn't.

You're right - it doesn't say that the people "should not look after the sick, educate children, and take care of the old". But the people aren't doing those things you pathological liar - the federal government is doing those things. And it is 100% unconstitutional.

If you weren't so selfish and greedy, you would start a foundation to "look after the sick, educate children, and take care of the old". And that would be constitutional.

Sorry but your children, sick and old are already getting the short end of the stick compared to most other modern and western civilizations. Bitching about taking away the scraps the government gives them shows your true colours Scrooge McDuck.

 

[P@triot]

It says nothing about riding horses in the constitution but if someone does I wouldn't argue it unconstitutional.

But if the federal government bought horses for all of the citizens - it would be unconstitutional. Why do you keep trying to apply the constitution to the actions of citizens??? The constitution doesn't limit citizens - it limits the federal government. You should really try reading it sometime before you try commenting on it.

 

[P@triot]

Sorry but your children, sick and old are already getting the short end of the stick compared to most other modern and western civilizations. Bitching about taking away the scraps the government gives them shows your true colours Scrooge McDuck.

Sorry...but you don't get to violate the law simply because your ego makes you believe that you can deem for all of society when it is ok to break the law.

The birth rate is seriously down in the U.S. (and across the world for that matter). But that statistical reality doesn't authorize people to start raping women to increase the birth rate. The law still stands. It is still in effect.

 

[P@triot]

Sorry but your children, sick and old are already getting the short end of the stick compared to most other modern and western civilizations. Bitching about taking away the scraps the government gives them shows your true colours Scrooge McDuck.

If what you say were even remotely true, then you would have no problem getting the votes necessary to amend the U.S. Constitution and make those items the constitutional responsibility of the federal government. Oops...

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Liberals continue to block the progress of mankind. Their first attempt was with economics. They took us back to the 1800's - implementing Karl Marx's "from each according this abilities, to each according to his needs". And though it has collapsed economies around the globe, that wasn't quite enough for liberals. So then they decided to take us back to the 1700's with their politics. Shred the U.S. Constitution, consolidate all power into one branch (the executive branch) and then consolidate all power there to one man (the president) - much like King George III. But that still wasn't enough for them. They then insisted on taking us back to the 1600's by outlawing energy. Everything (coal, fracking, nuclear, etc.) is "bad" for the environment (even though all science points to no impact at all on the environment) so now we're only allowed to burn candles for light and heat.

But shockingly enough, that still wasn't enough for regressive "progressives". Their latest assault to stop the progress of mankind is their assault on speech. It has literally gotten to the point that we can't even use words which are not only common - but also accurate. Calling a man a "man" is now illegal in New York if that man prefers to be called a woman (so the government is basically forcing us to tell a lie - just like oppressive regimes throughout history have). And basic words like "mailman" and "anchorman" have now been forbidden by Princeton University.

Liberals have actually achieved their goal of taking us back to the caveman era were all we have is fire for light and heat and no words are spoken - we can only grunt and point. I can only imagine what the next step is for the regressives.

Princeton University Wants Staff to Avoid Using the Word ‘Man’

There is nothing more absolutely useless and stupid than your posts. All of them. You're a first class troll full of bullshit and bile.

 

[Tuatara]

It says nothing about riding horses in the constitution but if someone does I wouldn't argue it unconstitutional.

But if the federal government bought horses for all of the citizens - it would be unconstitutional. Why do you keep trying to apply the constitution to the actions of citizens??? The constitution doesn't limit citizens - it limits the federal government. You should really try reading it sometime before you try commenting on it.

Really, what a joke. You are blowing smoke about education and the sick yet keeping mute on the amount the government spends on arming itself. If one were truly a defender of keeping limits on the power of the government then they would target the amount spent on the military and defense. Keep blowing smoke. Making sure your population is properly educated is a good thing. I know that is beyond your scope and you rather keep them uneducated and misinformed but you can't have the whole population watching Fox news.

 

[Tuatara]

Sorry but your children, sick and old are already getting the short end of the stick compared to most other modern and western civilizations. Bitching about taking away the scraps the government gives them shows your true colours Scrooge McDuck.

If what you say were even remotely true, then you would have no problem getting the votes necessary to amend the U.S. Constitution and make those items the constitutional responsibility of the federal government. Oops...

They are not even part of the constitution. Everything the federal government does is not in the constitution, get it.

 

[Tuatara]

Sorry but your children, sick and old are already getting the short end of the stick compared to most other modern and western civilizations. Bitching about taking away the scraps the government gives them shows your true colours Scrooge McDuck.

Sorry...but you don't get to violate the law simply because your ego makes you believe that you can deem for all of society when it is ok to break the law.

The birth rate is seriously down in the U.S. (and across the world for that matter). But that statistical reality doesn't authorize people to start raping women to increase the birth rate. The law still stands. It is still in effect.

What law, explain. You're comparing the need to educate children, take care of the elderly and offering healthcare to all with rape. You are one big sicko.

 

[P@triot]

Liberals continue to block the progress of mankind. Their first attempt was with economics. They took us back to the 1800's - implementing Karl Marx's "from each according this abilities, to each according to his needs". And though it has collapsed economies around the globe, that wasn't quite enough for liberals. So then they decided to take us back to the 1700's with their politics. Shred the U.S. Constitution, consolidate all power into one branch (the executive branch) and then consolidate all power there to one man (the president) - much like King George III. But that still wasn't enough for them. They then insisted on taking us back to the 1600's by outlawing energy. Everything (coal, fracking, nuclear, etc.) is "bad" for the environment (even though all science points to no impact at all on the environment) so now we're only allowed to burn candles for light and heat.

