The U.K.’s Response to Covid-19 Has Been World-Class

linux07

Gold Member
Mar 29, 2020
401
191
188
Provocative point from
Tyler Cowen
: "In sum, the best life-saving medicine and the best candidate vaccine both come from the U.K. For sure, there might be some elements of coincidence here, but the same can be said for the more effective public-health responses as well.

By the way, if you are looking for the second leading candidate in the race to fight Covid-19, the most plausible answer is the U.S., which has produced the useful antiviral remdesivir and is working on a broad array of vaccine candidates, with generally promising results, even if none of them is as far along as the work at Oxford. The U.S. may yet pass the U.K. for overall contributions, but as of mid-July in per capita terms the British are the winners by a landslide.

It is fine and even correct to lecture the British (and the Americans) for their poorly conceived messaging and public health measures. But it is interesting how few people lecture the Australians or the South Koreans for not having a better biomedical research establishment. It is yet another sign of how societies tend to undervalue innovation — which makes the U.K.’s contribution all the more important."

 
The population of the UK is around 66 million. So far there are about 50,000 deaths from the Covid virus. The population of the U.S. is about 330 million and about 150,000 deaths. Do the math and see how well the U.K. comes out.
 
Provocative point from
Tyler Cowen
: "In sum, the best life-saving medicine and the best candidate vaccine both come from the U.K. For sure, there might be some elements of coincidence here, but the same can be said for the more effective public-health responses as well.

By the way, if you are looking for the second leading candidate in the race to fight Covid-19, the most plausible answer is the U.S., which has produced the useful antiviral remdesivir and is working on a broad array of vaccine candidates, with generally promising results, even if none of them is as far along as the work at Oxford. The U.S. may yet pass the U.K. for overall contributions, but as of mid-July in per capita terms the British are the winners by a landslide.

It is fine and even correct to lecture the British (and the Americans) for their poorly conceived messaging and public health measures. But it is interesting how few people lecture the Australians or the South Koreans for not having a better biomedical research establishment. It is yet another sign of how societies tend to undervalue innovation — which makes the U.K.’s contribution all the more important."

They have single payer.
 
Must be nice not having the FDA dictate a stringent process to advance drugs.

The Brits have the Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Agency, which made the FDA look like the loosey goosey profits before people agency that it is. The FDA has approved numerous questionable products and treatments which other nations would never allow.

 
Must be nice not having the FDA dictate a stringent process to advance drugs.

The Brits have the Medicines and Health Products Regulatory Agency, which made the FDA look like the loosey goosey profits before people agency that it is. The FDA has approved numerous questionable products and treatments which other nations would never allow.

Not sure you or I are on the same chapter, or even the same book, DL.
 
Last edited:
Gt. Britain has a death rate of 0.076% which is not very good.
The US has a death rate of 0.039%.

And any country that is not protecting the vulnerable while trying to accelerate herd immunity, is not handling this or any epidemic correctly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top