The Woman Question

[Jay Zepher]

Loss of the ability to distinguish what is real from what is not real, or not recognizing that something exist as opposed to what does not exist, can be a form of psychosis. People with this condition have been and still are treated for their mental illness without much controversy regarding their need for treatment.
Now, let's play with words and change the meaning of psychosis so that it may not include ALL people who cannot distinguish what is real from what is unreal, that is, let's make exceptions for people who want their version of reality, however unreal it may be, to be the ONE TRUE reality so that these people are no longer viewed as unusual or unstable but as pioneers and reformers who are only confirming what is - again - TRUE. True to who? you might reasonably and expectantly ask, but in fact you may not ask that since the definition of psychosis has changed, and changed rather quickly, you are no longer a reasonable person questioning what is obviously unreal and frankly, crazy. YOU are now the unstable, crazy person.
It is not just psychosis, it is MASS psychosis, or as the more observant in our culture are presently recognizing and calling out, mass hysteria.
As the title of this thread "The Woman Question" very purposely hints there are historical precedents to mass hysteria and one we all know in particular happened not so long ago when a very dangerous and evil psychotic persuaded a nation to accept his version of reality in which a race of people were redefined as "subhuman" in order to instill his horrific answer to what was then called "The Jewish Question."
Well, we don't know where the whole debate of what is a woman leading to, but just questioning what a woman is seems the first step back to the past, not forwards.
If I were a woman I would not like where this is going, nor would I believe that this eerie redefining of a woman is progress. It is most probably leading back to the dark ages of women treated as second class citizens and in this case not even allowed a definition. Then to, what lacks definition may come to lack identity, even when they are half the population of the planet.

 

[Anathema]

We are quickly moving towards a time when the female gender will be split in two… women (traditional women) and woMen (trans and feminists).

 

[White 6]

Loss of the ability to distinguish what is real from what is not real, or not recognizing that something exist as opposed to what does not exist, can be a form of psychosis. People with this condition have been and still are treated for their mental illness without much controversy regarding their need for treatment.
Now, let's play with words and change the meaning of psychosis so that it may not include ALL people who cannot distinguish what is real from what is unreal, that is, let's make exceptions for people who want their version of reality, however unreal it may be, to be the ONE TRUE reality so that these people are no longer viewed as unusual or unstable but as pioneers and reformers who are only confirming what is - again - TRUE. True to who? you might reasonably and expectantly ask, but in fact you may not ask that since the definition of psychosis has changed, and changed rather quickly, you are no longer a reasonable person questioning what is obviously unreal and frankly, crazy. YOU are now the unstable, crazy person.
It is not just psychosis, it is MASS psychosis, or as the more observant in our culture are presently recognizing and calling out, mass hysteria.
As the title of this thread "The Woman Question" very purposely hints there are historical precedents to mass hysteria and one we all know in particular happened not so long ago when a very dangerous and evil psychotic persuaded a nation to accept his version of reality in which a race of people were redefined as "subhuman" in order to instill his horrific answer to what was then called "The Jewish Question."
Well, we don't know where the whole debate of what is a woman leading to, but just questioning what a woman is seems the first step back to the past, not forwards.
If I were a woman I would not like where this is going, nor would I believe that this eerie redefining of a woman is progress. It is most probably leading back to the dark ages of women treated as second class citizens and in this case not even allowed a definition. Then to, what lacks definition may come to lack identity, even when they are half the population of the planet.

I remember back in the day, an important and popular woman question was "Want to smoke another bowl, and fool around?
Of course Jimmy Buffett put it differently:

Of course Paul McCartney, brilliant but with questionable priorities and apparently not into safe sex said:

 

[Bob Blaylock]

We are quickly moving towards a time when the female gender will be split in two… women (traditional women) and woMen (trans and feminists).

All the noise made by, and attention given to, mentally-fucked-up freaks that are confused about the difference between male and female notwithstanding; they are, and will always be, a tiny minority. Natural selection will see to it that this will always remain the case.

 

[Anathema]

All the noise made by, and attention given to, mentally-fucked-up freaks that are confused about the difference between male and female notwithstanding; they are, and will always be, a tiny minority. Natural selection will see to it that this will always remain the case

The trans movement, probably. Unfortunately the Feminist movement has considerable power and legs (no pun intended). That movement is far more dangerous than the trans movement.

 

[Marener]

All the noise made by, and attention given to, mentally-fucked-up freaks that are confused about the difference between male and female notwithstanding; they are, and will always be, a tiny minority. Natural selection will see to it that this will always remain the case.

Don’t look at us. The political right has made transgendered people out to be the biggest threat the country has faced in decades.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

In 1986 an economist named Herbert Stein proposed Stein's Law. Which he expressed as "If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.

The religion of trans cannot go on. The deification of all things homosexual cannot go on. The celebration of gay and drag cannot go on. Unfortunately sometimes stopping has catastrophic results. It can't be helped.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Don’t look at us. The political right has made transgendered people out to be the biggest threat the country has faced in decades.

And they might well be.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Don’t look at us. The political right has made transgendered people out to be the biggest threat the country has faced in decades.

Yours is the side that is promoting this fucked-up madness, and demanding that sane people play along with it, to the point of allowing male perverts into women's restrooms dressing rooms, locker rooms, and such, and allowing male athletes to cheat by competing as “women” against actual women.

As usual, yours is the side that is promoting evil and insane policies that can only cause harm, and then trying to place the blame for that harm on those of us who opposed these policies and warned what the consequences would be.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

In 1986 an economist named Herbert Stein proposed Stein's Law. Which he expressed as "If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.

The religion of trans cannot go on. The deification of all things homosexual cannot go on. The celebration of gay and drag cannot go on. Unfortunately sometimes stopping has catastrophic results. It can't be helped.

In this case, the results of putting a solid end to this shit cannot possibly be nearly as catastrophic as the results of allowing it to continue.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

It's really a simple distinction.

If you're a Republican, conservative, moderate, you believe there are two genders. One is male, one is female. Pretty easy to understand, we go with nature and science.

Then, we have Dimocrats, liberals, leftwingers. Hold on to your hat! We are now treated to the insane world where these utterly insane emotionally unstable people reside.
It's a world where science and biology is sucked down the rabbit hole, and comes back out in a pretend world where everyone is expected to go along with pure fantasy and nonsense! A world where 'normal' is flip on it's head and replaced with various definitions that would make Webster's and Funk & Wagnalls simultaneously orgasm. A world where women's sports are dirty words, and where biological men are encouraged to beat up on women. Since, you know, 'woman' is a subjective word anyway!

Like the bumper sticker I saw a few days ago......'Giant Asteroid' 2024!