I'm familiar with court cases... Courts are not science or biology. Distinctions on "viability" by their very nature, confirm the existence of a human being. Literally, it is the court's opinion that the fetus is not a viable human being. There is no denial of science. It IS a human being. Again, how long it can survive outside it's reasonably expected parameters (viability) doesn't change what it is.
Well, yeah, it kind of does. The reality, of course, is that before Roe, women where having abortions and the doctors were writing down something else on the charts. all the courts did was strike down laws no one was following because they were stupid.
Again, there is no special logic, it's simple biological fact. A zygote is a human being in the zygote stage of development. It can't be anything else... it's living, it's an organism and it's human. Whether the organism is capable of accomplishing a feat doesn't change what the organism is. Tampons, clergy and coffins is your silly way of showing you can't refute biological fact.
then by that logic, we no only need to outlaw abortions, but IUDs, morning after pills, and women exercising after sex. Give little Zygy a chance, baby... And then we need to throw up the Crime Scene Tape around those Tampons to make sure that devious ***** didn't do little Zygy in!!! CSI:Cotex Scene Investigation!!!
Or you phonies can just mind your own business and stop pretend you give a **** about kids. THis is about putting those uppity bitches in their place.
Well then you're saying that you intend to keep being dishonest. Now you're appealing to a straw man argument. Social welfare programs or lack thereof, have nothing to do with this. It's just more of your diversion from the fact you can't refute biology.
it has everything to do with this. If you guys were serious about saving little Zygy from the Medical Waste container, you'd support programs that would make not putting him there more attractive. Paid family and medical leave, universal health care. The Europeans (eeek! Socialism!!!!) already do this, and they have an abortion rate that is half of ours. Meanwhile, the Philippines have the kind of laws you want, and they have MORE abortions per capita than we do.
But because you are stupid, you don't realize that the One Percent are playing you. They get you all upset about this BULLSHIT so they distract from what they are doing to the middle class- which probably causes more abortions. Women aborting fetuses in their 20's and then desperately trying to get pregnant in their 30's....
And yes, according to liberal courts who share your anti-life viewpoint, fetuses (who are human beings) are considered medical waste. That's precisely why you have a vibrant pro-life movement and it's not going away. You will one day be stopped from denying basic human rights to millions of unborn human beings. The ancillary court findings of Roe v Wade will become a small footnote in history. Dishonest people such as yourself, will suddenly find "redemption" and blame the millions of deaths on the right as you always do.
Guy, what do you think women did about unwanted pregnancies before 1973? Here's a hint. The birth rate did not suddenly drop in 1974. IN fact, in 1975, it started going up again. Women are going to have abortions NO MATTER WHAT THE LAW IS.
As I said before, read up on the Philippines. they have 500K-800K abortions a year, despite abortion being illegal except for threat to life of the mother. or if you want to have some real fun, read about Romania under the Ceasecus (sp). they tried to ban abortion and birth control to increase Romania's population. and it worked for about one year before women figured out how to get around these laws and get abortions and contraception.
again, you guys can't tell women, "you are on your own' after birth and then be horribly surprised when they keep that from happening before birth. so, yeah, we will blame you for the current state of affairs.