Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 19,228
- 5,643
- 265
Wrong moron.you dumb asses were bad during the russia lie and the schiff sham you believed to be trueI just proved that they are.They are not evidence you total retardWrong, turd:No they are not you stupid foolAffidavits are evidence, moron.They are not evidence they are statements and people routinely lie in them.Affidavits are evidence the evidence is what the eye witnesses sawYes and they are routinely proven wrong by evidence.Do you know what an affidavit is?No they are not they are just claimsaffidavits are EVIDENCENo pone has presented evidence of fraudROFL! Says the douchebag who spits "no fraud" every time evidence is presented that there was fraud:They're so emotionally invested in this that you'll likely never see them admit they've been conned.No it won't, turd. It's never going away. Do you actually believe people are going to ignore this monumental swindle?All this crap will fade into background noise as of Biden's Inauguration Day.The evidence for it is abundant in this forum. All the usual subjects are telling the most outrageous lies imaginable. Good article. Read it.
One of the most misused words in modern society is “gaslighting.” Articles, videos, and social media users lob the term at their ideological enemies like rocks at a Black Lives Matter peaceful protest. But we’re witnessing the most blatant and widespread attempt at mass gaslighting that we’ve seen in the nation’s history. The Swamp wants us to believe widespread voter fraud didn’t happen and if we think it did, then we must be insane.According to Psychology Today, “Gaslighting is a tactic in which a person or entity, in order to gain more power, makes a victim question their reality. It works much better than you may think. Anyone is susceptible to gaslighting, and it is a common technique of abusers, dictators, narcissists, and cult leaders.”Abusers. Dictators. Narcissists. Cult leaders. Throw in useful idiots and the self-proclaimed arbiters of truth in media and Big Tech and it seems like we have The Swamp perfectly nailed as perpetrators of massive gaslighting. They want you to believe the case is closed. They want you to think there’s no hope. They want us to ignore the mountains of evidence that demonstrate unambiguous voter fraud and accept that an old, straight, Caucasian, rich career politician outperformed every great leader this nation has ever had.
Oh, blah, blah, blah. There was no amount of voter fraud that could have swung the election. 60 lower court cases and two SC cases should have made that clear for you that by now.
Seriously, it's over. He lost. Deal with it. This constant form of "bargaining" isn't healthy.![]()
Then they can whine like children/Trump, begging for attention, all they want.
No harm, no foul.
You present Zero evidence.
Just useless debunked videos
Fake witnesses
Just show me something from a court that confirms the “monumental swindle.
Otherwise, like always, you screaming at the Sky is hilarious and I love it.
Right now, you got nothing and you keep embarrassing yourself MORE than the 2016 Sky Screamers.
Fooled. Pranked. By a buffoon and his crew.
![]()
Does Darren Wilson and Micheal Brown ring a bell?
Once again affidavits were submitted saying Micheal Brown was shot while he was on his knees with hands in the air saying " hands up don't shoot "
The evidence proved beyond question that those aqffidavits were false and it was a legal justified shooting.
YOU HAVE NO FUCKING EVIDENCE
![]()
What is an affidavit? Is affidavit an evidence? - Law Times Journal
At one point of time or another, almost everyone is required to sign certain type of affidavit in the course of managing common,lawtimesjournal.in
An affidavit is a self made willing declaration in writing, signed by the deponent (person who makes the affidavit) and accompanied by an oath. “Affidavit” has originated from a Latin word which means to “pledge ones faith.” It is to be signed and witnessed by a notary authority. It is to be signed without any cross-examination by the affiant.Another way of thinking of an affidavit is as a kind of written court testimony. In the court of law, you are asked to take an oath on a Holy Book and swear that you’re telling the truth, likewise on an affidavit, you do this same thing in writing. You’re under oath, but your testimony is on paper. They are necessary in a way that the oral submission/testimony/evidence is only admissible before a judge but an affidavit can also be used as an alternative to this.Misleading information in an affidavit can result to criminal penalties against the affiant, but if the affiant fails to recall something or misses something then he cannot be charged for such omission. If the affiant includes something in the affidavit which is not an fully established fact or is not backed up by any evidence, then he will have to state that it is his ‘opinion’.The law on affidavits in India is usually governed by Section 139, Order XIX of the Code of Civil Procedure and Order XI of the Supreme Court Rules also. Judiciary at several instances have upheld the importance of the authencity of an affidavit by the means of the above mentioned rules and sections.
You have PROVED nothing.
I already addressed that.
Yes the collusion story was false and yes the Russian interference in the election was false.
This bullshit you are claiming is just as bad