Bills assets were in a blind trust while president. After his terms he gave speeches and made a few investments. I thought Trump said it was smart to take advantage of everything the law allows.
Bills assets were in a blind trust while president.
What assets? When he was in Arkansas, the governor made less than $40K.
What few investments he had at the time were in a blind trust.
You mean all his "used underwear money"?
Don't really know. You're the only one I know of that spends money for dirty underwear.
Don't really know.
That's clear.
Hillary used to donate Bill's used underwear and take a tax deduction for it.
The primary money-making engine was Bill Clinton. In his first year as an ex-president, he gave 57 speeches, an average of more than one per week. He traveled from Salem, Mass. (for the standard fee of $125,000), to Stockholm, Vienna and Warsaw ($183,333 each), and Milan ($350,000). Their 2001 tax return reports $13.7 million in gross receipts for his "speaking and writing" business.
An analysis by CNN early this year concluded that the Clintons were paid $153.7 million for speeches they gave between 2001 and 2015, when she launched her current presidential campaign.
Also on the 2001 return, Hillary Clinton reported receiving $2.9 million, the first installment of an $8 million advance for her memoir,
Living History. The contract was signed the day before she took her oath as a U.S. senator. Bill was already collecting a $10 million advance for
My Life, and when Hillary stepped down as secretary of state, she got an advance of $14 million for
Hard Choices.
Subsequent tax records show both Clintons earning money as speakers and writers, and Bill also as a consultant. These have raised political questions: Why was Hillary giving well-paid speeches at big banks? Was Bill creating conflicts of interest for Hillary as secretary of state? But in 2014, the last year before Hillary Clinton started campaigning, their income from
speaking, writing and consulting totaled $32.3 million.
It's likely the speaking fees and book advances would have been smaller for politicians without the Clintons' larger-than-life reputations.
Michael Johnston, the ethics scholar, said it's a symptom of the wealthy elite's rising prominence.
"We love the notion of the citizen politician," he said, but added this: "You can't be a presidential candidate without some acquaintance with wealth and power."