BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 105,192
- 38,777
- 2,250
I have no idea who those people are. Do you know their names?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea who those people are. Do you know their names?
Do you know their names?
I have no idea who those people are. Do you know their names?
The satellite data, gathered from 1979 to present says exactly the opposite of what you are claiming
And why should I care what those people, who I never heard of might say?Phoebe Plummer, 23 and Anna Holland, 22
CO2 does not warm the earth it makes it green. The sun creates climate. Humans cant produce enough CO2 to change anything because green plants in a greater way then we can produce it grow exponentially and convert it to O2 in a greater way then we can produce it.LOL What a foolish post. Tell you what, get your weight, get the same percentage of potassium cyanide for your weight as there is CO2 in the atmosphere, and take that potassium cyanide. See, a very small amount of something in a complex system can indeed change that system in negative ways. The change from 280 ppm of CO2 in the atmosphere to over 430 ppm is greater than the increase from deep glacial period to interglacial, which was 180 ppm to 280 ppm. Last time we were at this level there was no ice at the North Pole, and most of Antarctica was free of ice. Of course the thermal inertia of ice and oceans will mean it will take a few centuries to reach that point again, but the rapid increase is going to make some interesting weather inbetween.
Images
Videos
Approximately 430 parts per million
As of June 2025, the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Earth's atmosphere is approximately 430 parts per million (ppm). This level has been rising, with a record high of 422.7 ppm reported in 2024, marking the largest one-year increase on record.
MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology+1
Some of those solutions can and should be implemented now. Unfortunately, not all of them can.You can pretend you have never heard of "Just Stop Oil", "Extinction Rebellion", "Earth First", "Deep Green Resistance" and many organizations just like them ... who hold regular destructive protests all over the world and all who espouse the idea that we must implement "green solutions" whether we're ready or not.
But, no one believes for a moment that you don't know what's being done in your name.
Like what? Solutions to a problem that doesnt exist that dont workSome of those solutions can and should be implemented now. Unfortunately, not all of them can.
They don't care. Truth is not relevant to their mission of destroying the USA. They all work for China. They are traitors who should be tortured to death on live TV.Pretty amazing really that these executives in charge of climate change have no idea what they are even dealing with. 7-8% CO2, really?
The one dude was only off by a factor of 5000.
My, my. Isn't it kind of stinky where you have your head at present? The satellite data, gathered from 1979 to present says exactly the opposite of what you are claiming. And you damned well know it. I don't know why you are engaged in lying, but it is a definite clue to your character. Here is the satellite data'
View attachment 1172069
Are you truly trying to prove what a dumb **** you are? Yes, water vapor is the primary greenhouse gas. However, it's residence time in the atmosphere is less than ten days, then it rains out. CO2's residence time is in centuries. And when CO2 and the other GHGs raise the temperature of the atmosphere one degree, it will hold seven percent more water. CO2 is the primary driver of the present warming of the planet, which is creating a changing climate.
Every major scientific group in the world says you are a dumbass.The typically stupid warmist/alarmist look its is warming! chart that is proof of CO2 driving it. when not a shred of evidence is posted for it, that is how stupid the remaining climate cultists is down to these days.
They have nothing for it.
NO Hotspot exist that was a cornerstone prediction of the AGW hypothesis.
NO Positive Feedback Loop exist that was a cornerstone of the AGW hypothesis.
They were formulated 35 years ago and still not found today this means the AGW is a massive failure.
You run on endless climate bullshit narrative that is all you have left.
I'm always amazed at how wrong you instant internet experts can get.Oh my gawad! your ignorance is stunning!
Water Vapor is continually replenished in the atmosphere, ever heard of the water cycle from the NOAA,
The water cycle
![]()
At its core, the water cycle is the continuous movement of water as it changes between liquid, solid, and vapor states. These transformations occur on the Earth's surface and throughout the atmosphere.
LINK
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Every major scientific group in the world says you are a dumbass.
If my choice is between some anonymous internet troll who gets his information from people who say vaccines don't work while ranting about gay frogs, or from every major scientific group in the world, I'll go with the scientists every time.
I'm always amazed at how wrong you instant internet experts can get.
I don't care about your silly charts. I don't know how to interpret them, and every major scientific group in the world says you don't either.Back to the old consensus bromides, another dead post on arrival as you failed to address what I actually stated,
==============
"The typically stupid warmist/alarmist look its is warming! chart that is proof of CO2 driving it. when not a shred of evidence is posted for it, that is how stupid the remaining climate cultists is down to these days.
They have nothing for it.
NO Hotspot exist that was a cornerstone prediction of the AGW hypothesis.
NO Positive Feedback Loop exist that was a cornerstone of the AGW hypothesis.
They were formulated 35 years ago and still not found today this means the AGW is a massive failure."
============
Why can't you CO2 sniffers answer them, above your pay grade or your brain would burn up trying to understand it........
I posted this kind of stuff many time only to get consensus bromides that is how empty climate cultists really are as they don't even know what the fuss is about, scientifically they simply hear and obey their leftist programmers which are dominated by government handlers.
Show me how you are more credible than all those scientists, and you might have something. Till then, you are wasting my time and yours. You should STFU.Your ignorance is stunning!
Water cycle is what put water into the atmosphere you moron that is what the NOAA is specifically stating!
"Fluxes: How water moves.
There are many ways that water moves between pools — liquid water evaporates into water vapor, is transported through the atmosphere, condenses to form clouds, and returns to the surface as precipitation like rain or snow. Water can flow across the land, down into the ground, then be taken up by plants, and back into the atmosphere. Water can even return to the atmosphere from solid ice or snow, skipping the liquid phase!
Here are some of ways that water moves, or fluxes, and the terms we use to describe them:"
==============
It is no wonder you people are stupid as shit when it comes to basic science.
Show me how you are more credible than all those scientists, and you might have something. Till then, you are wasting my time and yours. You should STFU.

I don't care about your silly charts. I don't know how to interpret them, and every major scientific group in the world says you don't either.