The Very Worst Racist

[frigidweirdo]

It certainly is my fault to expect any reasonable discussion. I will bite the bullet and say I am the fool sometimes hoping for adult discussion.

You wrote your piece, I wrote mine, you don't seem to like what I wrote, whatever. You think somehow I was not writing in an adult fashion, that's your view. I wrote what I believe, what else can I do?

 

[2aguy]

I didn't know conservatives started welfare, modern day slavery.

How's that? You mean FDR was a conservative...LBJ was a conservative...right?

 

[boilermaker55]

NO! You have it all wrong I was condoning your comment and doing my mea culpa for expecting more from this board. It was nothing against your post.

It certainly is my fault to expect any reasonable discussion. I will bite the bullet and say I am the fool sometimes hoping for adult discussion.

You wrote your piece, I wrote mine, you don't seem to like what I wrote, whatever. You think somehow I was not writing in an adult fashion, that's your view. I wrote what I believe, what else can I do?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Q: What ideology actively works to discriminate, and has historically worked to discriminate against blacks, including enslaving them:

[ ] A. Liberal

[ ] B. Conservative




Answer is B.

"Q: What ideology actively works to discriminate..."

Liberalism....no doubt.

It was no accident that a racist was selected to head the Department of Justice.....after all, he was selected by the 'Get Even With America' President.


Nor was Holder the only one selected on that basis.


8. No sooner was President Obama sworn in then he names Deputy Assistant Attorney General Loretta King to be the head of the entire Civil Rights Division. Political appointees who worked with King described (to Adams) how she proudly boasted that her career advanced primarily through race-based preferences.
Adams, Op. Cit., p.11.


9. “Attorney General Eric Holder may be the face of the Justice Department, but behind the scenes, a little-known assistant attorney general named Loretta King (no relation to Martin Luther King, Jr.) has been the driving force behind the DOJ’s recent, most questionable racially motivated decisions. Neck-deep in the more divisive civil rights cases of the past several years — most notably the New Black Panther voter intimidation case and the recent Dayton, Ohio police department’s testing standards issue — the Obama appointed assistant attorney general has many wondering whether her guide is the law or racial politics….According to Adams, race-based decision making has been a consistent staple of King’s actions and resume.

1. 1. In testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights about the New Black Panther case, former DOJ Voting Rights Section chief Christopher Coates explained that King ordered him to stop asking trial attorney applicants whether they would have a problem dealing with cases involving white victims. 2. “In the spring of 2009, Ms. King, who had by then been appointed Acting AAG [assistant attorney general] for Civil Rights by the Obama Administration, called me to her office and specifically instructed me that I was not to ask any other applicants whether they would be willing to, in effect, race-neutrally enforce the VRA [Voting Rights Act],” he testified. “Ms. King took offense that I was asking such a question of job applicants and directed me not to ask it because she does not support equal enforcement of the provisions of the VRA.” Critics contend Assistant Attorney General Loretta King guided more by racial politics than the law The Daily Caller 3. This is what King said as she introduced Holder to the Division: “I can’t tell you how exciting it is to go to work every day, and look up at the photos, and see that we now have two black men running the country.” Had a state manager gathered his workers to celebrate white men running the country, this same DOJ would have sued him for employment discrimination.

Racial extremists dominate the most powerful division of federal law enforcement.



10. "Sources inside the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department tell me that Deputy Assistant Attorney General Loretta King, the controversial career lawyer who ordered the dismissal of the New Black Panther Party voter intimidation case, has announced that she is resigning. King is infamous within the Division for her opposition to race-neutral enforcement of discrimination laws. She made it very clear to her subordinates that she did not want any lawsuits filed against minority defendants no matter what violations of federal voting rights laws they committed. This was the lawyer chosen by President Obama to be the acting head of the Civil Rights Division when he took office."
A Partisan at Justice Resigns Loretta King

 

[RandallFlagg]

I didn't know conservatives started welfare, modern day slavery.

How's that? You mean FDR was a conservative...LBJ was a conservative...right?

I didn't know conservatives started welfare, modern day slavery.

How's that? You mean FDR was a conservative...LBJ was a conservative...right?

It has only been in recent times that democrats have painted themselves with the bullshit "liberal" or "Progressive" brush. Most democrats up until the late 60s were considered moderate or conservative. It wasn't until the worthless hippie pig scum began running for office that the democrats were kidnapped by "liberal Nazis".

-or-


They did the Arlen Specter thing - turn coated from party to party in an attempt to keep their cushy jobs.

 

[2aguy]

Notice PC skipped right over my question asking if Bull Conner, Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond,George Wallace were conservative or liberal.

Ah...that's your problem...you are confusing terms...republicans at the time of democrat open racism would have been considered "classical" liberals....racist democrats would have been "conservative" only in that they sought to "conserve" their old racist ways...in today's terms...their desire for big government, and support of top down government control of people would now make them "liberals"...while Republican "conservatives" are really "classical" liberals still...

