the white privilege rhetoric is racist and anti-historical

[Mortimer]

"There is no White Privilege," says a man who benefited from white privilege all his life.

A little bit maybe and subtile for example a white man wont be stereotyped for his race when there is a crime comitted by a single member like a brown or black man
But its far from universal and undifferentiated to be seen anymore and there is growing injustice against whites
The police reaction to henry novak being called racist is a case of PoC privilege

 

[SeaMajor7]

Is it white privilege to wake up at 4:30 in the morning to get to work?

 

[Lisa558]

Is it white privilege to wake up at 4:30 in the morning to get to work?

And to expand…..

Is it white privilege to get up at 6:15 am to walk 1/2 mile through the rain or snow to catch the 7:35 am bus that gets you to the Metro at 7:55 that will get you to your city stop at 8:25 where you then walk an additional 1/2 mile to get to your office building by 8:50 in time for your 9 am start - and then do it in reverse 8 hours later, arriving home at 6:30 pm….

….so that Mama* with four illegitimate schoolchildren sleeps in until 9 am and then goes to the grocery store with her EBT card, watches TV until early afternoon, and then takes her youngest to the Medicaid office - all paid for by the people with the long commute and full-time jobs?

* OOW birthrate for blacks is 73%

 

[Mortimer]

And to expand…..

Is it white privilege to get up at 6:15 am to walk 1/2 mile through the rain or snow to catch the 7:35 am bus that gets you to the Metro at 7:55 that will get you to your city stop at 8:25 where you then walk an additional 1/2 mile to get to your office building by 8:50 in time for your 9 am start - and then do it in reverse 8 hours later, arriving home at 6:30 pm….

….so that Mama* with four illegitimate schoolchildren sleeps in until 9 am and then goes to the grocery store with her EBT card, watches TV until early afternoon, and then takes her youngest to the Medicaid office - all paid for by the people with the long commute and full-time jobs?

* OOW birthrate for blacks is 73%

I think its a bit unfair to paint all blacks as unemployed or lazy ben carson is a neurosurgeon
Im neither anti white nor anti black
I try to be fair to everyone

 

[SeaMajor7]

And to expand…..

Is it white privilege to get up at 6:15 am to walk 1/2 mile through the rain or snow to catch the 7:35 am bus that gets you to the Metro at 7:55 that will get you to your city stop at 8:25 where you then walk an additional 1/2 mile to get to your office building by 8:50 in time for your 9 am start - and then do it in reverse 8 hours later, arriving home at 6:30 pm….

….so that Mama* with four illegitimate schoolchildren sleeps in until 9 am and then goes to the grocery store with her EBT card, watches TV until early afternoon, and then takes her youngest to the Medicaid office - all paid for by the people with the long commute and full-time jobs?

* OOW birthrate for blacks is 73%

That's waisist. Now get back to work!

 

[Lisa558]

I think its a bit unfair to paint all blacks as unemployed or lazy ben carson is a neurosurgeon
Im neither anti white nor anti black
I try to be fair to everyone

I didn’t paint them all like that. I merely mentioned that, given the OOW birthrate, it is more likely for blacks to be on welfare. Similarly, given the UE rate, it is more likely for blacks to be unemployed.

I am pointing out that insanity of the leftists hollering about “white privilege.”

 

[Lisa558]

That's waisist. Now get back to work!

I’m retired. I EARNED it!

 

[Mortimer]

I didn’t paint them all like that. I merely mentioned that, given the OOW birthrate, it is more likely for blacks to be on welfare. Similarly, given the UE rate, it is more likely for blacks to be unemployed.

I am pointing out that insanity of the leftists hollering about “white privilege.”

Its ok you were not the only or first one though the other guy did first

 

[JoeB131]

And to expand…..

Here it comes folks.

Is it white privilege to get up at 6:15 am to walk 1/2 mile through the rain or snow to catch the 7:35 am bus that gets you to the Metro at 7:55 that will get you to your city stop at 8:25 where you then walk an additional 1/2 mile to get to your office building by 8:50 in time for your 9 am start - and then do it in reverse 8 hours later, arriving home at 6:30 pm….

I would say if that's the job you have, your life kind of sucks. I mean, at least have a car, for crying out loud.

….so that Mama* with four illegitimate schoolchildren sleeps in until 9 am and then goes to the grocery store with her EBT card, watches TV until early afternoon, and then takes her youngest to the Medicaid office - all paid for by the people with the long commute and full-time jobs?

Well, that's the problem, the rich should be paying for that. The rich should be paying for that public transportation. The rich should be paying your retirement. Of course, no one is actually paying for this, we are just borrowing our way into an endless hole.

Now, as I've pointed out to you MANY times, 40% of people on assistance have at least one family member that works, and 70% of people on assistance are only on it for a few years before they get their life straightened out.

* OOW birthrate for blacks is 73%

It's 32% for white people, what's your point? If you factor in all the white dudes who get divorced and move on with their lives, that's a problem as well.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

I didn’t paint them all like that. I merely mentioned that, given the OOW birthrate, it is more likely for blacks to be on welfare. Similarly, given the UE rate, it is more likely for blacks to be unemployed.

I am pointing out that insanity of the leftists hollering about “white privilege.”

