The Stalwarts of "Democracy" (The Democrats) Are now Trashing the Supreme Court for not ruling in their favor

[struth]

It still isn't a "rule" or anything of the kind, and it never was. It was simply a suggestion in a speech he made. 40 years ago. People frequently change their minds over half a lifetime.

And after Republicans barred the Garland nomination, they swore they'd never ever nominate a Republican in an election year. That lasted 4 whole years, untill RGB died, weeks before the 2020 election

Of course it was a rule, the biden rule. Funny how when dembots come up with rules they get pissed when it’s used against their interest

Maybe biden shouldn’t of said anything

The biden rule only applied when the the senate was a different party then the president during that election year

Whine all you want but the biden rule was followed

 

[Slade3200]

Thus far you’ve had a significant lack of good faith. It’s not very compelling to continue if you’re going to be so evasive and misrepresent what I say.

I didn’t misrepresent what you said. I asked you a question and your reply made me think that you were indeed claiming she called the court treasonous. You then corrected me and said she called the decision treasonous. So fair enough. I’m just looking for the quote where she said that.

 

[Slade3200]

Thus far you’ve had a significant lack of good faith. It’s not very compelling to continue if you’re going to be so evasive and misrepresent what I say.

Remember that time you claimed that I hadn’t read the decision and then you evaded my reply when I called BS on it?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Remember that time you claimed that I hadn’t read the decision and then you evaded my reply when I called BS on it?

Because the decision didn’t give a president from the law for committing any crime

But thats how Democrats, the MSM, and leftists are reporting it. Major lying going on to scare their base

 

[Slade3200]

Because the decision didn’t give a president from the law for committing any crime

But thats how Democrats, the MSM, and leftists are reporting it. Major lying going on to scare their base

You do see the irony here though… you are positioning yourself as being against the leftists and Dems and MSM because they are lying… while lying yourself by saying I didn’t read the decision, which I did, and by misrepresenting what sotomayor said about the decision

 

[Mr. Friscus]

You do see the irony here though… you are positioning yourself as being against the leftists and Dems and MSM because they are lying… while lying yourself by saying I didn’t read the decision, which I did, and by misrepresenting what sotomayor said about the decision

You said a vague incorrect statement.. if you had read it you wouldn’t have said what you said

 

[Slade3200]

You said a vague incorrect statement.. if you had read it you wouldn’t have said what you said

Well I did read it. If you think I misinterpreted something then address that instead of making false statements about what I have and haven’t read. You still haven’t show Sotomayors quote to back up your other claim…

 

[konradv]

You didn’t read the decision and what was proposed/said, obviously.

The leftist MSM lives low-information voters such as you

We’re not low information, just not accepting the MAGA narrative that any worries are unfounded. Trump’s Project 2025 agenda lays out an America George Washington would not recognize, having given up ultimate power TWICE. The Founders did not envision a man like Trump, refusing to accept defeat, and his minions, willing to do anything to subvert the Constitution.

#IFYOUCANKEEPIT

 

[Clipper]

View attachment 970299

When will Trump be headed to the Kremlin?

 

[HikerGuy83]

The outrage is not entirely over the fact that the court gave Trump a pass. The outrage is also over the fact that little by little they are destroying The Constitution by undermining it with their edicts, especially this year.

Destroying it by actually following it ?

What a joke.

The right to privacy was pulled out of Douglas' backside. It doesn't exist in the context he put it.

Penumbras must be hiding your logic too.

 

[HikerGuy83]

We’re not low information, just not accepting the MAGA narrative that any worries are unfounded. Trump’s Project 2025 agenda lays out an America George Washington would not recognize, having given up ultimate power TWICE. The Founders did not envision a man like Trump, refusing to accept defeat, and his minions, willing to do anything to subvert the Constitution.

#IFYOUCANKEEPIT

Yes they did.

They envisioned it all.

If you squats hadn't been so anxious to wipe out the Constitution, Trump would not exist.

 

[Clipper]

Destroying it by actually following it ?

What a joke.

The right to privacy was pulled out of Douglas' backside. It doesn't exist in the context he put it.

Penumbras must be hiding your logic too.

For a guy who's "innocent" & the subject of a "witch hunt" & "lawfare" Trump sure did everything in his power to beg the SCOTUS to get him off the hook. Trump's lackeys on that court paid lip service to what happened on J6 because they didn't want to address it, & confront it in their decision. They sure as hell did a bang up job looking the other way as a favor to their MAGA keeper.

 

[HikerGuy83]

For a guy who's "innocent" & the subject of a "witch hunt" & "lawfare" Trump sure did everything in his power to beg the SCOTUS to get him off the hook. Trump's lackeys on that court paid lip service to what happened on J6 because they didn't want to address it, & confront it in their decision. They sure as hell did a bang up job looking the other way as a favor to their MAGA keeper.

I am sure Brothers Grimm would welcome your fairy tale into their collection.

 

[Clipper]

I am sure Brothers Grimm would welcome your fairy tale into their collection.

Your Trump cult proves how sick this Country is.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Your Trump cult proves how sick this Country is.

Hope it just gives you that Camel Harris tingle to say that.

Cult

Cult

Cult......

You feel better ?

 

[konradv]

Yes they did.

They envisioned it all.

If you squats hadn't been so anxious to wipe out the Constitution, Trump would not exist.

Nice gaslighting!

#FELLOWTRAVELER

 

[rampart]

How did the court give Trump a "pass".. can you point to any precedent that the SCOTUS botched?

the president is constitutionally charged to "faithfully execute the laws. "if he is doing that duty, why does he need "immunity?"

of nixon had immunity, why resign?

of clinton had immunity, why the deposition and the perjury?

 

[HikerGuy83]

the president is constitutionally charged to "faithfully execute the laws. "if he is doing that duty, why does he need "immunity?"

of nixon had immunity, why resign?

of clinton had immunity, why the deposition and the perjury?

Because getting a blowjob isn't an official act.