Berry Goldwater...of who you are implying was a racist for not supporting the civil rights act of 1964 did so on classical liberal grounds...the federal government had no right to tell a private citizen how to operate their private business...

And of course you will not post that Berry Goldwater started Arizonas chapter of the NAACP, desegregated the Arizona national guard before Truman desegregated the Army, and supported for all of the other civil rights bills...

So try to paint him as a racist all you want...it isn't true no matter how much you leave out about who he really was...

 

[2aguy]

The worst racists are clearly those that patronize minorities. We all know who they are too, don't we?

Worse than this?

Really? Worse than this? You're not serious...

Do you really have to show the victim of the democrats in the south...?

 

[LoneLaugher]

I love it when USMB nutters point the finger at liberals and yell "RACIST!!!". It is a thing of beauty.

Such disconnect.

 

[Erand7899]

The southern Democrats at that time were Conservatives.

Southern Democrat, Northern Democrat, Western Democrat, it didn't make any difference, the majority of them were and still are racist.

They didn't want Blacks in their unions, working next to them, or living next to them. The South had Jim Crow, but the North was just as racist then, and is more racist today. They just learned to hide it.

The Southern Democrats are still more conservative than those from the North, especially the Northeast, and that didn't have a damn thing to do with racism. The vast majority of those racist Southern Democrats were White, so if you are White, you must be a Southern Racist, right?

 

[2aguy]

liberals and yell "RACIST!!!

You know...if the libs/progressives/democrats/socialists would keep one name and stop changing names when people realize who they are....this would be a lot easier...but the big government types...the ones who owned the slaves, and created the new deal, and the great society...because they wanted power over other people...keep needing to hide their true natures...so the name changes continue...

 

[PoliticalChic]

@PoliticalChic
I understand why you want to point to the Ike Brown case as proof of Holder's racism. You are copying and pasting from a site that says it, and the reason the site says it boils down to a "no decision" letter sent to Brown's people when they were requesting changes be made to allow for a closed democratic primary. of course, the reason the letter was sent had nothing to do with whether or not the changes were acceptable, but rather was notification that while under the court's injunction the DoJ was not the proper authority from which to request such an authorization.

sites, such as the one you are surely copying, use that letter to claim Holder didn't want to do anything to prevent Brown from disenfranchising white voters, when in fact they used that very request as evidence in their filing for the extension of the injunction.

so... do you see how completely wrong you are? will you acknowledge that you were fooled by a hack site that was using your confirmation bias to sell you a stack of lies?

Wrong.

It is the position of Liberals to ignore discrimination if it was against whites.
Public pressure caused the case to be brought....with a wink and a nod, and the surprise was the court decided against Ike Brown.

Just as the Bush DoJ brought the case against the Philadelphia New Black Panthers...and it was dropped AFTER IT WAS WON, by Holder....

....the same plan would have ensued had not Ike Brown laughed at the charges, and made his hubris public.

1. United States v. Ike Brown Brown was the head of the Democratic Party in Noxubee County, a majority black county. The party ran the Democratic primaries, which served as de facto general elections, and Brown made no secret about his desire to see every government office in the county held by a black officeholder. “You ain’t dealing with Mississippi law, this is Ike Brown’s law,” was his motto. Brown organized teams of notary publics to roam the county collecting absentee ballots, the notaries regularly cast the ballots themselves instead of the voters.

a. During one election, teams of federal observers counted hundreds of verified examples of illegal assistance. Brown lawlessly disqualified white candidates from running for office. Ike Brown institutionalized racial lawlessness, and brazenly victimized white voters during the 2003 and 2007 elections. And yet, many in the Voting Section never wanted the Department even to investigate the matter.

b. Hostility pervaded the Voting Section…Some said that unless whites were victims of historic discrimination, they shouldn’t be protected….Because whites were better off than blacks in Mississippi, no lawsuit should be allowed to protect whites, they argued.

c. Before the trial, article after article appeared in the New York Times and other newspapers critical of the decision to bring the Ike Brown case. ABC News presented it as a classic man-bites-dog story. Even National Public Radio traveled to Noxubee to do a story suspicious of the Bush administration’s decision to sue Ike Brown. The benefit of hindsight makes the national media effort to demean the case, and the hostility from the civil rights community, look laughable and petty. We won the case, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision in two historic opinions.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/j-chri...ual-law-enforcement-reigns-at-obamas-doj-pjm- exclusive/4/

 

[JakeStarkey]

Ah...that's your problem...you are confusing terms...republicans at the time of democrat open racism would have been considered "classical" liberals....racist democrats would have been "conservative" only in that they sought to "conserve" their old racist ways

Horse puckey. The GOP were not classical liberals at that time at all. Simple statement by you means nothing in terms of proof.