There are more white people on welfare than there are Black people but were you aware of the following:

There existed a requirement that was commonly called the "man-in-the-house" rule (or "no man in the house" rule) under some state implementations of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC).​

​

In practice, many states denied AFDC [welfare] benefits if an adult male was found living in, regularly staying in, or sometimes even frequently visiting the household. The theory was that a man should be supporting the family, so the family was deemed ineligible for welfare assistance. In some jurisdictions, investigators conducted home inspections to determine whether a man was residing with the mother and children.​

​

The rule was not part of the original federal AFDC statute itself. Rather, states adopted various versions of it, often referred to as "substitute father" or "man-in-the-house" regulations. In 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the historical_event entity King v. Smith, held that Alabama could not deny AFDC benefits simply because a man who had no legal duty to support the children was present or involved with the mother. The Court invalidated Alabama's version of the rule.​

​

So stated succinctly:​

Under many state AFDC rules during the 1950s and 1960s, a family could lose welfare benefits if there was a "man in the house," even if he was not the children's father and had no legal obligation to support them. The Supreme Court largely ended this practice in 1968.​

Study Examines “Man in the House” Rules in the Voucher Program

And guess who immediately took advantage of that ruling?

 

[Lisa558]

There are more white people on welfare than there are Black people but were you aware of the following:

There existed a requirement that was commonly called the "man-in-the-house" rule (or "no man in the house" rule) under some state implementations of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC).​

​

In practice, many states denied AFDC [welfare] benefits if an adult male was found living in, regularly staying in, or sometimes even frequently visiting the household. The theory was that a man should be supporting the family, so the family was deemed ineligible for welfare assistance. In some jurisdictions, investigators conducted home inspections to determine whether a man was residing with the mother and children.​

​

The rule was not part of the original federal AFDC statute itself. Rather, states adopted various versions of it, often referred to as "substitute father" or "man-in-the-house" regulations. In 1968, the U.S. Supreme Court, in the historical_event entity King v. Smith, held that Alabama could not deny AFDC benefits simply because a man who had no legal duty to support the children was present or involved with the mother. The Court invalidated Alabama's version of the rule.​

​

So stated succinctly:​

Study Examines “Man in the House” Rules in the Voucher Program

And guess who immediately took advantage of that ruling?

Of course there’s more whites on welfare - there are more whites, period. There are also more whites giving to charity, paying income taxes, and rescuing abandoned kitties from the animal shelter.

But blacks are more likely to be on welfare than whites, and that is a result of the 73% illegitimacy rate. The “no man in the house” was designed by Democrats to break up the black family and encourage more illegitimacy.

As far as the rest of your stuff, TLDR.

 

[JoeB131]

Of course there’s more whites on welfare - there are more whites, period. There are also more whites giving to charity, paying income taxes, and rescuing abandoned kitties from the animal shelter.

But blacks are more likely to be on welfare than whites, and that is a result of the 73% illegitimacy rate. The “no man in the house” was designed by Democrats to break up the black family and encourage more illegitimacy.

As far as the rest of your stuff, TLDR.

The problem is, black people were poor before, when the OOW birth rate was only 20% among blacks and 5% among whites. It has less to do with "illegitimacy" and more to do with systematic racism preventing black families from developing generational wealth.

Today, the OOW birth rate is 32% among white and 72% among blacks, but white still have the advantage of generational wealth and white privilege.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The problem is, black people were poor before, when the OOW birth rate was only 20% among blacks and 5% among whites. It has less to do with "illegitimacy" and more to do with systematic racism preventing black families from developing generational wealth.

Today, the OOW birth rate is 32% among white and 72% among blacks, but white still have the advantage of generational wealth and white privilege.

Wrong

It has everything to do with illegitimacy.

The fact is black people were only relatively poor. They were in fact rising in wealth and thriving in most areas. Until Johnsons disasterous effort to create dependency.

Whites have the advantage again only because there are more of them. The OOW birth problem also harms whites just not as much, because again there are more whites. In areas with a a high rate of OOW it is irrelevant what color or race the people are the same problems persist,

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong

It has everything to do with illegitimacy.

The fact is black people were only relatively poor. They were in fact rising in wealth and thriving in most areas. Until Johnsons disasterous effort to create dependency.

Actually, no. If anything, Johnson's efforts reduced poverty.

Here's a hint for you. In 1959, the black poverty rate was 55%. Today it is 17%.

Whites have the advantage again only because there are more of them. The OOW birth problem also harms whites just not as much, because again there are more whites. In areas with a a high rate of OOW it is irrelevant what color or race the people are the same problems persist,

No, whites have an advantage because the system is rigged in our favor.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Actually, no. If anything, Johnson's efforts reduced poverty.

Here's a hint for you. In 1959, the black poverty rate was 55%. Today it is 17%.

View attachment 1271238



No, whites have an advantage because the system is rigged in our favor.

Wrong

Poverty increased after Jonhson especially for blacks

The system is not rigged there are simply more whites

You are truly stupid and a racist

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There are more white people on welfare than there are Black people

What is the percentage of whites who are on welfare?
What is the percentage of blacks who are on welfare?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Actually, no. If anything, Johnson's efforts reduced poverty.

Here's a hint for you. In 1959, the black poverty rate was 55%. Today it is 17%.

View attachment 1271238



No, whites have an advantage because the system is rigged in our favor.

Actually, no. If anything, Johnson's efforts reduced poverty.

How much of the reduction was due to increased welfare payments and how much was economic growth?

 

[Lisa558]

Wrong

Poverty increased after Jonhson especially for blacks

The system is not rigged there are simply more whites

You are truly stupid and a racist

Actually, the system IS rigged - and has been for 50 years - in favor of blacks.

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong

Poverty increased after Jonhson especially for blacks

I just demonstrated to you that it didn't...

Never mind. I forgot who I was talking to.

Once again, someone should have taught you at a young age that contradiction isn't an argument.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I just demonstrated to you that it didn't...

Never mind. I forgot who I was talking to.

Once again, someone should have taught you at a young age that contradiction isn't an argument.

no you did not

yes you did you are taliing to your better

Once again apply your own advice and stop lying with every post