The Stalwarts of "Democracy" (The Democrats) Are now Trashing the Supreme Court for not ruling in their favor

[okfine]

Get a new routine...You're more fucking boring than Larry the Cable Guy.

You talking to me, comrade?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Can we all just be happy and enjoy the dismantling of the administrative state? We should all be happy about that. We have actually made our government accountable.

 

[Oddball]

Can we all just be happy and enjoy the dismantling of the administrative state? We should all be happy about that. We have actually made our government accountable.

Shitlibs are never happy about anything, that's why they're shitlibs.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Can we all just be happy and enjoy the dismantling of the administrative state? We should all be happy about that. We have actually made our government accountable.

rationally yes.. in application no.

The battle is:

Corner 1: GOP, Conservatism, Talk Radio, FOX opinion, NY Post, and other low end media entities

vs.

Corner 2: Democrats, DNC, Wall Street and Globalist Corps, The MSM (NBC, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, NYT, TIME, CNN, WAPO, DailyBeast, AP, etc), Academia, Big Tech, Social Media, Entertainment/Hollywood (Movies, Late night "comedy", The View, etc),....

If social influence was a 50-50 fight, Conservatism would win 75% of the vote every year. Only leftist bottlenecks keep the balance of power for the leftists.

 

[Concerned American]

Rump Rump Rump you friggin losers. 6-3 isn't favorable to all.

Democrat tears. Buckle up. There are more coming in the next four months. Tissue?

 

[BluesLegend]

This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Dems are 100% phony. You can't believe one word that comes out of their filthy lying pie hole. That's why after 4 years of yapping on about democracy they throw democracy under the bus. Shit on the Constitutional separation of powers. And go full blown mob insurrectionist when they don't get their way. Like the 2 year olds throwing a tantrum that they are.

 

[BluesLegend]

Shitlibs are never happy about anything, that's why they're shitlibs.

They are in a constant state of sourpuss misery.

 

[Independent thinker]

This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Let's review the Democrats the past years:
2016: It's okay to challenge an election because through paying for disinformation (Steele Dossier) against our political rival we can say that the presidential election was stolen and the president is illegitimate.
2020: It's an attack against Democracy to suggest an election was completely and totally legitimate for any reason, as it undermines our democracy

When SCOTUS decisions go favorable to the left: "THE SCOTUS Has spoken, you must obey this institution"
When SCOTUS decisions go unfavorable to the left: "The SCOTUS is a radical, activist, treasonist court that must be opposed (with insinuations to violence)

Remember, Kavanaugh had an assassination attempt on him that was thankfully broken up. It wasn't widely reported because the media hates him.

Here's the deal, it's either:
1. Elections are okay to question or they're not.
2. The SCOTUS is legitimate or its not.

You don't get to dance back and forth based on if you got your way. That's what children do.

I have pointed out in other threads that Biden and the left can trash judges and courts but Trump is under a gag order and cannot trash judges and courts without the threat of jail time.

 

[struth]

The outrage is not entirely over the fact that the court gave Trump a pass. The outrage is also over the fact that little by little they are destroying The Constitution by undermining it with their edicts, especially this year.

Keep gaping at that bright shiny object.

I think what is amazing, is post like this here....what it shows is just how uneducated dembots are about the Constitution, our Republic, the rule of law and basic civics.

Demafascsit really work on these sort of dembots, it's tragic

 

[Dragonlady]

This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Let's review the Democrats the past years:
2016: It's okay to challenge an election because through paying for disinformation (Steele Dossier) against our political rival we can say that the presidential election was stolen and the president is illegitimate.
2020: It's an attack against Democracy to suggest an election was completely and totally legitimate for any reason, as it undermines our democracy

When SCOTUS decisions go favorable to the left: "THE SCOTUS Has spoken, you must obey this institution"
When SCOTUS decisions go unfavorable to the left: "The SCOTUS is a radical, activist, treasonist court that must be opposed (with insinuations to violence)

Remember, Kavanaugh had an assassination attempt on him that was thankfully broken up. It wasn't widely reported because the media hates him.

Here's the deal, it's either:
1. Elections are okay to question or they're not.
2. The SCOTUS is legitimate or its not.

You don't get to dance back and forth based on if you got your way. That's what children do.

Shall we start with the manner in which Mitch McConnell stole two of Trump's picks by refusing to even interview Merrick Garland 9 months before the 2016 election, and then ramming through Amy Coney Barrett's nomination AFTER voting in the 2020 election had already started.

ACB has to be the least qualified SC Justice in my lifetime. Her only qualification is that she's been funded by the Federalist Society since law school. They needed a conservative white woman to replace a liberal Jewish woman. Being Catholic and virulently anti-abortion was her only qualification.