 

[JakeStarkey]

PC is chattering mindlessly like a chipmunk, as is EC in her thread.

Are you sisters at the kettle of malfeasance together?

 

[PoliticalChic]

PC is chattering mindlessly like a chipmunk, as is EC in her thread.

Are you sisters at the kettle of malfeasance together?

Post #3 ripped you pretty good, huh?

 

[mudwhistle]

Bull Connor was a hard core far right Conservative like Political Chic.

You forgot Democrat.....

 

[BluesLegend]

PC is chattering mindlessly like a chipmunk, as is EC in her thread.

Are you sisters at the kettle of malfeasance together?

Post #3 ripped you pretty good, huh?

I felt the shockwave three threads over.

 

[Samson]

PC is chattering mindlessly like a chipmunk, as is EC in her thread.

Are you sisters at the kettle of malfeasance together?

Hey, she probably works up a sweat cutting and pasting Op-Ed opinions from "PJMedia.com" and "Freerepublic.com" blogs, then pretending its all fact.

 

[paperview]

For all her chatter, no reply to this:

Let's have a listen to that "liberal" democrat, George Wallace :

"Never before in the history of this nation have so many human and property rights been destroyed by a single enactment of the Congress. It is an act of tyranny. It is the assassin's knife stuck in the back of liberty.

With this assassin's knife and a blackjack in the hand of the Federal force-cult, the left-wing liberals will try to force us back into bondage. Bondage to a tyranny more brutal than that imposed by the British monarchy which claimed power to rule over the lives of our forefathers under sanction of the Divine Right of kings.

Today, this tyranny is imposed by the central government which claims the right to rule over our lives under sanction of the omnipotent black-robed despots who sit on the bench of the United States Supreme Court.

...Yet there are those who call this a good bill. It is people like Senator Hubert Humphrey and other members of Americans for Democratic Action. It is people like Ralph McGill and other left-wing radical apologists.They called it a good bill before it was amended to restore the right to trial by jury in certain cases.

It was left-wing radicals who led the fight in the Senate for the so-called civil rights bill now about to enslave our nation
...
You and I know that that's extremely difficult to do where our newspapers are owned by out-of-state interests. Newspapers which are run and operated by left-wing liberals, Communist sympathizers, and members of the Americans for Democratic Action and other Communist front organizations with high sounding names.

However, we will not be intimidated by the vultures of the liberal left-wing press. We will not be deceived by their lies and distortions of truth. We will not be swayed by their brutal attacks upon the character and reputation of any honest citizen who dares stand up and fight for liberty.

LINK

There's more rich red-meat for your there, connies. You'd love it. That was his July 4th "patriotic" American speech, where he decries the Civil Rights Act.

The whole speech sounds like it was plucked straight from a Tea party rally, save a few words here or there.

 

[NoNukes]

Bull Connor was a hard core far right Conservative like Political Chic.

Yeah, right.

Back in reality, the Left is in a perpetual feeding frenzy to keep blacks poor and contained in the urban ghetto plantation.

Anytime a black person becomes a successful conservative, the Left does a virtual lynch job.

Another ******* are too stupid to know what is good for them post.

 

[NoNukes]

And so PC lies again. 1948 is not the same year as 1973. Learn to read and concentrate.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9515 mit Tapatalk

1. Clearly I didn't lie....I never do.

You didn't find anything in the post that was false.....so, you lied.

2. "1948 is not the same year as 1973."
How about 2008?

Nothing changed from the Dixiecrats to the present for segregationist Democrats.

This, from 2008:
"Bill Clinton told Ted Kennedy that Obama 'would be getting us coffee' a few years ago: 'Game Change'"
Bill Clinton told Ted Kennedy that Obama would be getting us coffee a few years ago Game Change - NY Daily News

3. Now....to continue with your education:

1. Goldwater was one of only six Republican senators to vote against the 1964 act. He did so on libertarian grounds, opposed to the act’s restrictions on private property which he believed beyond the Congress’s powers under the commerce clause. Five others supported the party’s presidential nominee.
   1. Goldwater went on to win five southern states in 1964: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. But he lost eight.
   2. Democrats build the ‘southern strategy’ tale on the fact that the same states voted for ‘Dixiecrat’ Strom Thurmond in 1948 (less Georgia).
   3. Except that Nixon and Reagan lost, or almost lost the same states in ’68 and ’80…
   4. And Jimmy Carter and Clinton did pretty well in those states in ’76 and ’92.
   5. And the Goldwater states went right back to voting Democrat for decades…

More??

4. Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” The neocons Nixon s southern strategy - Pat Buchanan - Page 1

1. 1. In ’76, Carter swept the South. Was Carter appealing to bigots….or is that only the case when Republicans win the South?

In your face, you dope!

Clinton said this because Obama was young and new to politics. You are the one making it racial.