Who spread those rumours?
When asked for actual evidence what was offered...
This is the thing, there is so many buried in the RW media bubble they don't understand that if there was evidence to back those rumours (which seem fictitious) there would be an investigation. Trump was President for four years and their is no evidence...
Why? Because they are bullshit...
We saw when Trump lost the election there was many allegations by even Trump's lawyers on TV. But when they go to court they admit there is no evidence to back their claims... It is simple propaganda...
They then claim bias when they showed no evidence
While the President and his lawyers make histrionic claims in public, the campaign's legal filings are narrow in scope
time.com
A settlement was reached Thursday between Rudy Giuliani and two former Georgia election workers to decide the ownership of his Florida condominium and three World Series rings, which were sought to satisfy a $148 million defamation judgment against him.
www.pbs.org
That's it... A lot of claims and innuendo (rumours, "people say.."...) but no facts or evidence...
Repetition makes a fact seem more true, regardless of whether it is or not. Understanding the "illusion of truth" effect can help you avoid falling victim to this trick.
www.bbc.com
This is why they loose some many times in court...