BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 100,806
- 36,022
- 2,250
Your argument is a fallacious false dilemma.Actually they have shown no evidence whatsoever. It's obviously just a fabricated conspiracy theory.Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hackingWho told you that and why did you believe them?
And -
I can't remember the details but didn't the Brits have proof as well?
Or was that just his watching women pee kink?
What a disgusting, repulsive little worm he really is. It's easter weekend and he can't even find someone to join him on his weekly golf vacation.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
None of us here have access to the information and evidence, so it all comes down to credibility. Do you trust all 17 of our federal security agencies, or do you trust some hyper-partisan right wing shock jock who regularly reports on reptile like shape shifting space aliens? You have every right to believe the shock jock. That is your choice to make, but that doesn't make him credible.
The fact of the matter is that none of our intelligence agencies have said that Trump had anything to do with the leaking of the DNC e-mails. Zero, zip, nada. Not a single one.
And how do we know he had nothing to do with it? Just because the evidence hasn't been presented yet doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Isn't that the theory the right went with during all those years of Benghazi investigations?