The warming of Greenland progressing more rapidly than predicted

I am sure that you are so damned stupid you do not even realize that the scale of the two graphs are so different that the comparison is meaningless. The first is measured in giga tons, the second in millions of gigatons. That is literally a million to one difference in the slope of the graphs.

Once again you show gross inability to understand the point of the two charts as it made clear that despite the melting over several decades doesn't make a dent to the remaining volume because it is so massive.
 
Are you saying you are so ******* dumb that you never bothered to read what the scientists actually have predicted?

They have predicted negligible zero summer ice in the Arctic, gave you the statements of a number warmest/alarmist scientists but your renowned Swiss cheese memory banks you carry around failed you again.
 
I notice you completely ignored my post about Greenland when there were far less ice there yet nothing collapsed anywhere except fainting women.

New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago​


LINK


The material must have scared you away.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Once again you show gross inability to understand the point of the two charts as it made clear that despite the melting over several decades doesn't make a dent to the remaining volume because it is so massive.
Totally cracked me up when I read his response.

I thought.....he is calling you stupid and then says what ?????
 
No wonder you are considered an idiot. You prove it with every post. So, for twenty years the temperature declined in Greenland, but for the next 125 years, it increased. Increased to the point that we can measure the increase in the sea level from that melt. But continue in your willful ignorance, it is amusing.
Ya moron!! CO2 UP and the temp went DOWN!!! For TWENTY YEARS!!!

Explain, dingleberyy!!

Your gunja has made you loopy!!!

Greg
 
C'mon Greenland. I am thinking of buying a summer home there and need some terra firma to put it on. How much more ice do we have to go before I see the actual Greenland?
Burn a few more car tyres and assist.

Greg
 
I notice you completely ignored my post about Greenland when there were far less ice there yet nothing collapsed anywhere except fainting women.

New Study: Greenland Was 3-7°C Warmer And Far Less Glaciated Than Today 6000-8000 Years Ago​


LINK


The material must have scared you away.

:abgg2q.jpg:



The Vikings settled the southern tip and farmed it until the 1400s, when the advancing continent specific ice age "froze them out."

That was a big big Global COOLING talking point in the 1970s.

Greenland's ice adds a new ice layer every year. CO2 FRAUD defines that as "melting." How? IT GREW MORE ICE THAN IT HAD THE YEAR BEFORE.... as it has done for at least the past million years...


 
The Vikings settled the southern tip and farmed it until the 1400s, when the advancing continent specific ice age "froze them out."

That was a big big Global COOLING talking point in the 1970s.

Greenland's ice adds a new ice layer every year. CO2 FRAUD defines that as "melting." How? IT GREW MORE ICE THAN IT HAD THE YEAR BEFORE.... as it has done for at least the past million years...



The Vikings settled the southern tip and farmed it until the 1400s, when the advancing continent specific ice age "froze them out."

How far north did Greenland move between the Vikings' arrival and their departure? Link?
 
The Vikings settled the southern tip and farmed it until the 1400s, when the advancing continent specific ice age "froze them out."

How far north did Greenland move between the Vikings' arrival and their departure? Link?



A few feet. When the Vikings arrived, the Greenland ice age was hung up on the mountain range at the top of the southern tip. That's why the entire southern tip was green and they called it GREENland.

When an ice age gets "through" a mountain range after building up behind it for centuries, there is an accelerated rush of ice, moving miles per year, as the pressure of the mile thick ice behind it is finally released.
 
A few feet. When the Vikings arrived, the Greenland ice age was hung up on the mountain range at the top of the southern tip. That's why the entire southern tip was green and they called it GREENland.

When an ice age gets "through" a mountain range after building up behind it for centuries, there is an accelerated rush of ice, moving miles per year, as the pressure of the mile thick ice behind it is finally released.

The distance was right, for your theory, but the Ice Age was "hung up"?

LOL!

That's hilarious.
 
The distance was right, for your theory, but the Ice Age was "hung up"?

LOL!

That's hilarious.



What happens when a continent specific ice age moving away from the pole encounters a mountain range?

It doesn't initially go through it. It builds up, sometimes over a mile.


