The trump government has consistently claimed it has no control over the immigrants it sent to El Salvador

And that’s you celebrating the total lack of accountability.

I suppose Boasberg may have some options to punish lawyers who are blatantly lying before the court. I don’t know for sure. Seems like a thing the courts would want to put a stop to.
Heh. You place too much faith in powerless men.

What's he gonna do? Deport them?
 
Well, yes, because by a function of our legal system, your protestations were rendered meaningless.
“Get rekt” is a celebratory statement. Don’t pretend otherwise.
 
Heh. You place too much faith in powerless men.

What's he gonna do? Deport them?
I don’t know. Can he disbar them? Don’t you think there should be repercussions for lying to the court?
 
“Get rekt” is a celebratory statement. Don’t pretend otherwise.
It can be meant in a couple of ways:

One of which can be used derogatorily, in place of "get f**ked."

You high-strung leftists don't know the vernacular of the common folk.
 
I don’t know. Can he disbar them? Don’t you think there should be repercussions for lying to the court?
State bars typically handle disbarment. But the lawyers aren't going to be disbarred.

Don't expect any action from any of the lawyers' state bars.
 
It can be meant in a couple of ways:

One of which can be used derogatorily, in place of "get f**ked."

You high-strung leftists don't know the vernacular of the common folk.
Yet again, "get fucked" is a celebratory statement.
 
Don't you mind, even a little bit, that your government..........the one you voted for.........has been lying to you, the rest of the public, and perhaps most importantly the courts, about its degree of control over the immigrants sent to the CECOT prison?

Has the regime been so successful in dehumanizing those people in your eyes that their suffering is of no consequence to you?
This is what these fake ass Christians want.
 
And that’s you celebrating the total lack of accountability.

I suppose Boasberg may have some options to punish lawyers who are blatantly lying before the court. I don’t know for sure. Seems like a thing the courts would want to put a stop to.
First, the matter of "who knew what when" needs to be established. If the regime and or the regime's lawyers knew of the document weeks ago then the DoJ should be held in contempt of court.

Will the regime pay a political price for its potential deception? Of course not. trump has already shit on the Constitution to no effect so why would anything change now?
 
State bars typically handle disbarment. But the lawyers aren't going to be disbarred.

Don't expect any action from any of the lawyers' state bars.
It's federal court and there is a federal bar. I'm not an expert but I think you need to be a member of the federal bar association to have cases before federal court.

Don't you think there should be consequences for lying to the courts?
 
It's federal court and there is a federal bar. I'm not an expert but I think you need to be a member of the federal bar association to have cases before federal court.

Don't you think there should be consequences for lying to the courts?
To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a 'federal bar.' Only state bars.

Bar associations are voluntary associations made up of any number of lawyers; they have no power to grant law licenses.
 
Yet again, "get fucked" is a celebratory statement.
No, it isn't. To elaborate, it essentially can be celebratory, or it can literally mean "go f**k yourself."

I'm tellin' ya Marener, you're barking up the wrong tree on this one.
 
To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a 'federal bar.' Only state bars.

Bar associations are voluntary associations made up of any number of lawyers; they have no power to grant law licenses.
I believe your knowledge is incomplete.


There definitely is a thing such as the Federal bar.


Again, don't you think there should be consequences for lying in front of a judge?
 
No, it isn't. To elaborate, it essentially can be celebratory, or it can literally mean "go f**k yourself."

I'm tellin' ya Marener, you're barking up the wrong tree on this one.
Deny. Deny. Deny.
 
I believe your knowledge is incomplete.


There definitely is a thing such as the Federal bar.


Again, don't you think there should be consequences for lying in front of a judge?
Bar associations don't grant licenses. There is a difference that you are unaware of.

Bar associations are, by default, groups of lawyers to which any singular lawyer can join voluntarily. They don't grant the ability to practice law in the federal court system.
 
15th post

Document Casts Doubt on White House’s Claims About Deported Venezuelans​

For the past several months, the Trump administration has insisted in court that it has no control over the nearly 140 Venezuelan immigrants it deported to a prison in El Salvador this spring under the powers of a rarely used wartime statute.

Both in filings and at hearings, Trump officials have asserted that because the men are being held by jailers in El Salvador, the Salvadoran government has control over their fate. The administration has repeatedly made that claim to argue that it has no real authority to bring the immigrants back itself.


On Monday, however, lawyers for the Venezuelan men produced a document indicating that the government of El Salvador recently told the United Nations that it, in fact, bears no legal responsibility for the men. The document, written in response to a U.N. inquiry examining some of the deportations, also claimed that the Salvadoran government was merely doing the United States’ bidding when it accepted the men into its prison system.

“The actions of the state of El Salvador have been limited to the implementation of a bilateral cooperation mechanism with another state, through which it has facilitated the use of the Salvadoran prison infrastructure for the custody of persons detained within the scope of the justice system and law enforcement of that other state,” the document said.

A claim made in response to questions raised about the timing of their deportation relative to a court order blocking it, the dubious authority under which the deportations were carried out, the due process the deportees were given, and the veracity of the allegations made against the deportees by DHS/DoJ.

I imagine Judge Boasberg is going to want to know from the DoJ attorneys when they became aware of the document and why they didn't tell the court about it. You know.......seeing as it undermines the government's position of having no control over the deportees now that they are in El Salvador.
You got him now. LOL
 
Bar associations don't grant licenses. There is a difference that you are unaware of.

Bar associations are, by default, groups of lawyers to which any singular lawyer can join voluntarily. They don't grant the ability to practice law in the federal court system.
You have to apply for permission to have cases in federal court.


I imagine that admission can be revoked for bad behavior. Don't you think lawyers who lie to the court should face repercussions?
 
You have to apply for permission to have cases in federal court.


I imagine that admission can be revoked for bad behavior. Don't you think lawyers who lie to the court should face repercussions?
Admission can be revoked, but that does not mean disbarment.

Damn, you want a punishment for anything the Trump administration does even remotely wrong. It gets rather annoying.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom