Well no.. it totally doesn't. Biology is science and it's not a matter of opinion. A new organism exists at conception. It will be a living organism until it expires naturally or is terminated. Nothing else is ever added to make it what it is already. Court rulings do not make it something else. Ignorance and denial of science, doesn't make it something else. False criteria of conditions or demands do not change what it is.
So you can say that we approve this legally and I can't argue that point, everyone is aware that abortion is legal, I think... there is no debate the court ruled in Roe v Wade and we've had legal abortions for years. If that is the argument you thought was happening here, I guess you win it... no on else was arguing that point.
Go back and read Joes"s post again about countries in Europe and their abortion rate. You're hung up on liberals acknowledging that the fetus is a human life and as such, must be protected, while ignoring that the fetus will become a baby if its gestation reaches a certain point, and as such, will have enormous financial and emotional needs throughout its childhood. Needs that its mother has no way of meeting. And you ignore that.
You refuse to provide women with ANYTHING to help or encourage them to continue this pregnancy. You treat her as a parasite on society for getting pregnant at all. She can be fired from her job, given work so difficult or dangerous to her pregnancy that she has to quit, or really anything her boss chooses to do because she is pregnant. And you won't vote for any sort of protections or assistance to the mother, but you insist she have that baby.
Does that make sense to you?