6 of the current justices are Catholic, but only 23% of the US population is Catholic. And not mainstream Catholic, but radical fringe Catholic sects. For Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society, it is a prerequisite since they wish to establish a theocracy.

Donald Trump's breakneck appointment of federal judges at the highest levels, financed and promoted by the Federalist Society, has allowed a takeover of the SC by dark money. They are now funnelling cases to the SC at a breakneck pace through filing cases in jurisdictions with a majority of Federalist Society judges on the Appeals court, to establish their brand of Christianity as the law of the land. They are quite literally legislating extreme right wing law, from the bench.

And then the same people who promoted this stepford wife, who had never set foot in a courtroom as either a prosecutor or a defense attorney, as a great choice for SC because she opposed abortion, and every other liberal pillar of justice, called Katanji Brown Jackson, the most experienced SC Justice in decades, an "affirmative action" appointment.

 

[Oddball]

Shall we start with the manner in which Mitch McConnell stole two of Trump's picks by refusing to even interview Merrick Garland 9 months before the 2016 election, and then ramming through Amy Coney Barrett's nomination AFTER voting in the 2020 election had already started.

ACB has to be the least qualified SC Justice in my lifetime. Her only qualification is that she's been funded by the Federalist Society since law school. They needed a conservative white woman to replace a liberal Jewish woman. Being Catholic and virulently anti-abortion was her only qualification.

6 of the current justices are Catholic, but only 23% of the US population is Catholic. And not mainstream Catholic, but radical fringe Catholic sects. For Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society, it is a prerequisite since they wish to establish a theocracy.

Donald Trump's breakneck appointment of federal judges at the highest levels, financed and promoted by the Federalist Society, has allowed a takeover of the SC by dark money. They are now funnelling cases to the SC at a breakneck pace through filing cases in jurisdictions with a majority of Federalist Society judges on the Appeals court, to establish their brand of Christianity as the law of the land. They are quite literally legislating extreme right wing law, from the bench.

And then the same people who promoted this stepford wife, who had never set foot in a courtroom as either a prosecutor or a defense attorney, as a great choice for SC because she opposed abortion, and every other liberal pillar of justice, called Katanji Brown Jackson, the most experienced SC Justice in decades, an "affirmative action" appointment.

 

[Dragonlady]

I'm very surprised that Biden addressed the media regarding this decision with a teleprompter but didn't take even one question. Considering the public opinion by the Dems to "move on" and "he had a bad night", it would have been a perfect time to take questions for a half our and counter the argument.

Such decisions don't help the narrative it reinforces it.

This is not a thing to be taking questions on. This was a statement that needs to be made to the American people. A warning of the rampant lawlessness of this Supreme Court. It was not a time to be scoring "political points" in an election campaign.

Joe Biden is doing two jobs right now. There's his day job - running the country while the Supreme Court overturns the Constitution and precedent at every turn; he's involved in funding two major conflicts, and your enemies are seeking to undermine your elections; and

He's running for President.

He cannot "campaign for President" from the White House. It's illegal.

 

[struth]

Shall we start with the manner in which Mitch McConnell stole two of Trump's picks by refusing to even interview Merrick Garland 9 months before the 2016 election, and then ramming through Amy Coney Barrett's nomination AFTER voting in the 2020 election had already started.

ACB has to be the least qualified SC Justice in my lifetime. Her only qualification is that she's been funded by the Federalist Society since law school. They needed a conservative white woman to replace a liberal Jewish woman. Being Catholic and virulently anti-abortion was her only qualification.

6 of the current justices are Catholic, but only 23% of the US population is Catholic. And not mainstream Catholic, but radical fringe Catholic sects. For Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society, it is a prerequisite since they wish to establish a theocracy.

Donald Trump's breakneck appointment of federal judges at the highest levels, financed and promoted by the Federalist Society, has allowed a takeover of the SC by dark money. They are now funnelling cases to the SC at a breakneck pace through filing cases in jurisdictions with a majority of Federalist Society judges on the Appeals court, to establish their brand of Christianity as the law of the land. They are quite literally legislating extreme right wing law, from the bench.

And then the same people who promoted this stepford wife, who had never set foot in a courtroom as either a prosecutor or a defense attorney, as a great choice for SC because she opposed abortion, and every other liberal pillar of justice, called Katanji Brown Jackson, the most experienced SC Justice in decades, an "affirmative action" appointment.

All he did was folllow the Xiden Rule. xiden was chair of the senate judicial committee and created the rule.

