Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,826
- 59,842
- 2,645
The existential statement is always more well proven than the universal statewent, in strictest terms. But, in scientific terms, either can be accepted as fact.You tell me. Make your point.Well you should be. Going further, you should also be convinced that accepting a scientific theory as fact is also scientific, after a preponderance of verification alone. Quantum mechanical theories are always a good example of this. Try as we might to prove false the duality and apparent paradoxes, we cannot and, instead, show exactly what our physics predicts.I would agree he is...and does so without any honest attempt to falsify anything. He is verifying. You would imply this is unscientific.
Stretch it more....say, we search for life elsewhere. Thats not so easy as trying to find a swan. What are we attempting to falsify? Nothing. Is this unscientific?
I do not believe so. I am unconvinced that verification is in itself unscientific.
Which has been scientifically proven to a higher degree in your opinion?
The Tasmanian Wolf is extinct. Can never be verified, only falsified. Has never been falsified despite many, many, many attempts to scour remote regions of the continent it lived on.
The Timber Wolf is not extinct. Can never be falsified, only verified. Has actually been verified.
LOL. I'm just asking your opinion as to which has been proven to a higher degree and why you would believe it to be so?
There is no wrong answer.