The U.S. Continues to pay for the Mistakes of The Bush Administration

[Meister]

Geeze, rightwinger's ass has been handed to him, and doesn't even know it.

 

[The T]

Geeze, rightwinger's ass has been handed to him, and doesn't even know it.

I don't think *IT* really cares. For it happens frequently. But typical for a LIB.

 

[JakeStarkey]

T, you just got kicked in the face, you are spitting blood and teeth, and you are a sight to behold. LOL

 

[concept]

The U.S. Continues to pay for the Mistakes of The Bush Administration

This is true.

Because of the poor showing of former President Bush, we ended up with this complete anti_American fuck-up in Barack Obama.

Has there ever been a more unprepared candidate? Had Bush done a better job, we wouldn't be saddled with such a national embarrassment and such a dangerous far left liberal joke.

So yeah, I do put this on Bush.

 

[oreo]

The U.S. Continues to pay for the Mistakes of The Bush Administration

This is true.

Because of the poor showing of former President Bush, we ended up with this complete anti_American fuck-up in Barack Obama.

Has there ever been a more unprepared candidate? Had Bush done a better job, we wouldn't be saddled with such a national embarrassment and such a dangerous far left liberal joke.

So yeah, I do put this on Bush.

Along with this--

 

[oreo]

In October 2002, a few days before the US Senate vote on the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution, about 75 senators were told in closed session that the Iraqi government had the means of delivering biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drones that could be launched from ships off the US' Atlantic coast to attack US eastern seaboard cities. Colin Powell suggested in his presentation to the United Nations that UAVs were transported out of Iraq and could be launched against the US. In fact, Iraq had no offensive UAV fleet or any capability of putting UAVs on ships.[77] Iraq's UAV fleet consisted of less than a handful of outdated Czech training drones.[78] At the time, there was a vigorous dispute within the intelligence community as to whether the CIA's conclusions about Iraq's UAV fleet were accurate. The US Air Force agency denied outright that Iraq possessed any offensive UAV capability

And of course, the person you voted for "John Kerry" who was on the senate intelligence committee--[/COLOR for YEARS-]who staeted--:he voted for the war--before he voted against it"--

 

[oreo]

In October 2002, a few days before the US Senate vote on the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution, about 75 senators were told in closed session that the Iraqi government had the means of delivering biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drones that could be launched from ships off the US' Atlantic coast to attack US eastern seaboard cities. Colin Powell suggested in his presentation to the United Nations that UAVs were transported out of Iraq and could be launched against the US. In fact, Iraq had no offensive UAV fleet or any capability of putting UAVs on ships.[77] Iraq's UAV fleet consisted of less than a handful of outdated Czech training drones.[78] At the time, there was a vigorous dispute within the intelligence community as to whether the CIA's conclusions about Iraq's UAV fleet were accurate. The US Air Force agency denied outright that Iraq possessed any offensive UAV capability

And of course, the person you voted for-- "John Kerry" who was on the Senate intelligence committee- for YEARS--who stated--"that he voted for the invasion of Iraq--before he voted against it"--

 

[JakeStarkey]

Military intelligence was abysmal, Bush was biased, and Cheney was outright lying. The Bush administration is at major fault for the Iraq invasion, and its opponents, both those initially and those later, are to be commended for their forthright boldness in condemning the warmongers. History will handle George W. Bush et al harshly. Rightfully so.

 

[rightwinger]

In October 2002, a few days before the US Senate vote on the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution, about 75 senators were told in closed session that the Iraqi government had the means of delivering biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drones that could be launched from ships off the US' Atlantic coast to attack US eastern seaboard cities. Colin Powell suggested in his presentation to the United Nations that UAVs were transported out of Iraq and could be launched against the US. In fact, Iraq had no offensive UAV fleet or any capability of putting UAVs on ships.[77] Iraq's UAV fleet consisted of less than a handful of outdated Czech training drones.[78] At the time, there was a vigorous dispute within the intelligence community as to whether the CIA's conclusions about Iraq's UAV fleet were accurate. The US Air Force agency denied outright that Iraq possessed any offensive UAV capability

And of course, the person you voted for "John Kerry" who was on the senate intelligence committee--[/COLOR for YEARS-]who staeted--:he voted for the war--before he voted against it"--

The Senate gave the President authorization to procede with war if he thought it necessary.

It was a George Bush decision to pull the trigger on the invasion. Bush was advised by our allies to wait, that there was no immediate threat, to allow weapons inspectors more time. Bush and Cheney called them all cowards and invaded immediately.

Guess who had the last laugh?

 

[logical4u]

In October 2002, a few days before the US Senate vote on the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution, about 75 senators were told in closed session that the Iraqi government had the means of delivering biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drones that could be launched from ships off the US' Atlantic coast to attack US eastern seaboard cities. Colin Powell suggested in his presentation to the United Nations that UAVs were transported out of Iraq and could be launched against the US. In fact, Iraq had no offensive UAV fleet or any capability of putting UAVs on ships.[77] Iraq's UAV fleet consisted of less than a handful of outdated Czech training drones.[78] At the time, there was a vigorous dispute within the intelligence community as to whether the CIA's conclusions about Iraq's UAV fleet were accurate. The US Air Force agency denied outright that Iraq possessed any offensive UAV capability

And of course, the person you voted for "John Kerry" who was on the senate intelligence committee--[/COLOR for YEARS-]who staeted--:he voted for the war--before he voted against it"--

The Senate gave the President authorization to procede with war if he thought it necessary.