But shockingly enough, that still wasn't enough for regressive "progressives". Their latest assault to stop the progress of mankind is their assault on speech. It has literally gotten to the point that we can't even use words which are not only common - but also accurate. Calling a man a "man" is now illegal in New York if that man prefers to be called a woman (so the government is basically forcing us to tell a lie - just like oppressive regimes throughout history have). And basic words like "mailman" and "anchorman" have now been forbidden by Princeton University.

Liberals have actually achieved their goal of taking us back to the caveman era were all we have is fire for light and heat and no words are spoken - we can only grunt and point. I can only imagine what the next step is for the regressives.

Princeton University Wants Staff to Avoid Using the Word ‘Man’

There is nothing more absolutely useless and stupid than your posts. All of them. You're a first class troll full of bullshit and bile.

In other words - you're a brainwashed progressive who can't dispute the facts so you get all pissy because the facts are in direct conflict with your bat-shit crazy ideology.

 

[P@triot]

Really, what a joke. You are blowing smoke about education and the sick yet keeping mute on the amount the government spends on arming itself.

Well defense is the constitutional responsibility of the federal government - so why would I complain about them properly carrying out their duty?

Like I said...you should actually try reading the U.S. Constitution sometime.

 

[P@triot]

Everything the federal government does is not in the constitution, get it.

Because of asshole progressives who have violated and then shredded the U.S. Constitution. Don't you get it?!?

 

[P@triot]

Making sure your population is properly educated is a good thing.

Yes it is. And it doesn't take the federal government to do it. It is the responsibility of the states to educate its citizens. The fact that you don't know that is a condemnation on the federal government's interference in education. Sad.

 

[P@triot]

Sorry but your children, sick and old are already getting the short end of the stick compared to most other modern and western civilizations. Bitching about taking away the scraps the government gives them shows your true colours Scrooge McDuck.

Sorry...but you don't get to violate the law simply because your ego makes you believe that you can deem for all of society when it is ok to break the law.

The birth rate is seriously down in the U.S. (and across the world for that matter). But that statistical reality doesn't authorize people to start raping women to increase the birth rate. The law still stands. It is still in effect.

What law, explain. You're comparing the need to educate children, take care of the elderly and offering healthcare to all with rape. You are one big sicko.

What law? Oh I don't know....that little law called the U.S. Constitution. You don't even know what you don't even know. You are so uninformed and uneducated about this topic that you shouldn't be discussing it. You're embarrassing yourself.

And yes - I made that comparison because it is the perfect example. Just because you deem there is a problem doesn't give you the right to violate the law. If you think the elderly aren't receiving proper care - then start a foundation to address that. The U.S. Constitution can't prevent citizens from donating their time and money to address issues. Just ask Bill Gates. Everything the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation does is constitutional. It's the way our nation was designed to function.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Liberals continue to block the progress of mankind. Their first attempt was with economics. They took us back to the 1800's - implementing Karl Marx's "from each according this abilities, to each according to his needs". And though it has collapsed economies around the globe, that wasn't quite enough for liberals. So then they decided to take us back to the 1700's with their politics. Shred the U.S. Constitution, consolidate all power into one branch (the executive branch) and then consolidate all power there to one man (the president) - much like King George III. But that still wasn't enough for them. They then insisted on taking us back to the 1600's by outlawing energy. Everything (coal, fracking, nuclear, etc.) is "bad" for the environment (even though all science points to no impact at all on the environment) so now we're only allowed to burn candles for light and heat.

But shockingly enough, that still wasn't enough for regressive "progressives". Their latest assault to stop the progress of mankind is their assault on speech. It has literally gotten to the point that we can't even use words which are not only common - but also accurate. Calling a man a "man" is now illegal in New York if that man prefers to be called a woman (so the government is basically forcing us to tell a lie - just like oppressive regimes throughout history have). And basic words like "mailman" and "anchorman" have now been forbidden by Princeton University.

Liberals have actually achieved their goal of taking us back to the caveman era were all we have is fire for light and heat and no words are spoken - we can only grunt and point. I can only imagine what the next step is for the regressives.

Princeton University Wants Staff to Avoid Using the Word ‘Man’

A lot of truth in your post they have goals and they don't vary far from the route to get them into law.

 

[regent]

The interpretation of the Constitution will continue as the nation continues, and since liberalism can't be stopped in a Democratic Republic it will continue its path of liberalism. Our evidence of that path is our history.

 

[P@triot]

The interpretation of the Constitution will continue as the nation continues

Keep telling yourself that, snowflake. President Trump just appointed Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court and he will uphold the U.S. Constitution (just as Antonin Scalia did after being appointed by Ronald Reagan). If he gets two more appointments as expected - there won't be any more of this "interpret" the U.S. Constitution bullshit. It will be upheld exactly as it is written and there won't be a damn thing you fascist, anti-Americans will be able to do about it.

 

[P@triot]

and since liberalism can't be stopped in a Democratic Republic

Bwahahahaha! Seems the American people sure as hell put a stop to it already. Conservatives own the House, the Senate, the White House, and an astounding 33 of the 50 states (leaving you fascists in charge of a pitiful 17 states). Obamacare was repealed by the House. Barack Insane Obama's mandates have been rolled back by President Trump. Hell, even all 50 states now permit conceal carry.

It may (or may not) be temporary. But liberalism has most definitely been stopped.