 

[struth]

This is not a thing to be taking questions on. This was a statement that needs to be made to the American people. A warning of the rampant lawlessness of this Supreme Court. It was not a time to be scoring "political points" in an election campaign.

Joe Biden is doing two jobs right now. There's his day job - running the country while the Supreme Court overturns the Constitution and precedent at every turn; he's involved in funding two major conflicts, and your enemies are seeking to undermine your elections; and

He's running for President.

He cannot "campaign for President" from the White House. It's illegal.

No doubt this is far too big a job for senile joe. He should step down

 

[Dragonlady]

All he did was folllow the Xiden Rule. xiden was chair of the senate judicial committee and created the rule.

Bullshit. There is no such thing as the "Biden Rule". McConnell made that up, just like every other thing that Republicans claim Joe Biden did. Biden gave a speech in 1992 that a nomination shouldn't take place in the "full throes of an election campaign". In 2016, Trump hadn't even secured the nomination when Garland was nominated.

McConnell did what had never been done before - on both scores. The tradition is that after the nominating conventions are over and the campaign is fully underway, you wait until after the election to nominate someone for the SC. It's a "tradition", not a rule.

Garland was nominated by Obama on March 16, 2016, months before either convention. There was in fact time to have him seated before either convention, but McConnell refused to even start the process claiming it was an election year. A number of justices have been appointed in election years, but none after the conventions.

Then when RBG died, AFTER voting had begun in 2020, McConnell rammed through her nomination before Trump was voted out of office, clearing violating all "rules" and "traditions". The fact that she had NO qualifications whatsoever to be on the SC only made it a more naked power play.

 

[Dragonlady]

No doubt this is far too big a job for senile joe. He should step down

By that standard, so should Trump, who is obviously bat shit crazy and ready to declare the USA a theocratic dictatorship.

 

[struth]

Bullshit. There is no such thing as the "Biden Rule". McConnell made that up, just like every other thing that Republicans claim Joe Biden did. Biden gave a speech in 1992 that a nomination shouldn't take place in the "full throes of an election campaign". In 2016, Trump hadn't even secured the nomination when Garland was nominated.

McConnell did what had never been done before - on both scores. The tradition is that after the nominating conventions are over and the campaign is fully underway, you wait until after the election to nominate someone for the SC. It's a "tradition", not a rule.

Garland was nominated by Obama on March 16, 2016, months before either convention. There was in fact time to have him seated before either convention, but McConnell refused to even start the process claiming it was an election year. A number of justices have been appointed in election years, but none after the conventions.

Then when RBG died, AFTER voting had begun in 2020, McConnell rammed through her nomination before Trump was voted out of office, clearing violating all "rules" and "traditions". The fact that she had NO qualifications whatsoever to be on the SC only made it a more naked power play.

Hahah no he didn’t, literally Biden stated it, there is videos of it

The biden rule only applied if the senate was run by the opposite party of the president. That wasn’t the case in 2020

 

[struth]

By that standard, so should Trump, who is obviously bat shit crazy and ready to declare the USA a theocratic dictatorship.

Hahaha making things up isn’t reality

 

[konradv]

This would all be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

Let's review the Democrats the past years:
2016: It's okay to challenge an election because through paying for disinformation (Steele Dossier) against our political rival we can say that the presidential election was stolen and the president is illegitimate.
2020: It's an attack against Democracy to suggest an election was completely and totally legitimate for any reason, as it undermines our democracy

When SCOTUS decisions go favorable to the left: "THE SCOTUS Has spoken, you must obey this institution"
When SCOTUS decisions go unfavorable to the left: "The SCOTUS is a radical, activist, treasonist court that must be opposed (with insinuations to violence)

Remember, Kavanaugh had an assassination attempt on him that was thankfully broken up. It wasn't widely reported because the media hates him.

Here's the deal, it's either:
1. Elections are okay to question or they're not.
2. The SCOTUS is legitimate or its not.

You don't get to dance back and forth based on if you got your way. That's what children do.

What’s democratic about installing a president who is absolutely immune from the worst crimes? What is going to stop them from doing all they want? What’s to stop Biden from forgiving all student debts and throwing the border wide open? Would SCOTUS approve or suddenly, hypocritically amend their ruling?

#IMPEACHTHOMASALITO

 

[struth]

What’s democratic about installing a president who is absolutely immune from the worst crimes? What is going to stop them from doing all they want? What’s to stop Biden from forgiving all student debts and throwing the border wide open? Would SCOTUS approve or suddenly, hypocritically amend their ruling?

#IMPEACHTHOMASALITO

He has already opened the border and repeatedly tried to violate the law in regards to student loans

He isn’t going to be prosecuted for either of those things either