It was a George Bush decision to pull the trigger on the invasion. Bush was advised by our allies to wait, that there was no immediate threat, to allow weapons inspectors more time. Bush and Cheney called them all cowards and invaded immediately.

Guess who had the last laugh?

Got it, the whole armchair quarterback and hindsight thing, understand it. Going into Iraq was a mistake.
Can you please tell us how to beat the terrorists?
Can you tell us how to keep people that think they have the right to tell other people how to live from coming here and killing or injuring US citizens?
Can you tell us why we should let them move the battlefront into 'our' streets?
Can you tell us if you even want us to win the war: that would be the one where if muslim extremists win, they get to call the shots for the entire world (in their plan), or if you want the USA (the ones that have the Bill of Rights as part of their Constitution) that wants freedom for all individuals to win (and keep those freedoms)?

The critics out there amaze me, they are the same ones that cry and say "someone" should do something, and then when another person sacrifices their: time, money, life, will say "you shouldn't have done it that way". Yes, we had men die to protect you rights to say those things too, sad, but true.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No, logical4u, now you are wrongfully crying that everyone else is at fault, but not Bush. That is not only wrong but also stupid thinking. Many, many warnings came from very many sources. Your man made a terrible, terrible decision that will hound his memory as long as objective history is written.

Your rewriting of history through factual misinterpretation is not acceptable and will not be accepted. Watch and see.

 

[GWV5903]

No, logical4u, now you are wrongfully crying that everyone else is at fault, but not Bush. That is not only wrong but also stupid thinking. Many, many warnings came from very many sources. Your man made a terrible, terrible decision that will hound his memory as long as objective history is written.

Your rewriting of history through factual misinterpretation is not acceptable and will not be accepted. Watch and see.

I find it funny how big of a dumb ass you are, hell I am rolling in laughter right now, thank god your ilk is the minority.....

I'll start with a few of Clinton's quotes, please be sure to point out exactly what parts of this are re-written.....

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow." - President Bill Clinton 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

This one is from then Secretary of State.....

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

Now these where their statements prior to 9/11......Look what they said after 9/11....

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

Jake, no one is re-writing history, no the leadership you voted for has no spine, they wilt & wither when a decision of this magnitude has to be made. They all clearly believed the intelligence, they just don't have any conviction.....

 

[garyd]

Doggie exactly how is Bush responsible for what a bunch of assholes at one detention center did?

 

[rightwinger]

Got it, the whole armchair quarterback and hindsight thing, understand it. Going into Iraq was a mistake.
Can you please tell us how to beat the terrorists?
Can you tell us how to keep people that think they have the right to tell other people how to live from coming here and killing or injuring US citizens?
Can you tell us why we should let them move the battlefront into 'our' streets?
Can you tell us if you even want us to win the war: that would be the one where if muslim extremists win, they get to call the shots for the entire world (in their plan), or if you want the USA (the ones that have the Bill of Rights as part of their Constitution) that wants freedom for all individuals to win (and keep those freedoms)?

Yes I can tell you

The first thing is you have to go where there are actually terrorists

There were no terrorists in Iraq

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank you, GWV5903, for proving my point. Your arguments are exactly what history teachers and professors throughout the U.S. are using to demonstrate how false the GWB administration was and is in trying to defend its legacy.

Choices have consequences, you guys pulled the trigger, and shot your privates off.

You are going to have live with that.

 

[Meister]

Thank you, GWV5903, for proving my point. Your arguments are exactly what history teachers and professors throughout the U.S. are using to demonstrate how false the GWB administration was and is in trying to defend its legacy.

Choices have consequences, you guys pulled the trigger, and shot your privates off.

You are going to have live with that.

Jake projecting again.....

 

[txlonghorn]

YAWN.....you dipshits will still be blaming bush when BO get's voted out in 12.

Because we all know that BO is perfect and can't mess up. And even if he were to have an off day and make a boo boo, then he can just say, "WHO...ME? NO NO...WASN'T ME. IT WAS MY STAFF...THEY MADE THAT DECISION....IT WAS BUSH'S FAULT FOR LEAVING ME SUCH A MESS TO CLEAN UP. I CAN'T BE THE ONE TO BLAME....I'M THE PRESIDENT DAMNIT!!! Now...let's all calm down and go out on the porch for a beer and a smoke. Roger's cookin' possum tonight!!"

 

[The T]

Thank you, GWV5903, for proving my point. Your arguments are exactly what history teachers and professors throughout the U.S. are using to demonstrate how false the GWB administration was and is in trying to defend its legacy.

Choices have consequences, you guys pulled the trigger, and shot your privates off.

You are going to have live with that.

Jake projecting again.....

It's ALL he does. It's ALL the power he thinks his MASTERS have given him. He HAS no mind of his own. JAKE is a fuckin' DRONE.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Doggie exactly how is Bush responsible for what a bunch of assholes at one detention center did?

Bush did not do his job. The boss is always responsible, responsible for training and responsible for making sure his directors and managers establish policies and that they are enforced.

 

[The T]

Doggie exactly how is Bush responsible for what a bunch of assholes at one detention center did?

Doggie cannot ANSWER that until Doggie confers with his handler.