The Truth of Obamacare

[longknife]

Here are 50 well sourced examples of Obamacare’s lies, illegal actions, hypocrisy, waivers, and exemptions @ Here are 50 well sourced examples of Obamacare?s lies, illegal actions, hypocrisy, waivers, and exemptions | Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog and check out the links.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Why is it called Obamacare anyway? He had nothing to do with it.
It should be called PelosiReidcare...they are the ones Obama passed the buck to, and the ones responsible for such a clusterf*ck.

 

[eflatminor]

You mean to tell me that the central planner do NOT know what's best for everyone?

Well color me shocked...

 

[dblack]

Why is it called Obamacare anyway? He had nothing to do with it.
It should be called PelosiReidcare...they are the ones Obama passed the buck to, and the ones responsible for such a clusterf*ck.

Maybe "FowlerCare" would attribute it more accurately.

 

[Mr. H.]

Damn Demoturds.

 

[DennieCyper]

Yeah even I would like to know why is it named as obamacare.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Yeah even I would like to know why is it named as obamacare.

It was introduced by nutters before it was opposed by nutters. Then, nutters named it.

 

[Joe Steel]

Here are 50 well sourced examples of Obamacare’s lies, illegal actions, hypocrisy, waivers, and exemptions @ Here are 50 well sourced examples of Obamacare?s lies, illegal actions, hypocrisy, waivers, and exemptions | Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog and check out the links.

One of the links (No. 4) contains a link to an article which mentions the Supreme Court's power to declare laws unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court has no constitutional authority to declare a law unconstitutional. It gave itself that power in Marbury v. Madison. On that basis, the opinion in NFIB v. Sebelius is merely a recommendation. The President has no obligation to be governed by it.

 

[Bern80]

Here are 50 well sourced examples of Obamacare’s lies, illegal actions, hypocrisy, waivers, and exemptions @ Here are 50 well sourced examples of Obamacare?s lies, illegal actions, hypocrisy, waivers, and exemptions | Dan from Squirrel Hill's Blog and check out the links.

One of the links (No. 4) contains a link to an article which mentions the Supreme Court's power to declare laws unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court has no constitutional authority to declare a law unconstitutional. It gave itself that power in Marbury v. Madison. On that basis, the opinion in NFIB v. Sebelius is merely a recommendation. The President has no obligation to be governed by it.

Of course they do. That's why the exist. To determine the constitutionality of laws.