Antarctica - AntarcticGlaciers.org



Transantarctic Mountains Map




There is a "hole" in the TransAntarctic Mountain Range, slightly "left" of the center of those two images.

That is where the Antarctic Ice "took out" mountains. How thick is the ice there? 2+ miles.

When 2+ miles of ice moves 10 feet a year, that's still an unreal amount of momentum. It gets in the mountains, it freezes. During summer, it expands a bit, cracking rocks while moving. Eventually, it "moves mountains." And when it does, all 2+ miles of the ice releases all the pressure it was applying to the mountains before moving them.
 
What happens when a continent specific ice age moving away from the pole encounters a mountain range?

It doesn't initially go through it. It builds up, sometimes over a mile.


Antarctica - AntarcticGlaciers.org



Transantarctic Mountains Map




There is a "hole" in the TransAntarctic Mountain Range, slightly "left" of the center of those two images.

That is where the Antarctic Ice "took out" mountains. How thick is the ice there? 2+ miles.

When 2+ miles of ice moves 10 feet a year, that's still an unreal amount of momentum. It gets in the mountains, it freezes. During summer, it expands a bit, cracking rocks while moving. Eventually, it "moves mountains." And when it does, all 2+ miles of the ice releases all the pressure it was applying to the mountains before moving them.

The Transantarctic mountain range isn't in Greenland, you stupid ****.
 
The consequences are China or Russia will move in and take it.

Boomers like you are so ******* naive and dumb. Like your belief in climate change hoax nonsense.
What ******* nonsense. The only way that China or Russia could take Greenland is if NATO does not exist. And that is why Trump is doing his very best for his good buddy, Putin, to destroy NATO.
 
Greenland's continent specific ice age is at least 1 million years old, and

EVERY SINGLE YEAR IT GROWS ANOTHER LAYER OF ICE ON TOP, WHAT ICE CORES DOCUMENT, AND HENCE IS GROWING ICE NOT LOSING IT....
******* stupid post. Most of Greenland is more than a mile in altitude, so, yes, there is another layer of snow added every year. But the glaciers move, and slide into the sea, so it loses ice every year. And at present, the loss far exceeds the gain.
 
China is moving to renewables faster than any other nation. And when it comes to GHG's, we are the second producer right after China.
Wait

I thought CO2 was a deadly gas killing all life on Earth and China was far and away the biggest emitter

IMG_2246.webp
 
15th post
The warming and melting of Greenland, in fact, of the whole Arctic, is progressing much more rapidly than the scientists predicted. Evidence from the ice cores and ground underneath the ice show that in the past there was major ice loss at lower GHG levels than we have today. And as the warming Arctic makes the jet stream Rossby waves more extreme, southern areas are seeing colder winter storms, while the Arctic sees brief periods of above freezing temperatures in the dead of winter.

"A rapidly warming Arctic that feels unfamiliar even to experts​

The changes in Greenland are part of a broader pattern across the Arctic, where warming is proceeding at roughly four times the global average. Long term assessments like the annual Arctic Report Card have documented how sea ice, snow cover, and permafrost are all shifting in ways that would have been hard to imagine a generation ago. One recent installment described how the region now looks dramatically different than it did 20 years ago, noting that it is the continuation of a long term pattern and that the Arctic has shifted into a new state of being. That new state includes more rain on snow, more open water in autumn, and more frequent episodes of extreme warmth.


Some of those extremes have stunned even veteran researchers. Earlier this month, temperatures near the North Pole spiked more than 36°F above average, briefly pushing conditions above the melting point in the heart of winter. Scientists who work in Svalbard, Norway, in the high Arctic have described how the signs of rapid climate change are unmistakable, as documented in a detailed Transcript of their observations. When I hear glaciologists and sea ice experts say that the Arctic they study today barely resembles the one they first encountered in their careers, it becomes clear why the word “terrifying” is no longer considered hyperbole."

I don't get the problem. The place is an icebox. How can it being warmer be a problem?
 
But the glaciers move, and slide into the sea, so it loses ice every year.


Even at age 40 million years old, AA is still adding ice, has not yet reached the point where the iceberg loss exceeds the annual ice layer addition.

Greenland is net adding ice every year.
 
Back
Top Bottom